In this chapter I am going to give the history of Argos' founding from various non-Israelite peoples in Israel, but based on personal mythical interpretations. You'll need to be the judge as to whether I'm interpreting well. The storyline of this chapter borrows from the mythical genealogies at the following website.
http://www.timelessmyths.com/classical/argolis.html

Greece was founded by multiple mythical characters, and each version should be dissected for what it's worth. In one version, Inachus was the first peoples of the Argolis (region), who founded the twin cities of Argos and Mycenae. From the peoples in which Inachus depicted there came forth the Carians settled at nearby Megara, which I would suggest reading as Me-Cara. Because the mother of Car was Cerdo, it's clear that the Carians were made an Inachus-Cerdo mix.

I will therefore keep in mind that the Kurds (and/or Guti) ought to figure into the Carians. The Kurds were Hurrians and so I'm already giving birth to another realization, that Kurds too were Horites. All of the above, in other words -- Carians, Kurds, Hurrians -- are variations of "Hor(ite)." They were the Armenia-to-Greece empire formed by the proto-Kabala, even the founders of Athens/Attica as described in another chapter on Hephaistos and Attis/Kybele.

Yes, I'm quite certain, Greece was a Horite entity. And even "Graea," the term said to be the root of "Greece," where "Gra" is the root, may have been a Hor(a) variation. Couldn't the Horites have been Gorgons (proto-Parthians) since the latter were fundamental to Greece's foundation? As "Geryon" would imply, the root of "Gorgon" may at first have been "Hori/Gori," and only afterwards did the "y/i" modify to a "g". Hera (Zeus' wife) is suspect as Horite peoples, which is a monumental discovery if true, occurring here as I write, because for years I haven't had the slightest clue as to which peoples she could depict.

The Inachus peoples furnished a tribe/alliance depicted as Apis/Apia, and I'll assume tentatively that these were the Avviy/Avvites from Israel. Because Inachus was made "married" to Melia ("honey"), I will also entertain -- especially upon learning that the Appian Way (Roman road to Greece) was named after bees -- that Apis/Apia was code for a peoples depicted by the bee secret code. Apis peoples were such wicked tyrants that they had to be ousted from power by a fellow bloodline, but as they were unseated by Telchines, they themselves revealed as a sorcerous peoples, one wonders concerning the nature of the Apians. The myth writers attempt to disassociate Argus from Apis, for to glorify Argus peoples, but in reality they were the bee-line peoples, as we shall see.

On the very same day that I wrote the paragraph above, I found a message on my answering machine from Kathleen, who said that I need to check the dictionary under "Apian." And there it was, that our English "apiarian" and "apiarist" relate to bees and beekeepers, and that they are rooted in the Greek word, "apis," meaning "bee" (singular). Now I understand how "Meropes/Merops" is said to mean "bee eater" or "bee something-else." An online dictionary (etymonline.com) says: "...from apis "bee," a mystery word unrelated to any similar words in other I.E. [Indo-European] languages." That is, this particular Greek word for bee is from another language, and I would suggest from the makings of the Ugric (proto-Hungarian) and/or Altaic (oriental Aryan) languages...that may just have been an Aryan-Semitic mix as per the Aryan-Semitic mix that was the dragon-line Kabala.

Thanks again Kathleen, my Hungarian-Hebrew friend whose surname begins with "Bot." She was the one who alerted me to the fact that Appian/Apian Way was named after bees. This long stone road was started and overseen by the Roman Patrician, Appius Claudius Caecus, but the question is, where did his name come from? Did it connect to the Apis peoples of Greece on the rear/past, and to the Frank bees to the front/future? Did the mythologists cleverly but foolishly leave bee crumbs that we can follow in tracing the dragon's footsteps? Will these crumbs now reveal the inhumane nature of these peoples ever-seeking to destroy others that they might rule, peoples to this day that seek to convince us that those who so conquered and destroyed are to be honored and served?

Inachus also put forth the Telchines under code words Telegonus, Telchus, and Thelxion. The Inachus branch under codeword "Io" (his daughter) were allied to the Telchines and together they ruled Egypt, this being the meaning of Io's marriage to Telegonus, king of Egypt. As the Io peoples will be shortly revealed as the mythical Aphareus, where he depicts the historical Apharsites (found also in the Bible), thought by the NIV and many others to depict the Persians, we can now begin to reveal Inachus as a Persian branch of some sort, though I think possibly the Elamites (proto-Persians according to Josephus). The Elamites shared territory east of Mesopotamia with Kassites/Guti of the Zagros mountain regions.

For that reason and the following, I would suggest that Inachus was the same as Dionysus/Zagreus in that the latter is probably to be understood as Dio-Naxos simply because Naxos was his island. Inachus I would view as I-Naxos, meaning that the myth writers may not have been as clever as they thought they were being. If I am correct in equating Inachus with Dionysus, it explains why Dionysus was a bee-line peoples of the island of Chios, where his daughter there was Merope. Moreover, if I'm correct, an Inachus branch should furnish a Maenad peoples that were sacred to Dionysus, but also Satyrs, and indeed they do.

As I trace Inachus to Aphareus-Persians in Israel, keep in mind that Aphareus, who must have depicted the historical Apharsi/Aparni, may just have been the Apiru-Persian mix that I define as the dragon cult. I'm going to share ideas in another chapter from the website of a scholarly writer who equates the Apharsi with the Hebrew-striped Avars and meanwhile traces the Avars to the Dehava, the latter found in conjunction with the Apharsites within the Ezra-4:9 list of anti-Israeli peoples living in Israel.

Inachus put forth "Argus," and I would suggest that these are the Biblical Archevites, also found in Ezra 4:9 in conjunction with the Apharsites. The Archevites are moreover revealed by reputable sources (e.g. Strong's) as the peoples of Erech (early home of the dragon cult). It is not a small announcement to identify Argives as the carriers of the Tammuz/Ishtar cult of Erech...keeping in mind that the island of Bute in Scotland is in conjunction with Argyll.

The mythical Aphareus gave birth to Lynceus, and while there are two such names in mythology, I would view them as the same peoples but at two different times/situations. The Lynceus that is not technically the son of Aphareus was the son of Egyptus/Aigyptus, meaning that Aigyptus and Aphareus can be equated, serving also to reveal that Aphareus became a Greek peoples in one branch and in another the Aryan rulers of Egypt...the same rulers roughly as depicted by Io, Inachus' "daughter."

As Egyptus was made the brother of Danaus (i.e. the Greek Danaans), the two may very well depict the Dinaites found in the same Ezra-4:9 list of anti-Israeli peoples...who were all living in Israel along with the Cutha and Avvites. True, they are said by the Bible (2 Kings 17:24) to have come to Israel during the Assyrian exile of Israelites, but it's thereby possible that they had settled Samaria (northern Israel) in centuries prior, even before the Israelites had been a nation. This mention of the Dinaites is something to really think about for those who have committed themselves to tracing Europeans to the Israelite tribe of Dan, or that Danaus depicted the tribe of Dan. I sense that the Dina-ites were the same as Tinia/Thyni (of Thrace/Phrygia), sacred root of the Etruscans, Scandinavians, Germanics, and Celts/Britons. As the Thyni were the Bithyni/Budini, I will connect the Dina-ites to Bute of Argyll, even as I had previously connected the Greek Danaans and British Danann to Bute.

We find that Lynceus was assigned the son, Abas, a term that I am strongly tempted to equate with the Avvites. Abas is then assigned twins, Acrisius and Proetus. Whereas the latter seemed elusive, a more common variation was "Proteus," which caused me to entertain Pro-Zeus and find that it clicks. For one reason, Zeus is ordinarily made the father of Perseus, and yet the author of "The Greek Myths," Robert Graves, "notes that in the earliest version Proteus is Perseus' father."
www.johnpratt.com/items/astronomy/myths/perseus.html

Secondly, Proteus is made the son of either Poseidon or Nereus with Doris, and quite often when there is a double parentage, both should be regarded as possibly true. As Nereus was the fish god, he equates with Dagon...and then Doris would equate with the city of Dor (Israeli coast north of Joppa) where Dagon was worshiped. But as Zeus was equated with Dagon himself by a Phoenician whistle blower (Sanchuniathon) who found documents telling what the mythical secrets were, it again identifies Proteus as the Zeus line...prior to the Zeus-proper peoples of Crete. This tells us that Zeus depicted a Dor(is) peoples (makes sense for a peoples also depicted as "Taurus") but mixed with codeword "Nereus." Nahorites? However, this doesn't tell us who the Dor inhabitants were; they may or may not have been Avvites. I suspect that the inhabitants were the same that named Tyrus.

"Acrisius" I would then suspect to be Ekron, one of five cities (south of Joppa) in which the Bible says were left to the Avvites when Joshua conquered Israel (Joshua 13:3). The deduction thus far in this reasoning is that the Avvites were from the (historical) Apharsites. Keep in mind that ProZeus was made the twin of Acrisius, so that whatever we determine for Acrisius' identity, the near-same ought to be true of the Zeus line to Crete.

If one can connect the Apharsites to the Dehava (also "Dahae") using historical documents, one could have support for a Dehava-Avvite connection, which is extremely important in that Dehava (founders of Daghestan) was in Avar country (Avars live there to this day), for "Avar" and "Apharsite" are a near-perfect match, especially as the Avars are known to have had distinct Hebrew elements so as to identify them as the Iberi. That is, the Avars were Abars/Iberi that then modify to "Aphar."

While Zeus was made the husband of Danae, Acrisius (a Danaan from that alliance) was assigned "Danae" as a daughter, wherefore Acrisius is really the (Pro)Zeus line in its continuation. Moreover, the Dina-ites are thus tentatively connected to Ekron and/or the Gaza-branch Avvites (ignore that Ekron, Gaza. etc. were Philistine cities, for the Avvites at this point had not yet been conquered by the Philistines, who were yet in Caphtor/Crete at this time). Because Zeus official wife, Hera, depicts the Horites in my mind, I would add to this picture a Horite peoples that were allied to Dor/Zeus peoples. Zeus was made to mate with Danae to produce Perseus, and this translates to the same as a ProZeus alliance with Acrisius i.e. a Dor alliance with Ekron to produce the rulers of Mycenae.

I'm not making a Danae-Dahae equation, by the way, even as Ezra distinguishes between the Dina-ites and the Dehava. If I'm correct in pegging the Dina-ites as the Thyni/Bithyni/Budini, then they were of Buz, son of Nahor, even as the Neuri lived among the Budini. This would imply that the Budii Medes were either the same as the Busae/Buzi Medes even though Herodotus distinguished the two, or that the Budini were not from the Budii, but rather had acquired its "d" from Buz > Bud.

The Buzi may have been at the heart of the Eden cult of Mesopotamia, later the Edones of Thrace but possibly also the Edones of Megiddo(n) (near Dor). Assuming with some logic that "Utu" (the dragon sun god of Eden) was a Sumerian form of "Adam," the first-born of Nahor may have been named after Adam, for this son's name, as spelled by the Bible, was "Uts" (Genesis 22:21).

"Buz," we may conjecture in light of the sacred bee line, came to mean "bee." But as a hive is described by occultists as an empire, we subjects being the bees that provide honey/taxes for the royals, where an empire is also a House, it's of no surprise that "beth/bet/bute" came to mean "house" (Old English "hus" no doubt from "pos" = house). As Positano, a Naples-region city said to be named after Poseidon, is said to be named after "posa" = house, I would suggest that "Poseidon" means "House of Eden" while at the same time indicating the house of the Busae/Buzi Medes.

Zeus was raised by bees on Crete, which symbol potentially ties to either Buz or the Avvites, or both, and this would then explain why Pro-Zeus (i.e. Proteus) was given birth by Poseidon as well (as Nereus). Because Nereus was a fish-like god-of-the-sea -- i.e. very much like Poseidon himself -- it suggests a close relationship between the two, which would be the obvious case if Nereus depicted, as I suspect, Nahorites. The question then becomes: was "Nahor: broken into two syllables such that he came to be called "Hor" and "Horites"? That may seem like a stretch, but if Horites were Hurrians, and if Hurrians were named after Haran, the city in which Nahor lived, the stretch is shortened.

Perseus was made to mate with Andromeda in Joppa, and as this city was on the Israeli ocean shore just to the north of the Gaza-to-Gath Avvite strip, I wonder if "Joppa" wasn't a variation of "Avviy" (the Biblical term for Avvites). Joppa is said by some to be named after Jupiter (or Japheth). As I'm about to identify Apollo as an Avvite branch, I can begin to view Avvites as the founders of the Jupiter cult, especially as I'm about to connect the bee line to the first Romans.

Under this line of reasoning wherein Joppa (also "Jaffa") is an Avviy city, the Avvites come out looking like "Iavva," which of course evokes Javan, son of Japheth. It would then make for exceptional logic that "Io" was a short form for the Avvites in that "Ionian" has been said by many historians to be a variation somehow of "Javan." Keep in mind that Io was, like Zeus, depicted as a white Taurus (Aryans of Dor?), and that he and she were made to mate. That is, ProZeus was an ally of the Joppa Avvites, wherefore an ethic mix developed that gave ProZeus some Avvite blood. But as Io was made to name the Bosphorus strait, it's clear that she depicted the Busae/Buzi bee line, thus equating Avvites with Buz. More evidence of this equation is forthcoming.

I'll mention here, as is appropriate, that "Joppa is also the name shared by a number of villages in Scotland; one on the outskirts of Edinburgh, another on the outskirts of Ayr." Ayr over-looks the island of Bute, and of course Edinburgh seems named after Eden! That's the fast-man's way of connecting the dragon line to Scotland.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joppa

Recall that I identified the Avidia/Avith variation of "Avviy" with the "Avatar" destroyer of Indo-Aryan myth. Couldn't "Jupiter" furnish "Avatar"? If so, then the Biblical Abaddon may just be the Jupiter bloodline, even the Avvites, which then makes the Coming of Jesus to destroy and replace the Dragon all the more gigantic.

Prior to mating/mixing with Andromeda, Perseus had saved her from a sea monster that was brought against the kingdom of her parents. That sea monster was revealed as the kingdom of Nereus, for Andromeda's kingdom had raised itself in pride above the Nereids (suggesting family ties) to earn the attack of the "monster." Might the Nereids (Nereus' bloodline/kingdom) have been the Nairi of Lake Van since Nereus was the son of Pontus (a Black-sea coastal land near Armenia)? As Nereus was the father of ProTeus, it would seem that Zeus was rooted in the Nairi-Nahorites, even the Bia peoples who named Lake Van..who just may have been from Buz. Is it possible that "Bia" and "Buz" became "dia/dio/dios/teus/zeus"?

It can't be a coincidence that Nereus had 50 children, as had Danaus, as had Aegyptus, as had Caucon (probably same as "Kikon"). This number 50, I think, is code for the Hecatonchire ("100 hands"), which in turn (in my opinion) is code for a Gogi peoples. One (of only three) Cyclopes (monsters virtually the same as Hecatonchire) was "Arges." We're going to identify Arge in a few paragraphs as the Hyperborean peoples...that founded Argos and the Argos bee line, which included a certain Bias. One Hecatonchire (there were only three) was named "Gyges," and another "Cottus," the Cati/Cutha Kabalists, I assume. A third was Briareus, while the father of Aphareus was Perieres! Are you with me? The Kabala was a Cutha-Gogi mix from the Perieres/Apharsite Elamites.

When Perseus and Andro-Meda mated, they (both Zeus bloodlines) give birth to Gorgophone, perfectly expected in that both Perseus and Andro-Meda depict Iranians. I can't help but see that both depicted Gorgons, which would then disclose that Aphareus was himself a depiction of Gorgons. Indeed, Gorgophone was made the mother of Aphareus, this then possibly placing Aphareus peoples in Israel if not Joppa. I would tend to view the Perseus peoples as evolving into the Aphareus peoples, and it may be in Israel that the Apharsites got their Apiru-like name...when Persians mingled with Apiru. The Apharsites then kept two homes, one in Israel and one back in Iran.

Acrisius put Danae and Perseus into a chest and floated them off to sea, meaning that they left Israel by sea, in this case during warfare with Acrisius and while losing the war. We might view Perseus here as Aphareus and Gorgophone going to Greece, but we cannot fail to view him as the Zeus peoples; that is, the Pro-Zeus peoples settling Crete on the way to establish Zeus proper...who was surrounded in myth by Curetes of Crete.

Meanwhile the Danaan ancestors of Perseus (i.e. from Danaus), whom I'm assuming were Dina-ites from Ekron, had been in Rhodes en route to ruling Argos. When Perseus arrived to Greece, I deduce that he settled with the Danaan rulers of Argos, for Perseus is made the founder of the twin city of Argos, Mycenae. There is no question but that Zeus was allied to Danaans at this point, which is precisely the picture in his mating with Danae. As Perseus is a Gorgon/Persian peoples, while Danaus/Danae was Africanized, I would view Zeus as the Gorgon portion of the Zeus-Danae alliance. That is, Zeus comes out looking like Aphareus/Abar/Avvite/Iberi/Apiru = Kabala Hebrew peoples!

I would suggest that Danaus uprooted proto-Phoenicians from the Argos area, because Agenor (from Argus) depicted proto-Phoenicians. Agenor (Kagan?) was made father of Argus Panoptes, who killed Echidna (the Akkadians), wherefore one could surmise that Akkadians (the Cutha/Cati Kabala) were ruling Argos at some point with the Argus line in proto-Phoenicia vying for power. Note that "Panoptes" translates to Pan-Op-ites "all the bee tribes." Indeed, as Apollo also killed the Echidna serpent (also known as Python), it reveals Apollo as the Argus peoples, a solid fact that becomes more apparent when we learn that a certain Arge and Opis came to Apollo's island (in Greece) from the far-north Hyperboreans (that Apollo depicted).

As the Cyclopes were from Tartarus (as was Echidna), and were likewise killed by Apollo, Python/Echidna were the Cyclopes Gogi. It therefore stands to reason that Argus Panoptes (i.e. Apollo) was a Cyclopes peoples and therefore likely from the Cyclopes tribe of Arges. I would now suggest that "Cyclopes" should be read as Cycl-Opis, what the term likely means to the initiated. And behold that Hera gave birth to Arge so that these Gogi would trace to Horites if indeed Hera depicted Horites. If the Horites were the Curetes, then of course the Curetes were Gogi. Just as the Curetes were the root of the Trojans, so the Cyclopes from Tartarus would configure to Dardanus, a co-founding Trojan bloodline. As Trojans stem from Ares, so he too may have been an Horite peoples in that Hera gave him birth (with Zeus). The Horites thus appear as the Hros/Rosh of Aras/Araxes river, where some say the Cutha lived. Gog, in Ezekiel 38, is revealed as the ruler of the Rosh.

Agenor was assigned the son, Krotopos, who in turn gave birth to Sthenelus the swan line. The latter term, at one time a difficulty, is now easily deciphered as the Sithone branch of Edones, wherefore my previous Sithone-Sidon connection now seems viable (for Sidon was in Phoenicia). I would suggest that "Krotopos is a Horite term i.e. Hor-topos. Mount Hor, north of Byblos (in Phoenicia), comes to mind. Byblos was "Gebal" (like French "abeille" = bee) to the locals, and is today Jubay (much like Avviy or its hypothetical "Iavviy").

I had reasoned that the Phoenicians migrated together (or roughly at the same time) with the Kothar-was-Khasis of the Gath/Gaza region, to Cilicia, and that the Cati/Khassi peoples of Cilicia then settled a new Cilicia in Phrygia, where they set up their sun god, Attis, and their goddess Kybele, under codename Eetion/Iasion, king of Thebe. Well, one can now conclude further that, from Phrygia, the Cati (probably the Katz surname to this day) settled Argos, but as they ultimately named Attica/Athens after Attis, I conclude that their being ousted from Argos by the Sidon branch of Argus is what caused a Cati re-settlement in Athens, identified in myth as Aphrodite = Apiru-dite. In the meantime the Cati were growing in Thrace as the Getae/Edones...while the Sithone branch of Edones I can only interpret as the Argus bloodline from Sidon (rather than the one from Gath).

It is known that Athens was settled by the Cecrops bloodline (depicted as half serpent), and it may be that Athens is where the Kabala joined the Gogi. But the two may have joined previously, for example as the Hebros-Kikon mix that was in Rhodope (Thrace). In any case, both the Kybele Kabala and Cecrops came to rule Athens. Which of the two depicted the Cecrops snake-portion is a toss-up; perhaps both in that the two fused together were the Utu dragon line itself.

Because a part of Athens was called "Acropia" after the Cecrops name, the mythical Cecrops could have been a reflection of Ekron. That is, Athens was settled specifically by the Kabala-Gorgon mix that were in Ekron. Cecrops would thereby trace back to Acrisius, if indeed the latter depicted Ekron's inhabitants.

Serving as evidence that the Kabala were in Argos, Iasus is said to give birth to Io, she being the goddess specific of Argos. Iasus appears to be the same as Iasion, the latter of which depicted the same Kabala peoples as Dardanus, a peoples about proto-Troy in Phrygia (whom I would define as Typhon, "husband" of Echidna, probably the Tubali who lived in conjunction with the Iberi/Avars). That is, Iasion proto-Trojans came to Argos as the Io Kabala. This then reveals that the Aryan Egyptian rulers as per Io were the same as Hephaistos (Hebrew father of Kabala and husband of Aphrodite), who was in fact intimately wrapped up in Egyptian myth.

These Kabala Egyptians were the ones who furnished Agenor/Phoenix in Phoenicia, according to at least one other myth, but what no myth claims is that the same Egyptians also furnished the Danaans in/near the Ekron region, for this is the big secret, reveals (inadvertently) one online Kabalist, that the Kabala was in Israel. As YHWH Himself does not reveal this in the Bible outright, He too wanted to keep it a secret throughout most of history...though He does give hint when equating a king of Tyre as Satan himself. God would have reason to keep this a secret in that He gave the dragon bloodline the right to rule the Earth until the Appointed Time of its destruction, to prove to us all that a world governed by Satan will produce countless evils (which the dragon line blames on Him). It will likely turn out that ProZeus was Satan's main line, even as "Dor" is perhaps the same as Tyre's earlier name, Tsur. Keep in mind that the Dorians were, along with the Cutha/Xuthus, made one of three main Hellenistic branches, suggesting a distinction to be made between the Cati and the Dorians. As the third Hellenistic group were the Aeolians, Gelanor (introduced below) comes to mind.

When Danaus (know to have been a descendant of Io) came to Greece, he was the Ekron-based Kabala cult coming to rule Argos again, after the city had been taken for a term by the Phoenician-based Kabala. If you wonder why almost all mythical characters can be traced to the Kabala, it's because the Kabala wrote the myths, stressing mainly their own movements. Sthenelus (a depiction of the Sidon branch) gave birth to Gelanor, who must have been the historical Gelonus/Geloni that later settled with the Budini and Neuri north of Greece.

Because a mythical Sthenelus was also made king of Liguria, it verifies that the Ligurians -- the holy grail line -- were from the Sithone/Sidon/Phoenician branch of Kabala. This bloodline is the Freemasonic phoenix symbol. The Getae Thracians, on the other hand, the main stump of Edones, I would trace back to the Gaza-region branch of Kabala, for the (pre-Philistine) inhabitants of nearby Gath were "Gittites" after that city's name.

The question now becomes whether or not the Satyrs were named after the Sithones? I had traced them to the Getae because Satrys were half goat. Perhaps their other half was the Sithone branch. Pan, a Satyr, could therefore depict the Phoenicia-based Kabala, the Sithones, suggesting very neatly that his father, Hermes, was the Taut (alternative of "Thoth") peoples who settled Sidon prior to coming to Arcadia (beside Argos). It's easy to figure that the Taut peoples were the Egyptian Kabala ruled by the historical king Thoth of Egypt. Since Greek myth places Agenor in Sidon as an Io peoples originating in Egypt, a Taut-Agenor near-equation seems likely. If Taut/Thoth depicted Dedanites (of Abraham, I'm assuming, not Dedan of Arabia), then we ought to view the Satrys as Dedanites.

One of the Cyclopes was named "Steropes, and I think this converts to Satyr-Opis. The remaining Cyclopes, Brontes, I haven't yet identified with even a stab.

While it would seem tidy to connect Arcadia to Akkadia, I would suggest a better Arcadia connection to the Archevites (of Erech). That is, the dragon cult of Erech was in Arcadia before the Hermes line arrived to take over. As the Arcadian region west of Argos is said to have been founded by Pelasgians, note that this term can be understood as Pel-Asgi, evoking the Ashkenaz of Iran that settled Ashkelon (on the Israeli sea coast just north of Gaza). What's startling is that the Apiru of Akkadian and Hurrian/Hittite records, yes the Hebrews, were logogrammed as "ASG-GAZ." This is an incredible revelation for those tracing Ashkenazi "Jews," for we now see that they were Kabala non-Jews meshed with Ashkenazi (son of Togarmah) Aryans, and living at Gaza and Ascalon in proto-Israel.

When Danaus arrived to Argos, he is said to have expelled Gelanor...a depiction of Sithone Edones remember, since he was son of Sthenelus. If Gelanor depicts the Geloni who much later fled war to take refuge with the Budini and Neuri, then, if the latter were Nahorites and Buzites, it shows kinship between they and Gelanor Sithones, thus hardening my theory that the Budini had been Edones. This then supports the view that the Eden cult was honored by Nahor, and in fact carried by Nahor, if not devised by Nahor and/or his fathers. Buz peoples (later the bee line) then become equivalent to the Eden cult.

Gelanor may translate to the holy grail line out of Phoenicia, if I'm correct in defining the holy grail as the mythical Cilix, son of Phoenix, who depicted the Kabala cult in Cilicia. As Agenor is said in one myth version to give birth to Phoenix, and as another Agenor gives birth to Sthenelus, Sthenelus and Phoenix may depict the same peoples precisely, explaining why Europa was the daughter of Phoenix while Sthenelus was mythical symbol of Liguria, the center of all Europe.

I'm assuming that the Cilician holy grail were the Cati, otherwise depicted as Cadmus, brother of Cilix (and Europa). Gelanor should equate with Cilix/Cadmus/Europa, the holy grail line(s). It's premature at this point to decipher Gelanor as the historical Alans, and I think the Galli/Gauls are a much better interpretation, even as the Gauls are defined by historians as the Celts or northern Italy (where Liguria was located) and France (where the Redones were spinning their wheels). The Gelanor holy grail line was not the same as the Danaan line which ousted Gelanor from Argos. The Danaan line furnished the British Danaan and Bolgs, the Celts proper as distinguished from the Gauls.

Lynceus (from Egyptus) reminds me of "lynx," a wild cat. He may have been a peoples that became the Lingones of Gaul, who are said to have become the Lugii. Lynceus ruled Argos after Danaus, followed by Abas and Acrisius. Proteus (twin of Acrisius) ruled Tiryns near Argos, a term that solidly evokes the Etruscans by their "Tyrrheni" designation, which was inadvertently revealed to me by Greenway7 as a possible version of "Tarragon," which the back/side of her cereal box claimed was a version of "Dragon." The cereal was not, I repeat not, the original Grape Nut. As the Etruscan version of Zeus was "Tinia," expect Zeus to have furnished the Thyni and Bithyni/Budini.

Lynceus was the son of Aphareus, I remind you, and Aphareus' brother was created, "Leucippus"; ignoring the horse (or kitten) suffix, we are left with Leuci, the name of an historical peoples exactly, smack to the north of the Lingones! Both Aphareus and Leucippus were sons of Gorgophone so that indeed: 1) Gauls were Gorgons, 2) Gelanor depicted Gauls, and, 3) the "nor" ending may suitably depict Nahor Gauls who became the Scandinavian Nor, mythical founder of Norway. The Nahorites turn up further north-west as the Catti-branch Batavians (in Netherlands); could that be Bat-Avi? As Nor and Gor ruled Norway together, might the second refer to Horites/Hurrians named after Haran, the city in which Nahor lived? But I look now at whether "Netherland" could not have been originally Nahorland. I'll also suggest that Lynceus/Lingones became the red rose Lancastrians (England).

Two mornings, separated by not many days, I awoke hearing, on each occasion, a single word echo in my mind that led to key connections. I can't recall the first just now but the second word was Sparta...that almost instantly led me to make the Sparti-Sepharvite/sephiroth connection while still in a drowse. It felt as though the Lord was communicating to me something He wants us all to know. A third occasion occurred July 9th, and the word was "Al Qaida." I had no idea what this term could have to do with Greek myth, but within five minutes I realized, to my amazement, that it was essentially equivalent to "Cati." I trust this "voice" I have been hearing, and I think the modern Al Qaida is therefore connected to the Cati.

This made me wonder whether the online conspiracy reports concerning a sinister Bush-family connection to Osama bin Laden may have any truth, and just as I wrote this sentence I realized that "Laden" is essentially the spelling of the mythical Ladon dragon! So I went to the houseofnames.com to see if I could connect the Bush surname to Cati peoples. I found that the surname was also "Bos," evoking the Poseidon/bee line, but when I found that another variation was "Buski," which means "bush" in Norman. After some contemplation, I found three black boar heads on the Booth Coat; the English Bush Coat uses three black boars!!

A day or two after finding that, I found that the Redding Coat is exactly that of the Booth Coat. Joseph Redding was the first President and priest of the Bohemian-Grove club, and the creator of the club's Molech-like human-sacrifice ceremony.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/Bohemian_Grove_symbolism.htm

The Bush Coat uses a goat's head on the Crest, which may connect to the bee peoples that raised Zeus (details in the coming chapter). I do note the central Fleur de Lis on the Bush Coat, and the two gold spread Phoenix. A spread phoenix is found in the Chief of the Bosco/Busci/Bosio Coat of Lombardy (north Italy).

Wikipedia says that "Qaida" is a Mujahidden movement, where the latter term is rooted in "qaideen." The article says that Al Qaida is a resurgence of ancient "Ghazi" holy war, the goal of which was to establish Muslim/Turk world rule. The earliest Ghazi movement was Iranian, rooted in the Sassanid empire of Afghan-Aryan regions, and was an offshoot of the Seleucid and Parthian empires. In this way one could view Al Qaida as the neo-Seleucid empire of Daniel 11 and Revelation 13:2, kingdoms ruled by the anti-Christ. The Ghazi were characterized by a plundering lifestyle, akin to how I perceive the aggressive dragon line rulers who for their bully-wickedness and utter lack of consciences came to rule much of the earth. The Ghazi evolved into the Ottoman Turks, who were cousins of the Khazars.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghazi_warriors

Osman I was the first Ottoman Turk ruler. He and successive rulers used "Gazi" in their throne names, but were also known as "Khans," the short form for "Khagan." Ottomans were themselves offshoots of Kok/Gok-Turks, what I suspect were a Gogi peoples even as were the Khazars. The "Gazi" designation may have root in the Gath/Gaza Kabala, for the Kothar-wa-Khasis ruled there, and evolved into the Khazars (as goes my view).

A future Gogi leader leading Al Qaida and Saddam loyalists to power in the Middle East is what I believed to be (before I even started this dragon-line section of my book) the Biblical anti-Christ. I had, before starting this section, rooted the "Star of David" in Khazar Zionists of the Templar period, and so this would reveal that the Kabala was an integral part of the Khazars. The same may be true of the entire Muslim religion; it may have been a creation of Kabala branches mixing with Turks/Muslims. George Bush Jr. has said that the Muslim religion is "a great religion." [Update September 2006 -- At the following website (a short video with Bush being interviewed by ABC), Bush says that there are "different routes" to Heaven, and does not deny that Muslims are unable to get there: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_8GoF9SLas End Update]

I have here some room to add some insight that the world should know. It is the belief of many Christians that the present age started in about 2350 BC, at the end of the year-long Flood, and that all records prior to the Flood have been destroyed. Evolutionists/atheists/pagans wish to add as much time as possible to 2350 BC in order to cause the world to deny the veracity of the Flood. And so they have added several centuries to recorded history, but in any instances where they speak of man much more older than 3,000 BC, there are no written documents to support their claim.

King Menes of Egypt is timed by secular "experts" at 3200ish BC; the lists begin at that time with Narmer, father of Menes. It is obvious, however, that Egyptian king lists have much repetition, and there's no doubt in my mind that "experts" know it but disregard their own dishonesty. When I spent merely an hour seeking some repetition, I found it! Depending on who is giving the data, the first dynasty list is roughly as follows:

"Menes, Djer, Athothis, Teti/Ati, Djet, Merbapin, Semerkhet...(and later) Sneferka."

These kings are the same as those below, listed (by Britannica) for the end of the fifth dynasty and start of the sixth (approx. 2400-2200 BC according to Britannica):

"Menkauhor, Djedkare, Isesi, Unas, Teti, Userkare (Phiops), Pepe I Meryre...(and later) Neferkare" (Britannica "Egypt" 1970).

It's common knowledge that Menes was also called "Aha," wherefore it is easy to see that Menkauhor is a Menes-Aha combination.

Djer easily modifies to Djedkare.

Athothis easily equates with Isesi.

Sometimes Djer is viewed as Uenephes (see website below), which easily equates to Unas.

And Merbapin, when flipped to "Bapin-Mer," easily becomes "Pepi Meryre."

A few generations later, Sneferka is named as a first-dynasty possibility, who must have been the same as Neferkare of the sixth dynasty.

I can't help but pity the impoverished historians who made that blunder. The serious question is, how many other kings have been repeated twice, or even three times, by our worshipful Egyptologists?
(see http://www.nemo.nu/ibisportal/0egyptintro/2egypt/index.htm)