Written late, with a new Hebrew theme, June 2006.
Reading previous chapters is required to make this one understood best.
It may have been God's will to have Joshua leave the peoples of Gath, Gaza, and Ashdod in the side of Israel, for His long-range Plan. For the following reasons, these "Philistines" seem to have become the Zeus peoples on Crete (i.e. the proto-Trojans). Philistines worshiped Dagon, and per very large chance the proto-Trojans of Crete, styled "Daktyloi" by the myth-code writers, were from Dagon bloodlines, for Dagon was called by the Greeks, "Cretan Zeus." If you don't know, Zeus was raised on Crete by Daktyloi
"Daktyloi" was fashioned to mean "ten fingers," and these I view as Poseidon's ten sons, who first ruled Greek Atlantis as the Trojo-Philistines now under discussion. I found the following (italics not mine):
"The god Dagon first appears in...Mari texts...An interesting early reference to Dagon occurs in a letter...written by Itur-Asduu an official in the court of Mari and governor of Nahur (the Biblical city of Nahor)..."
The contents of the letter is not pertinent here (it has to do with Dagon appearing in a dream), but the existence of a city of Nahor, and it's attachment to Dagon, is central. Mari was between Ur and Haran, and Nahur must have been likewise. Many writers place Nahur on the Habur river, also called "Khabur" and once again smacking of the Kabeiri cult of Greek myth, which was indeed based in the Daktyloi. Now read this (italics mine):
"The Book of Kings in the Hebrew Bible describes Israelite captives from Samaria who settled near Guzana (17:6, 18:11)."
What I mean to point out is that, centuries after the Cutha Kabalists settled Samaria (northern Israel), they were invaded by God via the hand of the Assyrians, and the 10 tribes of Israel who sinned with the Kabalists were likewise invaded, and the whole lot were brought back to Cutha, surely, for "Guzana/Gozan" must be that very term evolved over time. My interlinear version of 2 Kings 17:6 reads, "...and made [the Samaritans] live in Halah, and in Habur by the river Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes." Halah is placed by the Zondervan Atlas off the Tigris river just north of Nineveh, while the same Atlas located the city of Gozan east of Haran, and on the Habur river.
The Samaritan exile to Assyrian is treated again in 2 Kings 19:12, where we read of "the sons of Eden who were in Telassar," As "tel" means "hill," the city was "Assar," and by chance this was the city named after Asshur, brother of Dedan, and/or the city of the Assi/Aesir." Moreover, as I am very interested in tracing the Edones to the modern day, whom I have previously traced back to Eden and forward to the Jutes/Goths/Odin, I'm marking this, that the Edones had likely been, at least in part, the Aes branch of Guti.
[Update August 2006 -- After writing this chapter and that paragraph, I independently traced Zeus to the mythical Asopus, which I moreover interpreted as Assi-Opis aside from any consideration of this paragraph. Opis was in Gozan. End Update]
Do you see how nicely this has all fit together after all, how Guti and Jute/Goth seem related, and how the Aesir gods of the Goths/Jutes reflect the city of Assar, and how the Edones evoke Odin, ruler of the Aesir, while also connecting to Eden of Mesopotamia, even as the Aesir religion and the Kabala are represented by a tree of life (i.e. as if in the Garden of Eden)? But Eden had started at the Persian gulf: "The alluvial plain of Babylonia was called Edin...on the western bank of the river." "The river" refers to the one into which the Euphrates and Tigris join, a short stretch leading to the Persian gulf.
Clearly, Odin was worshiped as the serpent in the garden, and ditto for the dragon sun-god cult, but what's sad is that the religion was based on desires formed in the hearts of Hebrews, even Hebrews after the blood of Abraham and his brother. It is no wonder that God hated idolatry in Israel so much. Dagon may have been the god of the Nahorites themselves, not merely of Nahorite allies into which Nahorites inter-married, and having moved to the coast of Israel, Dagon (i.e. his peoples) then proceeded to Crete (then Caphtor), where the Philistines are said by Genesis 10:13 to have originated. As Philistines were in Israel as early as Genesis 21 and 26, their landing on Crete was yet earlier. Some equate Philistines with the Greek “Pelasgians,” but I'm not yet of an opinion.
I'm not suggesting that Zeus/Trojans were Philistines, for Philistines are revealed (in Genesis 10) as Hamites. Rather, I'm suggesting that Zeus/Trojans were Cutha Hebrews mixed with Kassite-Aryan blood (Cimmerian/Togarmite/Ashkenazi), and that when these migrated from the shores of proto-Israel to Crete, Canaanites of the same regions followed and thus formed the proto-Philistines. These Cretan Canaanites inevitably formed the Hamite peoples called "Caphtorites" (mentioned in Genesis 10).
The Aryans of Crete, which Strabo identified as Daktyloi from Rhodes, were called "Curetes," after which the term, "Crete," was founded, apparently. The wild-bash affairs of the Curetes have been compared to those of the Cotys-branch Thracians, wherefore Cotys is pegged as a root of the Trojans, which may then identify Cotys as the Korybantes proto-Trojans. Note the “Cur” and “Kor” prefixes in those terms, especially as the Curetes and Korybantes peoples are often equated as the same peoples hinging around “Ida” (i.e. short for “Eden?). Cotys was made the father of Attis, and should therefore refer to the Cutha Hebrews more directly than the more-ancient Guti. One is pressed to view Zeus as a creation of the Kabalists and therefore as a counterfeit Biblical God.
[Update August 2006 -- My ex-Rosicrucian email correspondent, Kathleen Bot____, has notified me that “god” is itself rooted in “Goth,” but I would say much earlier in the Guti/Cutha. Many say that “Zeus” is a variation of “theos/dios,” and of course the Biblical God is “Theos” in the Greek New Testament. Kathleen is convinced that the term, “Jesus,” stems from Greek myth as a variation of “Zeus,” since the true name of God’s Son was “Joshua” i.e. with one “s”. It’s frightening that “Iasus,” a mythical ruler of Argos, is almost the very New-Testament word, “Iesous” (Strong’s #2424), the term for our “Jesus.” I conjecture in a coming chapter that Iasus was the same as Dardanus’ brother, Iasion, mythical founder of the Kabeiri cult at Mount Ida, and possibly a depiction of the Aes peoples.
The abominable thought is this, not that Kathleen believes that Jesus was a fake (i.e. that he was not the true Son of YHWH), but that the Greek New Testament, as we now have in our possessions, is to an unknown extent a Gnostic-Christian work wherein the Christian writers mistakenly connected Jesus to Kabalistic concepts. Rosicrucians and other Kabalists are doing the same to this day, but this is of little danger to my Faith, for indeed the Gnostics were unable to altar the main story line of the New Testament, even if they got away with injecting their slant on certain terms. The reality is, Joshua, his Crucifixion, and His Resurrection, is in Isaiah 53, and was there centuries before the Greek New-Testament was meddled with. I realize that by my publishing this I will give fodder to those who wish to destroy Christianity, but it's better in my opinion that you deal with this now rather than later, in the great tribulation period. You either believe that the New-Testament writers were liars/fiends/fakes/sickos, advancing a Son-of-God concept that was based merely in a man, or you believe their report on the Son to be true. The situation doesn't change, for the attack on this Truth by Satan’s forces is so great that no one can have Faith apart from the power of the Spirit to impart it. If YHWH chooses you, you will have Faith and you will overcome this spiritual onslaught. End Update]
Keeping in mind that the Edones were the Getae, the website above tells further that Dagon was "Siton" to the Greeks, which surely explains why the Edones were also called "Sithones," which then identifies the "Sitones" living next to the Swedes as Dagon descendants. The conclusion is that Edones are rooted in Dagon.
Strabo connected the Tochari and the Assi to the "Passianis/Pasiani," quite possibly the Buzi/Busae Medes, whom I now suspect as Nahorites from his second son, Buz. This is significant, for even before knowing of Buz's existence, I had developed the theory that Poseidon descended/depicts the Buzi Medes. This term, "Pasiani," gets me closer to "Poseidon." I will be elated when I finally find the historical link between the Buzi and the Guti, which up to this point I must only imagine in that the Buzi are in several ways root-able in the dragon bloodline.
I now have some reason to believe that the Kassites took over the Egyptian "Ptah" cult that had in turn taken over the Guti cult in Gath, for I found this quote (square brackets mine to indicate the Hurrian-Manes bloodline): "The Egyptian god Ptah is given the title du gitti 'Lord of Gath' in a prism from Lachish which has on its opposite face the name of Amenhotep II (c. 1435–1420 BCE) [Min-Hotep]...in the Ugaritic texts Ptah is seemingly identified instead with the craftsman god Kothar-wa-Khasis."
Lachish is near Gath and the Ugaritic region (northern Syria) is known to connect with Akkadia and other Semitic entities; the phrase "Kothar-wa-Khasis," no matter how the various historians decide to translate it according to various local/irrelevant terms, smacks too much of the Khazars/Kassites for me to view it in any other way. My point being obvious, that my connection of Gath (and nearby Gaza) to the Kassites is correct. I did not make the Kassite-Gath connection as a result of finding the above quote, but rather found the quote afterward, a most-supportive piece for what was already more than a hunch.
Another website (below) tells that the term, "Ka-sha-lu," is associated with Kothar-wa-Khasis, and behold that the Philistines of Caphtor are said by Genesis 10:14 to derive from the "Kasluhim" (in this case from Ham). It's clear that Kothari/Kassi peoples ended up in Egypt, and this squares with Greek myth wherein it locates some Poseidon Aryans in north Africa, for which reason Egypt shares a part in the Atlantean story. According to Greek myth, the Europe-god, Phoenix, stems from Poseidon mixing it up in Egypt, meaning that Phoenicians were an Atlantean entity as well. Perhaps the hardest question of all is, who wasn't?
The website (below) says that "Kothar's second land is Kaphtor." That is, while Kothar was associated with the land of Ptah (in Egypt), he was also significant in Crete. Myth relates in various ways that the Phoenix bloodline made a home in Crete before founding Europe (i.e. Romans, Celts and Germanics). The question is, as the Phoenicians came to Crete as a Zeus-Phoenician mix (i.e. Zeus-Europa), was that Zeus the same as Dagon, and, if so, wouldn't that connect Dagon to the white bull that the myth depicted Zeus as? As the bull was "Taurus," while Dagon was chief god in Dor, I would identify "Dor" and its Greek version, "Doris," not to mention Tyrus, as a Taurus peoples. Connection of Dor and Tyre to the Taurus mountains of Cilicia is now evident, an important point in this story, as we shall see. It's also apparent that Dagon referred to the Semite position of the dragon bloodline, while the white Taurus depicted the Aryan (Gorgon) side. Therefore, the Aryan element -- in Atlanticism, in the Trojans, in Egyptian-Poseidon blood, in Europe, in Russia, in India, in the Orient, in North America -- was Kassite-Cutha.
If Gath was a Kassite entity, the Gittites must have been blood contributors to Greek-theater Atlantis (usually viewed as a Cretan and/or Rhodian empire). Let me put it this way, that because Dagon was Cretan-Zeus to the Greeks, Dagon's Mediterranean shore in Israel became a base of Greek Atlantis. Moreover, the same shores become home to the chief god/bloodline of Greek myth. It is expected by me, therefore, that this same bloodline formed western Atlantis.
In the following quote, Dagon is revealed as the father of Zeus, Cronus: "In the euhemeristic account of Sanchuniathon, El (rendered Elus or called by his standard Greek counterpart Cronus) is...the son of Sky [Uranus] and Earth [Gaia]...El is brother to the god Bethel, to Dagon, and to an unknown god equated with the Greek Atlas..." (square brackets mine)
There you have a connection again of Dagon to Atlas/Atlantis. Years ago I interpreted the castration of Uranus by Cronus, and the throwing away of his testicles, as the formation from Uranus (i.e. Eran/Iran) of the Greek region of Elis; I don't remember how I arrived to that deduction, but the above quote seems to clinch it where Uranus is El and Elus. To confirm that El is the Greek god, Cronus, we find that: "In a later passage it is explained that El castrated Sky" (website above).
Others say that Elisha, son of Javan, founded Elis, but if that's true, then El must refer to Elisha's descendants. This doesn't necessarily make Cronus a descendent primarily of Javan, for mythical sons are not always bloodline linked; they can also be people linked, as in the United States and Canada being two sons of England. As Uranus probably refers to Eran (old Aria), and Zeus to Crete, Cronus must refer to an intermediate peoples.
[Update August 2006 -- In later chapters, I will trace Cronus to the proto-Satyrs of Gozan, and even to the founders of Gozan, the mythical goats. This means that Cronus depicted the Guti and the Getae Thracians, but also the Kothars (“koza” means “goat”). I speculate that “Cronus” is rooted in “Cor,” hence the Curetes and Korybantes that his son (Zeus) more-directly depicted. End Update]
When mythographers had Cronus throwing the reproductive organs of Uranus into Greece (Greece is assumed to be the ballpark into which they were tossed), the idea is that Greece became a procreation machine for reproducing Iranians/Aryans. Cronus must be rooted in a peoples in/near the Iranian theater that, upon defeating the Eran peoples, sent them fleeing, whereafter they ended up in Greece. I can then begin to identify Uranus as the Kassites/Guti, and that part of them that migrated to Greece I would interpret as the Gorgons. These may or may not have taken the northern route, through Caucasia and along the north shores of the Black sea. Cronus could then depict a branch of Kassites whom instead became the Gittites (of Gath).
The website continues: "But one of Sky's concubines who was given to El's brother Dagon" had a son who was "called by Sanchuniathon Demarûs or Zeus, but once called by him Adodus, is obviously Hadad, the Ba‘al of the Ugaritic texts..." Cronus is Dagon after all, since Dagon gives birth to Zeus.
It is important to stress here that Sanchuniathon was reported as being the founder of hushed Phoenician writings (prior to the Trojan war) that revealed what myths subsequently attempted to cover up. While some historians are uncertain in what to think of him and the ancient writers who copied from him (his works have been lost except for what was quoted by others), he and they just may have been telling the truth. The theory of evolution, which modern Rosicrucians have unleashed upon the world with wild success, was written within the secrets found by Sanchuniathon, as for example he found writings claiming that the first life forms appeared as germs, and then transformed into intelligent forms. It's a mark of shame on modern peoples that "intelligent life forms" are to this day spending so much time and money advancing that same fantasy born in the mind of a wizard. So darkened are their minds today that they will not so much as consider our history in terms of Japheth, Shem and Ham, for these have to do with the Biblical Flood, which to "intelligent life forms" is beyond belief/understanding.
As Dagon was a fish below his belly, he was from the sun-god cult of Utu, for the concept of mermen/mermaids originated in Eridu (to which Utu belonged). Enki is at the center of Eridu, and he is likely "Ankhiale [who] is described in the Argonautica as the mother of the Daktyloi."
And so Dagon in Greece was disguised as "Daktyloi," the reported meaning of which is "ten fingers/tribes," which I would render as ten branches of Dagon, even the ten sons of Poseidon as related by Plato. As we find the continental beginnings of the Daktyloi in Phrygia around proto-Troy, note that there was a mountain named Kabeiri at Pessinos ("little Pess"?), which by chance was the Buzi/Busae/Poseidon term evolving into the "Bessi" Thracians. If so, the Bessi (priests of the Satyrs) were the carriers of continental Atlantis. "Atlantis" was not a political entity, nor public, but was a secret concept (devised by the Kabeiri).
[Update August 2006 --Perhaps the Bessi carried Atlantis as far forward as to the American office of President via the Bush name. It’s interesting that the English Bush coat of armsuses three black boar heads, for I had (years ago) traced the Calydonian boar to Corinth, a city that may have been founded by the same peoples (almost-certainly the Carians) as was depicted by Cronus (i.e. “Coronus” sounds like “Corinth”). It is expected by me, therefore, that the Bush name traces back to the British Caledonians. End Update]
When I checked possible similarities between Nahor's and Poseidon's 10 sons, I learned that Plato gave us reason to doubt that the names he was sharing were the original. He gives the list of ten as were used in Atlantis, but he gives one name, and only one, in the Hellenic tongue, which name happened to be the alternative of the same Gadeirus that I've already mentioned, and that I've tied to the root of the Kothars/Khazars. That alternative name was "Eumelus." Compare with Nahor's third son, Kemuel, he being an ancestor of the Israelites on the female side (i.e. the father of Leah, Rebekah and Rachel, wives of Isaac and Jacob), not at all meaning that the Eumelus Atlanteans were Israelites. But as cousins of the Israelites, the Eumelus/Gadeirus Atlanteans would have been, in the beginning, Mesopotamian Nahorites.
In the west, the Gadeirus peoples may have been, not only the Cathars, but the Iberi who founded the Eber river in northern Spain. These Iberians are commonly regarded as Tubali peoples from Caucasia, for Josephus lumped "Tibareni" in with "Iberi" and "Tubali." I certainly have a problem here, and would suggest a solution wherein the Iberi were the Hebrews among the Tubali (Tubal was son of Japheth), and that "Tibareni" appears as a Tubal-Iberi combination.
"Tibareni" was a Latin term, and one must therefore ask if Tiberius Caesar, the Roman ruler under which Jesus (or should I say “Joshua”?) was crucified, wasn't just such a Hebrew-Tubali mix. It is said that he was named after the Tiber river, but was the Tiber named after the Tibareni? Perhaps, for it was named after Tiberinus, a god of the Latin city of Alba Longa (near Rome). The term "Alba" belongs to Caucasia, exactly where Tubal was, in what is now Azerbaijan (note the "Azer" in that term, evoking Gadeir/Khazar). This now explains how the Latins derive from Circe (daughter of Helios), where she depicts Circasia/Caucasia.
"Tiberinus" is dragon-line important because it was the Julus bloodline leading to Julius Caesar and at least four subsequent Roman emperors, including Tiberius. In other words, the Tiberinus Caucasians became the Romans. In that bloodline was placed the mythical Aventius, named after the Aventine hill (not vice versa), the home of the mythical "Cacus" was on the Aventine. This hill may have been named after the Greek goddess Hebe, for her Roman alternate was "Juventes." Hebe and Cacus also evoke the gods, Hebros and Kikon, of Rhodope (Thrace). Therefore, if Hebe and Hebros were Hebrew peoples, the Latins, and therefore the Julus-line Romans, were a Hebrew-Gogi mix.
If it seems curious to the prophecy student that I lump both Meshech and Tubal, not to mention Rosh, into a Gogi category, it's because I'm open to viewing Gog, not as a specific family, but as the peoples of Caucasia/Gogasia collectively. Therefore, the Albians and Avars of Caucasia could be included, not to mention the Kabars and Khazars.
Josephus wrote: "for those anciently named Iberi, and Tyrrheni, and Sabini, are now called Romani" [i.e. Romans]. It is for the mention of "Iberi" that some view Romans as stemming from Tubal, but I would rather contend that the Romans had some Hebrew blood. Note also the Sabini, possibly from Hebe’s husband, Teisheba, and prior to that from Abrahamic Sheba. The Tyrrheni became the Etruscans proper, and while they were the founders of Rome, the Roman dragon line may have been more Sabina-important than Etruscan.
Aeneas, Trojan founder of the Julus-line of Romans, come from Aphrodite and her lover, Anchises. Remember, Aphrodite was the official "wife" (not merely a lover) of Hephaistos, wherefore she must have had much Kabeiri blood. Her lover, Anchises, evokes Enki, the brother of Ishtar the Great Mother of paganism, who was called the "Heavenly Mother of the Dragon," or "Mother of the Heavenly Dragon." This verifies what the Bible subtly implies, that the dragon of Revelation depicts the seven hills of Rome, but was moreover founded, earlier, in Babylon the Great Mother (who was at the time of Revelation's writing "sitting" (i.e. ruling) from the seven hills). Let's face it, the apostle John, merely an Israelite fisherman, without a computer and internet at his disposal, nor even a good library, couldn't have figured all that out on his own (it's taken me years). Nor could Revelation have been a product of dragon-line Gnostic Christians, for Revelation exposes the destruction of the dragon line. God was the author of Revelation, in other words, and he was responding in myth-like code to myth writers, with an Armageddon ending of their empire!
As it’s a popular idea that Enki founded Dagon, Anchises may have depicted Enki worshipers in Israel. Even the Bible (Ezekiel 8:14) reveals Hebrew women of Israel mourning for Tammuz, Enki’s successor. Ezekiel saw this revelation in a vision, where God had the women mourning at the north gate of Jerusalem i.e. toward Samaria. Ezekiel was told to look north in verse 5. But in verse 16, the wicked Israelites (still in the vision) are shown looking to the east and bowing down to the eastern sun (god).
When I first studied the Arms of Cardiff (modern capital of Wales), I did not know what the horse depicted that had the tail of a fish. I think I now know: Enki of Eridu, in whom the mermen/mermaid concept originated. But Wales should also be rooted in Dagon for the following reason:
"Dagon his name, sea-monster, upward man
And downward fish; yet had his temple high
Reared in Azotus, dreaded through the coast
Of Palestine, in Gath and Ascalon..."
Note the city of "Azotus," the home of Dagon. It had been Ashdod previously. Recall the mythical codeword, "Dido," lover of Aeneas, princess of Tyre removed to Carthage, possibly a very-important code in that infant-sacrificing peoples were prolific in the Tyrians of Carthage, which peoples were moreover depicted by Hercules, the same Hercules who founded Plato’s Atlantis. Might Dido have been connected to the "dod" of Ashdod? Was "Ashdod" an Assi-Dedan or Asshur-Dedan combo (Asshurites were a Dedanite tribe)?
Behold. Not far from Ashdod, there was the region of "Gaderos"; I kid you not, see Joshua 15:36. Then, the Joshua text lists a cluster of 16 towns, including: "Bozkath...and Gederoth, and Beth-Dagon...and Makkedah" (15:41). There's Geder right next to the House of Dagon, whom I'll assume was connected to Kemuel, son of Nahor, as hinted by Plato. I note also a Boz-town, which makes absolute sense if Gadeirus was Kemuel, for Kemuel was Nahor’s son immediately after Buz. I also see what sounds like Megiddo and Macedonia: Makkedah. Recall my hypothesis that MakEdonians and Dorians (of Greece) had become the Scandinavian houses of Odin and of "Thorri" and/or "Thor." Recall also that the mythical “Nor” ruled Gotland after Thorri. I would never believe that secret societies do not know their roots on the Israeli shores. But I can believe that some of them do not know that their roots are in non-Israelites.
Recall my hypothesis that MakEdonians and Dorians (of Greece) had become the Scandinavian houses of Odin and of "Thorri" and/or "Thor." I had also hypothesized that the Dorians stemmed from Dor (Israel). I now find that Dor was prolific in Dagon worship so that Dor may also have contributed to western Atlantis.
Arthurian myth suggested that a Roman-Trojan named "Brutus" founded Britain, and this could then reveal the founders of western Atlantis. The finger points to the Bruttii peoples of southern Italy, relatives of the Julus (i.e. "Patrician") bloodline. The Bruttii had been a branch of Lucani, and the Lucani had been Samnites/Safini i.e. Sabini
This region of Italy was also home to the Thurii (see location), a branch of Sybari peoples from Greece, clearly connected to the mythical Thorri and historical “Sviar" Swedes. The Sybari evoke the infant-sacrificing Subar(tu), so that both Dedan and Sheba are revealed as infant-killing peoples, a most-insensitive and ignorant peoples. This is what the secret societies know but do not want you to know. Had the secret societies any qualities worth mentioning, they wouldn't be secretive. I despise them, and yet I know but a drop in the bucket of their atrocities. God knows them all, however, and will expose all. The clock is ticking, you sons of witches, so hurry up and do what you must, this is your dark hour.
I Taut I Saw a Buzi Cat
It's a wotta fun to we-invent history in one book,
but this is not my idea as much as it's
the direction of the myths.
Table of Contents