Previous Chapter


March 2007

In the previous chapter, I found that the Arthurian holy grail cult in Arda was the bloodline of Greek myth's Laomedon. It was this Trojan character from whom came a certain Memnon, whom I will assume to have been as closely related to the Greeks depicted by Agamemnon as his name is identical. There is a key to a mystery or two made visible where Memnon was an Ethiopian king, not only revealing that the Ethiopian Aryans were of Troy, but explaining how the Egyptian element (e.g. Taygetos pyramid, and the Mani/Min peninsula) got to Sparta.

Myth has Memnon bringing his Ethiopian army to the battle of Troy, to fight for the Trojans, and one can assume that the remnants of that army not returning to Africa ended up in the Mani peninsula. They were then depicted in myth by both Agamemnon and his brother, Menelaus. The big question now is, did the Memnon Ethiopians choose Mani because the inhabitants/founders of the city of Laas, on the Mani peninsula, had been their distant friends or relatives? I'm insinuating that Laas stemmed from Laish, a city of Sidonians, for indeed the Phoenicians were, more than friends, directly founded by Aryan Egyptians. It's possible that the dragon cult of Laish moved to Mani when the Daniy defeated them in war 1500ish BC (as per the book of Judges).

It's also made plain in myth that a portion of Egyptian Danaans, called "Aegyptus," moved to Methoni!! Can you realize why I used those exclamation marks? Laomedon. I can now see that he depicted an alliance between the cities/kingdoms of Laas and Methoni, and it may therefore be that both of these cities were as Trojan as Laomedon himself. Identifying the Ethiopian Aryans as Trojans is extremely important because the Merovingian Franks claimed to come from Trojans, yet I had traced them to Merops of Ethiopia. I am convinced already by non-mythical reasons alone that early American Illuminatists were the same line exactly as the Merovingians.

See Mani and Methoni on this map of ancient Messenia; Mani is the peninsula to the right of Methoni, but Laas is off the map further to the right. Take a good gawk at mount Mathia, for Memnon's brother was made Emathion! The latter was ruler of the dragon bloodline in Arabia, but clearly he too moved to Messenia with Memnon.

It is now understood why mythical Aegyptus settled Methoni, for Aegyptus stemmed from Laomedon in the first place i.e. from Laomedon's grandson, Memnon. That latter term certainly evokes Memphis (in Egypt, near Ethiopia), and so what I had written in a previous chapter is now more important:

"The following interesting theory may serve to reveal that Danaus' brother, Aigyptus, was from Memphis:
'The Greek historian Manetho referred to Memphis as Hi-Ku-P'tah ("Place of Ptah"), which he wrote in Greek as...(Ai-gu-ptos), giving us the Latin AEGYPTVS.'"

It's clear that Agamemnon (who fought against the Trojans) could not have been the very same as the pro-Trojan Memnon, and yet the specifics of the relationship should come out somehow. When I went fishing to find what "aga" means, I found one definition as "original," and another as "lord," and since "lord" is often the same word as "first/chief/high," I would suggest that Agamemnon was the first Memnon family, and that he produced Memnon. During the period that th Memnon branch was in Africa, the Agamemnon Trojans settled Greece. The fact that they later warred against Troy does not necessarily mean that they could not have been Trojans, for the dragon bloodline is always at war with everyone, especially it's own kin.

For this is the nature of the dragon, and explains why almost all of Europe and the world is of the dragon bloodline, for normal people don't tend to want to kill and rape others just to become the most powerful dogs of the human race. The normal people got robbed or wiped out, and the dragon took power everywhere. If not for dragon-tribe warring against dragon-tribe, the bloodline would be much more powerful today. In the end, Armageddon is dragon fire against dragon fire, and the stench will go up.

In the picture wherein Agamemnon was the ancestor of Memnon, we can identify Agamemnon, not only as Laomedon the grandfather of Memnon, but as Tithonus the father of Memnon. Can you spot which historical Thracians Tithonus depicted?

Agamemnon had a son (Orestes) who depicted Orestia (modern Orestiada), a major city in Arda (on the Hebros river). Think about the importance of this, for had the same bloodline via Menelaus (brother of Agamemnon) not been in Epirus, I would not have any means by which to trace Arda to Arta of Epirus.

Another point of vital importance is now obvious, that the Arthurian bloodline is suspect as this very Spartan dragon, a theory that I am about to clinch by tracing the Agamemnon-Menelaus bloodline to Arthurian realms in western Europe. If this is a first, and if it's true, this book (and the one to two years full-time that is has taken from me) will be more than worthwhile. The dragon bloodline is still writing code to this day, mocking us the normal people, refusing to give us their true history in plain language. And no wonder, for they are the scum of the earth who use poetry, prose and tales to wash their bloody acts white, and to proclaim their sorcerous nature as Godly.

[Update September 15, 2007 -- I just found an article (from 1911 Britannica) on dragons that traces the symbol both to Agamemnon and King Arthur. I'll just quote it partially:

Thus, in Homer (Iliad xi. 36 seq.), Agamemnon has on his shield, besides the Gorgon's head, a blue three-headed snake (Speucwv), just as ages afterwards the Norse warriors painted dragons on their shields and carved dragons' heads on the prows of their ships. From the conquered Dacians, too, the Romans in Trajan's time borrowed the dragon ensign...Under the later East Roman emperors the purple dragon ensign became the ceremonial standard of the emperors, under the name of the SpaKc vrecov. The imperial fashion spread; or similar causes elsewhere produced similar results. In England before the Conquest the dragon was chief among the royal ensigns in war. Its origin, according to the legend preserved in the Flores historiarum, was as follows. Uther Pendragon, father of King Arthur, had a' vision of a flaming dragon in the sky, which his seers interpreted as meaning that he should come to the kingdom...."

Of course, the vision never happened because Arthur was not a real person; he was a code of secret-society writers depicting a certain people. The article goes on to tell that the Welsh dragon (still on the Welsh flag to this day) stemmed from king Arthur. In short, the dragon depicted the Brits (brothers of the Welsh), i.e. the Bruttii = Calabrians. End Update]

Laomedon acts as a Trojan link to Spartans, but I had already realized before stumbling over him (very recently) that the dragon bloodline must pass from mythical Paris of Troy, to Menelaus of Sparta, and then to Pyrrhus of Epirus. Therefore, an inclusion of Priam (another Trojan king) into the bloodline is absolutely necessary in that he was made the father of Paris. This is extremely important, for in this picture the region of Arda seems to have been mythical Aretus, a son applied to Priam. This is quite perfect alongside my discovery that Arthur was a Pari Muse bloodline.

The dragon bloodline had also to carry a Laus-like term, and I had already found that the "laus" in "Menelaus" described the "Lao" of "Laodicea," so that "Laomedon" is quite a perfect term from whom this dragon cult should derive. Before coming to these revelations as per Laomedon acting as the ancestor of the Agamemnon bloodline, I had concluded the need for the western (Ladon/Laus) dragon to stem from Leda and her swan bloodline. Therefore see that the wife of Agamemnon was Clytemnestra, daughter of Leda!

This provides at least two dragon bloodlines, one from Leda herself, and the other from her daughter with Agamemnon. The latter is known as an "Atride" bloodline, named after the father of Agamemnon, Atreus. I have traced Atreus to certain Gauls of the Arthurian theater (I'll soon explain) without realizing that he probably depicted, not Arda, but the Odrysians of Arda. This discovery was very key.

An Atreus-Odrysian connection is supported where Dryas depicts the Odrysians. Moreover, as I had already conjectured that Dryas depicted Troy, the realization now that Atreus was also a Trojan bloodline leads to identifying him as "Tros," the symbol of Troy. The other symbol of Troy, Ilus, no doubt depicts the Laus bloodline. The fact that Troy was on the Troad explains why "Dryas" was alternatively "Dryad," and why the "Atreus" bloodline is called "Atride." I have been a little amazed at how fluent the revelations are now coming. These are the Druids, wherefore I will now be able to announce which Celt tribe in particular the Druids stemmed from.

The Odrysians were from Peleps, for Pelops was made father of Atreus. Myth seems only to place Tantalus (father of Pelops) in Lydia, but myth is stingy in divulging his ethnicity. If it's correct to identify Dryas as Dorians, this discovers a Dorian ethnicity for the dragon bloodline. I have traced Dorians (and Troy) to the regions of Tyre and Dor, this then aligning very nicely with Clytemnestra (wife of Agamemnon) being made the wife first of Tantalus. For she, being in the Lydian theater of Tantalus, should depict the Khaldi, who I say were the Chaldeans, anciently the "Chaldim/Khaldim." As "im" is a Semite suffix, it is only one factor which has identified the Chaldeans as Hebrews. The Khaldi were the proto-Celts, I claim, and this is what makes these particular Hebrews the most wicked ever to walk the planet. Chaldea and Babylon are treated in the Bible as virtually one and the same, and Babylonians are always a symbol of God's arch enemies, and the most abominable peoples in His eyes. Gog and Babylon are two intertwined peoples, even in the last days, as per the Revelation-17 picture of Gog riding Babylon the Mother of Abominations; in this Illustration, Babylon sits in Rome.

I have already explained that the Hebrew element in the Ladon cult of the Tyro-Litani region was in the Daniy who seized the city of Laish. As these should prove to be the Danaans (who ruled Argos), there needs to be evidence that the Pelops bloodline ruled Argos (if indeed the Daniy-Ladon cult led to Pelops before evolving into the Spartan dragon). Myth writers seem very reliable here, for they made Atreus (son of Pelops) a king of Argos!

Therefore, Tantalus and his son Pelops were a Danaan-Trojan alliance...which should explain the "Tan" of "Tantalus." As per Pelops being a symbol of Peloponnesia, it's now clear that it was a Danaan-Trojan alliance which overtook that Greek island. Yet it can be gleaned that, before arriving into Greece, the Danaan-Trojan cult became the Odrysians=Atreus, on the Hebros river at Arda. That is, because Atreus leads the Odrysians to Argos, they must have been the Danaans who came to rule Argos.

I just found some evidence suggesting that it was the Danaans in particular which depicted Arda, for Wikipedia reports that mythical Danae (symbol for the Danaans) founded the city of Ardea. However, while Ardea may indeed connect back to Arda, it was a city in Lazio (!!!), otherwise known as the Latium province that surrounds Rome.

It becomes easier to understand how Danae of Argos could have founded a place near Rome when we see that her father, Acrisius, could have depicted the Greek founders of the Aciris river in central Lucania (see Aciris on the map of ancient Lucania). This is all very good, for as Acrisius was made the son of Abas, and as the latter was said to be the founder of the Abantians (of Euboea), it's easy to figure that Acrisius depicted Abantians...known to have moved to Italy.

Therefore, the Bantia and Bandusia region of Lucania are more likely identified as Abantian settlements, a very important point if this was indeed Ban(t), the father of Lancelot. In this picture, the Lancelot bloodline is revealed as Danaans of Argos, and should therefore have included Hercules, the Danaan conqueror of Erethlyn's Gorgons. Indeed, we see, at the mouth of the Aciris river, the city of Heraclea. The possible significance of Grumentium on the Aciris river is the Garonne region in Aquitaine, for it was anciently "Garumna."

Iin Messenia, Acrisius probably depicted mount Acritas to the immediate south of mount Mathia. As proof, we see Theganussa (on this map of ancient Messenia), smack next to Acritas, and then at the source of the Aciris river (Lucania) we see Tegianum, which was surely a settlement of the same peoples who named Theganussa. Many chapters ago, I had identified Acrisius, in his role as his twin, Proteus=ProZeus=Dagon, as a stem from Ekron into Greece. Ekron was just a giant's piddle away from Gath, and with an east wind Ashdod too. This was in fact Dagon country, wherefore per chance "Thegan" was a variation of that senseless "god" that real human beings actually worshiped as supreme.

It can now be tentatively assumed that Erethlyn (i.e. mythically Eretheia, location unspecified in myth, but somewhere in the far west of Europe) stemmed from the ancient Danaan city of Ardea (at Rome), especially if I've been correct in tracing Erethlyn to Rhaetia of northern Italy. As I and others connect Rhaetia to the Ruthene (Ruteni Gauls), it's necessary to mention that the inhabitants of Ardea were called "Rutuli." That is, an Ardea-Ruthene connection appears likely. In fact, "Rutuli" seems to mean, "wheel," as does "Ruteni/Rodez." We are soon to see some surnames, highly pertinent to this dragon hunt, using the wheel as a symbol.

Now's the perfect time to repeat that Gypsies use the wheel as their symbol to this day, while Gypsies are from Gyppe of Methoni! Surely you can tell who the Gypsies were, can't you? The same who wrote "Annuit Coeptis" on the Great Seal of the United States: the Aegyptus branch Danaans!! Fakers, liars, secret-society boneheads who can't grasp what is good. Snakes in the grass, vomit to the world, pain and anguish to all, that they might have your money and rule over you. I wouldn't want you to lose sight of that reality, for these are about to force all societies to honor them in the near future with what is called the "Image of the Beast" (where the "beast" is the dragon; see Revelation 13). I'm not referring to Gypsies, but to the Freemasonic founders of the United States.

In just a moment, I'm going to show some reasonable evidence that the Sintians became rulers of Sparta and married the Ladon dragon there. From that perspective, read this:

"Sinti or Sinte (Singular masc.=Sinto; sing. fem.=Sintisa) is the name some communities of the nomadic people usually called 'Gypsies'..."

I'm not of course equating the Sinte Gypsies with the Santones, but I would definitely consider that the two were from the same Sintian stock of Thrace/Lemnos. Because a sub-group of Sinti Gypsies were called "Cigani," I would also identify them as the Ligurian swan, mythical Cygnus. I don't doubt that some Sinti of late times came to northern Italy (Piedmont) from the Indus, as is said to be the case by historians, but I would suggest that they came to Piedmont because Sintians of previous centuries had already settled the region.

It's also necessary to mention that the Venus cult of Italy was founded in Ardea. This helps to make the connection back to Arda on the Hebros, for that river was surely named after Cabero, the wife of Hephaestus, but who was also Aphrodite. Venus, you see, is always equated with Aphrodite. Therefore, as the dragon cult seems to have entered Italy at Ardea, perhaps the dragon/beast of Rome that is Biblically important had it's beginning in Ardea (about 20 miles south of Rome). Alba Longa was smack beside Ardea. I see the possibility of Lancelot depicting Longa, and Arthur depicting Ardea.

Atreus was made a king also of Mycenae, the city founded by mythical Perseus (a Gorgon) on the outskirts of Argos. Perseus was the son of Danae! Therefore, there is little doubt that Atreus was a depiction of the Danaans in the Arda region of Hebros, and for that reason it would seem to be a fair assumption that Arda was founded by Atreus=Odrysians...even though "Arda" and "Atre" are not the same spelling. It is "Arda" that I would root in the term, "wheel," as per "Aereda/roda" = wheel.

I can now be sure that Arthur was rooted in the island of Rhodes, you see, and in one myth, Danaus (symbol of the Danaans) founded all three Rhodian cities that were assigned to Helios and Rhoda. One of those cities was Ialysos, which evokes the Halys river = its Halybe inhabitants = Arthur's Excaliber sword. Another city was Lindos, which I say evolved into Atlantis, and perhaps London, a capital of the Brets.

Greenway7 did it again. She timely sent me an article, with a major point made that fits well right here. First let me say that the article is written by what must surely be a twisted Freemasonic "Jew" within the Catholic church. He leaves enough clues in the article to make apparent his Kabala background, and attempts to merge Kabala, or at least Talmudic Judaism, with Jesus. As a fine example of what my work here in this book hopes to counter successfully, let me quote him: "I hold that the Messiah Ephraim is Prince Henry Charles Albert David [Harry]of Wales and his older brother Messiah Manasseh is Prince William Arthur Philip Louis of Wales."

You see, Freemasons teach that Britain are the double Israeli tribes of Ephraim and Manasseh (sons of king Joseph of Egypt). In my opinion, these terms are used to disguise and twist the reality, that Britain is from Aphrodite and Manes. My explanation as to why those latter terms are virtually the same as Ephraim and Manasseh is that Joseph named his sons after those two pagan deities, for at the time Joseph was co-king in Egypt and while Manes/Min was sacred down there at that time, the Israelite family of Joseph had been from the Euphrates river, which I think was glorified as Aphrodite. But clearly, Manes and Aphrodite were not the same as Manasseh and Ephraim, the two sons of Joseph, nor should the two tribes that followed be mistaken for Manes and Aphrodite of the dragon cult despised by the one True God.

While the author of the article makes connective claims without providing evidence, so that everything claimed needs to be tested, I will agree with one thing he says, which I will quote below because it agrees with a major finding in my work. Quite possibly the author knew something of a reality and spilled the beans where other Freemasons/Illuminatists dared not to (square brackets not mine):

"In much literature on the lost Tribes the patriarchal Tribe of Dan and the matriarchal Tribe of Dinah [found with the Josephite Tribes especially Manasseh] have been confused. The Tuatha de Danaan of Ireland are not of Dan but of Dinah. She is the Goddess Dana or Dona called by the Romans Diana."

I had earlier claimed that the Danaans were not from Dan, but from the Biblical Dinay (Ezra 4:9, though not included in all English versions), which certainly seems identical with the "Dinah" above. In Ezra 4:9, the Dinay are lumped in with Chaldean Semites, living in Israel but opposing the Israelites. I claim that these were the Kabala/dragon cult in Israel, and that they have since attempted to hijack the promises made by God to Israel, concerning Israel's Millennial rule over the world. That is, Kabala is much about creating a messiah over a world rule, and convincing the world that their world rule is the one promised in the Bible. Where they will not be able to convince the masses, simply because their claims are ridiculous, they plan to force the world to comply with their agenda. This is the False Prophet, I believe.

Confident that the Muses (i.e. Mysians) were a part of the Odrysians, because it's a fact that Muses and Dorians were one/connected, perhaps Mycenae was the Muse suburb in the Argos metropolis. Indeed, as Muses of Mysia were of the Parion region, so we have Persius founding Mycenae.

I should also like to mention here my previous identification of Abas as an Avvite peoples (from Gath and Gaza on the Israeli shores), for the Aciris river is situated beside the Siris river. I have already identified the Siris region as one of the dog-worshiping Avvites due to "Sirius" being associated with the dog. This clue will help solve several mysteries, not least of which is the Stewart link to the Avvites of Lucania, for Stewarts of early times used a dog as their sacred symbol.

The picture gets far worse if the proto-Washington surname, Wassa, represented the Avvites of Gaza (and/or Gath). This is not a bad theory for more reasons than the following alternatives of "Wassa": Gaish, Gash, Gaze, Gace, Gaco. Recall also my theory that the Wassa surname traces to the capital of the Mittani kingdom, Wassukanni, for this can now be tested by my other belief that the Mittani founded Methoni. That is, if the Wassa surname goes back to the peoples of Methoni, and moreover connects to the Laomedon bloodline, it will serve as evidence for a Wassa link back to the Mittani.

The Thracian ancestry (claimed by many) of the Trojans now appears to be in the Laomedon marriage to Strymo, for this term suggests that his Laus-Trojan peoples were likely with her on the Strymon river, Thrace. There are only a few major Thracian tribes on that river to chose from, but I would point to the Sinties/Sintians because the son of Laomedon was Tithones. I realize that "Tith" is not exactly "Sint," but I'll add that Sithones were a branch of Edones, while Edones lived at the mouth of the Strymon. Therefore, the Sithones ought to be beside the Edones, as are their other fellow tribe, the Mygdones, yet I don't see Sithones on this map of Thracian tribes, whereas the Sintians are located beside the Edones. I can see how "Siton" became "Sint," and for this reason mythical Tithonus was likely the Sithones=Sintians. That is, Laomedon, his son Tethonis, his son Memnon, and the Atrides -- Agamemnon and Menelaus -- were Sintians.

To show how reliable the myth writers were, they had Sthenelaus (i.e. the Sithones) as son of Perseus, who was in turn son of Danae = Odrysians of Arda. This agrees with Edones, and their Sithone tribe, stemming from Dryas = the Odrysians of Arda. Of course, Sthenelaus depicts the Sithones in Greece, and apparently allied to, or identified as, Laas.

Since Sintians were the first inhabitants of Lemnos, could "Memnon" have been code for Lemnos? After all, the "L" might be beside the "M" in the alphabet just because the letters had been interchangeable at one time. It's clear to me that I'm dealing with Amazons even before Lemnos enters the picture. It's also possible that Tyndareus depicted Sintians, and for certain Tyndareus depicted Amazons, as can be quickly realized when looking at the mythical characters in his immediate family.

Tyndareus fits the part of Laomedon Trojans because Tyndareus was a king of Sparta, and Leda's husband. Just as Tynd-Areus appears to be a Sintian-Ares alliance (Ares is elsewhere "Areus"), so we find that Leda's father, Thestius was the son of Ares. Ares must always figure into the dragon cult, because he was depicted in myth as owning a dragon...that became the "Spartoi." In this picture, his son Thestius would translate into that dragon, even as Thestius' daughter (Leda) depicts the Ladon dragon. The mother of Thestius was Demonice, what must surely be a verification that "Lacedaemonian" refers to a demonic peoples.

The fact that Ares was made to mate with Demonice verifies his link to Laconians so as to produce the Spartans in the first place. In that picture, Thestius becomes the first Spartans. In another version of the facts, the goddess Sparta was made to marry Lacedaemonia, in which picture I would view Sparta as Ares (i.e. who married Demonice), thus proving that Ares evolved into Sparta.

I am wondering whether Sintians were depicted by the mythical sun god, Sandon/Sandes. It certainly has logic where the dragon cult has already been traced to both Tarsus and Lydia, since Sandon was the god/founder of Tarsus, and was particularly great also in Lydia. As he is identified (by others) as Hercules, it would appear that Sandon depicted the Mysians ruled by the Hercules bloodline (1200-700 BC), and for that reason Sandon should prove to be the sun god of the Muses.

In other words, the Sintians look like Muses, and if true, they should trace back to the Gorgons = Aryans. The article below says that Sintians have been connected by historians to the Thessalonian city of Sindos, but there were also the far-off Sindoi of Caucasia, off the Azov sea, where Gorgons (e.g. Georgians) could be well expected. There seems to be some consensus that "Sindoi" is equivalent to "Indus" and therefore somehow connects to Aryans.

The above "d" versions of "Sintoi" were what allowed me to spot their mythical symbol in "Tyndareus." He is given two fathers, one being Perieres, a term that I long ago traced to Parthians for more reasons than it's "Peri" prefix. At that time, I had no inkling of the Pari Gorgons that were the Muses. Where Gorgophone is not the mother of Tyndareus, it's Batea, whom I had suspected as Bat Georgians! The Laz Georgians, if not the same as Bat Georgians, were smack beside them. The Mysians and Lydians were so close that they are often equated, and so if there was a difference between Bats and the Laz, the Bats were of the Mysians as per Batea's father, Teucer.

As Batea represents the Teucer (non-Tros) side of the Trojans, Tyndareus must be viewed as such. As Teucer was king (i.e. peoples) of Mysia, Tyndareus (and possibly the Sintians whom he depicted) is now certified to depict Muses. As Muses are thus the Teucer side of the Trojans, I will identify Muses as Togarmite-branch Gogi.

Assuming that the Sintians were from the Sindoi of Caucasia, the Kuban river upon which they lived needs some investigation. It has its source near mount Elbrus, now in the region of Prielbrusie (do I see a "Brusi" in that?). Says Wikipedia: "The ancients knew the mountain as Strobilus, the Latin [and Greek] word for pine cone, meaning a twisted object." This is notable in that the Phrygian sun god, Attis (who should be another name for Sandon) had a pine cone for his symbol. Plus, I say that "Helios" derives from "helix," a spiral, the same idea as a snake coiled around the caduceus.

Knowing that a "b" and "m" were interchangeable, "Strobilus" could have become "Strymon." If indeed the two terms are describing the same peoples, then I would certainly view the Sintians on the Strymon river as an extension of the Sindoi on the Kuban river.

because the location of mount Elbrus is 40 miles south-south-west of Kislovodsk, my initial efforts to locate the peak got me to North Ossetia, just north of the north Georgian border. This led me to find that the central river and city of North Ossetia is Ardon. See map of North Ossetia. This would be of prime importance for those who identify the Arthurian bloodline as an Alani people, for Ossetia is also known as Alania. It made my heart race when, just after writing the previous sentence, I found that "The Ossetians themselves refer to their nation as irættæ," for this term is a near match with Raetia, Aereda and Erethlyn!!

I'm convinced: Arthur was from the Iraetae-branch Alania, and evolved into the Ruthene proto-Slavs. The Alani are indeed suspect now for forming the Hellenes of Greece, and the Arthur line should prove to have been of the Dorian-branch Hellenes. After they went Egypt way as the Telchines of Rhodes, they returned to the Greek theater and formed Arda because they had previously been the Iraetea. As I am about to investigate the Suebi Swedes in my hunt to find the roots of the American Freemasons, see the following quote: "In Georgian language, Alania and the Alans are known as 'Oseti' and 'Osebi' respectively." Just ad a "u" to get the ancient terms, Suethia, Suetia, and Suebi...all referring to Swedes.

I gotta tell you folks, sometimes it feels like I am being Led, for it was just a couple of minutes before finding the quote above that, for the first time, I saw "Ossetia" as the source of "Sitone/Sithone." It was hardly a solid connection, but the quote above proves that the equation is bang-on, for Sitones were placed by Tacitus smack beside the Suiones (in Gotland, now southern Sweden), a term that is widely viewed as representing the Suebi. In other words, if the Osebi Alans evolved into the Suebi, the Oseti term, with 99.9 percent certainty, evolved into "Sitone." In this picture, the Sitones/Sithones look like the ancient term, "Suetia/Suethia" = the Swedes proper. As more evidence that the Suebi were Alans, we have this: "...soon the names Alamanni and Suabi are used synonymously."

As Swedes were Rus, perhaps modern Communist Russia (founded by Rothschild and "Red-Jew" elements) used "Soviet" for honoring the ancient cult of Ossetia. It's interesting that "soviet" is defined today as "council," the same definition given to the American "caucus" (i.e. Ossetia was in Caucasia). Just as Russia was built on blood and tears, though not their own, so the story has always been the same for any kingdom of the Rus. God depicted the dragon cult in Revelation 17 as one which drinks the blood of the peoples which it slays, and it might just be that the blood in that gold cup belongs to the Swede bloodline.

This story is becoming incredible. Never would I have guessed that Redones and the Rose Line originate from Ossetia, but to find that Arthurian bloodlines are the very same makes for one explosive story, especially if these lines are the Biblical dragon. I already know that Dionysus, as Lyaios, was from Laish next to Panias, explaining why Pan Satyrs were among his company in Greek mythology. Note the Ossetian city of Beslan, beside Ardon, what might be the root of the Bessi Thracians, a leading/prophetic sector of the Satrai Thracians (map of Thracian tribes). Herodotus said that the Bessi and Satrai were together worshipers of Dionysus, and so see that the Arms of North Ossetia uses a gold leopard, spotted apparently, the symbol of Dionysus...but also used in forming the dragon symbols of Tammuz, called Mushussu. It wouldn't surprise me if the Muses go back to that term.

The Bible (Daniel 7) also uses a leopard to depict Greece, and so the theory of many that "Hellene" derives from "Alan" becomes important to prophecy students, for he end-time anti-Christ is described in Revelation 13:2 as being "like" that Greek leopard. Alans were a Gargarian-Amazon mix, according to Herodotus, as are the Muses under my investigation. This now compels me to say again that there was a Misia to the east of Ossetia, next to Cabalaca, in the Azerbaijan region of Baku/Bakukh = Bacchus.

It can't be a coincidence that the river upon which the Satyrs and Bessi lived, the Nestos, had its mouth in what is to this day the Kavala/Kavalla prefecture, named after the city of Kavalla. I think this was proto-Avalon, and will therefore trace the Satrys to Avellina of Campania. As "[Kavalla] was originally founded by settlers from Paros in about the 6th century BC," it was founded by Muses, for it is known that the Parion Mysians were from island smack beside Naxos (the sacred island of Dionysus). The Kikons were also in Kavalla.

As the peoples of Avellino are known to have been Hirpini branch Semnones (themselves a branch of Sabines), it serves as evidence that the Satrys and/or Sitones, in their migration between Kavalla and Avellino, had become the Daemonians of Laconia. The river at Avellino is the Sabatus, and looks like the makings of both "Suebi" and "Sveti/Swede." As the Sithones were mythical Tithonus, Abrahamic Sheba and Dedan are now evoked, especially as a tribe of Dedanites were the Assurites (Genesis 25:3), a term reflecting the Aesir branch of Swedes. I still hold out that the Besse were from Buzi Nahorites.

As Avellino was beside (Bene)vento, the Vanir sect of Scandinavians might just be from that commune. It's interesting that the more-ancient name of Vento was Maleventum, using a prefix that Wikipedia defines as "apple," for "Avalon" has been said to mean "apple land." I am keeping my eyes peeled for a Vento-Wend equation via a Vento-Veneti link.

It turned out that mount Elbrus was not in North Ossetia, yet I'm very happy to have made that mistake. Elbrus is in the republic of Kabardino-Balkaria (on the northern border of Ossetia). The "Kabar" portion of the name should prove to link with the Cabero/Kabeiri cult on Sintian-infested Lemnos. The "Balkaria" portion of the name identifies with the sacred character of Lemnos, mythical Vulcan i.e. the Balkan mountains in Thrace. The Moesi lived on the north side of the Balkans, with Arda and the Satyrs on the south side.

See map of Kabardino-Balkaria, and ask if the city of Urukh (on the Ossetian border) is conspicuous since Tammuz was from Uruk of Sumeria. This place could have been named by the Rukhs, what I trace to mythical Rig of Sweden = the historical Rugii. The Ruhks were known as the Rukhs-As, with the "As" portion understood to be Alans. Many think that "As" led to the Aes(ir). Wikipedia says that the Digora branch of North Ossetians lived in what is now Kabardino-Balkaria, and this term could connect to mythical Vortiger(n), an important Arthurian character who ruled the Brets.

See this modern map of Caucasia to see how close the Alans were to Kutaisi, the location of the golden fleece. I've already asked myself if "Ossetia" didn't derive from aasi/asin-like terms that came to depict the donkey cult, and Kutaisi was mythically Ais. Behold some more that there is an Ardon river in Aisne, France...that I'd say connects back to Ardon of Ossetia. I can now say with some confidence what I resisted from saying earlier, that the donkey symbol might just have depicted the Aes/Asi peoples, known to have named Azov. The Kuban river from mount Elbrus flows into Azov.

If the Sindoi Caucasians were a major portion of the dragon cult, they must trace to the first signs of the Trojan-theater dragon i.e. Dardanus on Samothrace, and his Kabeiri cult there. The following seems pertinent: "It was precisely the sacred language of the Sintioi that was spoken in the Island of Samothrace as well (Marazov 1998, 45)." To that, add that the same Kabeiri peoples were on Imbros via mythical Eetion/Iasius (brother of Dardanus and leader of the Kabeiri cult), and then compare "Imbros" with "Elbrus" (assuming that "Im" and "El" are both prefixes and therefore to be ignored).

I would suggest that the Sintoi were depicted by, not just Tyndareus, but the Satyr-related Centaurs...who I suspect lead to the Cantii Celts, founders of Kent and Canterbury. The Cantii can be gleaned as kin to their neighboring Atrebates. Can you spot where the Atrebates originated? Mythical Atreus = the Odrysians of Arda.

Off the coast of Kavalla was the island of Thasos, and this is what I identify as Thestius, the father of Leda. As you read the following about Thasos, keep in mind that Thestius was made the son of both Ares and Agenor:

"[Thasos] was colonized at an early date by Phoenicians...they founded a temple to the god Melqart, whom the Greeks identified as 'Tyrian Heracles'...An eponymous Thasos, son of Phoenix — or of Agenor, as Pausanias reported — is said to have been the leader of the Phoenicians, and to have given his name to the island." I've identified Hercules (many chapters ago) as the Rukhs of the Arak river, at lake Sevan (Armenia). This lake I identified as the mythical swan which mated with Leda to produce the Kikons i.e. mythical Cycnus. With the swan cult on Thasos, it well explains why Thestius (= a part of Thasos) was made the father of Leda. Leda is easily identified as Ladon=Lydians on Thasos. As I've identified her time and again as the holy grail bloodline, so we see the same again here, for mythical Thasos was brother to Cadmus and Cilix, the two terms that depict the holy grail bloodline (i.e. the Cati from Cilicia). Melkart is the god at the root of the modern Kabala (but this has nothing to do with the bloodline of Jesus Christ), and that now clinches a Kabala root at Kavalla (onshore of Thasos).

A few years before 700 BC, the Saian Thracians on Thasos were conquered by the Muses of Parion and Paros. The Saians may just have been the swans from Sevan...who'd I'd trace to the Suebi/Swabians/Suiones. The Sithones must have been part of the swans for that reason and more, especially since the father of the Cycnus swan was made "Sthenelus" (code for Sithones as far as I'm concerned). In this picture, Cycnus=Kikons were of Thasos, but of the Saians rather than the Pari Muses. Since Leda depicts Lydians, she can be identified as the Muses, wherefore it could appear that she eventually married the Saians (myth makes Zeus the swan, wherefore he may have depicted the Saians; note how "Thasos" evokes "Dios/Zeus).

Muses lived also in Thessaly (northern Greece around Olympos), and perhaps also Thessalonia, these likely being rooted in Thasos, or vice versa. I see the Sintians of Greece becoming allied with Leda as per Leda's husband Tyndareus, and at least one online article identifies the Saians as Sintians.

It occurs to me that the Saians were from Sion of mount Hermon, and that the Suiones were the same. It could be, therefore, that the founders of the Priory of Sion were Saians = the Kikon swans = Sthenelus Sithones. Since it seems that Sithones go back to Sidon, they would connect with Laish, which the Bible reveals as a colony of Sidonians, and of course I root Leda to the stalk of Laish. Tryrian Hercules would translate to a major representative of that stalk; he was the Lydian lion symbol, and was equated in that capacity with the supreme Phrygian god, Sandon, supporting a Saian-Sintian equation (where Hercules = the Saians).


Sepharvites: Gone with the Wend
Finding more parts of the Arthurian bloodline here.
Yet another land found reflecting his name.
This time at the foot of Switzerland.

Table of Contents