I didn't know until Thursday of this week, while watching Baron Coleman, that Lori Frantzve's mother has an Abbas maiden name. Although it's Lebanese, there is an Abbas surname listed with Abbe-branch Apps'/Abbs/EPPs, whom I can trace to EPPsteins. Therefore, God may have arranged the Abbas/Apps/Epps surname in order to point to the child-abuse relationship of Lori Frantzve and some military people whom she's been involved with.

You can click Abbas now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.

This week, Candace Owens is making some mild / subtle ties between Lori's daughter (Erika Kirk) to Jeffrey Epstein, investigating in hopes of finding stronger ties. This is the first I've heard of such a relationship, and one can suspect Trump's friendship with both Epstein and GhisLAINE Maxwell. Note Erika LANE Frantzve Kirk.

I'll start with a repeat from my 2nd update of last month, where the blue ocean waters in my Sleeping Beauty dream served evidence that I was on Epstein's island:

In the dream, I was transported from the shark-in-pool scene to a body of BLUE OCEAN WATER, and Oceans/Cains/Kane's/Keans have variations just like the Karla-related Keens, suggesting that Karla Frantzve Solomon [Erika Kirk's aunt] is an Epstein animal, for Waters share the Epstein Coat. Blue's are first known in Arran with the McCabe's having "salmon" in the colors of the Kane/Cain "fish," and, so amazing, Salmon-like Salome's list Solomons!!! Zowie, how can that be coincidental? It's suddenly linking the dream on Epstein's island to the friends and/or relatives of Lorin Frantzve.

The Oceans/Kane's probably point to Ro Khanna, who co-sponsored the bill of Thomas Massie to get the Epstein files released.

The other Irish Kane's/Cains use the fish in the colors of the Roach fish, and the latter Coat is in the colors and format of the Call trumpets. The white-on-green fish of Kane's/Cains are also those of VISSers, while Epstein's pilot was Mr. Visovski. Tromp-connectable Vise's/Vice's, sharing the cross of Wex's for what looks like a pointer to Les Wexner, are first known in Sussex with the Hams sharing the very-same "salmon" as McCabe's, which are white-on-green, same colors as the Kane and Visser "fish." Obama's Andrew McCabe comes to mind, a close friend of the Clintons.

The reason I've chosen that clip is that the McCabe's are also McAbbe's while Abbe's/Abbys have a version of the Abbas/Abb/Epp Coat! See that? And McCabe-connectable Salome's/Solomons are first known in Rhineland with Frans'/Frantz's. As Lori Frantzve and/or Erika Frantzve Kirk was involved with AUTO Busher, an alleged child trafficker in Romania, note the "Aut" motto term of McCabe's/McAbbe's. Abbe's/Abbys (Angus with Scottish Bride's) share an eagle's head in Crest with Scottish Bride's while McBride's are first known in Arran with McCabe's/McAbbe's.

Jewish, Arran-like Jewish Arens/Aarons share the quadrants of German Angels, and Auto Busher is thought to have been corrupt in relation to Romanian Angels. German Arens have "scales" while Scale's share the scallops of Abbas'/Apps/Epps and Abbe's/Abbys. Then, Shalls/Schals are first known in Rhineland with Frans/Frantz's while the Frantzve family under discussion opened Romanian Angels.

Shalls look like a branch of Salome's. Shallows/Shallys love the Anchors, a branch of Angers who in turn have the lozenges of English Angels in colors reversed. The latter are first known in Lancashire with Whalleys shoe share the whale with Shallows/Sallys. Incredible heraldry. Dols have another whale while the Dol Alans are first known in Shropshire with Sallows and with the Bats whose black bats get us to the black bat wings of Batons/Bastons in the "bastion" of English Angels. The FitzAlans of ARUNdels were in Arran-like Arun (Sussex with Shalleys/Shellys), and Arundels use "swallows," as do Swallows, first known in Lincolnshire with Fish.

I know of plenty of batons, for example used by Coffee-like Coughs/Cuffeys, but I know bastons only by Angels, and they show it as a CANE. The Cane's are listed with Oceans i.e. which gets us to the Kane "fish" in the colors of the McCabe/McAbbe salmon. Spanish Cane's share the Coat of Pasleys in colors reversed while Scottish Pasleys share the anchor of English Packs (Sussex with COFFERts and Arun) who are in turn in Anger colors and format. This is incredible heraldry. It's singing.

There's more because French France's are also LaFrench's while French's share the green dolphin in Crest with Coffee's/Coffers. The Dolphins/Dolfins (Dol colors) were previously first known in Surrey with Salemans and early, McCabe-beloved Salmons, yet Dolphins/Dolfins are now first known in Cumberland with the first-known Salmons, and with FARE's. French's are first known in Devon with Sever-branch Saffers who share "Aut" with McCabe's, and Severs, sharing the Frans/Frantz annulet, are first known in Somerset with Bride-like Bridge's, and with the CofFARE's who share the Coffer variation with Coffee's. Coffare's share the crescents of KIRKbys, first known in Lancashire with English France's and Angels. Romanian Angels is in Constanta while "Constant" is a motto term of Pasley-beloved Rose's.

Then, Coffee's/Coffers, sharing the wavy fesse of McCabe's, share a green Crest with French's and McCabe's, and the latter's Irish branch shares the green griffin in Crest with Leslie's, first known in Aberdeenshire with Coffee-beloved Cups/Cope's, and with Prophets who have a giant LEG in the colors of McCabe's. I'll remind that the latter have a McABBE variation. Leggs almost have the Trump Coat, and Trump, this week, made Erika Kirk an official military advisor, very suspicious.

I'll add that one Francis surname is first known in Derbyshire with the Cherrys sharing the Frans/Frantz annulet.

Then, the Abbas'/Abbs/Epps, previously said to be first known in Middlesex, near Epping, near the first-known Cabe-like Cape's, and near also the first-known Scale's, share the Scale and Abbe/Abbey scallops while Scayle's/SCHOOLs share the lozengy Shield of OREMs/Orrins (Aberdeenshire) while Erika and Charlie Kirk faked Charlie's death at a school in Orem, Utah. Scale's are first known in Hertfordshire with the Childs sharing the Francis eagles, and with the Orrin-like Orne's, though the latter are also first known in Middlesex with early Abbas'/Apps'/Epps and Stein(son)-branch Stains. EppSTEIN.

Fare's (share the Ferman and Firmin ANCHOR) are first known in Cumberland with DAGGERs while DEXARoi peoples lived on the APSUS river that flows down into Fier county of Albania, explaining why Abbas'/Apps'/Epps were previously first known in Middlesex with Fiers/Fears. Ferman share a green Crest with Coffee's/Coffers who are in turn in the colors of CofFARE's. Hovers/Hoffers share a Hoff variation with English Hoffs (Cheshire with Overs/Offers, Bride-branch Brights and Sale's) while Kirkbys and Coffare's/Coffers (Somerset with English Heffers) share the crescents of Irish Heffers, and then Sale's almost have the Coat of Cuffs and Cuffee's.

Repeat from above: "GhisLAINE Maxwell. Note Erika LANE Frantzve Kirk." English Lane's share the triple lions in pale of English Heffers, the latter first known in Somerset, where Frants/Friends (scroll down the page to "Friend") were previously first known. English Hoffs almost have the Coat of Frantz-beloved Goats/Gothams, the latter first known in Nottinghamshire with Frants/Friends.

The triple Lane lions are also of Irish Brians while Briancon/BRIGANTium) is in Savoy, where French Bride's are first known who apparently share a version of the Lane and Day Shield, for Heffers are first known in the same place as Bridge's and Days. The triple lions of the three surnames are almost the three of Englands, first known in Yorkshire with Brigdens and early Briggs (share McBride cinquefoil). The three of Lane's are called "lion's of England". McBride's, first known in Arran with McCabe's/McAbbe's.

The fretty Shield of Brigdens is shared with French Cottons/Cotta's, first known in Languedoc with Constans'/Constants who in turn share the stars of French Bride's, Brights, Days and Lane's. As it's Brigdens having the "Constans" motto term, we note the "Constant and TRUE" motto term of Scottish Rose's, for it explains the rose in the Brigden Crest. German KIRKners (Silesia with German Rose's) use a church while Church's are first known in Somerset with Brigden-like Bridge's and Days. English YOUNGs, first known in Essex with Angel-branch Angers, share the Coat of German Rose's. Brigham YOUNG of the Mormons. Turning Point loves Mormons.

True's/Tree's/Trows are in the pine tree of Constans'/Constants, and as Constanta is in Romania with a Trotus river, we go to the Trots sharing the six pale bars of Coats'/Cotes while the Cottons/Cotta's are also Cotys'. Romans/Romania's and Lane's share the split-Shield colors of Engels/Aingels/EngelBRECHTs, and while Romania is beside Ukraine, those split colors are the Ukraine flag. Then, English Angels are also Angle's, and I arrived to Engels/Aingels due to the "lions of England" of Lane's. Erika Lane Frantzve Kirk.

Ukraine Romans love the Rose's to assure that some of these surnames under discussion bumped into, and married, ancient rulers of Constanta, for heraldry almost-always pertains to rulers, often of the Varangian RUS of Ukraine. As "Robertians" had been French kings, it's notable that both France surnames share the lion of French Roberts and Propers/Roberts/Robins while French Robins, in Robertson and Ross colors and format, are first known in Brittany with French Brians while Irish Brians share the Robert lion too. Ruperts, sharing the quadrants of German Angels (rose) and Jewish Arens/Aarons, love the Rose's.

Robertians descended from rulers of WORMs (Germany). ORMs named Ormskirk in Lancashire, where English France's are first known. Orms share the eagle of Snake's/Snooks, first known in Kent with Dragons/Drains while German Dragons are first known in Silesia with Kirkners while Worms show only dragons. Here's from my 1st update in March, 2024:

I've seen the Augusta location on the Trotus as "Angusta," and I had found a "Vrm" character as count of Angusta, father of Helena. I didn't realize until now that Vrm could have been named after a noble of "Urmia," for Nairi lived at lake Urmia [land of king Rusa]. The Robertians, otherwise called the royal Capetians, are from Worms elements (Germany, and Roberts and Propers/Roberts/Robins share the Lane/Lawn lion. Launay is near Brest, and that's the general area of the first-known Helens who look like kin of Este's expected in the Hagar motto.

The Trotus drains into the AGARus, now the Siret, and French Roberts are first known in Burgundy with Snake-loving Sirets. Snake's/Snooks share the eagle of Vrm- / Worm-like Orms. The HEADs/Heeds (Norfolk with Orions/Irons) have the Este horse HEADs as unicorn heads, and Orms are said to be from "Orm de HEDoc." Heads/HEEDs were a branch of Haydens who have a SPOTTed dog for linking to Spottens/Spauldings and the ermine spot of Englands (Yorkshire with Orms). Spottens/Spauldings share the buckle of Leslie's in turn first known in Aberdeenshire with Orrins/Orems. Orm of HEDoc.

Ahh, Yorkshire is also where VERMins/Firmins and Formans/Fermens are first known, as well as Brighams whose Coat is much like the Vermin/Firman Coat! Formans/Fermans share the Ermine/Army and Robert lion! Candace Owens is married to Mr. Farmer. As Vermins/Firmins share the Farmer lion heads, it traces these batch of similar surnames well to count "Vrm," suspect as father to the Helen bloodline. Hells happen to share the Coat of Bridge-beloved Crabs!

Owens (Wales with Welsh Roberts) can be sharing the lion of Welsh Roberts, first known in Denbighshire with English Brians and Bathers. Wales may have been named from Wallachians of Romania, for Wales'/Walls (share Robertson and Scarf wolf head), looking like kin of Masters (Yorkshire with Scarfs), incorporate the Ukraine flag in colors reversed, meaning that Wales'/Walls (same place as Holders, beside Sheriffs) look related to Lane's/Lawns. Scarfs almost have the Bather Coat. Sheriffs share Wales/Wall and Erik fleur-de-lys, and the the Master and Holder griffins (Worm colors).

Bathers and Scarfs have wolves in the colors of the Romania/Roman wolf while Angels/Angle's love the Baston variation of Batons whose French branch shares triple-red roses in Chief with Ukraine Romans.

Though not in the same color, Gilberts and Holder-branch Holds/Holts share a squirrel while Squirrels (Devon with Gilberts) are also Scarf-like Square's while German Scherfs/Schare's share a Schere variation of Snake-loving Austrian Schere's. Snake's share the Orm eagle. Holds/Holts are first known in Lancashire with Ormskirk, said to be named by Orm of HEDOC," and Gilberts have a "heddwch" motto term.

Launays/Lawneys have the Angel/Angle lozenges in colors reversed, can we believe it? Launay is in Brittany with the Lane/Lawn-beloved Roys, and with the first-known Helena-like Helens who in turn look very related to Heads/Heeds and English Este's, the latter first known in Essex with Angel-branch Angers! Robertians were on the French throne as CAPETians, and Capes'/Capets are first known in London with Launays/Lawneys, tending to prove that the "lions of England" of Lane's/Lawns are the Robert lion.

If that's not enough, Capes'/Capets share the scallops of Abbas'/Apps/Epps and Abbe's/Abbys, yet they are also the scallops of Scottish Morleys/Mauls (Yorkshire, beside Frants/Friends) who in turn share the vertically-split Frans/Frantz Shield while Francis' are first known in Derbyshire with English Morleys. Morley-branch MORlands/Mauleys happen to share the fleur-de-lys of Arrows who are in the arrows of MOORmans.

We are thus in amazing territory because the Frantzve's under discussion opened Romanian Angels (housed lost or loner children) in Constanta (Romania) while "Constans" is a motto term of Brigdens. The Kirk's chose to fake Charlie's death in front of Mormons in a Mormon state, and Brigham Young was the second president of the Mormon church. Brighams are first known in Yorkshire with Brigdens (beside Smiths).

The first Mormon president and founder, Joseph Smith, takes us to Smiths sharing the heron with ORNE's/Horns. Orrins are also Orems, signalling Orem, Utah. I say that Arran of the McCabe's / McBride's was related to Orions/Irons of Airaines', for the latter is in Picardy with ABBEville, but also with the first-known French France's/LaFrench's who share the lion of English France's, first known in Lancashire with ORMsKIRK and Kirkbys. Orions/Irons are first known in Norfolk with Brains (not "Brian").

German Arens (another rose) happen to share the eagle of Orms, and the lone fleur-de-lys of Eriks who in turn share the saltire of French Brians. It just appears that Someone arranged these heraldic links as pointers to Erika Kirk and company, not because He likes them. Spanish Romans, sharing a lone, red pale bar with Brains, have four of that fleur-de-lys.

The lion of Lane-beloved Englands is given an "ermine spot on the shoulder," and Ermine's/ARMYs, first known in Lincolnshire with SPOTTens/Spauldings, share the Lane lion. The "Hinc" motto term of Spottens/Spauldings must be for the Hinks because they look like they share the Ermine/Army Coat but with the lions of England in their Chief. English Cottons, who love the Hink- and Angel-like Hanks/Anke's (Lincolnshire) are first known in Huntingdonshire with Abbas'/Apps/Epps, and with the Engains/Gains suspect in the Brain motto.

Hinks have a saltire in the colors of the Marine, Mariner and Orion/Iron cross, and Romanian Angels partnered with the U.S. Marines, though we may assume the army to have some involvement in whatever Romanian Angels morphed into under the public radar. Italian Angels are first known in Treviso with Saffer-beloved Vita's who in turn share the Sever/Saver, Frans/Frantz and Cherry annulet. Francis' and Cherrys are first known in Derbyshire with Haddens having a "Suffer" motto term. Haydens use SPOTs. Angels/Angle's are first known in Lancashire with Treviso-like Travis'/Trevis', kin likely of Buckleys and/or SPOTTen-beloved Buckle's. Spottens share the buckles of Leslie's, the latter first known in Aberdeenshire with a Tarves location. Treviso was anciently, Tarvisium. Buckleys are first known in Cheshire with Hink-like Ince's/Inch's sharing the Inch/Hinch Coat.

Italian Angels share the brown lion with Ankels/Ansels who in turn share the lozenges of Anger-branch Anchors. The VERMins/Firmins and Formans/Fermans love the Anchors.

While Cottons/Cotta's are also Cottards, Hinks are first known in Oxfordshire with Francis', Cottars and COUCH's (look related to Trots and Coats'/Cotes') expected in the "couchant lion" of Tints, first known in Somerset with the Heffers sharing the lions of England of Lane's (Staffordshire with Coats'/Cotes'). The Tint lion is also the one of Englands, and the "ROYal tents" of Tintons can explain the "roy" motto term of Lane's. French Brians are first known in Brittany with Launay and French Roys.

Cottars are in the colors and near-format of the Froggit frogs, and the latter surname (Derbyshire with Cherrys and the other Francis') love the Cherrys who in turn share the Frans/Frantz annulets. Froggits are said to descend from Roger de FrogCOT.

In the recent past, I've mistaken Erika's middle name, Lane, as that of her mother.

A true Christian would not take the military appointment that Trump just gave Erika, a position previously held by Charlie Kirk. This is not a good time for Christians to be involved in Middle-East wars, would you agree? The Americans are the first people I suspect to furnish the False Prophet with "fire from the sky." Trump's Space Force comes to mind, and Erika is now on an Air Force board. Turning-Point people were at Trump's political rally in Arizona for his 2016 presidential bid.

I've been warning for years against a potential desire to do an EMP false-flag event conducted by the American military on U.S. soil, and it just so happens that Erika's mother was involved in EMP "protection." Who better to conduct an EMP false flag now that the Kirk-shooting event has proven to be from crisis-actors conducting a world-class staged event? The air force is needed to drop EMP bombs. A military false flag is blamed on another country. Trump is adamant in going to war at this time, as if he's been waiting for this day. He would love to be the world dictator, which can explain why he generally hates the European rulers, his competition.

Jaco Booyens in the Sleeping Beauty Dream

Baron Coleman's Wednesday show, where he introduced Lori Frantzve's maiden name, was taken down by youtube immediately, but was up the next day with blurred-out documents. One person in the comments: "9 hours ago YouTube covered up every doc related to Lori aboss [sic] name and connections to anything." Someone says the show is at Rumble without censorship. At a facebook page: "Truly fascinating update. Erika Kirk’s mother, Loretta Ann “Lori” Abbas Frantzve, is of Lebanese heritage." I've seen her name also as Lorin. Anns, first known in Yorkshire beside Frants/Friends, almost have the Frant/Friend Coat.

In that Wednesday show, Baron exposes that Lori Abbas was a board-of-director of American Center For Freedom. American Center For Freedom (2020) is years older than Share Together, which was a charity opened (Fort Worth) in 2012 with Jaco Booyens as a director. He named it alternatively, Jaco Booyens Ministries (2019), which advertises itself as saving sex-trafficked children. These orgs look like Turning-Point and Trumpian elements, judging by the players.

Just when half the world is wondering whether the Frantzve's have secretly been child traffickers under the guise of running military-related orphanages, Baron comes up with Frantzve involvement in what could be a Christian disguise for child trafficking.

Likewise a director in American Center for Freedom was Jaco Booyens. "Jaco" looks ready-made for a pointer. Here's from my last update: "On his Sunday show, [Baron] shows evidence that Erika Kirk and/or her mother was involved in child trafficking in Jaco, Costa Rica, with a company, KidsFirst."

Why might Jaco's share the Marine and Mariner Coat? Jaco's are first known in Andalusia with the Lucents/Luca's in the motto of Irish Morine's. Lucks/Luke's are first known in Berwickshire with BOYs. Jaco BOOYens. Luce's/Lucys share pikes with the Geds who are in turn in Boy colors and format.

Why might Jack-branch Joke's be first known in Kent with Mariners, Rica-like Ricketts/Rackets, and Morinis-descended Deerings? Joke's are in Scottish Roman colors and format. Why might Marine's be first known in Hampshire with Cost-connectable Porters and Rich's? Jaco, COSTa RICa. Ricketts love the Rose's who have a "Constant" motto term. Ricks are first known in Cheshire with Actons (share Rick, Rish, Risco, and Rigg fesse) who in turn have an Axton location in Kent i.e. with the first-known Ricketts/Rackets.

Maria's and Marina's look they share the symbol of Clements while "Clementia" and "RIGore" are motto terms of Frantz-connectable MORleys/Maule's (Yorkshire with SCAYLE's/Schools). "Rigore" can be part-code for Gore's (Kent with Mariners and Trips) who in turn share the crosslets of English Trips who in turn share the SCALing ladder (different colors) with Welsh MORRis' who in turn share the Busher lion. Otto Busher of Romanian child-abuse, friend of the Frantzve's. Scale's share the Morley/Maul scallops. Scayle's/Schools (same place as Morleys/Mauls) were likely kin of Orems, and I say the murder of Kirk at Orem's school was RIGGed.

Gore's almost have the Coat of Engains/Gains, first known in Huntingdonshire with the Abbas'/Apps/Epps sharing the Scale scallops. Abbas'/Apps/Epps even have a string of lozenges in the colors of the Scayle and Orem lozengy. Huntingdons (love the nearby Horns/Orne's) are in Rigg colors and format. My sleeping-bag dream featured an old friend, David Morley, which is how I discovered that Welsh Davids are from king David of Scotland, father of Henry, earl of Huntingdon. The last scene in the sleeping bag dream pointed to crisis actors used at the Kirk-shooting event (I won't go over all of that here). What God sets out to accomplish, nobody can thwart.

God's brutality at Armageddon needs to be justified by exposures beforehand of why this world deserves Armageddon. God needs to expose until we are all sick to the core of our souls, which I am already. Hang in there, have patience, switch off the news if you need to refresh yourselves.

Huntingdons are in the colors and format of WEFer-branch Wafers/WAYfers (Herefordshire with Morris' and Maurice's) while Jaco BOOYens (Fort Worth) opened up a Way Ranch (Texas). Ways/Weigh's, with fish in BOY colors and format, and having two wavy-white fesses to go with the one wavy-white fesse of Wafers/Wayfers, are first known in Dorset with Bushers sharing the Morris lion. Morleys/Mauls (almost the Jack scallops) are first known in Yorkshire with Bush's and Joke-branch Jacks. Ways/Weigh's have a "baton" to go with the "bastion" of Angels/Angle's, and while English Batons/Bastons have black bat wings, Bats with black bats are first known in Shropshire with Hunts/Hunters whom share their saltire.

Maurice-connectable MERICKs, first known in ANGLESey, share the Boy/Bo/Boeddu Chief, and moreover share the seahorse (different color) in Crest with Jack- and Joke-related Brokers! MERCY Me, for Jaco Booyens was/is a pastor of a Mercy Church. Angle-branch Angers are first known in Essex with Broke's and Brooks. Merics (not "Merick") share the Israel Coat. Romanian Angels, suspect as an Israel crime scene. Wafers/Wayfers share a wavy fesse (different colors) with Mericks. Justice's are first known in Perthshire with the Rinds in turn sharing the Broker scallops.

The Baton/Baston bat wings are perfect because Wings/Winks were first known in Perthshire with their Justice kin, and Baron shows that Jaco opened up a residential-like company (official corporation) housing children called, Justice Reform. Wings (MOOR heads) share the lone pile of Hagels while Eagle's/Hegels are in the Coat of Jake's/Jackmans. The Justice-beloved Balance's have a giant eagle in colors reversed from the Jake/Jackman eagle. Italian Boys/Bo's/Boets share the giant bull of German Backs/Bachs while English Backs have the Balance Coat in colors reversed! JACo BOOYens.

Plus, while Boyens curiously bring up the Coat of Irish Brians, English Brians are first known in Denbighshire with Welsh Bachs/Baghs. English Backs are first known in Somerset with Heffers sharing the Irish Brian Coat.

Boyen-like Boyns share symbols of Hamiltons, first known in Renfrewshire with Scottish Jacks. Boyns and Hamiltons share the cinquefoil of Bus', the latter first known in Norfolk with Bags, Jack-beloved Hollys, Brains, and Drops/Trupe's while Troops/Trupe's are first known in Banffshire with Boyns. Boyens/Brians have a lion half in the colors of the Drop/Trupe lion, nailing Boyns to Boyens and proving that they were a Brian and/or Brain branch. Briancon was Brigantium (Savoy with Bride's) while Hamiltons of Arran were kin of McBride's (almost the Hamilton / Boyn cinquefoil).

The Boeddu variation of Boys/Bo's, and the "boo" motto term of Irish Kilpatricks, convinced me that God had Sleeping BEAUTY in the dream to point from bull-using Beautys/Bowds to bull-using Boys/Bo's/Boeddu's. Now we might know why, especially as some of her children moved from my area of the Texas hills to Fort Worth. By "she," I'm referring to the first fulfillment of Sleeping Beauty, Miss Hicks, who married Dr. Hamilton William Kilpatrick III, her doctor of 31 years her elder. He pulled Miss Hicks out of her mother's womb, and married her at about age 20. I'm not suggesting he was a pedophile, but it could seem as though God chose this couple to be of the dream in order to point to pedophilia in the circle of Jaco Boyens. Last I saw Mr. Kilpatrick, he was in church.

Irish Kilpatricks even share a "laidir" motto term with Boyens/Brians! That is totally amazing. I have not known the Boyen and Boyn surnames before, so far as I can recall. Sleeping Beauty is pointing hard as a bull's horn to Jaco Booyens. Jack-beloved Hollys are first known in Norfolk with Patricks, with Hyke's/Hake's and Higgs, and with Boyn-connectable Drops/Trupe's in the "blood drops" of Scottish Kilpatricks.

Repeat from above: "Jaco's are first known in Andalusia with the Lucents/Luca's in the motto of Irish Morine's. Lucks/Luke's are first known in Berwickshire with BOYs. Jaco BOOYens. Luce's/Lucys [Norfolk with Patricks] share pikes with the Geds who are in turn in Boy colors and format." According to a Geddes-family webpage online, Geds ("DuRAT" motto term) were on the Nith river of Kilpatrick castle, and they became the Geddes' (Nairnshire with Rose's and Rats). Geddes' happen to have pike fish heads in the colors of the fish of German Butts/BOETs, and Boys/Bo's/Boeddu's are likewise Boets.

Kilpatricks ("make" motto term) were kin of Maxwells, a pointer to Ghislaine Maxwell, we may assume. Maxwells share the giant and double-headed eagle of Worths. Fort Worth. English Forts share a bee with Maxwell-branch Maxtons, and the neighboring Boys use bees. The Fort motto looks related to the motto of Maxwell-sept Pollocks, the latter first known in Renfrewshire with Hamiltons.

I've just found the Boyens mentioned in three files only, twice in 2016, and once in 2011. They are 11 times in the 2nd of November, 2016, along with the Boyne's. I went to Boyens after starting on Boyne's like so: "Mar of Scotland was beside Banffshire, and that's where Boyne's were first found while royal Tara was at the Boyne river. Boyne's share the motto of Hamiltons,..." Scottish Mars have two of the Drop/Trupe lion while Troops/Trupe's are first known in Banffshire too.

We then find that Jaco's Justice Reform is connected to Mercy Church (Fort Worth) whose head pastor is Jaco himself. His wife works in the modeling and acting business such as to evoke Epstein's pedophilia business promising the girls a modeling and/or acting career. It's a means to attract attractive ladies like a predator.

I can't recall how Baron connected Landen Schott to Mercy Church, but Baron claims Landen serves on the advisory board in Washington (aka Paula White et-al) through which Trump masquerades as a Christian-evangelical supporter. English Schotts/Scotts (Kent with Joke's) share the black griffin in Crest with Jake's/Jackmans (Essex with Joke-connectable Brooks). White's share the eagle of Jake's/Jackmans. I can link Mercys to Dragons/Drainers (Kent with Mariners) and Potters, the latter first known in Hampshire with Dragon-beloved Drake's, Marine's, and Ports/PAWTERs (Potter colors) sharing the bell of French Costs/Costa's (Languedoc with Constants).

Brooks are first known in Essex with Brocks/Broke's while Brokers have the Jack and Joke Coats in other colors. Brokers share the sea horse (different color) with Sea-branch Seamans, and Sea's are first known in Kent with Joke's. The Broker scallops are those of Mallets, first known in Suffolk with Seamans. Pointer to the U.S. Marines?

Hampshire is where Hone's are first known suspect in the "Honestum" motto term of Hamburgs. While German Trips are first known in Hamburg, English Trips share the Hamburg crosslets. Dragons/Drainers (in the Mercy Crest) are first known in Kent with English Trips who share the scaling ladder with Morris', a branch of Mercy-like Maurice's. French Jacques' are first known in Picardy with French France's who in turn share the Maurice Coat. It appears that this heraldic set is making a Jaco Booyens link to the Frantzve's.

When Baron shows merely emails between Jeffrey Epstein and Lesley Groff, one of Jeffrey Epstein's managers and/or advisors and/or bosses, youtube blurs it out, even though these emails are public turf in the government-released Epstein files. Shame, youtube, shame, protector of pedophilia. The reason youtube blocked these emails is that Ms. Groff shows herself to be a good friend of a Jena Masquelier, who in turn works for Jaco Booyens. Small world, as they say.

Jena's surname looks like a branch of Mascarelli's/Mascelli's (pine cones) or Masci's/Mascelli's (wings), and the Cone-branch Conte's had a Conte/Comites branch, first known in Languedoc with pine-tree Constants/Contans, Costs (share white bell with French Jeans), and French Jeans!!! We just got a pointer here to Constanta while on Jena Masquelier. Italian Conte's share the First lion, in case this can be a pointer to KidsFirst in Jaco, Costa Rica, for Cone's are first known in Kent with Jack-branch and Busher-connectable Joke's.

Young-beloved English Jeune's/Jenns happen to share the fleur-de-lys of English Constantine's/Costantine's (Devon with Pine's and Firsts, beside English Jeans/Jane's), while Constants/Contans (pine cones) are likewise Constantine's. Jena's/JENE's, new to me here, are not only first known in Silesia with the Rose's sharing the Young Coat (roses), but Scottish Rose's have a "Constant" motto term. But that's not all because I, with a Masci grandmother, had no shirt on in the Sleeping Beauty dream, but only my JEANs!!! Zikers, Jena Masquelier must have been at that shirtless scene.

I was BARE BREASTed at that scene while Bare's/Barrs can point to Bill Barr, son of the school principal who supposedly gave the wink for hiring Jeffrey Epstein as a high-school math teacher in New York. Brests/Brix's were a branch of Massey-related Bricks, and were probably, along with Bryse's and Brush's, variations from the Bruce's in the Jean/Jane Coat. After seeing myself with jeans only, I BRUSHed the knee of Sleeping Beauty, and Brush's are first known in Suffolk with Kidds. KidsFirst?

I was on a sandy beach with only jeans on, and Firsts (new to me this week) happen to have fitchee crosses in the colors of the Sandy and Sand fitchees. Plus, Sandys are first known in Worcestershire, where Jeans/Jane's were previously first known. Zowie, the Sandy and Sand fitchees are also those of Darlene's, first known in Devon with Firsts, and Darlene-branch Darlingtons are first known in Durham with the Conte's/Comitissa's who share the Cone antlers! Darlingtons incorporate the motto of Masons/Massins, first known in Kent with Cone's. The Cruce's in the Darlington motto are first known in Languedoc with Conte's/Comites', and it's Italian Conte's who share the First lion. French Croziers are first known in Auvergne with French Jeune's. Power-packed.

The Shirts/SHARDs (Cheshire with Masseys and Dunham Masci) play into the shirtless scene because SARDinia is where Bondi's/Blondi's are first known while Trump replaced do-nothing Bill Barr with Pam Bondi, who's the official boss of the Epstein-file release, yet she's covering for world-class criminals and child molesters. She deserves by now to be severely punished, for she's had enough time to repent, and to betray Trump's will by carrying out the will of Jesus, whom she claims to serve.

Bare's/Barrs share the lion head of English Dance's whose Coat looks related to the Sandy / Sand Coats, and then Italian Dance's are first known in the same place as Mascarelli's/Mascelli's and Masci's/Mascelli's.

To show some concise evidence that God is pointing to Jena MASQUELier, Jena's/Jene's have a "fox," as do English Foss', first known in Sussex with Mascals. Fossa is in Abruzzo while Abruzzo's/Abreu's almost have the Coat of French Jeans. Portuguese Abreu's share the wing of Masci's/Mascelli's, first known in Piedmont with Mascarelli's/Mascelli's.

As Baron points out, Jena's job description includes what looks like accommodating cross-border children at the Texas-Mexico border. It does appear suspicious, but then if it's not criminal, it's understandable that Jaco's ministry might like to support abused Mexican children. Yet if God is pointing to Jena via the Sleeping Beauty dream on Epstein's island, it looks criminal.

Epstein's island does have a sandy beach, and by the way, Beach's share the Shield of Clappers, the latter first known in Surrey with James' and Sands. Sanders share the elephant with Mascals. James Clapper was Obama's Intelligence Chief, and Epstein owned Little and Big Saint James islands. James', sharing the Jean/Jane lion, have the Joke scallops in colors reversed! Lookie there, another pointer to Jena Masquelier.

Lori Abbas and Jaco Boyens were directors for the now defunct American Center For Freedom. Also listed as a director is John Duplaise, Lori's buddy from Turning-Point involvement. Lorry's are first known in Dumfries with Kilpatricks, and they were a branch of Glorys/Lowrys expected in the motto of Frantz-connectable Saffers.

The DuPLAISE's can take us to Place's/Plaise's sharing the lion of French Roberts, and while Kilpatricks were kin of Maxwells, GhisLAINE Maxwell was daughter of Robert Maxwell, British-Israeli spy. English Laine's were shown having the Robert and Boyen/Brian lion, and then Italian Lane's are first known in Brescia, beside PLACEntia, home of the Ananes Gauls, explaining why Annandale's (Dumfries with Kilpatricks and Leggs) have a "Placit" motto term. Thus, John Duplaise may know Ghislaine Maxwell. Brescia is beside Val Trompia while Trumps almost have the Coat of Leggs.

Asking google for "John Duplaise 'American Center for Freedom'", google was programmed to pretend it doesn't known a John Duplaise in relation to that organization. But when I asked for "John Duplaise 'Jaco Booyens' 'American Center for Freedom'", it skirted the censorship program and coughed up: "American Center for Freedom. ... It was incorporated in Texas in May 2021 and the directors listed are Jaco Booyens, Lori Abbas, John Duplaise,...'American Center For Freedom' appears in search results as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, often listed as 'Freedom of Religion Inc. the American Center for Freedom,' based in Lakewood, NJ." Perhaps it closed down in Fort Worth and re-opened as the new-name company in New Jersey.

Mercys are first known in Gloucestershire (beside Maurice's) with Griefs/Greafs while Graffs are listed with Groffs. See that? Jaco Booyens of Mercy Church. Scherf-like Sheriffs are first known beside Gloucestershire, and George Bush, whom I trace to Scherffs, lives in Texas with Jaco Booyens.

English Bush's share the black boar with BOTHs/Booths (Yorkshire with Bush's). "PRUDentia" is a motto term of Scherf-connectable Wilkins while Prude's/Pride's are first known in Lanarkshire with the BOTHwells having a "boy" in Crest for a possible pointer to Jaco Booyens. Bostons/Bustons share the Coat of Hume's, first known in Berwickshire with Boys, and the True's in the Hume Coat are listed with Tree's, formerly first known in Warwickshire with Sheriffs. Scarfs, with wolf heads in the colors of the Romania/Roman wolf, are first known in Yorkshire with Bush's, Romney-connectable Pullings, and Bothwell-like Boswells/Boywells. The latter have the Mercy cinquefoils in colors reversed, how more than curious.

Boswells/Boywells show a Bovill variation while Boys/Bo's/Boeddu's show Bovelli's.

It get's interesting where Wilkin-like Wilks/Wilkinhoffs share a black anchor with Groffs/Graffs, in case Jaco was familiar with Lesley Groff. She was petitioning Epstein to treat Jena with favoritism, and while Jeans/Jane's are expected with the scallops of Pullys/PULLINGs (Yorkshire with Bush's, Walkers and Jean-connectable Brice's), Bothwells have "A boy pulling down a green pine tree" to go with the Constant pine tree. French Pine's share the crescents of English Walkers, and Constanta is near Walker-like Wallachia. Pullys/Pullings have a "palleSCERE" motto term.

The Coat of English Bush's could be related to Scottish Romans, and then the Pully/Pulling Coat looks related to the Coat of Romneys while Mitt Romney's Mormon family seems applicable to the Bush presidents. Mitt Romney and his father, George WILCKEN Romney, operated out of Boston, I kid thee not. Mitt is a Bushite war hawk, and pro-Israel.

President George Herbert Walker Bush, who hired Bill Barr as his U.S. Attorney General, descended from Smiths, which, when first learning of it, made me suspect that Prescott Bush, Nazi-collaborating banker, was descended from Joseph Smith, Mormon founder. Prescott's grandmother was Miss Smith, and I say he faked being the father of president Bush, whom I think was born George Herbert Scherff Jr, son of a Nazi.

It's notable that Rose-loving German Walkers look related to the Coat Rose-loving German Schere's/Scherfs who in turn share the vertically-split colors of the Wilkins. While Welks/Wilkinhoffs probably have the Dents in their motto, Dance's (Yorkshire with Dance's, Walkers and Bush's) have the vertically-split Wilken and Scherf Shield in colors reversed, and add the Barr lion head. These Scottish Barrs share the giant Este eagle while "ESTote" is a Wilken motto term. Walkers use "HonESTa." Hone's, whose Honey branch gets us to Boy-beloved Bee's, are first known in Hampshire with Potters sharing to Boswell/Boywell/Bovill cinquefoils.

While Pullys/Pullings are first known in Yorkshire with Joke-branch Jacks, Romneys are first known in Kent with English Goods, and with the Joke's (Stick colors) and Snake's while Austrian Schere's have "a SNAKE entwined aROUND a STICK." The Stick Coat is shared with German Goods, first known in Switzerland with Graffs/Groffs. It's helping to show that Joke's and Jacks are a pointer to Jaco Booyens. The black eagle in the Crest of Austrian Schere's is shared by Jake's/Jackmans (Essex with Rounds, and with Brooks sharing the Joke scallops).

The Tote's possibly in "EsTOTE" are first known in HAMPshire, which is southern Hampton. There's lots of talk from Candace Owens about Charlie Kirk's death and an argumentative meeting he had with pro-Israeli people at "the Hamptons." I'm just wondering why Amptons/Hamptons are in the colors and format of English Walkers (Yorkshire with Toots/Tute's/Touts). Irish Hamps share the fleur-de-lys of English Bush's. But closet, Americanized Nazis in high government positions are not expected to be pro-Israel. However, these neo-Nazis could have joined pro-Israel Rothschilds just because they were bought off by the criminal Rothschilian syndicates. I always thought that Bush invaded the Middle East on behalf of Rothschilds.

I'd like to go back to the "riGORE" motto term of Morleys/Mauls, first known in Yorkshire with Anns/Hanne's, Bush's, Walkers and GOWers/Gore's. Walkers use "Honesta," and Gore-connectable Hamburgs use "HonesTUM." Hone's share the double fesses of bee-using Honeys (Worcestershire with TUME's), and Hamburgs are first known in Oxfordshire with Bee's while Scottish Boys show only bees. Gore's are first known in Kent with Joke's while Gowers/Gore's are first known in Yorkshire with Jacks. Jaco BOOYens. Hamburgs use drops while Drops/Trupe's are expected as a branch of Troops/Trupe's, first known in Banffshire with Boyns. Irish Smiths are listed with Gows.

Drops/Trupe's share a Shield of black drops with Utters/Otterburns (otter heads) while Otters/Others and FENDERs/Venders (otter head) are first known in Huntingdonshire with Abbas'/Apps/Epps! I first saw Sleeping Beauty in a distance walk around the fender of a car to the hood! A CLOSE-up of her face flashed before me, and noting that she's beautiful, I started to walk toward her, then saw myself WALKing with only jeans on. Walks/Wachs (same place as Drop-loving Kilpatricks) share the garb of Close's and WAKEfields, both first known in Yorkshire with Walkers.

Kilpatricks have blood drops with their "dagger" while Bloods/Bluds look related to the Maxwell Crest that itself adds a "holly bush," and while Scottish Jacks love Hollys, English Jacks share the scallops of Daggers/Dackers. Scottish Maxwells are known in Roxburghshire with Utters/Otterburns, and English Maxwells in Yorkshire with Bush's. It could be signalling that Jaco Booyens knows Ghislaine Maxwell.

Gowers/Gore's share the white wolf in Crest with Gore's and Amptons/Hamptons, and white goat heads are in Crest with Bush's, Frans'/Frantz's and Timms/Time's, meaning that the "FRANGas" motto term of Gowers/Gore's can be for the Frans / France bloodline. Frangas-like Francis' are first known in Derbyshire with English Morleys. Gore's are first known in Kent with Smith-beloved Anvils/Hanville's, Timms/Time's, and with Deerings sharing the Ann/Hanne Coat, almost the Frants/Friend Coat. The Morinis'/Morine's in Deering ancestry share the Timm/Time fleur-de-lys. Gore's share the HAMburg crosslets.

"RIGore." One Rigg Coat shares the chevron-with-annulets of English Walkers (Yorkshire, beside English Smiths), half in the colors of the Franz/Frants annulets, and then Bush's share the white goat in Crest with Frans'/Frantz's (Rhineland with Dume's and German Bush's) and Time's/Timms (Kent with Masons/Massins). Dume's, suspect in the motto of heron-using Horns/Orms and Masons/Massins, have a giant heron to go with the heron in the Crest of English and Scottish Smiths. "Dum" is a motto term of the Riggs under discussion. German Barrs have hunting HORNs.

The Rigg and Bush annulets are shared by Ladys/Laudymans, first known in NorthAMPTONshire while Amptons/Hamptons are in Walker colors and format. Charlie rigged his death some five weeks after the Hamptons meeting. German Schere's/Scherfs have a rose "plant," and French Plants/Planque's love the Cabbage's, first known in Northamptonshire. Cabbage's ("omniBUS") share the lion of English Tillers, first known in Glamorganshire with Scherf-connectable Wilkins. See that?

English Plants (London with Launays/Lawneys) love the Rose's, and Plantagenets (London) share the triple Lane/Lawn and Heffer lions, yet they are also the triple lions in pale of Boyens/Brians. Heffers are first known in Somerset with the Sticks in the Coat of Austrian Schere's. Is Jaco Boyens connected to the Bush circle, and or is he descend by Americanized Nazi's.

William Hitler, nephew of Adolf, lives/lived in PATCHogue of Long Island, New York, beside a Scheriff family that I found in West Islip that married the family of a Jeffrey Dein, who himself lived in Post Falls, Idaho, a few miles from Hayden Lake, headquarters of Aryan Nation. Islips, a branch of Hazels (Devon with Patch's), share the LODGEd stag with Kilpatrick-branch Maxwells, and the latter place it under a "holly bush". Hollys are first known in Norfolk with Patricks, and Irish Kilpatricks are also Patchie's and Sheera's while Sheers/Shere's share (almost) the Schere/Scherf fitchee.

Scottish Kilpatricks (share Maxwell saltire) are first known in DUMfries with Walks, and with Lorrys in turn sharing the brown tree stump and motto of Lauders. Maxwell-beloved LODge's are first known in Suffolk with the Glasgow-beloved Lords/LAUDs. Ladys/Laudymans are first known in NorthAMPTONshire. Lauders share a brown tree stump with Corcorans, and Corks/Corrs have the lion tails of Tillers (same place as Scherf-connectable Wilkens).

Having said that: "The Corcoran Group has a significant presence on Long Island, particularly through its expansion into the Hamptons." Then, "As of 2025, [Erika Kirk] works as a real estate agent at the Corcoran Group in New York City." Baron Coleman thinks that this real-estate job of Erika's is a sham, or a front for housing children. Is Erika connected to Nazi elements of Long Island? In one show (don't know which) this week, Candace says she thinks Erika was an Epstein animal to some degree via the modeling world, probably as per her Corcoran sham.

William Hitler, son of Miss GLASSl and Adolf's father, gave himself a new surname, Stewart-Houston. Houstons (hourGLASS) are first known at Glasgow, and the Stewart Arms are in that region, including in the Arms of Renfrewshire. Glass'/Glassicks share the mermaid with Masons/Massins who in turn love the Spears/Spire's, first known in Renfrewshire with Glasgow, with Scottish Jacks, and with Boyn-related Hamiltons. Jaco Booyen. Scottish Jacks show only holly. Another hourglass is with BOOKs (Berwickshire with Boys and Boston-connectable Hume's) who are in turn beloved by Schott-related Roets, kin of Boy-like Bows/BOUGHs. Bostons are also BOWstowns.

Kims share the annulets of McKinneys, the latter first known in Peebles-shire with Scottish Romans. It's near Glasgow while the Lords/Lauds in the GLASgow motto have the Kim cinquefoils in colors reversed, meaning that Lords/Lauds look related to the French Pine Coat. The Pine and Boy-loving Bothwells are first known beside Glasgow. Amptons/Hamptons have the annulet of Kims and French Pine's in colors reversed, and Kims are first known in Bute with the Glass'/Glassicks (share mermaid with Masons/Massins) while Class'/Klassens have "LADY Fortune." Italian Fortuna's probably have the dog of Canossa's (see online), in the colors of the dog of the other Riggs having a "cano" motto term. "DEUM Time" became a motto of a Moray family, and Morays share the mermaid too.

Kim Walsh has been one of my topics, and George Bush Jr. married Laura Walsh. Romania's Wallachia, near Constanta. Walkers share the triple crescents of French Pine's, and BOSco's are said to have married Scottish Rose's having a "Constant and true" motto while True's, in the Hume motto, are also the Constant-beloved Tree's, first known in Wiltshire with Freys (Hume colors). Humphreys/HumFREYs. The "vrai" motto term of Humphreys is translated, "true." Freys are in the colors and format of Tysons who in turn share the Hume lion.

Kim Walsh was engaged to be married to Lawrence Kepke, and then Kepke-branch Koops/Kupe's use "candlesticks" while Candle's/Cantwells share the annulets of Walkers (Yorkshire with Keppochs). There you see the Walker-connectable sticks in the Koop/Kupe Coat.

Hume's share the BOSton/BOWstown Coat, and while Bows/Bough's are first known in Durham with Darlingtons, that latter's motto includes "dum spiro spero," which the full motto of Masons/Massins and Bushels (Yorkshire with Bush's). Bushels share the water bouget (different colors) with Bosco-married Rose's.

Darlingtons share the red crosslet of German Angels while English Angels are first known in Lancashire with the Wrays suspect in the Boswell/Boywell motto term, "Vraye." HUMphreys use a phrase, "L'HOMME vrai," and Hume's are also Home's (share Boston/Bowstown Coat). Bushite Bill Barr was the boss of Chris Wray, FBI chief and fellow deep-state protector under Trump. The Pays in the Humphrey motto were not only kin of Spears/Spire's in the Darlington motto, but a branch of Paisleys (same place as Glasgows and Spears/Spire's). Paisleys share the anchor of English Packs while Packers are first known in Berkshire with English Pasleys.

Kepke's Spider

Kim Walsh was engaged to be married to my friend, Lawrence Kepke. About eight years earlier, he chased me with a spider DANGLing on its web, because he knew I was afraid of spiders. He did this nasty thing in front of my friend, Karen Graff, at her place. https://www.houseofnames.com/ca/dangel-family-crest are listed with German and Italian Angels. Graffs list Groffs, and so I'm wondering whether the event points to Lesley Groff, Epstein's secretary, or maybe her boss by some Rothschild connection. By what coincidence do Leslie's have a GRIFFin?

Erika Kirk is being reported as a cousin of Miss Rothstein, and Rothschilds/Rothsteins are first known in Speyer while Spears/Spire's are also Speyers, suspect from a Rothes location on a Spey river, where Peter Pollock of Renfrewshire build a castle. Pollocks married Leslie's, explaining why Leslie's became earls of Rothes. Lesley Groff. Though not in the same color, Graffs/Groffs share the anchor with Paisleys.

The spider was dangling from its web, and Keeps, first known in Sussex with Felix's, have a "weaver's shuttle." Kepke's are first known in Saxony with their Weaver/WEBBer kin. I was only 14 at the time, I didn't know any heraldry. Felix's can be suspect in the "fleece" of Scottish Dingle's. I don't know whether Dingle's were a branch of Dangels, but this works not-bad as a pointer to Romanian Angels.

I've been over the spider chase many times with the Chase and Chance surname, but never with Lesley Groff at topic. This is wild, and I almost missed it because I don't usually re-load Chase's and Chance's, because I know what their Coats look like, and I know what the Chance Crest looks like. But I had forgotten what the Chace Crest is. Though not in the same style, the Dutch Gravels/Grave's share the cross of Chase's and Chance's, and while the Chase's share the green griffin head in Crest with Leslie's (!), the Chance lion, though not upright like the Graff/Groff/Graffin/Grav lion, is in the same colors. That is wild. I'm convinced that the spider chase points to Epstein's Groff character.

Graffs/Groffs love the Anchors, kin of Angers (Pack colors and format) who in turn have the lozenges of English Angels in colors reversed. Ankle's (Kent, beside Keeps), sharing the Anchor lozenges, look related to the Keep Coat. The Anger lozenges are with Irish Nagle's who have a "nightinGALE" while Gale's are first known in Yorkshire with Keppochs, and with Galleys in the "galley" ship of Keeps. The nightingale can be partly for Nights/Knights, first known in Suffolk with the Kidds who share the upright Kepke goat, white like the Frans/Frantz goat.

Lookie: the spider was HANGing on a web, and Hangers/Angers (Hampshire, beside Webbs) share the "escarBUNCLE" with English Angers. Buncle's love the Buckle's, first known in Suffolk with Kepke-connectable Kidds, with Lings, and with the StarLINGs/Starlincks essentially sharing the Coat of buckle-using Leslie's. Lesley Groff! Buncle's, first known in Berwickshire with Boys, are in the colors and format of Sticks, the latter first known in Somerset with Webbers.

Buncle's are said to be from Mercy-like Merse, and while Mercys have the Coat of Potters in colors reversed, Hangers/Angers are not only first known in Hampshire with Potters, the Hanger/Anger griffin is split in the colors of the quadrants by which the Mercy dragon is split. Potters are in Dragon/Drainer colors and format.

Kepke's dangled spider had previously pointed to poison COVID vaccines as per the Graffin variation of Graffs/Groffs pointing to graphene-oxide in vaccines, and here I now find a "corona" motto term in the motto of Mersers/Mercers! The latter are first known in Northumberland with Keep-loving Hebrons.

Weaver-loving Keeps are first known in Sussex with HAMsteads/HAMPsteads, Hams and Hammers. I just found Hamsteads as per the Wrays of Moreton-Hampstead. French Rays have a giant escarbuncle, and so the Hampshire location of Hangers/Angers may have been named by a Hampstead branch. Moreton-Hampstead is in Devon with the first-known Darts who in turn share the fesse of Hampsteads and Jena's/Jeans! The neighboring Jeans/Jane's and Spear-branch Spree's are first known in Cornwall with the Trysts and Tristans, and then "Keep tryst" is the motto Hebrons. Jena Masquelier, beloved of Lesley Groff. Spree-beloved Simple's (same place as Spears) have another "Keep tryst" motto.

Hebrons are first known in Northumberland with the Tunnels in turn beloved by spider-like Spitzers. The Justs suspect in the Wray motto are first known in Switzerland with Graffs/Groffs and Hebron-like Hebers, ZOWIE! See that? Kepke dangled the spider with Karen Graff (my age, 14) watching. It's now not a wonder that the Just Coat looks related to the Hebron Coat. Heber-like Heffers are first known in Somerset with English Webbers.

While Keeps were kin of Lorraine's (same place as Hebrons), Lorraine's share the eagle of Childs (Hebron colors and format) while Children look related to the Heber Coat. Kepke's share the upright goat of Kidds, the latter first known in Suffolk with Childers-beloved Buckle's! Leslie's use buckles. It's a pointer to pedophilia in the midst of pointing to Lesley Groff.

Childers are first known in Yorkshire with Hicks/Icke's (BUCK head) while Leslie had married IKE Groff. Ike's are listed with Hyke's/Hake's, first known in Norfolk with Hips'/HIPPERNs (share "birds" with Children) while Hebrons are also Hepburns. Ice's/Icke's are first known in Mecklenburg, beside the Jena-connectable Vos', first known in Pomerania with the ancient House of Griffin." Groffs are also Graffins, and the Velis' in the Griffin motto are first known in Northumberland with Hebrons.

Hips'/Hippers share the "sphinx" with Brocuffs, and the latter are first known in Silesia with Jena's/Jene's. It's perfect because the Shield-Chief colors of Brocuffs is shared with Brocks who put a "dart" into the paw of their Crest lion, and Darts, ignoring their canton, must therefore be in the Jena/Jene quadrant.

[I wrote many paragraphs below before coming back to Brocuffs, and while mentioning their flag, I remembered that it's the Dart fesse upon it! That is, it's the Jena/Jene fesse! As Brocks are first known in Essex with Brooks, we can re-mention that the latter share the Joke scallops for a related reason.]

That spider event is pointing very hard to Lesley Groff, very hard. I've got it recorded that it took place on a Doner street in Gormley, and Doners have white foxes in the colors and format of English Hammers. "...Boccabella's of Fossa. I can now repeat for the millionth time how Karen Graff, a friend who lived somewhat across DONER street (Gormley, Ontario) from me when we were both 14 years of age" (1st of November, 2024). Foss' and Vos' share the fox.

Note BoccaBELLa's, for Bells are in the Coat of French Jeans (share Groff lion) while Jene's/Jene's have a white fox. The lions combattant of French Jeans are shared by Mosers while Moses' are first known in Shropshire with Bellamys (share Bell fesse). Mosers and L'Aquila-line Kellners (almost have the Chiava key) are first known in Swabia with German Rolls/Raels (Royal branch?) who in turn share the lion of Scottish Roys, first known in Lanarkshire with Boy-using Bothwells. English Rolls are first known in Yorkshire with Boswells/BOYwells.

I kid you not, the Boccabella's were to topic because I found a Ms. Boccabella online who descended from/to Masci owners of the flour mill of my mother's father (he had married Miss Masci). That was in Picenze, beside Fossa. Bellamys, who had married Masseys of Ferte-Mace, are first known in Shropshire with Meschins. If BOCCabella's were named partly by the Book bloodline, they are first known in Berwickshire with Boys.

Both Fossa and Picenze are horse walks from L'Aquila, and so Bookers can have the L'Aquila eagle. L'Aquila is the Abruzzo capital, and Abruzzo's/Abreu's share two gold lions combattant with Mosers and Jeans, and more lions combattant are with Corcorans having a "bello" motto term. Corcorans share the full motto of Carols. Italian Carla's share the split-Shield colors of English Foss', and the Carla lion is also the one of French and Spanish Jeans while Corcorans have a different-colors version of the Carol Coat. Scottish Carla's/Carls are first known in Aberdeenshire with Leslie's, and the latter's beloved Buckle's are first known in Suffolk with Carlsons and Charles'. Portuguese Abreu's share the Masci/MASCELLI's wing. Jeans/Jane's are first known in Cornwall with CORCoran-like Corks.

Jena Masquelier, at my jean scene on Epstein's island. Meschins are also Masculine's, and this Masculine Coat has five boys in the format of the five keys of Sheaves'/Chiava's, first known in L'Aquila. It also has a giant mascle with fleur-de-lys ends in the colors of the Masci/Mascelli fleur-de-lys.

Italian Carla's are first known in Milan, where OTTONE Visconti ruled, and then Ottone's/Otto's are first known in Perusia with Grazi's who share the "pomegranate" with Scottish Carla's/Carls. This can be a pointer to Otto Busher and KARLA Frantzve Solomon, the sister of Erika's father, for German Bush's/Bushers are first known in Rhineland with the first Rothschild, Natts/Nathans, Frans'/Frantz's, and with Salome's/Solomons, the latter suspect by me from Salome Boethus of the Herods and Sadducees. The first Rothschild named his first son, Nathan. Boys/Bo's/BOETs could apply, as could Boyns or Booyens.

As Natters/Nutters look like they are from king Cnut, he thought to have named Nottinghamshire, where Nations/Nathans are first known, the latter can be from a daughter of Mieszko I, mother of Cnut. I trace WheelWRIGHTs to Mieszko, and they share a six-sectioned Shield with Natters/Nutters while adding the Catherine wheels of proto-Rothschild Roets. English Wrights/Rite's are first known in Sussex with Boards who not only share the antelope (different color) in Crest with Wheelwrights, but add the eight-martlet border of Saddocks/Sedgewicks, Chaddocks and Chadwicks. The Nation/Nathan comPASS can be part-code for Pass'/Pascals because they share the lamb with Lamberts (Surrey with Salmons), expected by me to be from Mieszko II Lambert.

"Passe" is a motto term of Roet-related Rollo's (Payne Roet descended from a Rollo-like surname). Roets and Payne's are first known in Somerset with BOARDers. The hourglass of Roet-beloved Books is shared with Houstons (Renfrewshire with Pollocks and Roet-related Spears) who in turn share the checks of Scottish Wrights/Rite's.

Saddocks/Sedgewicks can be gleaned as kin of Mascals...who share the black escutcheon (shield) of Natts/Nathans. Nations/Nathans are first known in Nottinghamshire with Frants/Friends and Frantz-beloved Goats/Gothams. The Vile calves could connect to Calvarys/Calverleys in Saddock colors and format. The calvary symbol is used by Karla-like Carlins/Carolins upon a white escutCHEON shared with Saddocks and Calverleys. The Carlin/Caroline Coat, sharing the Carr estoiles, is shared by KEON-branch Keens, a branch of Oceans/CAINs (Keons are also McCains). Thus, Carlin elements named Calverley.

Calvarys/Calverleys are first known in Morley of Yorkshire, near Leeds, and Kippax of the Caiaphas-like Keppochs (share Leeds fesse) is near Leeds too. Letts/Late's are first known in Gloucestershire with Vile's. Vile-loving GRIFFins are suspect from Herod AGRIPPa's, and Gripps share the Coat of Kepke- and Bush-beloved Goats/Gothams.

Calverley, near Leeds, was CAVErley, like "Caiaphas." Cave's (Lancashire with Furness) share the fretty Shield of Caens, the latter first known in Dorset with Chaffs, Furness-connectable Chaffins, Boet-branch Beautys/Bowds, and English Bushers. See anything suspicious? The Calverley-beloved Owls are first known in Suffolk with the Kepke-connectable Kidds, with CARLsons, and with English Charles'. The last time I saw David Morley, he was up to my place on his motorbike with CAROL, the church secretary, his wife.

While French Jeans share the Groff lion, Bellamys share the crescents of Seatons, first known in East Lothian with Vance's/Fanns and MASCALs/Keiths, and with Fortune's suspect in a Booker motto. Those Bookers share the Hick/Icke fleur while Ms. Groff married Ike Groff. The other Bookers have the giant eagle Griefs/Greafs in colors reversed. Griffins share a "Ne vile" motto phrase with Macey-related Fane's/Vans, and Vance's/Vanns are suspect in the motto of Hills, who are in the "hills" of spider-like Spitzers. Who might Kepke's dangling spider best depict, Jena Masquelier? He was chasing me with it, and Chase's share the patonce crosses of English Chance's in the Booker motto.

Keeps are first known in Sussex with Mascals and Vice's/Vise's while I'm reading that Ms. Groff is re-married to Mr. Vickers. Vickers/Vicers share a "galley" with Keeps!

The Bookers with the Icke fleur have a "chance" motto term in their English-version motto while English Chance's share the Chief of Masci-branch Mascarelli's/Mascelli's. French Chance's share the Chief of Marsh's who in turn love the Birds/Burds, first known in Cheshire with Masseys and Mace's/Maceys.

I had found Masci's in Ms. Boccabella's ancestry in New Mexico and Arizona, which is why I wrote: "...the Boccabella line to New Mexico, and later to neighboring Arizona. New Mexico has Jeffrey Epstein's Zorro ranch..." As she descended from the owners of the flour mill, note that Flowers share the cinquefoil of Potters (Hampshire with Pots) who are in-turn in Mercy format and colors reversed. Rinds, first known in Perthshire with Justice's, use a "flower pot." Karen Graff lived at the corner of Doner and Union streets, and Unions have millRINDs.

Sussex is where Hamsteads, Hams and Hammers are first known while Vissers (Ham and hammer colors) have "fish" in the colors of the "salmon" of Hams and McCabe's/McABBE's. Fish (Lincolnshire with Vicks) essentially have the Coat of VYCHans/Vaughns (Shropshire with Bellamys). German Hammers share the Graff/Groff lion.

Recall that Jaco opened a company housing children called, Justice Reform. Justice's look related to the Kepke Coat, and the Justice sword looks like the one of Mochs because the latter are first known in Burgundy with Justice-connectable Sirets. The Moch Coat is in red with Mucks, and the latter are first known in Banffshire with Boyns! Jaco Booyens! Look at how tidy that is.

NewMarch's are also NemMOCKs/NemMOKE's, and the Much's are listed with the Epstein-connectable Muschats, first known in Essex with Just-loving Peacocks. Heraldry has peacocks "in the pride," and Prude's/Pride's are first known in Lanarkshire with Scottish Mochs and Boy-using Bothwells. Scottish Mochs share the Chief of Hampsteads.

Justs (Switzerland with Groffs) are in the motto of Fear-loving Peacocks (Essex with Angers and Esters/STURs), and Fears/Fiers had been kin of Abbas'/Apps/Epps. Lori Abbas, fellow director with Jaco Booyens. Just sayin'. Real tidy.

Star-connectable Sturs/Stowers are first known in Hampshire, and Hampstead-beloved Stars share the lozenges of Settle's, and the latter are first known in Lancashire with Wrays and SHETTLEworths/Shuttleworths who in turn share the "weaver's shuttle" with Keeps (same place as Hampsteads). Lancashire is also where Angels are first known who have a "Stare" motto term while Star-loving Stairs/Stayers can link to the Stairr variation of Stars (near the source of the Stour river).

It's notable that Mersers/Mercers share the besants of Amptons/Hamptons, in case people from Mercy church were at the Hamptons meeting with Charlie Kirk. Hampsteads share an axe in Crest with Seaton-connectable Merch's/March's who named Bois-connectable NewMarch's/NewMarsh's. Seaton is at the Axe river...in Devon with Moreton-Hampstead. Another Axe river is in neighboring Somerset, where Marsh's are first known.

Newmarch's are first known in STIRLINGshire with the Robe's in the "robes" worn by the "female FIGURE" of Darlene's who in turn share the red fitchee with VICKERs. Fichters/Victors can take us to Feschs/Fechters/Vechters, first known in Switzerland with Groffs. Lesley Groff is reportedly Mrs. Vickers at this time. Leslie's almost have the Stirling Coat.

Karen Graff (her parents had a German accent) can take us to the Roet-related Karens and Kepke-connectable Goths/Gothams (Thuringia with Roets). Kepke's use a giant goat while Weavers/Webbers have a "Gott" motto term.

Unbelievably, while Lesley Groff was assisting Jena Masquelier, Karens and Jena's/Jene's are first known in Silesia with Kirkners, and while the latter show a church, Church's (beside Roet-beloved Moons) are first known in Somerset with Frantz elements, and with English Webbers and Scottish Roets. How does that happen? Scottish Roets love the Tree's, first known in Wiltshire with Webbs. As Moons are first known in Dorset with George's, youtuber George Webb comes to mind.

Graffs/Groffs are first known in Switzerland with Landens, and we can now point to Landen Schott where German Schotts have the quadrants of German Dingle's/Dinkels in colors reversed, while English Schotts/Scotts have the Roet Catherine wheels. German FREYs, first known in Bavaria with German Dingle's/Dinkels, share the Graff/Groff lion. Boston-connectable HumFREYs use a bottony cross while Bottons/Buttons/Bidens could have named Wray-with-Botton of the Wrays having a "vray" motto term. Wrays are not only first known in Lancashire with Angels, but the latter love the Boston-like Bastons while Rose-loving French Bastons/Batons almost have the Capote/Capone Coat which is in turn in Wray colors and format.

The Capone variation of Capote's recalls the ancient Junia Caepionis', whom I trace to English Capone's, first known in Cambridgeshire with English Julians, Caesar-like Cass', and June-branch, Jena-like Jeune's/Jennes' who share the fleur-de-lys of English Constantine's. Jena's are first known in Silesia with the Young-connectable Rose's, and "Jeune" is a Young motto term. Julius Caesar had an affair with Servilia Caepionis, mother of the three Junia's. Caesars share the Capote/Capone Chief.

One of the Jena/Jene quadrants shows the Coat of French Jennes'/Gennes in colors reversed. The latter surname is first known in Anjou = Angers. The Gettes' of Anjou share the Coat of Loge's, first known in Burgundy with Gene's/Gannays. Geddes' (not "Gettes") were kin of Constant-loving Rose's. And Constanta has Romanian Angels while English Angels were a branch of Angers.

Cass' love the Scale's sharing the scallops of Capes'/Capets and Abbas'/Apps/Epps. The latter are first known in Huntingdonshire with Otters/Others and English Cottons (love the Hanks) while French Cottons/Cotta's (Languedoc with French Julians) ought to be from Aurelia Cotta, mother of Julius Caesar. Humphreys have an otter. Cass-branch Cush's (probably Cousin kin) take us to the rooster on a cushion of Bibo's and Hahns (Mecklenburg with Vos'). The Hahn rooster is in the colors and format of the Jena/Jene fox.

Constantine's and Darts are first known in Devon with the Walerans whose "vos" motto term takes us to fox-using Vos', and then Jena's/Jene's, sharing the Dart fesse, have a fox too. Dutch Vos' almost have the Coat of Kos'/KOSINski's (Mecklenburg with Trumps, beside German Vos'), and Cussons share the giant eagle of English Constance's. Walerans were kin of Beautys/Bowds, a branch of Boys/Bo's/Boeddu's who might be related to the Chief of French Julians.

This would be a good place to add that Humphreys share the scallops of Crossmans, first known in Somerset with Crutch's/Crooch's. Candace Owens is on an important topic with Ms. Crossman this week, but I can't remember what she was about. The lone pale bar of Crutch's/Crooch's is in colors reversed with Black-beloved Crux's, Blake's, and German Walls while English Walls are first known in Gloucestershire with Griefs/Greafs. Croce's/Cross' are first known in Lincolnshire with Blacks.

The spider-like Spitzers are first known in Styria, a place which could have named the "steer" of Backs/Bachs that is otherwise the giant Boy/Bo/BOET/Boeddu bull. Butts/Boets share the fesse of Bottons/Buttons/Bidens, first known in Hampshire (beside English Backs) with Sturs/STYRE's. Spitals tell that they are from a Spittal location in KilMARON, and then Marons, listed with Merriots, not only have the Spital fesse in colors reversed, but are first known in Somerset with Webbers having three-and-three bars in the colors of the triple Maron/Merriot fesses. <> Repeat from above: "Why might Jaco's share the Marine and Mariner Coat? Jaco's are first known in Andalusia with the Lucents/Luca's in the motto of Irish Morine's. Lucks/Luke's are first known in Berwickshire with BOYs. Jaco BOOYens." It appears that Marine's named the Marons who modified to MARRIots because Webbers have a "praeLUCENT" motto term. They also have "disc" in Crest while Disce/Diss of the Dice's is in Norfolk with MARYs, and with Luce's who in turn are said to have been lords of Dice. Webbs, with the Marine / Mariner / Jaco cross in colors reversed, have eagles colors of the Dice eagles.

Why should Kepke's spider CHASE point to this picture? Chance-branch Chase's are first known in Hampshire with Marine's, Cassane's, and Casino-connectable Change's. Cassane's share the Epstein Coat, and Dice's go with Casino's and hookers. Norfolk is where Leslie-related CASE's are first known while Kepke's share the goat of Kidds, first known in Suffolk with the Case-beloved Buckle's, and with the Starlincks having the Leslie Coat with square buckles. Lesley Groff! Kepke chased me with a spider while Karen Graff laughed at my trying to get away from the spider.

For what it's worth, Lille's are expected in the Webber motto because they are first known in Oxfordshire with the Hurts/Horts while the blue Webber disc is usually a "hurt." Hurts/Horts are even in Spital colors and format.

The square buckles can go to Square's, previously first known in Worcestershire with Lilys, and now said to be first known in Devon with the Trebys sharing the Spital and Pitt besants. Pitts were a branch of Petts (Hampshire with Chase's). Spittal in Kilmaron is in Dumbartonshire, where Eure's are first known who almost have the Coat of Bee's (Oxfordshire with Hurts/Horts and Lille's).

Pitts and Petts are from the Petit bloodline in Kent, and the Pettys are too who are first known in Warwickshire with Sheriffs. Treby-like Trabys/Sadowskys use a "scarf." Kent is where Schere-beloved Snake's are first known while the other Schere's/Scherfs were likely a Square branch. Shere's/Sheers can be gleaned as kin of Carricks who in turn share the fesse and black dog of Marons/Merriots. Merys/Meriets share the Israel Coat.

Pitts are first known in Dorset with the Bugs sharing the Carrick fesse. Bugs Bunny can play here where Bugs were previously first known in Nottinghamshire with Goat-loving Bunnys. The latter are in the colors and format of Rabbits, first known in Suffolk with Kidds having the Kepke goat. Bunns, first known in Oxfordshire while their Bone branch is first known in Sussex with Keeps.

That's not all, folks. Bugs Bunny always had a carrot, and Carrots/Carews share a motto term with Carricks. The latter can be gleaned as Maron/Merriot kin, and they were at Merriot in Chard...of Somerset, where Carts and Carys are first known, and then Chards are also Charts. The latter have PARTridges while Petts are also Perts while Partridge's are also Pertridge's (Kent with Petits) who in turn share the Pepoli Shield while Webbers have the Pepin and Pipe bend-with-fleur in colors reversed.

I found a Zore surname (listed with Zehrers) as a possible pointer to the Zorro ranch, for they love the Hatchets/HACKets while Hake's are also Ike's while Lesley Groff married Ike. Hake's/Ike's are first known in Norfolk with Leslie-related Case's and Crows. Hake's/Ike's are in the colors and format of Irish Caseys, and Hicks' are also Icke's. I've said it many times that, the aunt of Miss Hicks married Mr. Casey, who sold my Texas property, and Scottish Caseys have crow heads. French Caseys, in Lily colors and format, are first known in Ile-de-France with Lys'/Lise's while the fleur-de-lys, used by Hicks'/Icke's, is a lily. Lilys are first known in Worcestershire with the Halpers sharing the Partridge Shield. English Lise's are first known in Hampshire with Chase's, Casino-connectable Change's, Cassane's, and Petts.

As Karen laughed at me, I remembered the Laughers/LOCHers, and they share a red fox with Foss', first known in Sussex with Keeps. Scottish Locks (swans) are first known in Lanarkshire with Scottish Caseys and Swans/Sions. The latter share the lion of Boxers (Wiltshire with Webbs), recalling how Bookers played to the Boccabella's of Fossa.

I'm very sure that the Graffs drove a Volkswagen van, and then a few weeks ago I discussed a dream I had where Jeffrey Epstein drove past me in a Volkswagen van. Mr. Graff always smoked a pipe, and Pipe's can be linked to Webbers. He had a German accent. He would come over to talk to my father with a beer, and Beers/Bears share the bear with the Shuttleworths who share the "weaver's shuttle" with Keeps.

Two Spiders

It's winter, and so I haven't seen a spider here for months, until a few days ago, I squashed one on my WALL beside the computer desk. It came in with a batch of firewood picked up off the garage floor. The day after, another spider was running on my desk. Webbers use a desk-like disc, and English Walls are first known in Gloucestershire with Griefs/Greafs, likely because Walls almost have the Coat of Masters who in turn share the GRIFFin heads of Boxers. The latter share the Ball "FIREball," and the spider came from the FIREwood. Boxers are first known in Wiltshire with Dice-related Webbs, and Dice's were at Disce. Bookers have the Grief/Greaf eagle in colors reversed. You can't believe it.

Aha! Bookers love the Eagle's/Hegels who in turn have the Coat of Wood-beloved Savage's in colors reversed! Woods share the giant tree with BOOK-loving Roets, first known in Somerset with Webbers! It's beside Boxers of Wiltshire.

Aha! The second spider was RUNNING like mad. I couldn't find it after it went to the corner of the desk under the Internet hub. Corners/Garners use a griffin head. Runnings share the wave fesse of Wafers, a branch of Weaver-like WEFers!!! Webbers have wavy fessewise bars, and heraldic waves are suspect as code for Weavers. Corners/garners share the red griffin in Crest with Brocuffs, and I showed how the latter link to Jene's/Jene's and Hips/Hipperns and therefore to Keep-beloved Hebrons/Hepburns.

I often laugh when God sets up things like this. It's completely funny to me, yet I know He must have some serious business to perform. Lucky you, the reader. Who are you, and what are you doing with this information, I wish I could know. But I think it's better I don't take emails only to let someone write-in and tell what they are doing, only to get caught by someone who's watching him/her. It's God's secret project.

The Corner/Garner Crest shares a red griffin in Crest with Foots, first known in Cheshire with fireball Balls/Balders, Hoffs, and Wood-beloved Savage's. German Balds are also BaldHOFFs. Keeps have a "galley," and Scottish Balds: "a galley under sail flags and pennants flying,..." Fly's (Hampshire with Chase's) of Flagi share the Webber fleur-de-lys, and both the red griffin of Foots and Brocuffs holds a flag. The Foot flag has the crescent of Bald-branch Bauds, I reckon.

After writing the above [before the insert], I got up to go do a couple of things, then came back and was telling God how amazed I am with this. "I'm convinced that it's from You," I was saying. Then the Internet MODem came to mind because the spider ran under the hub, part of the modem system, and that's when I recalled the "quoMODO" motto term of Elias', first known in West Lothian with Balders! Elias' and Elis' share the Motts/Mottin crescent. Alis use the "fir tree" while Firs are listed with Fire's!

What could it mean that the first spider was squashed directly above the modem sitting on the floor, straight up as a level about three feet up the wall. As English Walls are first known in Gloucestershire with Griefs/Greafs, did God just kill Lesley Groff on my wall? I took a tissue, put the spider on it, and threw it in the wood stove.

I didn't know until loading Balders that they have a "Constance" motto term! Spider-like Spitzer's have the "tunnel" while t Tunnels/Tunno's can take us to English Towns/Tune's while Scottish Towns and Tenants are first known in West Lothian! No balderdash. Tenants even have the Elias crescent in colors reverse.

Jacks/Jackmans, first known in Essex with Motts/Mottins, Broke's and Brooks, share the Town/Tune eagle, and look a little related to the Shield of German Balds. Towns/Tune's are first known in Suffolk with the Seamans who share a seahorse with Jack- and Joke-related Brokers. Towns/Tune's are first known in Suffolk with Starlings/Starlincks, i.e. sharing the Leslie Coat for another spider pointer to Ms. Groff, and then Bauds (share Bald ship) are first known in Stirlingshire while Starling-like Stirlings/Sturlings, I kid thee not, have the Leslie / Starling Coat on a black bend!!! It's got triple-gold buckles on a black bend to match the triple-gold fleur on a black bend of Webbers!

Leslie's love the Griffins who in turn love the Vile's who are in turn in Stirling colors and format. Then, the Stirling/Sturling Coat is in the colors and format of HUBBards, whom I looked up as per the Internet hub!!! Is Leslie Groff the spider under the hub? Yes, for Kepke chased me with a spider in the presence of Karen Graff. I'll repeat that Karens are first known in Silesia with Jena's/Jene's.

This is wild, for Vile's are even first known in Gloucestershire with Griefs/Greafs and Walls! I (or God) squashed Lesley Groff on the wall. German Walls and Crouch-branch Crux's share the lone pale bar of Blake's while Blacks have a "crux" motto term, and AI says: "The surname Crush has roots in England (notably Essex and Kent) as a variant of "Crouch,'"..." I CRUSHed the spider! See that? Vile's are in the colors and format of the bend-with-fleur of Webbers, first known in Somerset with Crouch's/Crutch's.

The spiders came in with the FIREwood, and Fiers are first known in Middlesex with Brokers, but also with Bruns of SPITALfield! wafer Spitals share the besants of Flame's, yet they are also in the Crest of English Gravels while Graffs/Groffs are Gravs too, and while Griefs/Greafs are Grave's too. Dutch Gravels/Grave's share the cross of Mee's/Meigh's who share the Tenant boar heads, and the Demys/DuMAYs suspect in the demi-lion of Graffs/Groffs could apply to Meigh's. The Bruns share the Coat of French Cruce's/Crois', first known in Languedoc with Constants and French Conte's, and the latter share the Coat of French Gravels/Grave's. How does that happen? The Brun and Gravel cross is shared with English Croziers while French Croziers are first known in Auvergne with French Bauds.

Aha. Tenants share the boar head of Juggs/Judds, first known in Herefordshire with the Wefers and Wafers, and the latter are in the colors and format Juggs/Judds! The second spider was running, and Wafers, sharing the wavy Running/Ron fesse, are in the colors of Abbas'/Apps/Epps, previously first known in Middlesex with Spitalfield. Herefordshire is also where Maurice's are first known while Mericks share a seahorse with Brokers.

I trace Juggs/Judds to Jugon, near to where the Motts/Mottins are said to have had a branch, at Cotes-de-Nord. Jugon is also near the Rance river of the Rinds and Rance's/Rynds. Rinds share the Broker and Mallet scallops. The Rance flows to St. Malo, and Malo's are listed with French Mallets who love the Buckle's, first known in Suffolk with seahorse-Seamans and English Mallets. The Arms of St. Malo has an ermine wearing a scarf, and Scarfs share the white wolf with Gowers/Gore's suspect in the Morley/MAUL motto. Gore's/Core's are first known in Kent with Seaman-branch Sea's, and Malls are first known in Cheshire with fireball Balls/Balders. French Balls have giant ermine spots while Leslie-connectable Spottens (Lincolnshire with Ermine's) love the Buckle's. Ermine's are also Army's while Cotes-du-Nord is now Cotes-d'Armor.

I read that Lesley Groff has a son, TYLER Groff, and then I sold tiles near the corner of Gorham and Leslie avenue (you can find that in the 5th update of this past January). Tile's are Tillys while Tylers/Tillers share the lion of Taylors, and so lookie here from HackingBullLegal: "Groff who was married to one Ike Groff now goes by the name Katherine TAYLOR COOPER." She doesn't want to be found. Leslie's are first known in Aberdeenshire with Cups/Cope's while Kepke's/Kopke's share a Shield similar to the one of Koops/Kupe's. Keeps are first known in Sussex with COOPERs, believe it or not.

Coopers have leopard faces while Face's share the Coat of Dutch Gravels/Grave's/Gravenhursts. Keppochs are first known in Yorkshire with Griffin-loving Cravens/Gravens. Kippax of Keppochs is 20-25 miles from Craven. Cravens are suspect with the Actons in their motto who in turn share one of the Jena/Jene quadrants. The "avance" motto term of Actons is super because Spitzers love the Hills who have a motto, "Avancez". The "VAILlance" motto term of Actons is excellent because Griffin-loving Velis' list Vails. Lesley Groff was/is in cahoots with Jena.

As Acton's share "l'homme" with the Humphrey motto, let's repeat: "This would be a good place to add that Humphreys share the scallops of Crossmans, first known in Somerset with Crutch's/Crooch's."

The running spider that got away at the hub gets us to Wafers and their WEFer branch. The dastardly WEF is in Switzerland with Davos, and I've said it before, I'm not making it up, that about a decade after I last saw Karen Graff at 14, when her parents moved away from our street, Joe Oullette had to visit his brother Dave, and when the door opened, there was Karen on a couch. There is a Daves variation for Davers, and while they have a "jay" in Crest, Jays are first known in Herefordshire with Wefers! See that? The spider that got away must signal that Lesley Groff is a WEF animal, and/or that God has a day reserved for quashing the WEF spider.

? WEF was founded by Klaus Schwab, and Schwabs share the giant FIRE/Feuerer unicorn! The spiders came in with the FIREwood. There is even a Fuhrer surname first known in Switzerland, in Graff/Groff colors! Fuhrer Schwab. Fuhrers have a "mount" while Mounts are first known in Peebles-shire with Balds.

Let's remind that Fiers are first known in Middlesex with Bruns of Spitalfield who took us to French Gravels/Grave's, and the latter's Coat is incorporated by the Valais' while Sion is in Valais of Switzerland. Swans/Sions are in the swans of Scottish Locks while French Locks/Desloges' are first known in Burgundy with Loge's.

Scottish Locks have a swan "eating a perch", and then an eagle "perch" is with Bodys/Botters in case they apply to Bauds. Perichs are listed with Pero's/Perino's while Perrins have fir cones while Firs are listed with Fire's/Feuerers. Perche's share the double chevrons of Grav-like Garveys who look a little related to Cravens/Gravens.

Fuhrer-beloved Mounds share the giant lion of Leghs/Leys (beside English Mounds and Leightons/Leytons) while Fuhrers are also FurLEGERs. French Legers share the double fesses of Dons, first known in Cheshire with Leghs/Leys. Legers are first known in Burgundy with French Loge's while English Loge's/Lodge's/LEDGE's are first known in Suffolk with the Broke's in the broken spears of Leghs. Broke's (Essex with MOUNTains) share the giant fleur of Fuhrers! Brokers, Middlesex with Fiers!!! I'm on fire. French Bauds love the Rams, first known in Essex with Broke's. Baud-branch Balds, first known in Peebles-shire with Fuhrer-beloved Mounds/MOUNTs. English Mounds, first known in Shropshire with Boyds, love Bee's, as do Boys.

The spider was squashed about eight inches below a LEDGE, and over this ledge is the stack of firewood on my FLOOR. It strongly suggests that the spider came into the light of my room from over this ledge. FLORE's and Flora's share the fleur-de-lys of Fuhrers and Scottish Croziers! The latter are first known in Roxburghshire with lodged-stag Maxwells! Ghislaine Maxwell was a part of the Lesley Groff crime ring. The spider on the ledge just pointed to Maxwell too. The same fleur are with English Walls and Browns/Bruns.

Crozier's are first known in Liddesdale with Elliots, and I had presented the theory that Kepke's spider points to Eliot Spitzer because the Elliot family lived directly across the street from my place. The spider chase was a few properties over from our place. In the 4th update of February, 2019, I talked about my dream with spider and fly:

It comes as per the last update convincing me that a dream with spider and fly was indeed God's pointer to Eliot Spitzer ("spider"-like surname):

I have told this many times before, that directly across the street from our Gormley home there lived the Elliots (Simon Graff was one house over). My first crack at deciphering "spider" was with "Spitzer," and when I searched online for a possible, relevant Spitzer, I came only to Eliot Spitzer of New York.

I made a mistake, the Graffs were more like two or properties over. Spitzer, a Hillary supporter, if I recall correctly, was convicted of a sex crime(s).

I kid you not, the spider was RIGHT BESIDE the desk lamp before running under the hub (about 12 inches from the lamp), and Lamps/Lambys use croziers! They are first known in Northumberland with Stove's, and with the Lums/Lambs in the Stove motto! I threw the dead spider into the wood stove. Deads can apply, for they almost have the fesse-by-lozenges of Abbe's/Abbys, a branch of Abbas'/Apps' from the Apsus river that flows through Albania's Fier county. The "casus" motto term of Lamps/Lambys can be for Scale-loving Cass' because Scale's share the Abbe/Abby and Abbas/Apps scallops. The latter are first known in Huntingdonshire with the BRUNets/Brownetts who are not only highly suspect as a Brun-of-Spitalfield branch, but share the Legh / Mound lion.

Jean-Luc Brunel, Epstein's partner is coming to mind, begging whether God has Brunel embroiled in the same heraldry that points to Jena, and here I'll repeat that while Broke-branch Brocuffs are first known in Silesia with Karens and Jena's/Jene's, Brokers are first known in Middlesex with Bruns. Browns/Bruns share the Broke fleur-de-lys. Brunels not only share the Jean/Jane lion, but have a "Caritas" motto term likely for the Carrots/Carews, first known in Cornwall with Jeans'/Jane's (probably the Bruce lion). It appears that God set up the heraldry for a pointer to him. What's up with this, doc? Should we expect some playboy bunnies in this Brunel picture? Jeans/Jane's were previously first known in Worcestershire with Tume's, tending to explain the "frucTUM" motto term of Brunels. "CariTAS" can be partly for Tass', first known in Suffolk with Bruce-branch Brush's. Royal Bruce's descended from Marjory Carrick, and Carrots/Carews share a Carrick motto term.

While Lady Fortune of the Klassens stands on a lone besant in the colors of the lone besant of French Croziers and Yorks, it's notable that "fortunes" is in the English-version motto of Lamps/Lambys (full motto shared with Irish Caseys) who in turn have the York saltire in colors reversed. I suggest Lamps/Lambys have the Oddie and/or Hague saltire.

French Croziers and Crozziers are first known in Auvergne with FLORY-using Bouillons (suspect from the Boii of Bologna). They share the flory cross of Taddei's, first known in Florence, also called, FIREnze. It's the line to Friend-like Ferrands, suggesting that Frantz's are from French-suspect elements who named Firenze. If French Ferrands/Ferrants had a red Shield, they would be in Wafer colors and format. Wafers are in the colors and near-format of Frants/Friends.

Hanging on the jamb of the ledge under discussion is an antique sheep shearer (shears), and Shears are listed with Shere's, the ones sharing the Schere/Scherf cross. The other Schere's are first known in Austria with Fire's/Feuerers.

Under the shears, standing on the ledge and leaning on the jamb, there is a cow shoe, dug up from my dirt along with the shears. Beside the cow shoe, lying on the ledge, is a train-track spike, dug up from my dirt, beside the road, where people were dumping trash before I bought this property vacant. The cow shoe can get us to the "wall" of Shoe's. The latter have a Knight while Knights/Nights are first known in Suffolk with Lodge's/Ledge's. The latter are in the colors and format of the giant Lauder griffin, and Lauders share two symbols of Lorrys, first known in Dumfries with the Nith river of the Nitts/Naughts and Nets/NIGHTs/McNaughts.

Further over on the ledge (it's a shelf, actually) are two horseshoes dug up from the dirt. Horse's are interesting because they are first known in Northumberland with the Perrins who have fur cones while Furs are listed with Fire's/Feuerers.

Repeat: "Scottish Balds: 'a galley under sail flags and pennants FLYING,...'" Cowes' happen to have "pennants" too, and Pennants are first known in Flintshire while Flints/Flans may have named flying-like Flynns. The latter's wolf is in the colors of the Romania wolf. I don't trust general Flynn, apparently a phony Christian of the cultic kind. The "animo" motto term of Pennants signal the Nimo's/Nemo's/Newmarch's, first known in Stirlingshire with Scottish Bauds.

"Nemo" is a motto term of Poindexters who share the lone Shoe star, and have the split-Shield colors of Romania's in colors reversed. The cow shoe, at our service. Dexters/DECKsters are first known in Lancashire with Cowes'. Decks/Daggers share the red squirrel with Square's/SQUIRE's, and PoinDEXTERs have a white "esquire's helmet" to go with the white "squire's helmet" of Armors. While Jugon is in Cotes-d'Armor, Juggs/Judds, suspect as Wafer kin, share the boar heads of Mee's suspect in the "Nemo me" motto phrase of Poindexters. The Imp's suspect in the Poindexter motto share the Nemo/Newmarch crescents.

Square's/Squirrels are first known in Devon with a Speck location of Specks /Spike's, Speccots and Spice's. The railway spike, beside the cow shoe. Cowes' are first known in Lancashire with Specks/Spike's/SPEAKERs. Trains share the Legh / Mound Coat, and one of my computer speakers is three inches from the hub.

As Judge Scalia was murdered at the Texas ranch of John B. Poindexter, let's repeat: "Then, the Stirling/Sturling Coat is in the colors and format of HUBBards, whom I looked up as per the Internet hub!!!" Hubbards were a branch of Huberts, and Poindexter, high up in the International Order of Saint Hubertus, had some 30 members of that Masonic-like hunting club at the ranch on the weekend Scalia was murdered there (February 2016). By what coincidence are the Hubbard annulets in the colors of the one of SCAYLE's/Schools?

Shortly above, the running spider's presence beside the lamp had brought Scale's, Abbas'/Apps, and Lamp-beloved Croziers to bear. Scottish Croziers and Cruce's were shown above to be kin of Bruns of Spitalfield, in Middlesex, where Abbas'/Apps' were previously first known. I assume that Spitalfield is part of spider pointers. Croce's/Cross' are first known in Lincolnshire with the Bracebridge's showing a crozier, but calling it a "staff," and then Stove's are also Stave's. The Bracebridge Shield is similar to the Scayle/School Coat. Staffs/Staffords, a direct line of Tunna-like Tonys/Tone's, share the Cruse chevron, and Tunnels/Tunno's are in the Coat of Spitzers!

As Bracebridge's are first known in the same place as Blacks, let's repeat: "German Walls and Crouch-branch Crux's share the lone pale bar of Blake's while Blacks have a "crux" motto term, and AI says: "The surname Crush has roots in England (notably Essex and Kent) as a variant of "Crouch,'"..." I CRUSHed the spider! See that?"

The motto of Griffin-using Velis'/Wills is in the Bracebridge motto, and then the Griffin motto is, "Ne vile velis." It just so happens that Brace's are first known in Herefordshire with Running-connectable Wafers. Lesley Groff, the running spider.

The cow shoe is going to play large because Cows/Cough's/Cuffs and English Cuffs are in the colors and format of Huberts, and while the latter are first known in Cheshire with Sale's, the latter essentially share the Cow/Cough/Cuff and Cuff Coats. Huberts and Cows/Coughs and Cuffs even share blue sleeves in Crest. Huberts even share the Elias / Elis crescents. Cows/Cough's even have an "Animus" motto term to point to Poindexter-beloved Nemo's.

The Mee's/Meigh's suspect in the Poindexter motto share the McGee/MAGEE boar heads while McGee's share the chevronwise swords to a point of Ricketts/Reckitts suspect in the "rectumque" motto term of Huberts. It appears that God is wanting to expose Scalia's killers via this cow shoe. Nemo-branch March's are first known in Cambridgeshire with SCALE-loving Cass'/Casts, Elys, Muscats/Musks of Ely, and Rumillys (Rocks and Lilys). March's look related to Pattys, first known in Worcestershire with the Tume's suspect in "recTUMque," and with Lilys and Rocks.

The all-important Vile's are also Veals, and so it can explain why they have 'calves." Cows make calves.

It should be added that Cowes' share "pennants" with Caddys, a branch of Mascals/Keiths, first known beside Musselburg. Mussels/Muscels, who love the Plate's (same place as Cowes'), are in the "muzzle" of FIR-tree Alis', suspect from Alis Rumilly-Skipton of Craven, in Yorkshire with the first-known Caddys and Elis'. Pennants look related to one Simson Coat while the other Simsons have an "Alis" motto term. Cravens almost have the Ely Coat. Elis' share the Hubert crescents, yet they are also the crescents of Motts, first known in Essex with Ely-related Muschats/Montfitchets whose Coat reflects the Craven/Graven Coat, itself in colors reversed with Rickett-like Ricks, first known in Cheshire with Huberts. Reckitts are expected in the Hubert motto.

The cow shoe is again pointing to Poindexter's remote ranch, via the Cowes pennants. Muschats/Montfitchets share the Epstein Coat, and Epstein's Zorro ranch is not far from Poindexter's. The spider running under the Internet hub took us here. The Running/Ron Coat is a wavy-fesse version of a Jena/Jene quadrant. You just saw the MASCALs/Keiths from the Pennant-loving Caddys. Jena MASQUELier.

The Cows/Cough's are also Cuffee's while green-Crested Coffee's/Coffers have the Arms of Taranto in other colors. The Mott-like Motels, a Mota branch, had a location in Taranto, and then the Coffee "cups" get us to Cups/Cope's, first known in Aberdeenshire with Cowells and green-crested Leslie's. Lesley Groff appears to be here, for Leslie's share a green GRIFFin in Crest with Fenns/Venns. google AI says: "Cowell Family: Features a cow on their coat of arms ("Ermine, a cow statant gules, within a bordure sable, bezantee")." The giant-bull Cole's, in the Cowell motto, now show a besantee Shield, and have another green Crest.

The French's, first known in Devon with Cole's, Fenns/Venns, Jena-linkable Darts, Stewarts, and a Seaton location, share the green dolphin in Crest with Coffee's/Coffers. Cowells share the green dragon with Seatons, first known in East Lothian with Vance's/Fanns and Mascals/Keiths (branch of Pennant-loving Caddys). Thus, even when following the cow-using Cowells, we come to Lesley Groff and even Jena Masquelier. Cowells share the lion of Stewarts, who in turn share the motto of Dart-loving Broke's.

What could it mean where spider-like Spitzer's use "hills" while "AVANCEz" is a Hill motto term? Spitzers have unicorns in the colors of the unicorn heads of Saffers, first known in Devon with Fenns/Venns and Fauns/Phones', and then Fane's/Vans/Phone's sharing "Ne vile" in their motto with Griffins. We saw the Vile's pointing hard to Lesley Groff.

Repeat: "By what coincidence are the Hubbard annulets in the colors of the one of SCAYLE's/Schools?" It makes it seem as though God arranged the heraldry to point to Scalia's murder. Scalia's are first known in FIREnze. Scayle's/Schools share the lozengy Shield of Patents/Pattens and Orrins/Orems. The Leslie griffin is shared by Patents/Pattens who in turn have the Culp variation of Cups/Cope's, first known in Aberdeenshire with Leslie's and Orrins/Orems. What could this mean?

The Coffee's/Coffers can be linked to McCabe's/McAbbe's, and then the Abbas-branch Abbe's/Abbys share the Scale scallops. Shears/Shere's are first known in Surrey, where Coffee-beloved Dolphins were previously first known, as well as McCabe-beloved Salmons. SALEmans are still said to be first known in Surrey, and Sale's almost have the Cow/Coughs/Cuffee Coat, in Hubert colors and format. Vance's/Fanns share the bend-with-stars of Salome's/Solomons, and JD Vance is promoted by Erika Kirk, she being related to Jack Solomon. Salmons and Dolphins are now said to be first known in Cumberland with Pattons (not "Patten").

The tip of the sheep shears is hanging less than two inches above the cow shoe. Shears can be gleaned as Schere's, and Patents/Pattens have a "palleSCERE" motto term. Patents/Pattens (Essex with Broke's) share the Scayle Shield, and Scayle's share the Hubbard annulet. Broke's share the fleur-de-lys of Pattons (previously in Shropshire with Broke-connectable Alans).

It's known that the heraldic potent cross, shared by Croce's/Cross, is taken from crutches. It means that a potent-like surname got related to Crouch's/Crutch's. Patents/Pattens are first known in Essex with the Chance's that use a patonce cross, and so the Patents look like they named the patonce variant. The bigger point is that the Chance's share the Chase patonce exactly! The spider chase! I CRUSHed the spider. I hit it twice. After the first, it was still moving with a web tied to the wall as it fell slowly, so I put it out of its misery with the bottom of the Kleenex BOX. That's called crush.

The Box's/Boxers share the griffin heads of Masters who in turn look related to Walls! The Kleenex box is on my disk-like desk, and Webbers have the disk. The box is right beside my land-line phone, touching it as we speak, and Phone's share "Ne vile" with Griffins while Vile's are in the colors and format of the bend-with-fleur of Webbers, first known in Somerset with, guess who? Crush-line Crutch's!

I've now got to go back to when I last saw Karen Graff as an adult, at the apartment of Dave Oullette. This recalls the Daves/Davers, who are in Diss/Dice colors and format. I'm repeating this because Dave is the brother of Mike, and the latter was in crutches about the time I dated Lorraine and Mamie. Here's from the third update in January, 2023: "Not more than four months after Joe's brother, Mike, gave us Lorraine's babe and feet symbol, he was with a CAST on one leg i.e. he was walking with crutches!" Cass'/Casts love the Scale's. I recall he had the crutches on in October, before I moved out of Paul Oullette's apartment that month, which was three months after Lorraine, and so he could have had the cast during the time I was seeing Lorraine.

The last time I saw (but didn't speak to ) Lorraine was when Paul Smith and I were in a restaurant. She was carrying an infant child to prove that Lorraine's share the Child eagle. The following is in many of my updates, but this comes from the 12th of February, 2023: "Back to Kepke in my dream walking up my driveway, almost four decades after I last saw or heard from him. A sickly / bony stag was following behind him, and Paul Smith on crutches followed behind the stag." Is that not amazing? English Paulins are first known in Somerset with Crutch's, and English Smiths almost have the Crutch cross. Kepke the spiderman bringing crutches to my driveway. I get it now. I get it now.

I always called that stag "sickly" from the first I had the dream, but I can now understand why, for Sichs/Sykes' share the "fountains" of Cass'/CASTs!!! I GET IT NOW. That stag was always deciphered as the Trump stag, and so I think someone's going to be lame.

AHAHA, I kid you not. It was only after writing "lame" that I checked for a Lame surname, listed with Crozier-loving Lamps/Lambys!!!!! They are first known in Northumberland with English Velis' (in the Griffin motto).

Paul Smith was my buddy, a licensed carpenter and avid fisherman, and then Carps, in Trump colors and format, are first known in Mecklenburg with Trumps. Carpenters share the Paul crosslets.

The "ASSIduus" motto term of Sichs/Sykes allows me to go to the Assi's, first known in the Orkneys with Flatts. I flattened the spider when I crushed it. I don't like to share a house with fast spiders. Actons could have been from AStons. Craven-connectable Ashborns/Asburners have an "Actio" motto term. Ashburys/Astbury look related to both Cravens/Gravens and Actons. The Sich/Sykes fountains can be for Fountains, first known in Norfolk with Flatt-branch Floats, branches in turn of Flag-related Fleets.

Sichs/Sykes' are first known in Cumberland with Browns/Bruns, and the other Browns/Bruns share the Vaughn Coat, in Smith colors and format, while Paul lived in Vaughn (Ontario city) when we were friends. Sichs share the Flatt and Float chevron, expected to be the Kiss/Cush and Cass/Cast chevron, but also the black one of Flag-loving Foots. Kiss'/Cush's share the red rooster in Crest with English Brunets/Brownetts. French Brunets/Brune's (Languedoc with Tours), who come up as "Brunel," share the tower of Tour-branch Towers, and Tours share the Coat of German Kirks while Sichs are first known in Cumberland with Kirk-related Carmans.

Repeat from above: "The spider was dangling from its web, and Keeps, first known in Sussex with Felix's, have a "weaver's shuttle."...Felix's can be suspect in the "fleece" of Scottish Dingle's." Dingle-dangle. The Dangels/Angels -- sharing Maso/Masella/Mason ROSE -- share blue keys with Chiava's of L'Aquila, suggesting that English Angels have the Massey pegasus. Erika Kirk had dated a Mr. Massey. Scottish Rose's (Nairnshire with Geddes') love Constants, and German Rose's are first known in Silesia with Jena's/Jene's and Brocuffs. Gettes' (Messey/Messier Coat in colors reversed) are first known in Anjou with the Fulk counts.

Flys of Flagi take us to Felix-like Flecks, listed with Flags! That explains why the spider was dangled (by God's will). Fleece-like St. Felice is the patron saint of Picenze, where my mother was born and raised, just a fly's fly from L'Aquila. The old catholic church there is named after Felice. My Masci-line mother lived directly across from that church.

When my mother spent a summer in Picenze at my age 11, the kids and I would play soccer in the front field of the church, and while Europeans call it FOOTball, Foots (Cheshire with Dunham Masci / Dunham Massey) have a griffin holding a flag. I see the Foot Coat related to Flatts/Fletts and Floats (Norfolk with Flags/Flecks, Dunhams, and earl Meschin), and then Fleets (Lincolnshire with Le-Meschin's wife of BolinBROKE) almost have the Flag/Fleck Coat, sharing the Meschin scallops. Dutch Flake's share the wing of German Fulks, and English Fulke's (Norfolk) share the Massey fleur-de-lys on a vertically-split Shield (see also Belgian Flecks) in the colors of the diagonally-split Grief/Greaf/Grave Shield! I would have missed that had I not talked about the soccer.

If that's not enough, wow, the Chase-like Case's, having the Leslie Coat on a red bend, are first known in Norfolk. As Chase's share the Leslie griffin head, Case's were a Chase branch, yet we need to include the Casino-connectable Cassane's and Chance-like Change's (share Casino Coat), both first known in Hampshire with Fly's and Chase's, because while the spider chase points to Epstein's Groff, Cassane's incorporate the Epstein Coat! It's a zinger, brought to you by the Snitch in the Sky, who sees everything, praise be to the Father of Jesus.

When I was in Picenze for the summer, I lived with a man whose name I can't recall, who married Miss Masci. As he took me to his bocci-ball match, I call him Mr. Bocci Ball. That match made an important revelation, for he kept repeating to me, "uno minuto, uno minuto," when I asked him repeatedly if we could leave (I was bored). By the time that I told this story for the first time, I was tracing Minute's/Mynetts to king Amyntes of the Galatians, son of king BROGITarus, high priest of Cybele, and so when checking the Bocci surname, I found it listed with BROCATo's, suggesting that those Galatians went through the L'Aquila area.

While Brocks/Broke's share the Masci fleur-de-lys, BROCuffs share a red griffin holding a flag with Foots! FootBALL and bocci ball can even indicate the English Balls/Balders, first known in Cheshire. It's got king Baldwin of Templar Jerusalem all over it because a future king of Jerusalem was Fulk V while Italian Fulks almost have the Coat of Massi's/Mattis', first known in Abruzzo with L'Aquila. I showed how Brocks/Broke's and Brocuffs point to Jena Masquelier, and her surname looks very related to Masci's/Mascelli's and Meschins/Masculine's, and then Mascarelli's/Mascelli's share the Chief of English Chance's. Jeans/Jane's share the Bruce lion, and I trace Bruce's, anciently Brusi's, to the Abrussi of Abruzzo.

Brooks tell of a Broc location in Anjou, home to the Jerusalem-line Fulks. Brocuffs share the potent cross of Norfolk's Skate's/Sheets and Chads, but also of Sheds/Scheds (Yorkshire with Brook-beloved Beavers) and Skeets/Skits/Skeochs, the latter first known in Ayrshire with the Sheds/Sheddens sharing the Chief-Shield colors of Brocks and Brocuffs. Chaddocks and Chadwicks were a branch of Mascal-related Saddocks/Sedgewicks (Sussex with Felix's), suspect from "Sadducee".

Bocci's/Brocato's are first known in Genova with Grimaldi's, and my mother's maiden name is, Grimaldi. Bocci-like Bookers are suspect with the eagle in the Arms of L'Aquila, and one Booker eagle is colors reversed from the Grief/Greaf eagle. It appears that God set me up as a child in Picenze, and then set up the bocci-ball match to bore me to death. We need to go through many difficulties for the Kingdom, said Paul.

Royals of that Jerusalem used the potent cross, which Taddei's use between the same fleur as used by Masci's. The potent is very linkable to the patonce of Chase's and Chance's, in the colors of the Taddei flory. Tattons (Cheshire) are said to have married Massys, and while Fossa is beside Picenze, Todds (Norfolk with Toots/Tuits and their Twitt branch) share a red fox in Crest with Foss', the latter first known in Sussex with Felix's. The grandmother of Mr. Bocci-Ball's wife was Miss Taddei. Taddei's/Tadders have the flory cross of Bouillons (same place as French Jeune's), in the colors of the Chase and Chance patonce, and Godfrey de Bouillon was the first ruler of Templar Jerusalem, but when he suddenly died, the first official king was made his brother, Baldwin.

Plus while Hamon de Masci was at Dunham Masci, Hamons and Masons/Massins are first known in Kent with Minute's who in turn share the Dragon/Drainer helmets in colors reversed. Dragon-using Drake's, first known in Hampshire with Potters (Dragon/Drainer colors and format), have an "Aquila motto term, and a "Muscas" motto term translated as "fly," and then Muscas'/Mosca's (giant LEOPARD) are first known in Florence with Italian Fulks and Taddei's, and English Leopards and leopard-face Coopers/Coppers are first known in Sussex with Felix's while Cope-branch Copps are first known in the same place as Flys and Potters. The latter share the Flower cinquefoil while my mother's father ran a flour mill across from the Felice church. I assume he inherited it from his Masci wife, for I had found a deed, or document mentioning the sale, telling of the sale to the Masci's (in the 1800s), if I recall correctly.

I climbed up a few times to the church BELL in the steeple. Bell-branch Bellamys married Massys, the same spelling as found in the Tatton write-up. Copps, Cope's and Cups/Cope's share the Maso/Mason and Mazzo rose, and Mazzo's add a griffin possibly of Cheshire's Marble's (from "MarBELL"?), for Marsi lived in Abruzzo. I trace Marsi to the Marici of Pavia, and March's (same place as Jeune's) share the Bellamy crescents. English Marks, Essex with Brocks and Brooks to whom Mr. Bocci Ball points.

While Mr. Bocci Ball married a Taddei liner, Tudors/Tadders share the helmet (different colors) with Minute's, and the latter use "open" helmets while OpenHEIMERs share the "sphinx" (different colors) with Brocuffs. Heimers, first known in Switzerland with demi-lion Graffs/Groffs, share a red "demi-fox" in Crest with Foss'. While Scottish Carla's are first known in Aberdeenshire with Leslie's, Italian Carla's share the Shield of Foss', and may be applying the Irish Leslie lion to it, yet it's also the Graff/Groff lion. See that?

French Chance's share the sun with Jeffreys. I don't mention the Jeffreys much in pointers to Jeffrey Epstein, and while they are first known in Aberdeenshire with Buckle-loving Leslie's, I can now repeat that, when I first entered Texas (by truck), I had a cloud-over-sun omen, which led to my finding the Omens...first known in Suffolk with Case-beloved Buckle's. Scottish Jeffreys have a cloud over sun. JEFFERsons have the griffin, suggesting a Jeffrey link to Leslie's as a pointer to Lesley Groff. Jeffersons are first known in Staffordshire with Jeune-branch June's, and Jena's/Jene's were a Jeune branch.

The Chase griffin has a "key" while five keys are used by Mattis-connectable Chiava's, first known in L'Aquila (seven miles from Mr. Bocci Ball). Cavii Illyrians were on the ancient Mathis river (Albania) while Mathis', sharing the moline of Chiava-like Chives' (Aberdeenshire with Leslie's and Jeffreys), are first known in Burgundy with Chiava-branch Clave's, and with the Messeys sharing the Jefferson saltire, making Jeffreys look like a Jefferson branch by way of the Leslie griffin. Hall of Names still has Jeffersons first known in Herefordshire with the Wefers sharing the Aquila eagle, and with Tudors/Tadders in the colors and format of Chivers/Cheevers, first known in Devon with Vita-loving Saffers, and so note that Chivers/Cheevers share the goat of Frans'/Frantz's while Frants/Friends (Tudor/Tadder colors and format) were previously first known in Somerset with Severs/Savers (beside Griffin-loving Chaffs). The Keips/Keipers could apply to Cheevers because Kepke's have the white goat too, which can argue for a "Kepke" trace to "Caiaphas."

Gaius Julius SEVERus of Acmonia was the son of king Amyntes of Galatia. The Bassus' who descended from Severus take us to one English Bass surname sharing the Mascal escutcheon, and these Bass' are said to be from Haddington, where Mascals/Keiths are first known, tending to reveal a Mascal marriage to Keiths. The Keith-branch Caddys love the Pennants who share the Trevor Coat, and Trevors are said to be from Tudor Trevor. PENdragons share the open helmet with Mynetts, and Pennys/PENES' share the black greyhound with the other Bass'. The PENEStae peoples were on the Drin river with the Cavii.

I trace Leslie's to a Lesce location on the upper Sava/Save, not far up from the Maezaei Illyrians. Save's are first known in Burgundy with Messeys and French Saffers (FIVE FALCons), and Severs/Savers share the Vita annulet while Vita's are first known in Tarvisium while Chives' are first known in Tarves while Trevors are first known in Herefordshire with Tudors/Tadders while Travis'/Travers share the Meschin scallops for a related reason.

A Fossa-trackable fox head is with Vita-loving Bellows/Ballots, first known in Cheshire with Balls/Balders who in turn share the "fireball" with Bocci-like Box's/Boxers.

Charlie is Alive

The Thursday show this week from Candace Owens is looking like the "best" I've seen from her in months, on the Kirk issue. Brace yourself for some satanic Christianity:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-HUyv9LyMg

Part of the reason that this video is one of her best is because she shows Charlie from a camera behind his back (34th minute), which shows how Charlie faked his death. It's one of her best videos also because it reveals how Candace is lying to her audience by being concerned only with one thing: advancing the fable that Charlie was murdered, and taking money from her audience on that "concern."

She is obligated, as is Baron Coleman, to tell the audience that the so-called "necklace" looks more like a grey tube, carrying fake blood, going to the valve of a Hollywood-type squib on Charlie's neck, which faked Charlie's neck wound. She shouldn't deny her audience that possibility, presented as a possibility, under the many circumstances calling for it. Otherwise, the podcasters are charlatans. She waited months to show this video, which she alone possesses aside from Turning Point and the police.

My theory is that the device pushing liquid through the tube created too much pressure, and burst a tube connector below Charlie's chin. Note the black rectangle inserted at the lower-left of the video which hides Charlie's armpit at times, for the device could have been under the armpit. The black box, a redacting object by the looks of it, may have been added to hide only a split-second of the scene, but rather than adding the box for only a split-second, they decided to keep it there.

A good theory is that a two-foot tube goes from the armpit, up over the shoulder on his back side, to roughly under his chin (under the shirt near or under the collar). Then, another 24-inch tube connected to it there, and went around his right shoulder, then back around to his left shoulder, then back down around the front side to the edge of the shirt collar, after which it goes under some fake skin to the valve at the "wound." This theory can explain why we see a thin, tube-like object flying around the back of his neck, and going to the wound. But there seems to be no way to explain how his neck chain is flinging off of his chest in that way.

At 34:50 of her video, one can see the tube to be about 24 inches long. If one follows it around, under the back of the shirt, to his right shoulder, it can be gleaned that the tube end was, and snapped off, roughly under his chin. At 35:38, it can again be seen abour 24 inches long.

Someone could have made a loose connection under his chin, but, even so, if this tube went flinging round the back of his neck, it screams that the device sending fake blood had an explosive amount of gas produced. The device is not likely a mechanical pump, but rather produces some gas to push the liquid, perhaps in a quiet chemical reaction. google AI: "Yes, many modern squib devices — specifically air squibs or pneumatic squibs — use compressed air or gas to propel fake blood."

My theory is that the black rectangle is intended to hide the explosive event. Another camera caught the shirt puffing up, as if some air beneath it, on the back side of the left shoulder i.e. directly above the armpit. "Her" video either doesn't capture this puff, or she's decided not to show the frame or two having it. Indeed, the black rectangle is very telling.

This video shows the audience to Charlie's front. No pistol can be seen. The wound looks like a pistol wound, and people are theorizing that it was a small-powered bullet. Charlie stopped moving as soon as the squib went off, because that's a good way to fake a death scene when you're not an actor. Just close your eyes, appear struck, and fall sideways behind the table with your helper breaking the fall. In reality, a pistol bullet to the neck wouldn't disable motion that quickly, but would rather cause a freak-out reaction of motion, which is why the authorities are conveniently saying that the bullet hit his spinal chord to disable all motion.

I asked google: "does a person move violently if shot in the spinal chord?" "Yes, a person can move violently or experience involuntary movements if shot in the spinal cord. While a complete spinal cord injury (SCI) usually causes immediate, flaccid paralysis (limp muscles) due to 'spinal shock,' it can also trigger involuntary muscle contractions, spasms, or jerky motions known as spasticity or clonus." It is unlikely a bullet would reach the spinal chord because it's at the far back of the neck, which expects the bullet to exit the neck if striking there.

At least Baron is able to say that there was no bullet wound. Candace doesn't say anything much aside from: HE WAS KILLED. Over and over again, her false claim, OVER AND OVER AGAIN. Brainwashing.

From the third update of February, 2019, I talked again about a dream where I saved a fly from a spider above my bed, but afterward, I felt the spider wiggling in my armpit while sleeping. I tried to get out of bed, but was paralyzed...because I was dreaming, and then woke up. It was a nasty feeling. Might this spider relate to Charlie's armpit:

I shared a dream several times of simply a spider on a strand of web trying to approach a fly stuck to the strand. I blocked the spider's path with a piece of cardboard. The only spider-like surname I could find was the Spitzers...

The Fly surname was first found beside the Webbers, and both use the same fleur-de-lys. It's what I need to see to verify that God is in the dream. Spitzers were first found in Styria, suspect with the Styre variation of Sturs [Hampshire], and the latter's Coat can be gleaned in the Crest of Portis'/Porchers because Portishead is near the source of the Stour river (beside Hampshire). Porcher-like Porcia's use boars in the colors of the one boar of German Corners, and the spider was at the CORNER of the ceiling.

There is a second Stur/Stour river in Worcestershire, where HILLs were first found suspect in the Spitzer hills.

Clinton-related Hillarys are likewise first known in Worcestershire, along with the Clent Hills, and so Eliot Spitzer may have been in cahoots when Hillary was a New York politician. Did you note that the spider was at the corner of the ceiling to match the running spider this week going to the hub at the corner of my desk? Scottish Elliots have a "recte" motto term while Reckitts are first known in Kent with Petits and early Petts and PITs. The armpit. Petts are now said to be first known (no longer in Kent) in Hampshire with Fly's. Kent is where Sleeps and TUNbridge is located while Tunnels are also Tunno's. I was sleeping when the spider attacked my armpit. I can link Sleeps to Jena-connectable Darts.

The vertically-split Tunnel/Tunno Shield is in colors reversed with Frans'/Frantz's, and while Erika Kirk is said to descend from Rothsteins, Tunnels/Tunno's share the Roten and Reitman hexagram. Rothsteins list Rothschilds and RODDENstein, and Tunnels/Tunno's are first known in Northumberland with Roddens/Rodhams. Hillary Rodham Clinton. We seem to have two pointers here, to Eliot Spitzer of New York, and Erika Kirk of New York's Corcoran outfit, whatever that sham is.

The Frans/Frantz annulet is shared with Severs, first known in Somerset with Webbers, and where Frants/Friends were previously first known. It's beside the Pits and Chaffs of Dorset, and while Chaffs share the Battle griffin, the Wigley use the embattlement design. The spider was wiggling or twitching in my armpit, and Twitch's/TWIGGs are first known in Derbyshire with Wigleys and Francis'. Lance Twiggs is suspect as a crisis actor in the faked Kirk killing. The other Francis' share the Coat of Courcys, first known in Somerset with Webbers and Frans/Frantz elements.

Twitch's/Twiggs have a white "esquire's helmet" to go with the white squire's helmet of ARMors (Berwickshire with Battle's) showing ARMs. Armpit. Again, Battle-connectable Chaffs are first known in Dorset with Pitts. The latter share the stork with Petts and Store's/Sturys, and while Sturs/Styre's are first known in the same place as Flys, Store's/Sturys are first known in the same place as Tunnels. It seems this spider in my armpit does connect to Spitzers, first known in Styria. That's my web stury and I'm sticking to it.

The same Elliots use a baton to go with the "bastion" of English Angels, first known in Lancashire with Charlie's of Chorley, and with the Ardens in the Pett motto. The bat WINGs of English Batons/Bastons take to Wings/Winks, first known in Worcestershire. Corners/Garners share a red griffin in Crest with FLAG-using Brocuffs, and Flys are said to be a of Flagi location. The fly was attacked at the top corner of the ceiling. The three Charlie "bottles" are in the colors of the three Armor arms, which is looking petty good.

Armors share the stars of ceiling-like Sealys/Ceileys/CELys while Keele's and Cheile's are first known in Lincolnshire with Harms/Arme's and Armys. That's a compelling way to decipher the ceiling location, yet the event was half on the wall. German Harms even have a flag but call it a "pennon," and Pennons look related to the Coat of Frants/Friends! Pennons are first known in Suffolk with the Tigers in the Sealy/Ceiley Crest, and with the Tunno-like Towns/Tune's.

Keele's share the quadrants of Drive's/Drove's, first known in Hampshire with Flys and Drake's. I trace Keele's to L'Aquila, and "Aquila" is a motto term of Drake's who use a "fly" motto term as translation of their "muscas" motto term. Italian Este's and Aquila's share the eagle of Wefers while English Weavers have an "Esto" motto term. Wefers are first known in Herefordshire with arm-using Brace's, and Bracebridge's are first known in Lincolnshire with Armys and Harms/Arme's. The latter use a "sphere" in Spear colors.

Candace claims she verified that military people were on-campass when the Kirk-shooting took place, who wore maroon shirts. Marone's/Marooneys are in Sealy/Ceiley colors and format. Flys are first known in Hampshire with Marine's, and their Mariner branch in Kent, in case the U.S. Marines apply.

The cardboard which I used to defend the fly perhaps goes to the "carNATIONs" of Papers, for Nations/Nathans have the campass-like compass while Natts/Nathans are first known in Rhineland with Tunnel-connectable Frantz's. It would be amazing if Harms/Arme's are in Orm colors due to being a branch, for that could point my armpit to Orem campass. The Arrows in the Nation/Nathan Crest share the Webber fleur-de-lys. Paper-like Scottish Pape's/Pope's have a Pump variation in case Charlie's device was a pump. English Pape's/Popps share a tiger in Crest with Sealys/Ceileys. Fly's are first known in Hampshire with Poppins/Pophams.

The Cards have a giant lion head, and if it's the Bruce lion, it traces to the lion in the Arms of Brescia, where Italian Lane's are first known almost having the Harm/Arme Coat. Papers are first known in Gloucestershire with the Walls, and the web was where the wall meets the ceiling.

The cardBOARD can go to BOARDers, first known in Somerset with Carys, Carts, Charts/Chards and Pepin-connectable Webbers. The Chart-beloved Partridge's almost have the Bracebridge Shield, and do have the Pepoli and Halper/Halfpenny Shield while Halps/Halfs/HELPs are first known in Lincolnshire with Bracebridge's and Harms/Arme's. I was helping to save the fly from harm. Arm-using Brace's are first known beside Halpers/Halfpennys and Papers, and the latter's CARnations can be for Cary liners. Partridge's/PERTridge's are first known in Kent with early Petts/PERTs, a branch of Pits. Armpit.

The Harm/Arme sphere is a besant, and both Besant surnames can be linked to Bee's and bee-using Bessins and Bistons while Bracebridge's have a "Be" motto term and while Bistons are first known in Worcestershire with the Halpers/Halfpennys who almost have the Bracebridge Shield.

However, the spider was in my right armpit, and Charlie's squib device is suspect in his left armpit. But it could have been in his right armpit. The tube could have crossed his back then up over the left shoulder to the "wound." However, his shirt puffed up on the rear-left shoulder.

My right-armpit area had a muscle twitch for about a year, I was worried about it. Twitch's/Twiggs can point to Lance Twiggs, and then Lance's have the fesse, in colors reversed, from the Lance-like Alans, first known in Shropshire with Cards, and the Sleap location of Sleeps. I was sleeping when the spider wiggled in my armpit.

If the cardboard is to go to Papers, it's notable that they share the lion heads of Tube- / Tober-like Tabers whose "Soles" motto term can go to the Sole's, first known in Derbyshire with Twitch's/Twiggs and Wigleys. Amazingly, Tabers have a "Soles occiDERE" phrase while Italian Dere's have "lances," I kid you not. Almost forgot: Lance's are first known in Norfolk with Twitch-like Twitts/Thwaits and their Tuit/Tute branch! This paragraph appears arranged by God to point to Lance Twiggs. But if he's in the spider, how might he link to the spiders this week which depicting Lesley Groff and/or Jena Masquelier? "OCCidere" can be partly for Oaks/Oke's, first known in Somerset with same-colored Webbers. Oaks/Oke's were related to Alans of Oakhampton, and Alans have the Lance fesse in colors reversed. e

AHH, Alans tell of being early in Mileham of Norfolk, and while Lance's are first known in Norfolk too, it's now gets crazy where Milehams are in the colors and format of Spitzer-like Spitals! Flaad, the father of the Dol Alans, is in the Alan write-up while I FLATTened the first spider this week! I showed how Flatts/Fletts link to Flags, and then Flys of Flagi are first known in the same place as Mills/Meilles'! The Tigers and Towns/Tune's are first known in Suffolk with the Malo-beloved Buckle's, and also with Mallets who share the scallops of Mill- and Mile-beloved Rinds, and then St. Malo is beside Dol.

If the wiggling spider was in my armpit as a pointer to Charlie's tube device in his armpit, then as houseofnames has no Tube surname, I've got to go to google: "Variations: Related or similar names include Tube, Tubb, Dube, Tobe, Taube (German for "pigeon"), and Tubes, says FamilySearch."

Tobers are also Taube's, Dauber, and Dobers, a branch of Dobermans. Ahh, Tubbs share the fleur-de-lys of Nation-beloved Arrows and Webbers! Tubbs have: "Tube was registered in Warwickshire" Sealy-like Seals are first known in Cornwall with Tippers while Kennedys of Tipperary share the helmet with Dobys. Taber-connectable Papers have the carNATIONs. Sleeps are first known in Kent with Fiens/Finis' sharing the Taber and Paper lions. Sleeps could be related to the Coat of Deads/Daubeneys/Dobneys, who were gleaned recently as a Deed-Doby merger. Deeds/Dade's (Norfolk with Lance's) share the Clent/Clint Coat in case you want to re-read above at the Clent Hills.

Dobys, first known in Renfrewshire with the Spears suspect in the Harm sphere, share the helmet (different color) with Twitch's/Twiggs and Armors. Spears and Haldans are first known in the same place with Scottish Pollocks while Jewish Pollocks were kin of DOBERmans/Tubbermans probably because DOBRawa was the wife of Polish duke, Mieszko I. His other wife was Oda of Haldensleben, and Haldans share the "Suffer" motto of Haddens, first known in Derbyshire with Sole's suspect in the motto of Tabers (Tupper colors). Mieszko myth traced him to a Piast the wheelwright, and while Wrights/Rights are first known in Sussex with Boards, the latter share the antelope in Crest (different color) with Wheelwrights. The spider was in the RIGHT armpit, and Pits share the checkered fesse of Scottish Wrights/Rights.

Pits share the besants of Spitzer-like Spitals, did I miss that until now? Spitals are first known in Dumbartonshire with Eure's suspect in the HOURglass of Houstons (same place as Pollocks) who likewise share the Wright/Right checks.

This video is long, but makes the case, in some fog, for Erika's Kirk's contact with Epstein animals:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJKJ4XhvJLY

Mechanics of Evaporation Via Heat Material

There are articles online to help you see a little of what vapor pressure is, though everyone wrongly describes the mechanics with the false, kinetic theory of atoms in view. Vapor pressure is easy to understand: the pressure of a gas above a liquid in a sealed container. The higher the liquid temperature, the higher the vapor pressure, for two reasons: 1) the gas is hotter; 2) the gas has more atoms. There is nothing incomprehensible here. Moving on.

google AI: "Vapor pressure is inversely proportional to the strength of intermolecular forces (often referred to as intermolecular bond strength or attraction)." That is, the higher the vapor pressure of any material, the weaker the atomic bond. That is a bad way to put it because, the higher the gas pressure above the liquid, the more the pressure pushes liquid atoms closer together. How does that make the atomic bond weaker? Instead, the atomic bonds are made weaker by the heat material in the liquid.

The kinetic theory claims that all materials at the same liquid temperature have an IDENTICAL kinetic-energy level for causing evaporation. They would then imagine, or at least predict, that the lightest atoms, in combination with the most-weakly attracting liquid atoms, will have the lowest evaporation points. So, as they do not in fact know which the lightest and heaviest atoms are, and because they do not know the relative weights of any atoms, they destine themselves to making this error: materials with low evaporation points and having what they think are heavy atoms MUST have weak inter-attraction of liquid atoms, and vice versa. If they do announce the specific atomic-bond strength by this reasoning, they are lost in chaos.

There's no liquid pressure at the liquid surface, and therefore there's no added bond strength to liquid atoms from liquid pressure. Liquid pressure doesn't make liquid atoms attract each other more, but rather gravity pulls the atoms down such that they merge a little deeper into each other, making it harder for upward heat to pop surface atoms into the vapor. Gravity force upon surface atoms is minimal, but does exist, yet it can be ignored when using vapor-pressure levels for seeking how strongly various atoms are bonded by attraction force. It's advantageous for one to know the relative inter-attraction at material boiling points, for this can help reveal the relative sizes of atoms, for, the larger the atom, the easier it evaporates, which is the very opposite of what kineticists believe.

It's laughable, actually, and they deserve to be laughed at because they failed to adhere to good physics when sacrificing the truth before their eyes: all atoms weigh the same. That's why the largest atoms evaporate at the lowest temperature, because larger size has NOTHING to do with how heavy atoms are, but receive more upward lift than smaller atoms at the same temperature. This is the secret to the beginning of unlocking the relative inter-attraction forces of all the different atoms.

It's not true that liquid atoms/molecules JUMP out of the liquid surface due to kinetic atoms i.e. in fast motion. Rather, surface atoms are PUSHED out by rising heat particles giving them lift. It's propulsion force. The problem may be: materials at the same temperature could have heat particles rising at different speeds, with different numbers per second, and different densities.

You understand. If the task is to know which atoms are more-strongly bonded than others, it would be much better is the upward heat-particle effect was identical for all liquids at the same temperature. But if one type of liquid gets more upward heat force than another at the same temperature, it becomes a mess to know the relative bond-strengths. The good news may be: the specific upward heat force per given temperature per given material may be such a minor player that it may be ignored.

Heat particles can be less dense and yet more numerous is they are on a wide "highway." There's going to more-numerous cars passing a gas station in a three-lane highway, as compared to a one-lane highway with cars twice as dense i.e. twice closer to each other. Therefore, when the tunnels or passageways between the atoms of a material are wider, they get more-numerous heat particles passing through, but only on that basis, which is not the only consideration for creating the level of upward force (or evaporative capability) at the liquid surface.

More-numerous heat particles flowing through a more-open material could perfectly offset the evaporative capability of more-dense, speedier heat particles in a less-open material. If the cars on the one-lane highway are twice as fast and twice as dense as upon the three-lane highway, the one-lane highway is the one you want to be on for saving time. I feel that a material with thinner passages through the atomic spaces will naturally get faster speeds and higher density of "cars," as much as that might strike you as wrong.

Rising heat particles strike atoms on their way up, but not all of them. In a three-lane highway, two lanes could be viewed with tires scraping the curb, but the middle-lane cars get no such frictional slow-down. In the same way, only the outside "lanes" of heat particles strike atoms on their way up.

The faster and more-dense they are initially propelled to rise, from the heat source at the bottom of a pot, the more PHYSICAL force they might strike atoms, in comparison with slower and more-numerous particles in wider passageways. Their striking atoms works to separate atoms i.e. it weakens their bond strength. However, the slower and more-numerous ones will slow less because they have a higher percentage of particles not striking atoms, for striking atoms slows them down. Therefore, the ones that begin fast and dense due to thinner passages will slow much, and the slower ones will slow less in wider passages... such that the evaporative capability could be identical for both situations, where they both have the same heat amount entering the pot.

That situation means that both materials will have the same density of particles within the atomic spaces, which I define as the same temperature. The higher the heat-particle density, the higher the temperature, the stronger the vaporizing capability.

The reason that I expect faster particles in thinner passages is that liquid flow in tubes becomes faster when the tube diameter is suddenly made thinner. They have the same density of molecules passing a certain point, but the thinner tube has them moving faster such that they have more forward to erode the walls of the tube. Faster heat particles strike atoms harder.

Heat particles are electrons and therefore differ from liquid molecules in that electrons repel each other. The more dense, the closer they are, the harder they repel each other and thus cause faster speed. However, where they take on faster speed, they also become less dense by nature of their faster speed, like when you get to the end of a traffic jamb, cars speed up and become less dense at that point.

google AI: "Liquid materials at the same temperature do not have the same total energy level. While they share the same average kinetic energy (temperature), they differ in internal energy due to varying masses, heat capacities, and intermolecular forces." The point in sharing the quote is to show that kineticists have all materials with the same kinetic energy at the same temperature, yet as different materials have different evaporation points, the kineticist is going to explain that by claiming: 1) all atoms have different masses = weights; 2) all atoms have different levels of inter-attraction. The atoms with less mass and weaker bonds get the lowest evaporation temperature. But it's not true. In reality, the atoms with larger size are more apt to evaporating at lower temperatures, and if two types of atoms are the same size (same cross-sectional size), the material allowing more-forceful upward heat will get the lower evaporation temperature, or, where all materials are at the same temperature, the ones with largest atoms and more-forceful heat rise will produce the higher rates of evaporation i.e. higher numbers of atoms in the gas, and thus higher vapor pressures.

Where you read different "heat capacities" in the quote, it's how much heat needs to be stuffed into a given material to raise it one degree. According to my model, the amount of heat stuffing has partly to do with the specific volume of atomic spaces, and partly with how easily electron atmospheres can be compressed by the invading heat. The compression of electron atmospheres makes the atomic spaces larger, for atomic spaces are directly between (merged) electron atmospheres. The greater the atomic-space volume in combination with easier-to-compress electron atmospheres, the more heat needed to raise the temperature by one degree, and thus the more heat capacity the material has.

A thermometer that registers double the expansion of a material claims twice the temperature, but as electrons create more than twice the force per a doubling of electron numbers, it can argue against linear proportionality between electron density and temperature.

To again show that modern science doesn't know the mechanics of vapor-pressure causes, AI first says: "...vapor pressure is a unique characteristic property determined by specific intermolecular forces [inter-attraction], MOLECULAR WEIGHT [caps mine], and structure. Substances only share the same vapor pressure at a given temperature if they have identical strengths of intermolecular forces." That doesn't make sense to me because there are three ingredients in the first sentence, and only one ingredient, atomic-bond strength, in the second, meaning that kineticists can pick and choose which one, according to their needs, for example fooling the public with simpleton theory versus arguing with experts.

That second sentence is admitting that molecular weight has NOTHING to do with evaporation rates. Their prediction that heavier atoms need higher temperatures to evaporate is not truly the case in their experimental results. Kineticists have seen that their predictions of evaporation points are not the reality, but rather than this being big news calling for a re-vamping of their atomic model, they continued to push their dope.

Note that they include atomic "structure" with the rate of evaporation. That could mean more than one thing. For me, it means atomic size and shape, both of which are predicted to affect evaporation rates.

Molecular weight is in that quote because, the heavier the surface atom, the more heat force needed to get it to jump into the vapor. That's merely the prediction, not the reality.

As part as the same response, AI says: "Substances with similar molecular sizes and intermolecular forces (like London dispersion forces) are most likely to have similar vapor pressures." No longer is it by atomic-bond strength alone, but also by atomic "size," which is what I claim, but for the kineticist, atomic size is proportional to atomic weight, meaning they have a massive problem on their hands. Get over it. Look Galileo's Pisa experiments in the eyes, and admit: all atoms weigh the same. With that in mind, you will be able to understand why all materials fall to gravity at the same speed, no matter their size or weight.

It's time for my boomerang to the back of his neck. His theory requires that, starting from scratch with a pot of cold liquid, the vapor formation should increase steady per each degree of temperature rise. There's linear increase, vapor formation proportional to temperature rise, twice as much gas per twice the temperature, with no exponential increase. He claims that, twice the temperature has twice the kinetic energy. He has nothing in his evaporation mechanics to explain the reality: vapors increase exponentially with each degree of temperature rise. goggle AI: "Yes, doubling the absolute temperature (in Kelvin) of an ideal gas effectively doubles the average translational kinetic energy of its molecules." Big problem there, needing an ad-hoc fix.

My theory can explain the reality by the same principle in effect where double wind speed creates exponentially eight times the force. Bringing gas atoms twice as close is known to produce eight times the gas pressure. Therefore, doubling the density of heat particles likewise increases force exponentially. Double the wind speed into a wall sends both the air atoms and air's free electrons closer together to the point that they exert eight times the electromagnetic force. It strongly reveals that double the wind speed brings particles twice as close.

But the kinetic theory has no liquid or gas atoms under inter-repulsion, and so it can't use this exponential rise in power to explain exponential rise in vapor formation. Big problem there, needing an ad-hoc fix.

As my evaporative process is due to heat-particle electrons, it can explain an exponential rise in vapor formation. As temperature expands materials, and as double the temperature theoretically means twice the material expansion (not always exactly the case), I would render the opinion that twice the temperature places heat particles far less than twice as close, at maximum 33-percent closer, for when they are 100-percent closer (twice as close), I'm thinking that they exert eight times the expansion force, but when roughly 33-percent closer, they are predicted to offer twice the expansion force.

In his theory, where he defines heat as the speed of atoms, all he has is speed to work with, but without repulsion force, and without electrons. Poor, ailing baboon, realizing that kineticism can't explain expounding levels of vapor production, but incapable of abandoning kineticism for the heat-material model.

To verify for you that kineticism cannot predict or explain exponential increase in vapor formation, I asked google: "in kinetic theory, do atoms of the same substance at 200 K move twice as slow as at 400 K?" The response has them going significantly less than twice as slow: "approximately 1.41 times faster [at 400 K], not by a factor of 2."

They say that the kinetic energy is doubled when doubling the K temperature, but that, even when doubling from 300 K to 600 K, the speed increase is only by 1.41 times. I don't know how they got 1.41, but as atoms are not kinetic, it's by way of pseudo-science. All they have is speed of atoms. If there's twice the speed of the same, non-repelling objects, they MUST produce 2 times the physical force. If there's only 1.41 times the speed, it cannot produce twice the kinetic energy. Therefore, they probably have a good reason for creating their 1.41 figure, a reason that hopes to save kineticism in some way(s).

google AI:

Yes, vapor formation (specifically, the equilibrium vapor pressure) has an exponential relationship with increasing temperature...Vapor pressure increases non-linearly with temperature, described by the Clausius-Clapeyron relation...The rise in vapor pressure is much steeper than the linear pressure increase expected for an ideal gas...This means that small increases in temperature can lead to large, rapid increases in vapor formation."

Where they say "ideal gas," it's the gas predicted by kineticism. Where it says, "the rise in vapor pressure is much steeper than the linear pressure increase expected for an ideal gas," it means they should trash kineticism. Naturally, the imposters have concocted a false explanation for exponential vapor increase, and so let's read it: "The exponential increase occurs because the fraction of molecules with enough kinetic energy to escape [the liquid] increases much faster than the average energy...." Oh well, they know that the temperature increase is exponential, but then imply an exponential speed-up of molecules even though the kinetic model doesn't allow it. We are dealing with children-like adults who will not be honest with the public.

The Clausius-Clapeyron relation: "It states that vapor pressure increases exponentially with temperature, often approximated as a 7% increase per 1°C rise in atmospheric moisture." Ya-but, in kineticism, doubling the temperature of a liquid gets a maximum of twice the kinetic energy in the liquid's atoms such that you get this simple prediction: vapor atoms cannot become more than twice as numerous per doubling of temperature. That's all that kineticism allows, and so the Clausius-Clapeyron relation denies kineticism as a viable theory.

If heat particles were mere pebbles without electromagnet force, then they would only double the heat energy with twice as many of them going up at the same speed, or if they all doubled their speed without increasing in number. But doubling the number of electromagnetic particles, even without an increase in speed initially, creates exponential force to increase speed and erode liquid-surface atoms into the air in exponentially-increasing numbers.

The goofers don't have a heat material flowing through their imaginary liquid. All that these impoverished ducks have to show for a century of quackeries is vibrating atoms exerting no significant electromagnetic force, and none of the atoms are flowing as a batch in the upward direction to pave the way for additional heat. In reality, the denser the heat material, the faster it rises, the better the particles pave open pathways to the surface for increasing velocity all the more.

Next, we want to tackle:

All liquids, regardless of their individual intermolecular forces, exhibit the same vapor pressure at their respective normal boiling points (typically 1 atm....

In other words, all boiling points have vapor pressures equal to the 14.7 psi, normal air pressure. Why should this be? Why should the vapor pressure of a boiling metal, in a sealed container, in the thousands of degrees, equal atmospheric pressure? Where's the relationship? It turns out that there is nothing spectacular about it.

All boiling-point temperatures are set at one atmosphere of pressure without a lid on the liquid container. The air above the liquid is placing one atmosphere of pressure on the liquid surface. Therefore, it's to no surprise that the same liquid temperature is in effect, under a sealed lid, when the vapor pressure reaches one atmosphere. For the purposes of doing the experiment, one starts with a vacuum between the liquid and the lid, then heats it until the vapor achieves one atmosphere of pressure.

The good news is that kineticists can be proven imposters when they begin to talk like this:

Yes, the internal pressure of a liquid (the vapor pressure inside bubbles) is equal to the surrounding atmospheric pressure for all liquids at their boiling points...their internal vapor pressure equals the external pressure.

No, wait, don't be deceived. The air pressure outside the liquid is equal to the pressure of the liquid surface, not the full interior of the liquid. The air resting on the liquid surface is transferring its pressure to it, but the liquid has increasing liquid pressure of its own such that the pressure is greater than the air pressure inside the liquid body. This next statement admits it, no surprise:

Yes, the liquid internal pressure (the total pressure within the liquid, including atmospheric pressure and hydrostatic pressure [= liquid pressure]) is effectively the same for all liquids at their respective boiling points when boiling occurs at the same external pressure (e.g., 1 atm).

I don't think that statement is correct at all. They get it wrong because they imagine the boil bubbles filled with vapor, and so they decided (predicted) that bubbles should have exactly the pressure of the air. That's wrong, and I'll explain why.

Heat has a lot harder time rising through metal liquid than water, not because of air pressure, which is the same for both, but because metals produce higher liquid pressure...not due to heavier atoms, but due to having more atoms per unit volume resulting in more weight per unit volume. It shows that metals have by far the smaller atoms than water, which is exactly the reason that metals have higher evaporation points, for smaller atoms get less lift from rising heat. You understand, the larger the bird wing, the more lift it gets per flap, because it strikes more air atoms than a smaller wing. The larger the atom, the more rising heat particles it gets underneath it. Simple physics, no stretching of the mind needed.

google AI: "Yes, boiling bubbles (water vapor) are smaller at the bottom of the pot and grow larger as they rise to the surface. They initiate at the bottom due to heat (nucleation sites) and expand in size due to reduced hydrostatic pressure..." By "hydrostatic" pressure, they refer to gravity i.e. liquid pressure. Thus, they admit that liquid pressure cannot be the same for all materials at boiling point, for liquid pressure yet remains. Why do they then insist that all liquids at boiling point have the same pressure?

I had to ask: "is liquid internal pressure (not vapor pressure) at 1 atmosphere only at the top of liquids when at their boiling points?" The response is correct:

No, the liquid's internal pressure (static pressure) is only approximately 1 atmosphere at the surface. As you move deeper into the liquid, the internal pressure increases due to the weight of the liquid above, a concept known as hydrostatic pressure.

The rising heat within the liquid counteracts some of both, the gravity force and atmospheric pressure. In the meantime, the heat is reducing the total atomic bond precisely because it consists partially of gravity force and partially of atmospheric pressure.

The rising heat doesn't know the difference between the three forces keeping the atoms closer than would otherwise be the case. It's one total force. The rising heat counteracts all three as best it can, not at all meaning that the three are not simultaneously acting at full blast. Like, when you hold up a banana, it counteracts gravity, yet gravity is still pulling on it. The air is yet weighing down on the banana, but your arm has counteracted that force too. The heat raises the water level of the liquid due to it's upward thrust, putting more distance between water molecules, yet gravity pulls them down just the same. Rising heat lowers the liquid pressure.

In order for the water to boil, all three forces must be overcome, and yet they cannot be fully overcome anywhere in the liquid but where the bubbles plow through. Only when the heat bubbles -- filled with and formed by heat particles -- move fast and large enough to overcome all three forces will the liquid cease to go hotter. In my mind, this point cannot arrive until the bubbles: 1) have overcome all resistance to upward flow, and, 2) become large and fast enough to spew as many heat particles out as the heat source is pushing in. That's the true mechanical definition of boiling point.

I asked google for the "mechanical definition of boiling point." It had the audacity to say: "The mechanical definition of the boiling point is the temperature at which the saturated vapor pressure of a liquid equals the external pressure [air pressure] surrounding the liquid. At this temperature, vapor pressure overcomes external pressure, causing bubble formation throughout the liquid." That's stupid. They have the vapors rising from the liquid overcoming air pressure acting on the liquid surface. That's stupid, but that's all they have to argue with. Heat material IN the liquid overcomes air pressure IN the liquid.

If you merely look at steam above a boiling pot of water, you know that the steam isn't keeping the air pressure from acting on the liquid. It's still there. It's not the air pressure above the liquid that's overcome, but rather the air pressure acting into the liquid that's overcome, by the speed of the bubbles.

Where the above says, "the saturated vapor pressure of a liquid equals the external pressure," what in tarnation is the saturated vapor pressure of a liquid? There can be no vapor in the liquid.
Here's how they explain the maximum temperature at boiling:

Liquid water does not rise in temperature at the boiling point because all the added heat energy is consumed in the phase change from liquid to gas (a process known as latent heat of vaporization) rather than increasing the kinetic energy (temperature) of the molecules.

That explanation can be proven false. It's trying to convince us that the boil bubbles formed nearest the heat source, at the bottom of the pot, absorb sufficient heat, via liquid turning into the vapor within the bubbles, that the heat source can no longer add heat to the liquid, even if the heat source is turned up wildly hotter. To disprove this explanation, one needs only to point out that vapors have atoms spaced apart by a fair distance. Can you see what's wrong with this picture, especially as the bubble grows larger when flowing to the liquid surface?

The liquid is wall-to-wall atoms upon the bubble "wall." There is no wall. The wall is the liquid, and all the molecules in the liquid are bubble destroyers wishing to invade the bubble. How can a few, sporadic vapor atoms, which contact the bubble walls only intermittently, possibly keep out the back-to-back invaders? They can't. The kineticists are making baboons of themselves again, because they refuse to define heat as free electrons in the liquid.

Had they properly defined heat, they would have realized that the bubbles are not filled with vapor, or at least not vapor alone, but are instead formed by, and filled with, heat particles. In being electrons, they are far smaller than atoms, and as such the heat particles can, and do, keep the invasion into the bubble from taking place, because there are numerous particles all across the faces of the invaders, and they have outward-directed repulsion as their weapon.

I don't think that one can find the relative bond strength of atoms from their boiling points. We can't even know how many layers of surface atoms are removed (evaporated) simultaneously at boiling point. Water in a vacuum boils so rapidly at room temperature that many layers must be blasting off at once.

To know the relative bond strength, one would need to be concerned with one atom blasting off at a time for all liquids. That doesn't look possible at boiling point. I do think that one could get a good feel for bond strength by listing the initial evaporation points of all materials. If, for example, one material begins to evaporate at 300 K, and another at 600 K, one could propose that the latter material has atoms bonded twice as strongly, for one could propose that twice the heat-particle force is active, at twice the temperature, to make those atoms blast off.

Or, if one material had initial evaporation at 442 K while another at 678 K, the latter would have 678 / 442 = 1.53 times stronger bond. The one at 422 K would be 1.53 times weaker, or 442 / 678 = .65 as strong. Now you know how to do the math for all material combinations. But can you find the initial-evaporation points of many materials? google says: "Yes, there are numerous tables and resources that show the initial boiling points and vapor pressures of various liquids, which represent the initial point of evaporation." But, it doesn't offer where I could find such a table. When I asked it to find me a table, it only gave a page describing evaporation (by the kinetic view of it, of course). I accuse kineticists of hiding such a table from us.

Once you have the relative evaporation points for many materials, you can compare them to your home-made list of atomic-bond strengths obtained from the melting points of the same materials, for I suspect that melting point is roughly or exactly when gravity first gets the upper hand against the atomic bond. I think that atoms at the melting point have bonds roughly equal to the gravity force upon them.

It is not necessarily true that the atomic bond is stronger for materials having greater distance between melting and boiling points, for I think that some atoms defy heat in their midst due more to their entanglement than their inter-attraction forces. Entanglement is due to proton shapes such a C or L, for example. Atoms can hook each other, and therefore cling together by that method. Atomic shape can therefore be considered a part of the atomic-bond strength.

Liquid Vapor Pressure, Desperate Concoction

As one needs to be about 40 feet deep in water to reach a pressure of one atmosphere, it tells that the anti-gravity heat material in a pot of water QUICKLY -- at a low temperatures -- counteracts fully the boon to the bond strength of water molecules provided by gravity-induced liquid pressure. That is, air pressure is by far the main factor in keeping water molecules bonded.

In the case of water, and perhaps most other liquids, gravity force may not be the first to be fully alleviated. They say that water evaporates even at, and below, its melting temperature, and I assume this is true in a lab i.e. apart from wind's facilitation outdoors. Therefore, heat-particle rise in water may first fully counteract the attractive bond of water molecules, and only at a higher temperature might it fully counteract gravity force at the liquid surface.

We might ask: if heat-particle lift can separate water molecules such as to turn them to gas at 0 C, why is there still a liquid existing at the boiling point, when heat-particle lift is far superior? The only possible explanation is that air atoms contact the liquid surface, though the baboons are loath to admit this because they have reasons, not good ones, to deny gas-atom contact with liquid atoms.

Some bugs walk on water precisely because air atoms contact the water surface to create "surface tension." The air weighs down on the water, but as air atoms are separated, air can't weigh down on all water molecules simultaneously. Evaporation should be easy to do. However, at boiling point, there is congestion / heavy traffic where out-blasted water molecules strike air atoms for a distance above the surface, and this is expected to force some of the steam molecules back into the liquid just about as soon as they are blasted out.

The air creates congestion also for the rising heat particles such that we could assume some of them going back into the liquid too. Only when there is a vacuum above the water can the particles and molecules rise freely away. AI: "A glass of water in a perfect vacuum will not last long, generally boiling away or freezing solid within a matter of seconds to a few minutes." Therefore, the air keeps the water from undergoing such rapid evaporation. Heat-particle rise is strong enough at normal atmospheric temperatures to disconnect water molecules against both their attraction forces and the pull of gravity. However, water is different than other liquids because its molecules become more separated with decreasing temperature below 2 C, explaining why ice evaporates even at -200 C. It means that, even at that cracking-low temperature, heat-particle rise is able to counteract the downward pull of gravity upon water molecules.

Mercury atoms evaporate only at room temperature or higher. As they merge deeper into each other with decreasing temperature, they cannot evaporate at all, eventually, at a certain, cold temperature. It means that heat-particle lift upon is in unable to separate mercury atoms at cold temperature. Someone at reddit, who understands only the kinetic view of evaporation, writes (square brackets mine):

A glass of mercury in a perfect vacuum will last significantly longer than in open air [with air currents facilitating evaporation], but it will eventually evaporate or sublime due to the lack of surrounding pressure. While in air a small amount might last for years, a vacuum (especially one with a continuous pump) will accelerate evaporation by removing the vapor layer, potentially leading to the disappearance of a small quantity within months.

He's been brainwashed into believing that evaporation happens when a vibrating liquid atom/molecule arrives to a speed sufficient to break the atomic bond. In my model, the upward lift either has the power to break the bond, or it doesn't. The kinetic view is that atoms are constantly changing their vibratory speeds. If a vibrating atom gets struck by a slower-vibrating atom, the struck one becomes slower and the striker becomes faster. He imagines that, if an atom is struck a half-dozen times in a row by six faster atoms, the struck one could possibly become a gas atom.

Whenever you stury physics, you need to be wary of pseudo-science from theory only, as theories have been deemed facts over the decades.

We now want to know: if heat-particle rise is able to overcome gravity force on water molecules in ice at -200 C, why doesn't ice melt until 0 C? If melting is as I define it, the point when gravity force first overcomes the molecular-bond strength, why can heat-particle rise overcome that bond strength at much lower temperatures? First of all, ice may not evaporate at -200 C unless it's in wind. But assuming it evaporates without wind effects, then all I can say is that heat-particle force can be greater at -200 C than gravity force.

But wait. Why can't heat-particle force barely lift a mercury atom at 40 C? Because it's a smaller atom. Heat-particle force increases when it's lifting larger objects. Water molecules are therefore larger than mercury atoms.

But wait. I would be negligent if not adding that heat-particle force acts in all directions, not only upward. It's gravity that causes the upward lift, but, ignoring gravity, heat particles are electrons inter-repelling in all directions equally. They can push atoms apart at liquid surfaces all on their own power.

I'm not saying that the bond strength of water molecules is weaker at sub-zero temperatures than all materials with evaporation points above atmospheric temperatures. Initial evaporation points cannot disclose the atomic-bond strength unless we also know the size of the atom/molecule. That is, unless we also know the force acting to tear the bond apart, and that force is always greater the larger the atom/molecule. Every specific temperature has a corresponding heat-particle force -- to be viewed as the force level of one electron repelling it's immediate neighbors -- but if that specific force acts on a larger atom, the total force to the atom is greater than when the same force acts on a small atom. It's the same principle as when gravity pulls on all atoms with the same force, but the object having a larger size (i.e. more atoms) gets pulled with the greater force.

The total atomic-bond strength of all solids has all three factors built-in, atmospheric and liquid pressure as well as inter-attraction. See what I'm saying? As a solid forms from a liquid, all the atmospheric pressure on the liquid is still in the solid even though atmospheric pressure has zero ability to force solid atoms closer together. The atmosphere already pushed them closer together when the solid was a liquid.

The gravity force already pulled the atoms closer together when the solid was a liquid. Therefore, every solid object that was once a liquid has atoms slightly closer where the solid was once the bottom of a liquid.

When the melting point arrives in which gravity overcomes the atomic bond, it's overcoming all three factors that once existed in the liquid. The total atomic bond (from all three) is weaker than gravity force during the heating process above melting point, and the total bond strength is overcome at evaporation point, but only at the liquid surface. Two atoms down from the liquid surface, it takes twice the force to get the atom to fly out because it's got an atom sitting on top of it. You can see that initial evaporation point is to be defined as when only the top layer of atoms can go flying.

As temperature increases, two layers can go free at once, then three layers with added temperature. By the time of the boiling point, a couple of inches of water depth can go flying per hour...but not one molecule can go flying if there is an air atom upon its head, because all the air atoms to miles in height add their collective weights to the top of that head. Only the molecules between air atoms can leave.

The kineticist knows that air atoms cannot transfer their weights to each other, all the way to the ground, unless they inter-repel, but he will not hearken. He chooses to remain an ignoramus.

As the air is so heavy, it's got to be true that the collective air sticks its "prongs" into the water for some depth. I don't know how that chaos might work, but it's known that atmospheric weight (defined as air pressure) transfers to the water molecules. The definition of boiling point is where the upward thrust of boil bubbles fully counteracts this air pressure. AI agrees as per my question, "can boiling point be defined as the point where liquid heat finally overcomes air pressure?"

Yes, the boiling point can be defined as the temperature at which the vapor pressure of a liquid equals the external atmospheric pressure. In this state, the liquid has gained enough energy ("heat") to create internal vapor bubbles that are strong enough to withstand and overcome the surrounding air pressure.

The latter part means that boil bubbles achieve zero restriction to upward flow, when the boiling point is reached.

As the kineticist can't explain how evaporation steals kinetic heat from water, and as I showed above that boil bubbles cannot be defined solely as vapor-filled bubbles, he is obligated to claim, as I do, that boiling point is when heat leaving the liquid surface equals the amount of heat entering the liquid at the heat source. The fact that evaporation steals heat from the steam above the liquid surface is irrelevant to the fact that heat-particle volume out the liquid surface equals heat-particle volume into the liquid.

Let me show you again how dishonest modern science is on behalf of sticking to the kinetic theory. AI answered my question: "Boil bubbles form because heat converts liquid water into water vapor (gas) at the bottom of the pot, where temperatures are highest." It's telling me that, no heat, no boil bubbles, yet one can watch boil bubbles, in online videos, in vacuums having no heat added to the water, begging how the bubbles form as they think they form, from liquid turning to gas WITHIN the liquid. Impossible.

Think about it. Just because the pressure of air above the liquid is removed, there's no reason for water molecules to jump out of each others' bonds to form a vapor bubble WITHIN the liquid. There is no vapor in the water that can suddenly expand in size to a full-blown, gigantic bubble. All water molecules are in contact, in bondage to each other. If one jumps away by some magical force, it can only jump into the midst of bonded molecules only to become bonded to others. There's no masked gang of millions of cold molecules all on the same street corner conspiring to jump out all at once to form a cold bubble just as soon as air pressure goes on vacation. It's a fantasy created by those who refuse to view heat as a material. They don't know what's going on because they haven't got the proper knowledge, and therefore they create false ideas. Heat material is centuries old, but they are hard-headed nuts refusing to entertain it, not realizing that all arguments pitted against it are unjustified.

The bubbles form because heat particles in the liquid are permitted to repel each other more easily when atmospheric pressure is eliminated sufficiently enough. There's heat particles at every street corner of the liquid, between all the atomic spaces. Just as soon as the air above the liquid goes on vacation, the heat particles begin to flow upward very easily because the atoms are at ease, the tension they were under disappears. While the molecules are sitting back having a breather, the heat particles put more distance between them, and out pops a bubble from one of the atomic spaces, then another from another atomic space.

See the difference? I have inter-repulsive material in the atomic spaces, perfectly situated for forming a bubble. They have nothing but rambunctious water molecules that supposedly scare away an entire neighborhood in order that they can form a bubble. Nonsense. There's just no reason or means for water molecules to form an in-liquid bubble.

They imagine molecules vibrating each other away such that they open up a small space between them...not easy to imagine but this is what they hope to make you believe. I showed why this is impossible, because the water molecules imagined in a bubble are far outnumbered by the liquid molecules that naturally wish to invade the bubble.

In the vacuum situation, there isn't even any added heat to make the water molecules vibrate faster in order that they should become rambunctious enough to form a bubble. One could conceivably believe that molecules could keep a bubble sustained if the in-bubble gas molecules are moving at 100 times the velocity of the liquid molecules, but that requires 100 times the temperature of the water. Forget it, that situation doesn't exist.

There is no magic vapor-producing ability in water. What you can have is a few gas atoms in a bubble if the bubble is formed by something else. An air bubble in water exists only if the bubble is filled with heat particles. It's the heat particles in a gas that form the bubble, and it's the heat particles that keep the water from invading the bubble. The bubble proves that heat is the material of free electrons.

Lookie: "if someone injects steam into water with a hose, will the steam form bubbles, or will it become absorbed as liquid?" "The steam will form bubbles at the nozzle exit, but these bubbles are transient. In sub-cooled (cooler) water, these steam bubbles will shrink and 'collapse' (condense) into the surrounding liquid." Steam can't form a bubble like air can because steam and water have an obvious affinity for each other. The liquid molecules "{suck" the steam molecules to each other, gobble them up.

On the other hand, you can pump hot air into water, and once much of the heat within the bubbles scrams into the water, air bubbles survive because some heat remains in them, because they can't leave unless the heat-particle density in the water's atomic spaces is lower (colder) than the density of heat particles in the bubble. But that situation isn't even possible with steam bubbles because, quite apparently, the liquid molecules are thieves, stealing away the steam molecules like hungry mobsters.

Kineticists know that steam bubbles are impossible, but because they're finks unwilling to learn the trade of heat-material physics, they lie and cheat and club you to the head if you dare mention heat material.

In short, the "vapor pressure" inside of water is a figment of the imagination for explaining a process that does not take place. One cannot measure the vapor pressure of a liquid because it does not exist. I asked google to prove that it exists:

Proving that vapor pressure exists in a liquid is done by demonstrating that, in a closed system [lid on pot], a liquid evaporates until the pressure of its vapor above the liquid reaches a stable value (equilibrium) that depends on temperature.

Uh, sorry, that has nothing to do with a vapor pressure supposedly lurking in the liquid. I know that vapor pressure is above the liquid, but that's not what I asked for. I re-phrased: "how does one prove that vapor pressure exists in a liquid? NO NEED TO EXPLAIN VAPOR PRESSURE ABOVE THE LIQUID." I almost took off my belt to scare AI into compliance.

The response now is similar gibberish: "Vapor pressure in a liquid is proven by demonstrating that the liquid continuously produces vapor that exerts pressure within a confined space, reaching a state of dynamic equilibrium [temperature]." It proves nothing of a vapor pressure existing in the liquid to simply say that vapor pressure exists above the liquid at the same temperature as the liquid.

As AI has struck out twice in a row, it's glaringly obvious that no proof exists of a vapor-pressure beast hiding in the shadows of the liquid. Go ahead, try to think of something else that causes the vapor above the liquid. Some people think it's called, heat. Yipper, but AI wasn't able to tell me that heat forms the above-liquid vapor upon my mentioning in-liquid vapor pressure. It's programmed to insist that in-liquid vapor pressure is a real thing facilitating the creation of a gas above the liquid.

It told me: "A high vapor pressure indicates weak intermolecular forces, meaning molecules escape the liquid surface more readily." No, stooge, a high density of heat in the liquid indicates that liquid molecules have more distance from each other, and have thus become weaker in bond strength. No vapor pressure is required, no vapor pressure is possible, in the liquid. It's heat-particle pressure that seeks to separate molecules, and that causes evaporation. Nobody needs proof that heat exists in the liquid, but nobody can prove that vapor exists in the liquid.

The only reason they want us to believe in a vapor pressure within the water is to have a means to explain their fantasial vapor-filled bubbles. Vapor pressure in the water has nothing to do with equilibrium. "Dynamic equilibrium at the boiling point is the state in a closed system where the rate of liquid molecules vaporizing equals the rate of vapor molecules condensing [going back into the liquid]." Okay, the water goes above its normal boiling point when the steam above the water is hotter, but it's thanks to the heat. And steam returning into the water does not create vapor in the water, if that's an insinuation of this quote.

Remove all pressure above the liquid, and heat particles come storming out of the liquid surface, creating a shake-pop-can effect of bubbliness.

"Yes, in-liquid vapor pressure is directly related to temperature, meaning vapor pressure increases as temperature increases." No, heat particles are related to temperature rise because they define temperature rise.

"At atmospheric pressure and 100°C (212°F), steam is approximately 1,600 to 1,700 times less dense than liquid water." Only a physicist with moral screws loose thinks that boil bubbles have vapor within them that match the vapor pressure above the liquid when that above-liquid vapor is at the same temperature as the liquid. The kineticist knows that 1 vapor molecule flying around in the bubble cannot keep 1,600 liquid molecules from invading the bubble. But instead of crying foul, he gladly snorts the theory to his own shame, and pawns it off to his own children while he sits stoned out of his mind before them.

Repeat: pumping steam into water has no bubble remnant, even after the in-bubble steam comes down to the temperature of the water. The steam bubble quickly vanishes completely, meaning that there can be no vapor bubble as a boil bubble. It's just that simple, and so when expert scientists insist on lying to the world, when they are guilty not of an honest mistake made at a weak mental moment, they are to be treated appropriately as unrepentant, radical, reckless cultists.

Air Atoms Cannot Attract Each Other

I either went over AI's head, or AI is knowingly hiding something from us. I asked, "how can air atoms weigh to the ground if they attract each other?" It responded as though oblivious to my query.

Air atoms weigh to the ground because Earth's gravity is far stronger than the weak attraction between individual air atoms...

Because air has mass, gravity gives it weight (approx. 14.7 lbs per square inch at sea level). This weight creates atmospheric pressure, which is strongest near the ground and decreases with altitude.

It admits the theory of kineticists that gas atoms have small attraction, which is impossible, but they teach it because the big-bang theory needs it to form stars. Let me re-phrase: "how can air atoms weigh on the ground if they are unable to transfer weight by inter-attraction forces?" I've never asked google such a question before. I figured that kineticists would simply conflate air pressure with weight, which is not permissible for a reason I'll explain below. AI responds:

Air atoms (molecules) weigh on the ground not by transferring weight through static inter-atomic forces, but through the transfer of momentum via collisions in a process governed by gravity and kinetic energy.

There we go, they are conflating air pressure with air weight because they have no other way to get out of this pickle. They think that weight of atoms transfers by speed of atoms, which proves them to be heinous imposters unwilling to let go of kineticism for the heat-material reality. Yes, air pressure is caused by air weight, but air weight is not caused by air pressure as they see it, as the collisions of atoms with objects. Since when is a cannon ball striking the ground equal to its weight? Only a moron would argue like this.

The response continues: "The 'weight' is transferred to the ground through billions of tiny impacts." How could google AI be so stupid? Because it's not thinking, but is only repeating what it fetches from others whom the google masters have green-lighted for fetched information. AI is a fetcher, not intelligent. Look at how it puts "weight" in quotation marks, as if the weight is not truly weight but is rather air pressure.

Nobody will deny that air weight actually exists, but these baboons will act too stupid to admit that, if air atoms produce 14.7 pounds per square inch on top of air weight itself having a force of 14.7 psi, there should be 29.4 psi everywhere. It would be the same as a ball weighing 10 pounds striking the ground with 10 pounds of force additionally by its speed.

I asked google: "If a ball weighing ten pounds strikes the ground with ten pounds of force by its velocity, how much force impacts the ground?" Response: "A 10-pound ball striking the ground with 10 pounds of force due to velocity imparts a total force equal to its weight (10 lbs) plus the dynamic impact force (10 lbs), totaling roughly 20 pounds of force at the moment of impact."

The point I'm making is that the velocity of the atom cannot be its weight, but the goons are intent on making it seem that it is because they know that atom-to-atom weight cannot transfer through inter-attracting atoms. If they are going to define atmospheric weight as the speed of atoms producing 14.7 psi impact on the ground, they cannot claim that the atmosphere collectively weighs down on the ground. It's one or the other, it can't be both.

Therefore, I win again. There is no such thing as the kinetic theory of atoms. No gas can produce air pressure from atomic collisions, and the goobers should know better. Nobody in his right mind is going to tell you that a few grams of gas in a container weighs a few grams due to its gas pressure.

You may have spotted that AI's response above seeks to modify weight into atomic speed so that both don't exist, but only the collisions resulting from weight. Nice try. How can weight be turned pure into speed, especially if the atoms don't inter-repel? If we drop a million balls from the sky, does gravity make them start to collide with each other such that they also defy gravity and remain in the sky?

I challenged AI: "do air atoms get their kinetic energy from their weights?" "No, air atoms (molecules) do not get their kinetic energy primarily from their weights. Instead, the kinetic energy of air molecules is directly proportional to the temperature of the air." Where it says "primarily," it's not alluding to some secondary / extra atomic speed via air-atom weight, but rather to the heat coming from inside the planet.

The response continues: "The energy that gives air molecules their motion mostly comes from the sun, which heats the Earth’s surface, which in turn heats the air through convection and conduction." Nobody in their right mind will argue that the weight of the air creates the speed of kinetic atoms at 1,500 mph.

Let's look at AI's response again: "The 'weight' is transferred to the ground through billions of tiny impacts." Ya-but, if the speed of atoms is from sunlight, how can we then claim with straight face that the speed of atoms transfers atomic weight when they collide? If you smack a tennis ball with your racket, how is its resulting force from speed equal to the weight of the ball? If the sun smacks air atoms, how are those smacks equal to the weight of atoms?

Or, if an atom smacks an atom just because it's angry at it, or for any reason whatsoever, the smacked atom is not going to register the weight of the atom that smacked it anymore than you slapping a kineticist on the lip is going to manifest as the perfect weight of your body. But go ahead and slap away, anyway.

google AI shockingly panders to that stupidity when asked: "what relationship is there between the collisions of air atoms and the weight of air atoms?" "The collisions of air molecules with a surface create atmospheric pressure, which is directly proportional to the weight of the air above that surface. Gravity pulls molecules down, increasing the frequency and force of collisions at lower altitudes, while a higher density of molecules at the surface results in more frequent collisions." Deception. It wants you to believe that gravity pull on atoms magically becomes air pressure via kinetic energy.

It's impossible to argue both that air atoms have most of their speed from the sun, and some from their weight. It's impossible because, if atomic collisions end up reflecting purely and only the weight of the atoms, then all the lion's share of speed from solar energy is ignored. You can't say that speed of atoms reflects weight if they have speed mainly from something else. But this teaching is apparently in science circles as sheer deception that should not be tolerated. But it's all the baboons have.

If atomic weight is to reflect or manifest perfectly as air pressure, then, in the least, all atomic speed must be produced solely by the weight factor -- by gravity pull on the atoms -- but as the goofers claim elsewhere that gas atoms have their motion due to heat energy, they thus sabotage their weight = air-pressure claim. AI doesn't understand this; it's only reporting what it's found on the topic, and so it has unwittingly snitched on them, made them look like imposters.

All air weight transfers as one collective organ because air atoms are in CONSTANT CONTACT by their inter-repulsion forces. They can thus transfer weight to each other by the ordinary, logical way without turning the laws of physics into a pretzel. Although all weight acts only downward, the inter-repulsion forces redirect all accumulated weight (from above) into all directions, because the atoms inter-repel in all directions. Nobody can assault this view. It's perfect.

However, if you're on mount Everest, the weight of air lower down than your feet does not affect you. Only the air atoms above you collective transfer air pressure against you.

In reality, atmospheric weight manifests as atmospheric weight. How logical, how straight. I asked: "how can atmospheric weight manifest as air-atom velocity?" google AI is stupid: "Atmospheric weight manifests as air-atom velocity primarily through the mechanism of kinetic pressure, where the gravitational force (weight) acting on the entire column of air above a surface is transferred into kinetic energy (velocity) of individual gas molecules as they collide with that surface." google AI doesn't understand why this is impossible. But, there you have it, AI incriminates those who provided that falsification.

I'll say it again: anyone who wishes to claim that gravity pull on all atmospheric atoms somehow creates kinetic energy matching the accumulated weight is NOT permitted to claim that air atoms receive their kinetic energy from the sun. We can't have both. This dilemma means that there is no such thing as the kinetic theory of atoms. Atmospheric weight alone discredits that theory. You need no other argumentation to make baboons of kineticists.

I typing: "weight of particles does not create their kinetic velocity." AI complied with some logic, though not all:

The assertion that the weight of particles does not create their kinetic velocity is fundamentally correct in the context of microscopic particles and thermodynamic systems, where thermal energy, not gravity, determines motion. In such systems, particle velocity is primarily driven by temperature (kinetic theory), not by their gravitational weight.

It now fetched contrary data. This data is correct, but my query didn't alert AI that I was concerned with air weight. If one does alert AI that air-weight transfer is the issue, it will bring up the falsifications. AI is a good tool to use to find the imposterism of the imposters. If they wish to lie to the public, we can find their lies with AI, though it's stupid if it won't or can't rebel against the falsifications. If the masters say, "repeat such-and-such even if it's false," AI will obey.

I then made another statement, though not posed as a question: "weight of particles creates their kinetic velocity in order to explain how air atoms transfer weight." AI now senses that I'm making a mistake, and inadvertently contradicts what it told me above:

The weight of the air above the Earth's surface — the gravitational pull on these molecules — does not directly create their kinetic velocity, but rather the kinetic energy (motion) of the molecules resists gravity and allows them to remain in a gaseous state.

... The velocity of air particles is directly related to the temperature of the gas, not its weight.

There's nothing said there about how weight becomes kinetic energy, and all appearances of this response suggests that weight does not manifest as kinetic speed. However, later in the response, it has a special section, and contradicts what it says above, because it's a stupid robot that can't think:

Transfer of Weight: The 'weight' of air is transferred to a surface through the high-speed, constant collisions of billions of molecules, which we measure as atmospheric pressure...

It's exactly the quote that it told me earlier, suggesting that AI is programmed to share this trash with anyone asking a similar question.

Next question: "if the weight of air is transferred to a surface through atomic collisions, doesn't this necessitate that the weight causes the collisions?" It responds with the phrase, "not the only cause," because the writer knows that the sun causes the collisions (square brackets mine):

Yes, the weight of the air (gravity acting on the atmosphere) is the root cause of the pressure, but it is not the only cause of the atomic collisions themselves. The pressure exerted on a surface is the result of air molecules colliding [air pressure] with it, and this pressure is, at equilibrium, equal to the weight of the column of air above.

Do you see how crazy that is, that the weight of air should equal air pressure? It's laughable and criminal. Kineticists are deliberately falsifying.

Another mistake they make, which took me until recently to catch, is their claim that a one-square inch column from sea level to the top of the atmosphere weighs 14.7 pounds per square inch. It can't be. It must weigh less than that figure because part of air pressure is from atmospheric heat, and yet another part is from proton-to-proton repulsion of air atoms.

They set a pressure gauge to zero in a vacuum, then allow atmospheric air to fill it to find the gauge reading, 14.7 psi. Part of that pressure is from the repulsion force of air atoms, and part of it is from the weight of air atoms. The weight of air atoms in a small container is next to nothing, of course, but the air that went into the vacuum, when the gauge reads 14.7, is from the outer air that is crushed by the full weight of all air above it before it goes into the container. Therefore, the little piece of air that goes into the vacuumed container is pre-crushed by the weight such that all the effect of weight on the outside is active in the container too. The 14.7 psi in the container is not solely from the wee weight of atoms in the container. It's from all atmospheric weight compressing air atoms and heat particles to a closer distance such that they inter-repel more strongly.

My thinking now is that air weight increases the pressure of the air, wherefore I see the 14.7 psi as a combination of weight and air pressure, where the weight becomes part of the air pressure.

Let me put it this way. If gravity did not exist, the air would have pressure from the inter-repulsion forces of the atoms and heat particles in their midst. But if we then turn gravity on, it pulls atoms closer to each other in the downward direction, creating added air pressure. Rather than having 14.7 psi from weight alone, plus added pressure from inter-repulsion, the two together tally to 14.7.

Yes, apart from gravity, the air would go lost into outer space. But if we can imagine turning gravity off for a minute only, allowing the air to instantly expand to a higher height, it would at that moment, before escaping, produce its own air pressure, without doubt. It is that very pressure which would repel it into outer space.

On top of these considerations, air pressure is reduced by upward heat particles, for as they give lift to air atoms, they create more distance apart between them, and thus their inter-repulsion forces decrease...which can partly explain why some people get headaches on low-cloud days. That is, sunny, dry-air days cause heat-particle rise to have a bigger effect in spreading air atoms further apart.

For the same reason that gravity pull modifies to air pressure in all directions, heat-particle force upon the air atoms modifies to air pressure in all directions.

Heat in a Vacuum

Action Lab has a video below showing that the temperature of an air-filled container starts at 17 C, and drops to 11 C by the time he removes most of the air about 70 seconds later. He doesn't have the courtesy or professionalism to show the pressure drop in the container as temperature drops.

As the pump is yet operating, the thermometer starts to climb higher than 11 C...because heat particles are coming in through the container walls even while he pushes them out with the vacuum pump. I assume that air cannot be pushed out without also pushing out the heat particles between air atoms. I don't know whether various types of pumps might allow some heat particles to remain in the vacuum. These particles are much smaller than atoms and could squeeze through the seals of the pump's air-sweeping mechanism.

The owner of Action Lab apes the kineticists with the desperate and false claim that the thermometer rises in temperature from the residual heat in the plastic housing from which the thermometer is made. How wicked and immoral, for it should have been obvious to kineticists two centuries ago that heat is a material that fills a vacuum by penetrating the container wall.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hTAr2GkhpM

The owner of Action Lab often falsifies to his audience, and never shows them all the potential results if they oppose his claims, which he borrows from modern physics. I don't see him bucking against the system or deviating. In the instance above, he could have done, and perhaps did do, another experiment that places the vacuum container in a dark fridge and a dark oven to show that the thermometer increases and decreases in temperature accordingly. From such an experiment, he knows he can't appeal to residual heat in the thermostat housing as the reason for increasing heat in the vacuum. But this goof is too dishonest to tell his audience of such an experimental result. He doesn't want to violate kineticists by so much as giving a passing mention of the alternative, heat-material view of heat.

If he had simply placed the container into a pre-heated oven immediately after the thermometer started to climb from 11 C, he would have seen that the thermometer would climb into the hundreds of degrees...because heat gets into and through the vacuum easily and efficiently. Instead, he's got the immorality to continue the century-old claim that heat cannot pass through a vacuum. This is the type of flippant immorality that infects modern science at all levels.

After allowing air to return into the vacuum, the temperature surprisingly rises above 17 C, the original temperature, to 20 C. As he offers a possible reason for this increase, the thermometer goes back downward to 19 C, at which point the show ends, but we can gather that it went back to 17 C to remain there.

His first attempt to explain the sudden increase to 20 C is that incoming air "got compressed." No it did not. Rather, air just came back in to normal atmospheric pressure. I can offer an explanation from my understanding of heat storage in the electron atmospheres of atoms. Heat material stored in atoms cannot be felt, cannot be evident, until it comes out as heat, but it is heat material all the same.

Prior to evacuating the container, air atoms were in contact with the container walls, and therefore air atoms were merged with the atoms of the container walls. When air was removed from the container, the atoms unmerged from the wall atoms, which caused both types of atoms to reload their electron atmosphere with heat particles in the container's air. That contributed to some temperature decrease.

Then, when air was allowed back into the container, the re-merging of air atoms with the wall atoms released as much heat as was absorbed during the unmerging. He shows the temperature of 15.9 when allowing air to re-enter. As the release of heat from the atoms sent the thermometer to 20 C, four degrees above 15.9, I can guess a good guess that four of the six degrees from 17 to 11 was from the cooling effect, the absorption of heat, as per the said unmerging of atoms.

It's tending to suggest that the vacuum barely went down, only two degrees, as the difference between pumping out all the heat out versus the simultaneous heat rushing into the container through the atomic spaces of the container walls. It tends to reveal a rather fast replenishment rate. It should show to be a slower replenishment rate if the owner of Action Lab took the time to do some proper experimentation, but maybe he's already too wealthy, from his show, to exert himself more. After a while, one can get tired of doing experiments.

If he were to insulate the container walls and re-do the experiment, and if he finds that the temperature then got significantly lower than 11 C, he would have good evidence for heat streaming into the vacuum through the walls. But then he would need to swallow his pride and admit that he's been lying to his audience. He is lying, because insulating the container walls is a necessary part of this experiment before flippantly telling the audience what he thinks is going on. The Flippant Action Lap Dog of the kineticists.

The heat in the thermometer isn't expected to flow to the temperature sensor much because heat naturally thrusts out into the cooler space in the vacuum, for that space is immediately beside the atomic spaces of the thermometer's plastic housing, while it's a long way, through many atoms, to the temperature sensor.

The temperature drop was steady at first, but slowed at the end. The thermometer sensor is not in the center of the container, which is the correct way to do this experiment because the heat is absorbed at all container walls:

Start temperature: 17
14 seconds: 16
21 seconds: 15
27 seconds: 14
35 seconds: 13
45 seconds: 12
54 seconds: 11.5
68 seconds: 11.1, lowest

Guaranteed, if he put a torch flame to the bottom of the container directly below the temperature sensor, he would get a fast and high increase in heat as compared to locating the flame anywhere else on the container, for heat mainly rises straight up. C'mon, Action Lap Dog, try it. Confess your sin. Confess your transgression against heat material.

NEWS

Another food-poison video for your consideration:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bP8KKzCnDvo

Word is that Italy and France applied to Iran to get assistance with their ships at Hormuz, instead of seeking help from Trump. There are many podcatsers who seem to be rooting for Iran over the United States. While I despise the Trump-military alliance, I cannot hope for Iran's government to win this skirmish. Regardless that Netanyahu appears guilty of Gazan genocide if God is not behind it, I, as a Christian, need to hold Iran guilty of passing weapons to Hamas and Hezbollah, and the Houthi too, for the purpose of annihilating Israel. Regardless of how sinful the Israeli people are, no nation should seek to wipe Israel from its ancient homeland.

---

NEXT UPDATE

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---