Reading previous chapters is required to make this one understood best.
Assuming that Picts furnished Lothians and that the latter were the Ladon dragon of Greece come to western Altlantis, the Picts ought to trace back to Echidna because she was made (by myth writers) Ladon's mother. As she was also the mother of the Nemian lion, she is suspect for depicting the same-old sacred lion of the dragon bloodline...even the lion symbol of Britain. How interesting would it be, therefore, to identify that lion as an historical peoples? And how sick and far from the truth were those peoples for continually depicting themselves with various animals, most sacred of which was the Eden serpent?
For new readers, I seek the devil-dragon cult in the Cati sect of the Kabala, not only because Echidna's mother was Ceto, but because "Echidna" itself seems to be a variation of "Akkadia"...wherein the Cadi/Cati term originates (in my opinion). Evidence that early British peoples stemmed from Echidna is in the fact that she was married to Hercules, the conqueror of western Atlantis associated with the Lydian lion.
Hercules had "killed" the Nemian lion, but then wore its fur, meaning that he was a peoples who fought a war with the peoples depicted by the lion, but in living amongst them for that reason, the two peoples became one. This event was early, the so-called First Labor, wherefore it was prior to the conquering of Atlantis, by which I mean to say that the Nemian lion was essentially Hercules, when Hercules came to Britain. Or, more exactly, it had evolved into the Lydian lion (i.e. depicting Lydian peoples) but mixed with the Danaan blood of Hercules. It is known that the Hercules bloodline entered the Lydian peoples at the Mysians, who were proto-Lydians, wherefore the Mysians and Moesi become candidates for being represented by the Nemian lion.
See on this navigational map of ancient Illyrium (if not available, see the same map here) that the Moesi were near the Adriatic sea just north of Epirus (in what is now Serbia), and that Dacians (= Getae Thracians) were parked in their kingdom. As Jordanes revealed Amazons to be a portion of his Gothic peoples, and because I identified Amazons as Meshech, note that the Daci-branch Getae lived on the Moschius river. But as the Moesi also lived on that river, might they not have been Meshech as well? Because I had identified the Nergal lion symbol as belonging to the Caucasian Hros, I can see that the Moesi and/or Dacian Goths were of the same Meshech-Rus peoples that founded Moscow.
Which portion of these Thracians, therefore, will side with end-time Gog in attacking Israel (as per Ezekiel 38)? Will their western branches play a part? I don't know. What I do know is that the three frogs of Revelation 16 unite with the anti-Christ for Armageddon (but it doesn't necessarily mean that they will contribute earlier to his invasion of Israel). As I surmised those frogs to be French-Dutch rulers of the dragon bloodline, while I see resemblances between "Dacia" and "Dutch," and "Holland" and "Alan," it's worth mentioning here.
Remember, Amazons married Gargarians (= Gorgons/Georgians) in furnishing the Rus, but this mix was also deemed the Sauromatians/Alans, an important point when later I touch on the Hebrew tincture of mythical codewords, Helen and Helenus. As more evidence that the Sauromatians/Alans were a Hros peoples who became Spartans, "sauros" is "lizard/snake" in Greek, wherefore follow that snake to Ares of Thrace, he being the Hros dragon/serpent giving birth to the Sparti, explaining why Helen was a Spartan branch of people.
If I'm correct, then the Alans were as Sepharvite/Subardic as I claim the Spartans to have been, and moreover Alan rudiments become the basis of the Sabina Italians and all the western Europeans stemming from them (e.g. the Suebi). The first Franks trace back to Suebi elements, wherefore the Dutch did likewise, and so consider again my claim that the golden fleece, because its rider was Phrixus, became the Frisians (north Holland). Put that claim beside the mythical fact that "Helle" was the twin sister of (i.e. same peoples as) Phrixus, and Holland pops to mind.
The Arms of Friesland and Arms of Netherlands use two gold lions (on blue background), a point that becomes more important by this chapter's end. The Arms of the Dutch use a gold lion on red, or a red lion on gold (website below).
The entire Greek family under codeword "Hellen" ought likewise to have been from the first floors of Sauromatia (same as "Sarmatia"), and as Georgians played a part in making up half the Sauromatians, expect the Laz Georgians to have been central, for the Nergal lion married mythical Laz. It bears repeating here that Xuthus was a son/branch of Hellen, a term smacking of the Cutha Kabala.
As Nergal is known to have been the god of the Cutha, how does the Hebrew portion of the Cutha play into the Moesi and/or Dacian picture? As part of the Dacian Goths, naturally, which is why I expect that the Cutha ended up in the Normandy-Netherland-Belgium coastal strip as the gold lion symbol. In short, the Nergal lion = the Goths, a Hebrew-Rus mix that conforms to the Gauls and Germanics. Shouldn't roughly the same apply when the lion reaches Celtic Britain?
At times, the lion symbol is viewed (to this day) as a leopard. Dionysus (depicting Curetes) was made to dress in leopard's fur when doing battle...meaning that the Curetes were the ones depicted as a lion. The Curetes then point to the Kartvelians/Kartli, who were the Laz (i.e. proto-Ladon) of Georgia/Abkhazia.
Okay, so it fits, meaning that I have learned the keys to unlocking this mystery. Evidence that I am on the right track is in the Arms of Kurdistan, using a black eagle (holding the sun god), the symbol used also by Epirus/Albania//Hohens. Assuming that the Kurds were anciently the Curetes/Kartli, this again ties the Cohen family of surnames to Molech. In that the eagle was a symbol also of Romans, see that the Kurdish flag is evocative of the Italian flag. The Lydian lion had a sun planted on it's snout, and of course by now you know that the sun god of Sumeria was depicted as a dragon with a leopard body and eagle parts. To these things add the fact that the Romans also used a lion to depict themselves, and realize here, at least, that this lion does not go back to the tribe of Judah nor any other Israeli blood, but to Nergal of the Cutha, and to the Laz/Ladon peoples that Nergal was inter-married (if not under sacred-covenant) with.
Ladon is revealed in myth as mythical Daphne, depicted by porpoise symbols across Europe, especially the Dauphine region of France...up the Rhone river and leading to the Rhine. How "she" arrived to the Rhone, by continent or by sea, is yet a toss up, but the porpoise symbol would suggest a sea route. As "porpoise" is literally "sea pig," it squares with my previous findings wherein the Ladon bloodline was depicted with a boar (i.e. Artemis the Amazon), and then becoming the Caledonian Picts via the Selene-Endymion alliance at Latmus. It's possible that these north Africans (Gorgons, I'm sure) became the Latins at roughly the same time that they settled the mouth of the Rhone (not later than about 1000 BC).
Recall that I had drawn a connection between Molosse and Molech (purely on similarity of terms, but with a strong intuitive feeling of being correct). Recall that I had identified the Zeus bull of Crete as a Molech cult, and that Zeus worshipers (Curetes) moved especially to Dodona in Epirus, a region that I think was named after Dedan, even as I think the Sabina were named after his brother, Sheba. Recall that the cornucopia cult of the Sabina was earlier on Crete, as the goat peoples who raised Zeus to adulthood, and that these were the same as the honey/bee-people symbolized by Melissa, who depicted the same Curetes as did the Curete leader, Melisseus.
This is not difficult; the goat peoples were Curetes that were deemed Satyrs in Europe, and as they are, surely, named after Saturn, it verifies that they were the Molech cult in that Saturn is known to be Molech by another name, as was Cronus, Zeus' "father." Can we not suspect that the Curetes depicted by Melisseus were founders of Molosse...in that Zeus worshipers moved to Epirus? This not only supports my view that Molossians were named after molasses (Greek "mellaceus"), but it traces Molech-worshiping Curetes to the Sabine region of Molise.
That the Picts were Curetes is already established in my mind, but by attempting to trace Picts back to Crete, one can discover other Curete peoples by other names. As Curetes moved to Rhodes and lived with the Carians already there (I think Curetes and Carians were named after the same stalk: Cronus), the Redones of France (initially on the Rhone) are suspect as Curetes-come-Picts, especially as Picts are routinely traced back to both Cruithin and Dal-Riada Irish. What I am seeing is a Curete movement from Sabina Italy into Gaul, and another Curete movement by sea...up the Rhone to meet the westward continental Sabina wave. Distinguishing the two at this point is a fog in my mind, and it may be that they came together back in Rieta province of Latium (Italian = "Lazio"). I am juggling what I know thus far to see if the green color/dragon of Italy doesn't fall on the Sabina wave of Curetes, in that the Rhodes wave ought to correspond to the red color/dragon. I've noted that the eagle on the Latium Coat is white.
I didn't have evidence when starting this chapter that the Sabina retained Molech worship, which thing was expected if the Sabina were from the Molech cult of Epirus, and if I was correct in the first place when tracing the Sabina to Epirus. But before finishing the chapter, I found some whopping evidence, huge because it also connects Molech to the Suebi, a very important point indeed. First, let me show evidence for what I have been claiming on merely an educated guess-timate: that the Suebi stemmed from the Sabina. This evidence (below) is solid in that the major Sabina tribe was the Samnian, while Tacitus reported that:
"The oldest and noblest of the Suebi, so it is said, are the Semnones, and the justice of this claim is confirmed by a religious rite...The sacrifice in public of a human victim...They dwell in a hundred country districts and, in virtue of their magnitude, count themselves chief of all the Suebi."
The implication is that the Sabina also conducted human sacrifices. The importance of Suebi inclusion in the Molech bloodline is that they were alternatively, "Swabians," and Swabia (south-west Germany) came to be the kingdom from which the Hohens arose!!
"Swabia consists of much of the present-day state of Baden-Württemberg (specifically, historical Württemberg and the Hohenzollerische Lande), as well as the Bavarian administrative region of Swabia" (brackets not mine).
I'm not going to suggest that the Hohens performed human sacrifices, yet anyway, but will insist that Hohens were of the Molech bloodline.
Sometimes gems come in a roll. Immediately after entering the above, I did a search on Semnones, and found this, albeit not without a loud reaction:
"[The Suebi] central tribe was called the Semnones and was based in Brandenburg, where they had a shrine central to all Suebi."
Why the loud reaction? Because the Hohens were rulers in Brandenburg! They are, therefore, highly suspect as a Sheba peoples...and somewhat suspect as members of the Samnite branch of Sabina. Brandenburg became Prussia, remember, so that what blood applies to Brandenburg applies to Prussia. As I've shown earlier, such terms as "Prussia" and "Brussels" likely stem from the Bruces, and they in turn from Abruzzo, smack beside Molise.
Moreover, the website above adds this: "Tacitus has [the Suebi] comprising Hermandurii, Marcomanni, Quadi and others." It's the Quadi (also "Coadui") that I would have you focus on. Aside from their likely being the Catti that became Hesse (Germany), they may have been at the roots of the Bohemian and/or Bavarian Illuminati, for "After about 400 CE the old cremation burials typical of Suevians like the Quadi disappear in Bohemia. The Quadi are among the mixture of peoples that evolved into the Bavarians."
It's still foggy in my mind as to what role the Hohens played in the Bavarian Illuminati, whether for it or against it, or its creators. One thing I already know is that they trace back in an unbroken genealogical line to Merovingian kings. This is then important in that the bee symbol of the Merovingians should trace through their Suebi blood back to the Sabina bee cult (Opis). Is it a coincidence that the capital of the Samnites was Bojano (in Molise), while a Dutch bee is "bij," or did the Bojano end up in the Netherlands (where also the Merovingians are said to originate) as the bee-line cult? Is it another coincidence that, while I view the Sabina as Sepharvites, and that "Spain" was alternatively "Sphen" and thereby named after the Sephardic "Jews," the bee in Spanish is "abeja"? Or couldn't "Bojano" have meant "bee people"?
If it's true (as stated) that "Marcomanni" means "men of the border," they were likely the Quadi, as they were mentioned alongside the Quadi as though related. They settled Silesia (the very region that I traced Salian Franks/Merovingians to), and so read this: "All of Silesia was inherited by Brandenburg...[later] most of Silesia was seized by King Frederick the Great of Prussia." Frederick was a Hohen(zollern)!
British-Israeli websites claim what at first glance seems feasible, that the Semnones were of the Israeli tribe of Simeon. But, aside from the similarity of terms, no further evidence is given/available. I have a different theory, for a common version of "Semnone" was "Semoni," and this would seem to stem from the Italian god: Semo Sancus. Wikipedia reports (website below) that the temple to this god was on the Quirinal Hill, which was not only a Sabina hill, but of the Quirites (no doubt the Curetes) branch of Sabina. The article goes on to say that "Sancus was said to have one son, the Sabine hero Sabus."
Sabus was simply a mythical symbol of the Sabines. If, thereby, the Semoni tribe of Suebi were from the Semo Sabina, one can then trace both "Semnone" and "Samnite", not to the Israeli tribe of Simeon, but to "Semo"...where the root has no "n" as does "Simeon," but rather attaches an "n" only as a suffix, as in "Americani" or "Sabina."
Like I said, sometimes gems come in rolls, for immediately after entering the above paragraph, I did a search on Sabus, and found verification for my educated guess-timate that the Sabina were from the Spartans:
"In the second century BC, Cato, Cn. Gellius and Sempronius Tuditanus, claimed that a Spartan named Sabus was the eponymous founder of the Sabines."
I found yet another gem at the website below that reveals Semo as the father of Sabus (Sheba?). But that's not the gem I'm speaking of. It's this:
(brackets not mine)
A demigod, son of Cronos, living on the Aventine hill. Kind of divinity that might be likened to the SATYRS or PANS. He is said to have used powerful drugs and practised clever incantations and to have traversed Italy playing the same tricks as the Idaean DACTYLS. Circe loved him, and being refused, transformed him into a bird (a woodpecker). Picus is father (by Canens) of Faunus."
Nothing could connect the Picts to Molech as this can, IF Picus depicted the Picts. He may not have. But what seems certain is that Picus was ancestral to the Latins and therefore was the westward continuation of the mythical lion of Akkadia/Echidna. Picus "is mentioned by Virgil in the Aeneid as being the father of Faunus, who in turn fathered Latinus."
There is little doubt that Picus depicted the Picensii tribe of Illyrians, that then became the Picene/Picenti of Naples and Abruzzo. I won't re-explain here why these terms can refer to a bee stinger as well as to a woodpecker's beak, but will repeat that the father of Picus was Saturn. As other myth versions have Circe for the grandmother/mother of Latinus, I would equate her with Canens, the mother of Picus-come-Latinus in Roman myth. Behold that Latmus (near Miletus) was beside the city of Caunus (in Caria), symbolized by the mythical Kaunos, son of Miletus.
I don't think it's a coincidence that the Curetes are sometimes numbered nine (rather than ten), and that Merlin myth had nine sisters (all witches) that ruled over the British apple garden of Ladon. Therefore, when modern writers yet attempt to portray these mysteries with glamour, know that the reality is sluttish (sorry, I don't know of a more-accurate term to use) and everything harmful to society. Do we think that secret societies kept secrets for nothing; isn't it obvious from this alone that they performed disgusting things...in their covens and in their "bee hives"?
If your view of a witch is the sweet Samantha Stevens (of Bewitched), then you are apt to be deceived by cultists today; it's not a coincidence that both Dick York and Dick Sargeant (the two who played her husband) were both homosexuals. These are the same peoples who have come to convince the world that homosexuality is not disgusting, and the way in which they have done so is to make everyone perform disgusting acts...from an early age, if possible, whether parents like it or not, whether parents know it or not.
These are the people who should be tormented, and they will be, mark God's words. These are the peoples whom God wants to expose and lay bare for all to see, that the world will never again revert to what they do. They have been allowed "out of the closet" that the world may see what they do, and to test the rest, that those who go over to their ways be condemned with them. Behold, even non-Christians are lamenting the sick development in the media.
I am not suggesting that sexual desires are in themselves sinful, but control yourself; put away internet porn. I'm not saying that you're a goat if attractive bodies and certain sexual acts turn you on. But I am saying that these acts performed for public display is worthy of severe punishment, especially as it fuels obsessive behavior/desire in married people and young children alike, increasing rates of divorce, rape, and you know the rest. If you're single and must fantasize, don't disgust God by enjoying the disgusting things seen in pornography. They are snakes who creep into government positions just to have the ability of corrupting society.
Do not accept them; do not become comfortable with them; do not let them get away with it. Protect your children. Complain to media outlets by phone (letters can get tossed), yell in their ears, scream, let them shake in your presence, for they know that what they do is wrong. Where are the church leaders? Too divided to be of any influence? How can all this take place with so many church leaders, unless church leaders aren't at all concerned? Exercise your right to be angry. This justifies anger. What if God lumps you in with them for your being happy in their society? Are you happy in Sodom? Is America blessed? Have you fallen for that line? Would you say that Sodom was blessed?
I'll bet you a bucket of sulfur down your throat, Freemason, that the peoples of Sodom were the same as those who started the Molech cult. Understand that Armageddon is Sodom's destruction on a grand scale. What shall we say to God on that score, that He needs "anger management"? God is allowing you the power for a dark hour, Illuminatists, but after that, open your mouth wide to buckets of sulfur. Swallow it, and let it burn. Call out for mercy, but your screeches will be ignored. You know the end of the story; our beginning, our honey, your fire in your belly.
As the Molech cult was also in Carthage, Cyrene in eastern Libya was likely named after peoples that had in the first place been depicted by Cronus. Doesn't "Cyrene" evoke "green" (Old English "grene")? The Libyan flag is, after all, nothing (i.e. no symbols) but green. This has importance in that I had found the Picts to be depicted by green, leading me to advance them as the green dragon and/or green lion symbols. A couple of hours after making the Cyrene-green connection for the first time, I found that Cyrene "stood on the boundary of the Green Mountains (Djebel Akhaar)."
I'm not suggesting that "Cronus" meant "green," but that "green" was formed from Cronus elements after they had come to be depicted by that color. In that the malachite gem is so called due to its green color, might Molech have been painted green for that reason? And might the cult have used all sorts of terms as "Green mountains, Green island, Greenland, Greenman, etc.? Green island belonged to the Tory Fir Bolgs of Ireland; Greenland was a Sinclair domain; the Greenman was a Roslin-Sinclair mystery.
"The ancient citizens of Caunus were known for their sickness and poor health. A harp player named Stratonicus, known for his sharp tongue, commented after a visit with the green-skinned residents...it is now assumed that malaria caused the city's health problems."
"Malaria" and "malachite" have the same root: "mala" = "sick/bad." Gangrene also comes to mind (note: Gan-grene). It is said that "malachite" derives from the Greek "malache" (= mallow-green), which itself derives from the moloukhia plant, a Middle-Eastern food. When I checked "mallow," I found that the mallow species of plants included althaea, the name of the goat/bee peoples who raised Zeus, and callirhoe, the important name among Greek Calydonians.
Althaea was the mother of Meleager (what I think is a Molech term), who, because he was made father of Parthenopeus, became the Parthalons of Britain i.e. the Pretani/Bretons = the Cruithne. Surely this must mean that the Caledonian Picts stem from the Parthalons, for Meleager was ruler of Greek Calydon. Moreover, a "Parthaon" was a Calydon king, father of Oeneus, while Meleager was the son of Oeneus. The latter term is said to mean "wine," but suspected to depict fermented honey and/or the honey-wine mix that was central to the orgiastic rituals and spiritual gnosis of the Curetes.
This would be a good place to re-mention Aeolus, the twin of Boitius, the two who became the western Atlanteans, but not before landing in western Italy i.e. in the Tyrrhenian sea. The leader of the nine sisters of the apple garden was Tyronoe, and the name of Calydon's wife was Aeolia! Let's not be naive, for the father of Aeolus was Hellen (to be distinguished from Helen of Troy but probably depicting the same Helenus Hebrews of Epirus), while the brother of Aeolus was Xuthus (a symbol of the Cutha Kabala, I am convinced). In that case, could we equate the Chaonians of Epirus with Caunus of Caria? Why was Bodrus/Budrus very near to Caunus while:
"Buthrotos (or Buthrotum) was a city in Epirus where Helenus, the Trojan seer, built a replica of Troy. Aeneas landed there and Helenus foretold his future"?
There is one statement repeated many times online, that Cyrene was named after "Kyre." Assuming that this is correct, I would add that the term should trace back to the Carians...mythical Car of the Argos (Aryan?) peoples. I'm convinced that Car is the Helios wheel (the Semitic "gar" = wheel), and therefore the island of Rhodes/Rhoda = the Latin wheel, but I'm wondering if "Car" doesn't trace back to Hari of Afghanistan, the term that furnishes "Aryan." After all, "Carian" is an acceptable alternative of "Aryan," as is "Hurrian." Recall that "Pakthas" referred to an Afghan peoples. Were these the Hari-come-Carians-come-Curetes-come-Cruithne/Picts?
Readers of previous chapters may know by now that "ari" is, to this day, Hebrew for lion. Clearly, this lion is not Judah, but the Rus Aryans. How did "Argos" form from "Ari"? Note that the Greek "Argolis" (region surrounding Argos) and the Scottish "Argyll" region evoke Hercules. That is, I think Argos derives from the same valley as depicted by Hera and Hercules/Heracles: the Aras river (Caucasia) that was alternatively "Araxes."
Is it a coincidence that Latmus and Miletus, not to mention continental Rhodes, were in Caria? Connection of Latmus to Lydia may be in thios statement: "The Lydians are described as a kindred people of the Carians and Mysians, and all three are said to have had one common ancestor as well as one common language and religion. (Herod. i. 171.)"
Latmus was at first "Heraclia," wherefore do know that Molech had yet another name: "Hercules." This now verifies that the Molech cult removed to western Atlantis with the Hercules wave of Gorgons. If you're a Freemason and you've been duped into thinking that the Freemasonic pillars are sacred for Solomon's honor, you're the fool of your superiors, and they despise you in that they lie to you. The pillars depict the so-called "pillars of Hercules," but the Dragon is attempting to take Israel to itself by tying all things dragon-line to Israel, and to Jesus if possible.
The god of Cyrene, Ammon, should prove to be a Cronus branch, for Ammon evokes the Biblical fact that the Molech cult started with the descendants of Lot's son, Ammon. Yes, for Molech is said, in 1 Kings 11:7, to be "the idol of the sons of Ammon." It is extremely logical to root the Ladon dragon to this Biblical person, Lot, therefore, and yet I resist, for there is another option, namely Lotan son of Seir, the Horite (Hari?). Patience, until the truth pops out.
I'm assuming that Pictus peoples were in Epirus along with the Molossians. The Molech connection between Epirus and Carthage/Cyrene can perhaps be made best through the mythical Dido, a queen of Tyre (where Molech/Hercules worship was rife) removed permanently to Carthage on the one hand, and yet resembling "Dodona" (of Epirus), the place highly sacred to Zeus. But there is yet another method, in that Alexander the Great was a descendant of an historical ruler (Neoptolemus) of Epirus, while the god "Ammon became famous because Alexander the Great claimed to be his son"
The Ammon god is shown with ram's/goat's horns at the above website. As Ammon was equated with Zeus, while Zeus in his cradle was depicted with a goat peoples, the horns of Ammon should prove to be goat horns i.e. cornucopia = the Curetes. This drags Hermes, the sexually-deviant ram (i.e. the golden fleece), who had goatish Pan as a son, into the Molech cult.
You can see Alexander with Ammon's goat/ram horns at that website, and I would again stress goat horns (versus ram's horns) because Daniel 8:5-9 depicts Alexander as a goat. Are you with me? Alexander was Satyr blood ruling the earth with God's sanctioning...until Jesus should come to destroy his Greek kingdom.
In evoking sacrifices to Molech, I've read that the Greeks after Alexander, those of the Seleucids -- from whom the anti-Christ will stem -- fried Israelites to death on heated metal platforms. Neo-Nazi type Freemasonic Aryans would see similar things re-occur today, but none do they know that they are persecuting their own kin in the dragon bloodline, for most "Jews" are just so, the very Aryan-Hebrew bloodline that created Freemasonry and the Ku Klux Klan in the first place.
Alexander traced himself, as you can read at the website above, to Perseus and Hercules. In the Daniel prophecy, Alexander the goat attacks and conquers a two-horned ram, the ram being the Medio-Persian empire (I wonder if the ram = the Aryans while the goat = the Hebrews). Daniel 8:9 says that the end-time anti-Christ comes from one of the four horns that grew out of Alexander's horn. Expect the anti-Christ, therefore, to be a goat-line/Satyr people, and expect him to receive the punishment worthy of Molech sinners, for as they burned people alive in the fire, so Revelation 19 reveals that Jesus will throw the anti-Christ alive into a fire so large that it's called a "lake."
Perfect reward, Lord YHWH!! Cleanse this planet of these types, and do not forget those who murder their own children in the womb without so much as one tear, especially abortionist doctors who do so for a reward in easy money. Hands hang limp, says the Bible, like women in labor, at the sight of Armageddon...when the world realizes its awful mistake. The sad thing is that this world would not now be what it is if there were not women numerous enough to join sinful men in their "sexual revolution." Isn't it odd that this revolution started at the same time as feminism, when feminism complained that men were sinful? Rather than be examples of what men should have become like, the feminists jumped into their sin-pool with both feet. In other words, feminists were not opposed to sinful, adulterous men (e.g. staying late at the office), but jealous of them. And so after women went out to work, the cost of housing doubled (because families could afford more for housing) so that two incomes are now needed to pay for the house that only one spouse was able to afford previously. Is that progress, or a crying shame?
The Ammon website also writes: "In the fifth century, the Greek researcher Herodotus of Halicarnassus stated in his Histories that the Lydian king Croesus (560-546) had offered sacrifices to Ammon." That's pertinent where some have traced ancient Gog, of Ezekiel's day -- the Gog addressed by YHWH in Ezekiel 38 -- to the Lydian king, Alyattes II, the king prior to Croesus. Remember that Lydus (the mythical symbol of Lydia) was from the line of Kybele and Attis, and thus from the Kabala cult. As Cotys was the father of Attis, the Cutha -- the Cati of Cilicia (even Cadmus) that moved to Phrygian Cilicia -- are revealed as the root of the Kabala. The phoenix symbol belongs to these, the Cati, so that the Laz-Rus dragon is a phoenix-lion alliance.
Seeing that the Laz peoples of Lazica may have become the Laodiceans, was the "Pacatiana" term of Laodicea, not only the root of "Pict/Pictone," but to be understood as Pa-Cati? If I'm correct in identifying the Cati with Cadmus, then the Cutha Kabala was in Tyre, wherefore the Litani river a few miles north of Tyre is where they must have lived. Might Ezekiel 28, where it speaks of Satan as a king of Tyre (Ithobaal III, I think), be referring to the Ladon bloodline there? There is no doubt that the Tyre of Ezekiel 27 is comparable to Babylon the Great of Revelation 17, while the king of Tyre in chapter 28 conforms to the "king of the north" of Daniel 11...for in both cases the kings in claim to be God (28:2) and honor precious stones (28:13); compare with Daniel 11:36-38.
Note that the end of the king of Tyre is said to be in a fire while everyone is watching (v 18), as when pagans stood round and watched burning human sacrifices to Molech. The greatest and repeated charge that God makes against Tyre and her king in those chapters is against their money-lust, evoking the modern Illuminati that has become unimaginably wealthy by trade. This is the Illuminati phoenix, the symbol of greatness of wealth, of empire-hood, and the mythical Phoenix, father of Cadmus and ruler of Tyre. It's not of any wonder that there is not enough money to go around, for the phoenix has horded it, and the dragon protects the gold in his cave...but in the end it will go to the humble of the Lord, says His Law, when the Knight comes on his "white horse" to slay the dragon. No, it won't be Arthur, nor Ares, for His name is Meek fitz Truth, and it is by those qualities that he will hold the Sword of Heaven in His hands. By the fruit of his tongue will the Word slay the nations, for he has been watching what they do/plan in secret.
As the founder of Lydia proper was the mythical Gugu/Gyges who ruled (7th century BC) about the time that Ezekiel was born, I'd entertain a Tyre-Lydia connection. In fact, Ezekiel 27:10 places Lydian soldiers in Tyre helping to fend off Assyrian invaders. What I did not understand previously, that the Ezekiel text places "Lydia" next to "Put," I now understand, for Put was a Libyan peoples while Lydians came to live smack beside Libya.
Recall that Zeus and Cronus trace to the Israeli shore where Dagon was worshiped, especially in the city of Dor. Then read that Cyrene "was founded early in the seventh century B.C. by a Dorian colony from Thera..." (a Cyclade island off the coast of Greece). Also keep in mind that Dorians of Greece were likely Edones along with Macedonians (Alexander was a Macedonian) and for that reason a connect to the Satyr Edonians is all-too feasible. Also keep in mind that "Macedonian" may be a variation of Megiddo(n) i.e. the expected location of Armageddon (Dor and Megiddo are very near to each other).
The website giving the above quote connects Lydians to Libya, saying that Cyrene "was the chief town of the Lydian region between Egypt and Carthage." Is that the Ladon dragon of north Africa...that became the Picts and Lothian? Is that Latmus removed to Libya?
The Marcomanni and Quadi "descended from the noble line of Maroboduus and Tudrus, the Tudric line apparently kings among the Quadi..." I say this in case a reader can help me make a Tudric-Tudor connection. After all, Tudors were stewards of the Gwynedd rulers, while Tydeus (a Greek Calydonian) was the brother of Meleager. That is, the Tudors may have been from the Pretani/Bretons that furnished the Caledonian Picts, even as Meleager became the Pretani. The Tudors trace themselves to king Arthur, and the Pretani were definitely fundamental to Arthur's Welsh/Cornwallish home base.
To help me trace the Tudors to times earlier than otherwise possible, I have found the ancient Tudor Coat in an article claiming that it later became the Coat of the John Yonge family (see website below), thus proving that the Yonges stemmed from Tudors. This Yonge Coat was originally that of earl Tudor Trevor, and because he lived in the 10th century, its gold lion on black and silver background might have been the fore-runner to the English lions, also gold. As the following website states that England's gold lions were of the Arms of Normandy, it makes possible that the Tudor lion was also in honor of Normandy, or some part of Normandy.
As Normans were of Rollo-Sinclair Vikings, one might assume that the gold lions were their symbol. Apparently not. What struck me as incredible is that, while having some (though little) reason to tie the Rollo line back to the Sabina, it was only afterward, upon my realizing right here that the Normans used a gold lion on red, that I re-discovered the Italian Abreu Coat using a gold lion on red!
The Abreu surname, remember, derives the Abruzzo region of Italy, in Sabina country, and this then recalls my hunch that the Tydeus boars became the mythical Sabina ruler, Tatius...who then furnished the Tudors. I now suspect that the Tudors should descend from Bruces, if I am correct in tracing Bruces back to the Abreu/Abruzzo terms. To show how the gold lion on red found in the Abreu Coat may connect to the Bruces and the British, there is an alternative view (not necessarily contradictory) on the origin of England's lion symbol that includes Louvain, the origin of the Bruces proper:
"Three lions have stood in the Royal Arms of England since the reign of Richard I. The First Lion: The Lion of Justice – Henry I (1069-1135) used a single lion as a badge...The Second Lion: - It has been suggested that the second lion came into the arms through Henry I’s marriage with Adeliza, daughter of Godfrey of Louvain, whose coat of arms also bore a lion. Thus from his grandfather, Henry II (1133-1189) inherited two gold lions on red. The Third Lion...it is thought that Henry II added the third when he married Eleanor of Aquitaine, whose arms are known to have been a single gold lion on red."
Aquitaine was "Akitania" to the Basques, evoking "Akatziri," noting also that Basques had origins in Abkhazia. But the big point is that the gold-lion-on-red-field of Italy likely became the gold-lion-on-red-field of Louvain. Abruzzo pre-dates the Normans and Bruces-proper by centuries, so that the direction of the gold lion was likely from Italy to France, not vice versa.
It is thought that the Bavarian Illuminati was at the root of Communism, and now that I see Hohen fingers in Bavaria, let me re-quote from a previous chapter as is pertinent here:
William Morris was a leader in the Socialistic movements of Britain, and so I've noted that the Irish Morris Coat uses a black lion on gold background, the symbol of the Hohen(staufen)s. Is it a coincidence that the Welsh Morris Coat uses a gold lion on red background, the very symbol on the German and English Marx Coats?
Marx, like the founder of the Bavarian Illuminati (Adam Weishaupt), was "Jewish." The "Jewish" Marx Coat uses red and silver checks, which may be the Hohen checks. Let me repeat here that Weishaupt's secret alias was "Sparticus."
I think I have found a forth kind of Cohen, using blue and gold checks, for the Dutch Nassau Coat is covered with them, but also has a gold lion superimposed upon them. It turns out that the gold lion on blue that is symbol to the Netherlands is the Nassau lion on blue.
The importance of the Nassau bloodline in the make-up of the Netherlands is as follows: "The kings and queens of the Netherlands are descendants of Otto [of Nassau].
I can see that I've just added to my tasks in the requirement to trace the Nassau bloodline, but I'm out of room here. As it should lead to Cohens and/or Hohens, read this: "Prince of Orange is a title of nobility, originally associated with the principality of Orange in southern France [on the Rhone]. It may be carried by members of the House of Orange-Nassau and the House of Hohenzollern." In keeping with my tracing of the Hohens to the Curete/Satyr goat/cornucopia cult, see that the Arms of Orange uses a cornucopia in its chief.
Check out the gold lion in the Crest of Bologne, and the blue background in the Coat. Coincidence, or not?
The Looming Power of Pisa
I am zooming in on the identity of Zeus.
Here is evidence that he was Opis,
in the land of the Cabelee.
Table of Contents