October 14 - 20, 2025
Pre-Tribulationist Activists Never Stop Poisoning Christians
or
Ancient Pagan Hebrews
or
News Section Last Section
Hall of Names is once again showing the descriptions of the Coats of Arms presented at House of Names. Click off (not on) of purple box to get started.
The Charlie Kirk versus Israel rift has brought to the fore the so-called "replacement theology," a phrase advanced by pre-tribulationists who insist on tarnishing proper theology for the sake of protecting the true heresy, "dispensationalism," a mutational invention of pre-tribulationists. The words of Jesus do not mutate, unless somebody mutates them. Pre-tribulationists are mutators. To this day, after despising their mutation for 45 years, I do not know what ails them that they should resist every post-trib teaching in the Bible.? There are four blatant post-trib passages, in Daniel 12, Matthew 24, 2 Thessalonians 2, and Revelation 20. Yet pre-tribbers have found ways to mutate those teachings. There is not one Bible verse that blatantly teaches two comings of Jesus in a seven-year period, but these wicked teachers have invented a one-Coming-two-stages mutation by which they reveal their willingness to openly rebel against the Scripture they claim to champion.
Pre-trib leaders try to pass themselves off as Bible experts because they need to be viewed as specially enlightened in order to convince believers that, when Paul says that God's people are not given to God's wrath, the true meaning is that they don't need to prepare to endure 1260 days of persecution from the anti-Christ. The honest believer understands Paul as meaning that the Chosen do not get shut out from Eternal Life. There's nothing in his words that would indicate the timing of the rapture, that it should come prior to the 1260 days of persecution, but pre-tribbers INSIST that Paul is implying exactly that because they have nothing better, in all the Bible, to hang their stupidity upon for pushing their pre-trib mutation. As they claim to be prophecy experts, that's why "stupidity" is justified, especially as they are being wicked rebels. Matthew 24 has the words of Jesus Himself, yet they rebel even against them. GROSS STUPIDITY. Do not trust them, do not respect them, call them out for creating a whole doctrine based misinterpretations.
I don't know how wicked their game is, but I'm always on the edge of wondering whether they will even enter Eternal Life. It's not for me to judge, but one thing I know, they hang their hats on nothingness for a reason(s). Sometimes I think their motive is cowardice. Can you think of any other possible motive for insisting that Christians are not given to fierce opposition from the devil?
The Charlie Kirk versus Israel rift has found Netanyahu appealing to Christians by referring to modern Israel as in the throes of fulfilling the promise to Abraham...which is a fundamental part of dispensationalism. The promise to Abraham can be fulfilled without any dispensationalist notion. Dispensationalism is an invention claiming that God has two sacred bodies, the Church and Israel. Those who disagree argued against it by saying that there has only been one Israel, ever, because the Church of Jesus was the transition of Old-Covenant Israel into New-Covenant Israel under Jesus. There has always been only one Israel, but pre-tribulationists twist that fact into "replacement theology," which is to say that the Church replaced bloodline Israel. No, it did not.
Rather, God rejected the rulers of bloodline Israel, and chose other rulers, the 12 Apostles. It was the same Israel, with new rulers under Jesus. Jesus Himself said so in Mathews 21:43: "Therefore, the Kingdom of God will taken from you [Pharisees / Sadducees], and will be given to a nation producing its fruit." Jesus was telling the chief priests that he was in the throes of a coup. We don't see two nations of God, but we see only one. It's just as Jeremiah said, that God will make a New Covenant with the house of Israel. The ONE house of Israel.
This teaching is very insulting to religious Israelites. They would prefer the teaching of Zionist pre-tribulationists who have both a Church and a restored Israel. It's fruitless to argue for this two-body view by appealing to Old-Testament prophecies speaking to Israel's restoration, because the apostle Paul already clarified that bloodline Israel would be rejected from the Kingdom, but, in the end times, some bloodline Israelites would be regrafted into it. ONE Israel, not two. The promise to Abraham will have some chosen Israelites joining the Church, once God has humbled modern Israel.
It can be gleaned that religious Israelis who dream of fulfilled Old-Testament prophecy have the related dream of wiping Christians off the planet once Israel rules the world. It can be gleaned that these religious zealots, but also Netanyahu and political company, love the Rothschilds and other Jewish billionaires because they seem to be the Chosen method of making Israel the world's powerhouse.
It's technically wrong to say that the Church replaced Israel. Don't fall for it. Rather, say that Jesus replaced the rulers of Israel, that the New-Covenant Israel continued as the Church of Jesus. Don't say that the Church became Israel, but say that the Church is Israel. Even in Old-Testament times, the chosen of God were his Church, while Israelites who worshiped other gods, or who ignored God's will while giving him lip service, were either cast out, or were never part of, His Church. Define "Israel" as the people chosen by God, which absolutely does not mean modern Israel. God has not chosen the bulk of Abraham's offspring. What can't we understand about that? The bulk of Abraham's offspring have not chosen the true God.
I call them Israelites because it's their own label for themselves, but they are not the Israel of God. They have not entered into Israel unless they have first confessed Jesus as God coming in the flesh to forgive the sins of Israelis. But forgiveness is only the beginning, for the calling is to conform to God's will according to the words of Jesus. When we make mistakes, we try not to make them again.
Here's how snaky pre-tribulationists are becoming: "To my utter amazement, a lot of people today are saying that 2nd Thessalonians 2:1-4 disproves the pre-Trib Rapture. The exact opposite is true:..." He goes on to say that this text does not in fact say that the anti-Christ must appear before Jesus appears, which is exactly what it does say. This type of argumentation is maddening, wacko. He tries to give weight to his argument by starting off with, "to my utter amazement," as if those who read the text at face value are the wackos.
Paul says in 2 Thessalonian 2:3: "that Day [of Jesus' return] will not come unless the apostasy occurs first and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction". That's the face value. Later, in verse 8, Jesus destroys the anti-Christ at His coming. It's completely logical in its sequencing, but pre-tribbers insist that there are two comings of Jesus in this passage. They imagine a secret rapture years before the anti-Christ gets authority, and they even insist that Paul has this secret rapture in mind, in these opening verses of Thessalonians:
Concerning the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our being gathered to him, we ask you, brothers and sisters, not to become quickly alarmed in mind or disturbed, neither by a spirit, not through a teaching nor a letter as though from us, that the day of the Lord has come. Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the apostasy occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of damnation.Only a moron can see two comings of Jesus in those words. It pains me that pre-tribulationists are acting such morons. They see the coming of Jesus to fulfill a (non-existent) pre-trib rapture in the first sentence, and then see the Return at Armageddon in the second sentence, and they then accuse post-tribbers like myself of distorting Paul by claiming that there's only one coming that Paul's speaking to. These Christians become maddening when they talk this way, and so we will need to wait and see how God deals with their madness, how painful it will be for them.
Pre-tribbers like to argue that God is too loving to send them through a battle with satan incarnate. Therefore, when that battle begins, or as they see it approaching, will pre-tribbers fulfill the apostasy? Will they become offended by Jesus when they realize that He does ask us to endure this final battle while on the Earth?
The post-trib message should include our building up courage to endure jail or murder, hunger, or death by cold. I'm horrified by murder or death by cold, and my life has toughened me beyond the softness by which typical residential Christians abide. Prophecy is what it is. When anything horrible comes upon us, we find power in uttering, "Jesus." In most situations, calling on Jesus saves us from horrible things, if we have taken Him to heart previously. But even those who have not previously known Him can get salvation from horrible things by calling to Him.
I reject the teaching of some post-tribulationists where they think every Christian will be killed with little hope of fending off the killers. I do not think it will be like that, for most of us. Jesus said that, when He returns, those taken to salvation will be grinding grain or sleeping. But He also said that some will not be taken, which is the most-frightening thing of all.
He said that the wise will store jars of oil, but didn't explain what is meant by "oil," nor did He say what is meant by "storing." It seems to have the connotation of storing foods in preparation for enduring the final 2,160 days, yet it can have another meaning wherein we hold to Faith and Spirit within the jars of our bodies. When we become angry or disenchanted with God, we can put Him off from our souls. That is the worst thing we can do. That is not storing oil.
If you need faith because this world has you doubting that Jesus did rise from the dead, look into the image of Jesus on the so-called "Shroud of Turin." That cloth is owned by Joseph of Arimathea, and shows a golden "burning" upon it, as if some radiation etched the cloth's upper layers with a color to reveal the face of The Obedient One. For the sake of many, He endured a horrific death on their behalf, even on the behalf of those who deserve to die that type of death, if only they would acknowledge their sins and change their ways, no longer living at enmity with God. Jesus endured it in order to make sons for God who would not anger Him to his face, sone who come to God in love, for the Cross have love for us written all over it. Acknowledge that love, because it is your motivation to becoming a true Christian. Above all else, obedience to God is acknowledging what Jesus did for us, and appreciating it's magnitude...something Trump refuses to do, the fool.
Make your own unleavened bread, in your home, even if you live alone. Add no yeast, no flavoring (salt is okay, I think), just some oil. You can eat foods with it, after you break it and eat some with no food, as you drink wine, though I'll use beet juice because I keep no wine. Give some heart-felt words to God for what Jesus did, and acknowledge it, because this is remembering it. Not that we can forget what He did, but that we should acknowledge it from time to time with more than a passing thought, because it is our personal salvation. Nobody in the Bible told us how often we should break bread, but Passover seems like a choice time. Not Easter, but Passover. Right now, I'm doing it every six months roughly. A piece of cracker just doesn't do it for me. I make a ten-inch flat bread. I prefer to do it when my heart is inclined for a special time, but if I do it often, it becomes / feels less special. Breaking bread alone is nice for it's deeper touchiness, solemnity.
Christians should do this together in homes, with meals and fellowship, but I fear that church gatherings have destroyed our meeting together in other ways. I've never heard a pastor say that believers should meet each other in their homes. Maybe a pastor fears that people will start home churches, take away some of his income, or make him look less successful in growing a church.
The Cross of Jesus is a means to emphasize that Christians need to get along, otherwise there is no Kingdom of God. A forgiving spirit is needed for the Kingdom to thrive. We look not at each other's imperfections, or, if we see some, we apply grace. Maybe we can blame the world for the bad sides of our personalities. After all, we were trained by the schools of the world while growing up, and we were also taught by our worldly friends. We put all those bad attitudes aside and move forward, with TRUE PROGRESS, unlike the reprobate retrobates who go backward to Sodom and call it "progress." They judge not, and thus "love" others in their parties, while they sin, while they violate God. They embrace all sorts of sinners and judge not, then call us hypocrites for not doing likewise. Instead of acknowledging the sins, they justify or downplay them.
When the Jerusalem church was confronted by the ministry of Paul, it decided not to trouble the Gentile believers to take three annual trips to the Jerusalem temple to keep the Law. The leaders reasoned that a new way of obedience to God was called for, and after some debate, the leaders concluded that Gentiles should shun paganism and sexual sins. No other stipulation was given, though it was understood that Gentiles should also keep to proper, common morality, which can be found in all the New Testament letters. Once a Christian has a made-up mind to keep to those things, life is for the enjoyment to the praise of God. But people who enjoy life without praising God are detestable in His sight. What's to wonder?
Christianity is not to be a stringent walk on tight rope. Proper morality, manners, respect for others, does not require all of our strength, all of our concentration, such that we cannot also breath easily and enjoy the things that God gave to be enjoyed, such as life itself in a big and open world with an even bigger sky. This is not a jail cell. We are truly free who abide by the common good, and because we have allowed the Bible to sink deep into our minds, we fast recognize when we are in the throes of doing wrong, and we put a halt to it, minimize it, which should be standard procedure (going forward, not backward) for Christians.
It is God's will that we should enjoy three meals a day plus a bedtime snack. It is God's will that we should enjoy sleep. It is God's will that we should enjoy waking to a different day each day, with changing weather to keep the outdoors from becoming same-old-same-old. It is not God's will that we should work in vain because the rich keep prices high. It is not God's will that we should need the income of 20 years just to own a home, and throwing a quarter of our income to a landlord all that while. That's what makes life terrible, and high taxes on top makes us want to scream. The Kingdom of God will not be like this cruelty. Pity those who prefer this life to the government under Jesus.
Pity those who have enough money to laugh now. They are like those on a ship with barrels of good food and wine while watching shipmates feed on stale cereals and half-rotten fruits. They laugh because they are not on a ship, because the plight of the poor over on the other side of the tracks is out of sight, out of mind. On the other hand, this is not true at all in the case of wealthy business owners who will not spare their own employees, whom they see daily, some extra wages. I suppose that the wealthy fear losing their luxurious lives. Should we hate them? One can't love while also hating, so if we hate something, keep it short.
Some think that being a Christian is to give assent to common good. That's not enough. If Christian nationalists become appreciated by non-Christian nationalists because they are on the same political team, and if the non-Christians decide to become Christians in the sense of adhering to the common good of Jesus, that's not good enough. Without making peace with God at the Cross, and without receiving the Spirit of God in the soul, aspiring to common good will backfire. Jesus said that, without Him, we cannot do good.
If someone wants to alleviate fears of Condemnation, but is unwilling to release the things needing release to be in good standing with God, the demons can frustrate any Christian conduct that's aspired to, or attempted. The parable of the four seeds applies here. The only way to find freedom in God is to release everything, or at least try to release everything, because we wish to be full-on for God. I assume that God does not find it flattering if we decide we want to be three-quarters full. What good is the three-quarters if the one-quarter pollutes it?
When one apologizes to God for past sinfulness, it's not to be for past sins, but for general sinful behavior, a ship steered at sea without the sail and mast of God to keep it straight. The going is going to get tough with heavy pelting to your hull, but pity those who keep to the rough waves because they are too manly to accept the help of God to smooth out the ride. Without God, we are useless in keeping the Straight Way, because demons infest and frustrate and make rot of our "good" to others. This is what we Christians learned who went into our 20s forsaking God. And when we realized our error, and applied the correct attitude toward God, we found peace...which is exactly the smooth ride I just mentioned.
We no longer need to fight the demons that make things rough because we no longer feed the demons, no longer give them a right to frustrate us, because our very thoughts are attuned to God's ways, and He protects us. We don't watch our shipmates starve while we feast. We don't lounge on the top deck while the shipmates scrub the lower floors to clean our bedroom quarters. Instead, we become the poor, and we become the servant, and we sacrifice the "good life" here because its a mirage. It's not the good life at all, but the wicked life. Jesus said that they are the wretched poor who are rich in this life. Jesus turned the tables on earthly realities, on earthly "wisdom." We see this glaringly about Jesus as soon as we begin reading the Gospels: he turns everything upside-down because that makes everything right-side-up.
When Jesus said that He did not come to bring peace to the world, but division, He risked being misunderstood. It sounds like a contradiction. However, he was not being divisive at all, in the evil sense, but was speaking to the salvation that He would grant, to the new converts He would claim, who would cause division when even their family members would break fellowship with them, and hate them. Jesus does nothing wrong, and those who inadvertently cause the division do nothing wrong, and thus the blame rightly goes to those who hate the brothers that Jesus makes. He turns everything upside-down, and even spoils the joy of whole families, making them loathsome without their realizing it.
Perhaps the Godless who hate Christians the most are religious Jews. Whenever they hate us, and we feel sorry for them, our crown starts to glisten. They ostracize a Christian convert, treat them like the dead, and get happy if they can hurt them more. This persecution is our crown of overcoming, for if we stay the course when even family members hate us, we have earned a crown, not merely eternal life.
This is what Jesus meant when He said that we must hate our family members, not Christian members of course, not even Godless family members who do us no wrong. But if family members hate us for becoming Christians, and apply other tactics to make us forsake Jesus, He expects us to shun their will rather than to betray Him, to not become entangled such that they slow us down in the progress we wish to make in Jesus.
There was a video out recently, titled, "The narrow way is faith only in Jesus Christ and the broad path is works salvation." Only a snake talks like this because it is confusing Christians. It gives the impression that is you think to do anything good for Jesus, you are dropping away from Faith. Only a fool talks that way. When Paul said that we are saved by Faith, he was battling the "circumcision group" of Christians who wanted Gentile Christians to maintain the Jewish Law. In Paul's mind, "faith" was not devoid of common good to which we are called, but anyone who tries to make those works somehow antithetical to faith is a moron, a snake.
When Paul said that good works cannot save us, he was only pointing out that the primary need is respect of the Cross, not that good works somehow spoils our faith or, shudder, gets us condemned on the wide road to destruction. I'm throwing a pie into the face of the video owner above who made that title because he didn't say, "The narrow way is faith AND OBEDIENCE in Jesus Christ." When he says, "faith only," he's being a moron who, although he reads the Bible, doesn't acknowledge the importance of works. Jesus made it plain Himself that, without obedience, faith only is dead. Therefore, let's not be moronic, but let's call them out who teach faith-only like snakes desirous of destroying our Faith.
The morons think that being free of doing works is what Jesus sets us free to. How convenient for the lazy in Jesus to take that approach. It must be a pre-tribulationist tenet. The blessed hope of coming to Jesus and doing nothing in return for what he did for us, just lounge in faith only, no responsibility to do anything for anyone. That's how these clowns come across. Your entire duty to Jesus is to believe only, they say, even though Jesus says that we must practice His words. What don't the morons understand about that? Why are they unwilling to say, "Faith and obedience in the Holy Spirit" is The Plan?
"Faith" should be interpreted as devotion to Jesus rather than mere belief. "Devotion" and "obedience" are the same thing. We become devoted because we are indebted to Jesus. We see that, unlike a human dictator, unlike satan, a precious God, infinitely above us and able to do a Shocking Thing, died to pay the price for our sinfulness, but do we then return to that sinfulness if we accept the Gift? Therefore, we will be rejected by God if we have faith-only without putting on the new man. Is it hard to put on the new man? Not if God helps us. Obedience hinges on remaining in The Vine. If we try to be the new man without the Vine's Spirit within, we will fail. The Vine's Spirit comes to us through Faith in Jesus.
A part about being a Christian is the long wait for the rest of the Gift. The wait wouldn't be a wait if the world were like us. We could then enjoy life to the ultimate if everyone were like us, if we didn't need to lock doors at night, if we could trust our neighbors to be like brothers, and trust our bosses to give us a fair shake of the profits. We wait because we live in a dark world where those on the wide road to destruction operate Godless, giving us nothing to be happy about. They have turned the world of humans into a machine, and are not yet finished tooling the machinery. Therefore, God will make an end to them in "one hour." I predict they will be balking at God more than ever, as that hour arrives, which will heighten their pains.
"Faith" is to endure in loyalty even though we do not see God, even though the Spirit of God is not always giving witness to us, to comfort us, to spur us on with renewed fuel. The end times will test our loyalty. It is better if we fall asleep in some agony while waiting than to partake heartily in the machinery.
Jesus said that the Law will remain throughout the Millennium. I assume it remains to judge those who die in their sins. Jesus died to remove that penalty. Paul says that there is ample Grace, God's not applying the law to those who strive for loyalty. If we find ourselves concerned with obedient thinking in Spiritual dry spells, that's a good sign. It's an even better sign if we are asking for more indwelling of the Holy Spirit, for holiness is loyalty. We don't wake up in the morning wondering what sins we can commit this day. Therefore, so long as we are obedient to obey Jesus when He says, "sin no more," we are free to enjoy the day.
However, I think that we can abuse enjoyment, when we are always looking to enjoy things to the point of neglecting service to God. But even in enjoyment, there are usually other people involved, and we can ALWAYS be mindful of applying God's ways when with other people, for all of God's commands have to do with how we harm, or do not harm. We can build each other, or tear each other down.
Beware the low lives in podcasting who claim to be Christians, but who urge you to use sewer language as if God is "cool" to it. These people push against the grace of God, and there is a point when He will abandon those who claim the name of Jesus if they apply too much worldly conduct while neglecting Clean conduct. God is clean, therefore be clean. If you have a sticky habit in using cuss bombs, then apologize to God after each use with a desire to overcome the habit. Don't use filthy language in normal conversation. I often feel like using bad language against the sewer mouths, for they provoke me, and probably intend to. Borderline Christians are in danger of being Pushed off the cliff, and they would like all of us to become borderline believers.
Ask ask ask for God's Spirit. Come back again and ask ask ask with a mind to prove yourself worthy of Him. He wants us to receive Him, but He doesn't relish living in a filthy temple. That's been the problem from the start. Men become filthy, then filthier, and they want their wives and children to be like them lest they feel guilty for being the only black sheep.
I'm not the bench mark for holiness, but as I write to you, I get a chance to condition my mind too. It's good to go over these things and put them close to the heart, and it's even better to develop a healthy view of God, the Bench Mark, for there are truck loads of fools in your town who would have you develop a nasty view of God. Think hard on what God is truly like, for those who think he's brutal or cruel have a terror-filled day coming when they see Him, if they see Him. I wonder: will the damned see the Glory of God prior to Sentencing?
The Cross is God's testimony that He's genuinely concerned about us becoming righteous. A brutal, evil God does not do something like that. A God who cries to us to become righteous is a righteous God. Righteousness means that we do no harm, but rather build each other up. That's why Christians should meet together in non-church gatherings, where they can talk with each other rather than merely sit shoulder-to-shoulder without talk. I've got news for church lovers: you can worship God all by your lonesome, and He prefers it that way.
I resist lifting my hands in church for three reasons: 1) not to offend others who don't raise hands; 2) not to be like the Pharisees who, for example, pray on street corners to advertise their "holiness"; 3) not to be mistaken for the wrong kind of charismatic. Some of us think that, when we raise hands on a regular, religious way, it makes those who don't raise hands feel inferior. I don't want to contribute to that. I don't want to be, "hey, look at me, the first to lift arms up, aren't I better than you?" Not everyone who raises hands has that attitude, but I'm sure that peer pressure plays a part for some, who fear looking inferior, or who aspire to leadership positions.
I've never been one to desire or strive for church leadership. It just seems self-interested to me. Rather than wanting to be at the front of the church, I desire being at a table or couch with other Christians. Christians who rub shoulders with the Godless all week long at work should naturally relish spending time with like-minded ones. We don't go only for what we can get out of it, but we are also mindful of how we can be supportive to the hearts of others. I'm just speaking what I think God wants to see.
For those not doing anything evangelical or online, perhaps this video has the right stuff for you:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8MaEn5MKSSEIf you can talk, you can talk to God. If you can raise your voice to get attention, you can do it to God. Use all your heart when needed, for God responds to the true heart. Argue your position when not heard, but see where and how you are losing the argument, and then adjust your talk accordingly, because we get to know Him that way. You can pick up where you left off the day/night before. I think God greatly values anyone who talks to Him with a naked heart. It cannot go unheard if it's full of naked praises without flattering dressings. If your heart doesn't feel like praising because you have a serious need that ruins the mood for praising, I know how you feel. Be still, and know the Lord is there. You don't always need to talk or think. Producing fruit in the heart is a work. Shaping the soul is not a waste of time if it's the shape that God wants it in. Old age is a good time for this. If God takes away the outer glory, makes us forsake socializing when our teeth yellow, and if it's because He "selfishly" wants us all to Himself, be happy. It's only logical, as we near the door of bodily death. In reality, He wants the best-possible resurrection for you. That's not selfish.
Non-Israelite Hebrews
Just came across this video showing that the Septuagint (pre-Jesus) and Dead Sea Scrolls (pre-Jesus) both had Jesus predicted, in about 1,000 BC, with pierced hands and feet, while the Masoretic Text (post-Jesus) that was basis for our Old Testament translation changed it to, "like a lion, they are at my hands and my feet." We can estimate that the anti-Christ Jews deliberately mistranslated the Psalm, with a lion, because the Psalm sounds just like it's predicting Jesus:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPNLJdgfrfEThe Septuagint translation may have some subjective liberties (deliberate errors) due to its Egyptian origins, but the translators didn't know what they were referring to when predicting Jesus on the cross. So, they just gave the correct translation, obviously, with no subjective need to alter the piercing of hands and feet. It's hard to figure how else a person becomes pierced in those two extremities, aside from crucifixion. The rest of that Psalm 22 has other evidences that it's speaking of Jesus on the cross. Read it if you never have. Some English translations borrow from the Septuagint for the pierced hands and feet.
In the Septuagint, and also in Luke 3, a character not in your old Testament is found by the name of CAINan. He is said to be the father of Arphaxad. In your Bible, Arphaxad's son is Shela, who is the SALa of the Septuagint, son of Cainan. Sala is the father of Heber, and your Bible has Shela, father of Eber. This is quite amazing because the Caeni Thracians lived to the east side of the Hebros river, and there was a Sale location at the mouth of the Hebros. Eber was the founder of all Hebrews. Thus, these Hebrews had apparently moved to Thrace.
At the link above, it says that Sale was a colony from Samothrace, the latter being the island upon which the Heber-like Kabeiri cult was founded. Therefore, I do declare, that Abraham's pagan ancestors removed from Babylon's outskirts to Thrace. One can now trace the namers of the Arda tributary of the Hebros to the Ardiaei Illyrians at/near Kotor, and I can trace the naming of the latter location to "Keturah," Abraham's second wife. Kotor-like Cutters, the surname, were first known in Dorset with Caeni-like Caens. Cutters use a dragon, and Draco-like Thraco was home to Caeni.
google AI: "The Ardiaean Illyrians, originally from the area of modern Montenegro, had their capital at Rhizon (modern Risan) in the Bay of Kotor." Ardahan is a Black-sea region near Rize. Ardahan was on/near the Aras river, and Arsus was a location on the upper Hebros, north of the mouth of the Arda. Arras was the Artois capital near the Eburones of Belgium.
The Eburones lived in the area settled also by proto-Merovingians such as the Batavians. Merovingians had been the Marsi of Maruvium, in Italy's Abruzzo province, which does not look coincidental i.e. pagan Hebrews named Abruzzo (capital at Aprutium) from mythical Aphrodite, mate of Aras-like Ares (pedophile cult), who became mythical Mars. The Marsi.
Eburones lived beside the Morini, and then Murunum (modern Morano) is beside Saracena while Wikipedia's article on "Saraka" has a Saraca family first in Kotor, then at Ragusa in the thick of the earlier Ardiaei. It thus makes some sense that the proto-Saraca named Sarah, Abraham's first wife. The Morini were in Artois smack where the family of Eustace II was, the family that furnished Baldwin, the first king of Templar Jerusalem.
Eustace ruled near Comines, and while the Comines' furnished Miss Comyn, mother of Adam Kilconquhar, a Crusader in Jerusalem, English Adams share the cross of Eustace's. Eustace-branch Stacys have it as a saltire cross, and it just so happens that it's the saltire also of Bruce's of Annandale, whom Adam's wife (Miss CARRick) married after he died. The Mee's suspect in the Eustace and Stacy motto list the My's (Nottinghamshire with Ainsleys) in the Ainsley motto, and the Ainsleys are in the colors and format of English Adams. The Annandale's share the saltire of Kildare's while Eustace's are first known in Kildare.
You can click Comine's now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links.
Ainsleys were a branch of Annas' who list Aunis' while Clave's and Loupe's were both in Aunis. Clave's share the key (different color) with the Arms of Comines, and the latter have it in black, as do Clavers/Cleavers, first known in Norfolk with Comine's/Comyns. "Clavo" is a motto term of Irish Carrs while English Carrs are also Currs while Eustace's have a "Cur" motto term.
Herod Antipas of Israel was banished by Augustus to COMMINGES (not far from Aunis) while Comine's are also Commings, and he lived at the same time as Annas, the chief priest of Israel. Annas' daughter married the next chief priest, Joseph CAIAPHAS, and CHIAVAS'/Chiapponi's are listed with Italian Sheaves' (share Clave keys). Chevers are first known in Devon, where CHIVES' were once said to be first known, and where Eustace-branch Staggs/Stage's are still said to be first known. It appears that the original Crusaders and Templars were from the bloodline of the two chief priests that murdered Jesus. It explains why the first grandmaster of the Templars is said to have married Elizabeth CHAPPES.
When the ten tribes went into exile into Assyria, they were not far from the Aras river. Plus, I think that the Joktanite Hebrews found in Genesis (at Sephar) were in proto-Assyria. Therefore, it's possible that Israelites married many of the Hebrew tribes. The Iberi of Caucasia probably lived partially on the Aras, and the Hebrews of Babylon / Akkadia lived on the (K)Habur tributary of the Euphrates from as early as the 15th century BC. "Joktan"-like Occitania has a southern end at the Ebro river of Spain, and the Sephardic Jews of Spain thus look like Joktanites of Sephar. Spain is also called, "Iberia."
Saragossa is near the confluence of the Ebro and Gallego rivers, and the Arms of Saragossa is the giant lion of Italian Gallego's/Galli's. The latter, in the colors of French Galli's, share the Abruzzo/Abreu lion. The latter are in the colors of Portuguese Abreu's who in turn, along with Spanish and Portuguese Chavez's (Galicia with Spanish Gallego's), are in the format of both the Italian Sheaves'/Chiava's, first known in Abruzzo, and French Saffers. It makes the latter look like they were from Sephardic Hebrews. French Clermonts (Dauphine with Galli's) have the Coat of Sheaves-branch Clave's in the colors of the Saffer falcons, and English Falcons are first known in Cumberland with the Dolphins in the Coat of English Clermonts.
Clermonts'/Clements (share a Clair Chief) are first known in Powys, and then the Comine write-up speaks to "Commins Coch" of Powys.
It's then interesting that while TERRAgona province is beside the Saragossa province, Terah was Abraham's father. The Arms of Saragossa province include the Arms of Aragon, and they look like the Arms of Terragona and the Coat of the Tarr/Tarres surname (Somerset).
This Week's Charlie Kirk Wrap-Up
Below is more evidence that Paramount Tactical is a government-biased stooge. He's probably getting paid because he went out of his way to "debunk" the disappearing man that has no bearing on the Kirk shooting, unless the government made the man disappear, or whatever reason, so as to prove that this video was tampered with before release to the public.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqbMXLIBETwParamount is trying to copycat the disappearing man with his own helper. But, the latter walks off the main sidewalk long before he gets to the tree. Paramount is not so stupid that he can't see the disappearing man remaining on the main sidewalk as far as the tree. Paramount's helper starts to walk down a hill a significant distance from the tree, and so his head goes lower on the screen, but the disappearing man never goes lower on the screen. Do we think Paramount can't see that? Of course he can, meaning that he's lying to his audience in an attempt to salvage respect for the plotters who tampered with th video. Shame on the youtube-video owner for not calling Paramount out on his falsification.
Here's Jason Goodman trying to explain a problem that he gave his viewers last week, when he didn't tell them that the bullet appears to be coming downward at a significant angle to Charlie's head. He's now trying to tell us that the bullet's trajectory is to be expected roughly horizontal with the ground. See why he says so, and see if you can prove him wrong before I tell you why I think he's wrong:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHMx6Zmr3L4When Jason's white-spot bullet is seen in front to the forehead of man in black with arms crossed, the camera view is downward upon the scene. If that camera were at eye level on a person standing on the same level as man with crossed arms, the bullet would be seen above the head of the man with crossed arms, and Jason knows this, but is not telling the viewers. The white spot, if it were a bullet, must originate above the SUV, but as there is no person there, above the SUV, that white spot cannot be the bullet. I say that it was doctored into the video to confuse.
I learned this week that there were no bride's maids at Charlie Kirk's wedding, which tends to support the theory of some, which I entertain, that he was not truly married, but partook in a fake marriage for government purposes, and that he feigned his death as a clean way (not divorce) to end it with Erika, and to give Turning Point over to others. His faked death then looks like a government, plotted false-flag event conducted by the Republican side for to acquire an excuse to go after leftists. That stinks.
Here's an accurate / Biblical way to view modern Israel:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NHWs8LY0S7AGod took Israel from Levite rule and gave it to Jesus from Judah. The Gentiles were added to Israel, and so they are a wing of the ONE bird of Israel. There's a Gentile wing, and an Abrahamic wing. ONE BIRD before Jesus, and one bird after Jesus.
Stephen Gardner, youtuber with channel by that name, is taking the FBI position (October 16th show), making him suspect as a traitor to common sense. Why? He shows that someone did a rifle-sound analysis, where all rings intersected at the spot that Tyler Robinson was reportedly at, but, I guess, Stephen's too daft to realize that the FBI side of things would feign such an analysis. Others did a rifle-sound analysis where the rings intersected at the bush-on-balcony spot, not even close to Robinson's position.
At the 35th minute of the video below, the woman says that half of Turning Point's employees are Mormons, I kid you not. What business did Charlie have listing Mormons, an elaborate of wing of Freemasonry, to his politics? Why did he agree to it? It tends to explain the bells-and-whistles theatrics, at his memorial, when his wife came out to speak. There's no indication I've heard of that she's a Mormon follower, and I've never heard that the Israeli government has Mormon favoritism for its American programs, but then this is maybe a wake-up call on that possibility, for his murder was staged in a Mormon state.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCNPZGCMUdsI'm now hearing some confirmation that big tech, no doubt at the demand/command of the government, denied any camera from streaming live at the Charlie Kirk event, even before the shot, but definitely after the shot. The details on this facet of the staging would be very telling, if somehow big tech would allow those details to get out.
The video below is a torment to watch, starting at 44 minutes, but in case you want to know, the cameraman who caught Turning Point taking down the camera behind Charlie looks guilty of being part of the plotters, begging why he advertised Turning Point taking down the camera. I suggest skipping from 52 minutes to 1hr2min. When you get tired of the salmon-shirt guy running his mouth (sewer language included), who's not on until after the one-hour point, it never gets better, never amounts to anything, so maybe you can just fast-forward to see how long he goes on for in making himself look guilty:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKE7IYgtFxoApparently, the video owner above broke the story below on finding the computers of the people who were involved in the staging of the Kirk shooting. The problem is, the video owner cannot know the exact computers, but the FBI can find them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nPe2Lhit7eI[Update October 24 -- In light of the Parkers below, I'd like to say here that Sam Parker has revealed that Mikey McCoy, Rob's son and Turning Point's manager, looks suspicious from the time he heard the gun shot, to when he was walking away casually (apparently on the phone) in the distance across the street while the other Turning-Point people put Charlie into a van. Story online. There is a Mikey/Mitchy surname sharing a "dagger" with McCoys, and Michael's/Mitchells are first known in Surrey with Salmon-branch Salemans while Mikeys/Mitchys have a "salmon." End insert]
The video above touches upon Caldera Engineering in Orem, suspect as part of the staged plot. Over the past few weeks, I've mentioned a crow and its caw that occurred in my yard three or four weeks ago. For that reason I brought up the Caw/McCoy surname, because Rob McCoy was a co-founder of Turning Point. But it's not until now that the Calders came to mind because I've known that they have a Coat much like that of Dutch Necks. The latter were in the last update like so:
I'd like to show how the English Role's can point Charlie's neck to the role of a crisis actor. It starts with the roll of paper in the Role Crest, called a "parchment." There is a Parchment surname listed with PARKmans, in Charlie colors and format, and then Parks use stage-pointable stags. One Parker Crest has a "stag," and the other Parker Crest has "a red stag's antler", the colors of the stag and antlers of Necks. The latter place a crown on one antler to emphasize the antler. The other Parkers, not with the red antler, have a "nec" motto term, and are in the colors of Pollocks who in turn have an "audACTER" motto term. The father of Pollocks was a vassal to the Dol Alans, and the latter became the Stewarts who share the checkered fesse of Parks.There was more to it that follows, but I don't want to repeat that entire discussion here. My next point as that Calders are also CAWdors. Calders (Role colors), first known in Inverness-shire with Gaw-like Gows/McGoo's, have a Coat version of the Cults/Celts, the latter first known in Perthshire with Role-like Rollo's and Gaws/Galts. The Patents/Pattens, possibly in the "Patentia" motto term of Gaws/Galts, share the Shield or Orems. Caldera Engineering is in Orem (Utah), the location of the Kirk staging.
The crow that cawed directly over my head first flew over my CANTALoupe plants, and then Candle's/Cantwells and Candys are first known in Suffolk with Thurstons. The latter appear to be in the Calder write-up: "The Calder surname was a habitational name, taken on from any of the various places called Calder, Caldor, or Cawdor; such as Calder in THURSO,..." Thurstons, in Stick colors, have hunting horns while Horns are also Orne's while Orems are also Orrins. Sticks, first found in Somerset with Caldera-beloved Borders, are in heraldic candlesticks, and Candys have the saltires within the Caldera border in half their colors. Koops/Kupe's have candlesticks and a border, and Cope's/Cups are first known in Aberdeenshire with Orems/Orrins.
THURstons have a heron in Crest while Herons share the Horn/Orne Coat. English Thors have the tower of Pellicans in colors reversed while a giant pelican is with cantaLOUPE-like Cantels, first known in Yorkshire with English Kirks, with Condys/Cundys and Keith-branch Caddys, and with Candals/Cundals in turn sharing the cross of Orions/Hierons (Norfolk, beside Candle's and Candys). Yorkshire is also where Schools/Scayle's are first known sharing the lozengy Shield of Orems/Orrins (Norfolk with Cattels and Keats). Loupe's share the German Kirk tower. Scottish Condys/Condys, sharing the cinquefoils of Keith-branch Kettle's, are first known in Perthshire with Kettle's. Candle's/Cantwells are also Kettle-like Kentels.
The Dume's expected in the Heron and Horn motto have a giant heron, but then "Dum" is a motto term also of Masons who in turn share the Freie lion. "Freemason" looks like it named itself after this bloodline. Orne province is where Masseys / Mace's of Ferte-Mace were from. There's this: "Commissioner Beau Mason was appointed Commissioner of the Utah Department of Public Safety by Governor Spencer J. Cox in June of 2025."
Candle's/Cantwells are first known in Suffolk with Mormans who might possible have a checkered version of the Orion/Hieron Coat. Mormans have a Moroni character in their ancestral mythology, and while Mormans are also Moormans, moor heads are with Morano's.
Over the past few weeks, I've shown of Chris PEARE pointed to crisis actors in a staged murder of Charlie Kirk. I can now add that both Portuguese and Spanish Caldera's share the "cauldron" with Spanish Paloma's. I've said a million times that I met Chris Peare at a La Paloma bar (before becoming a Christian). Spanish Paloma's (LePage colors) have two of the PERO/Perino pale bars, and Italian Paloma's share the dove of English Page's while French Pagans share the Pero/Perino hexagram. Palms are first known in Yorkshire with Scottish and English Pagans.
Back to the "audACTER" motto term of Pollocks, because Aude's have "silver swords, POINTs downward, MEETing in base." That looks like a pointer to Turning Point. Meets/Meads were once said to be first known in Somerset with the first-known Pollets/Pauletts in the motto of Pollock-like Pole's/Pools. Pollets have the Aude Coat on a black Shield.
When Chris Peare was on the first stage, she was there with her friend, LOUISE Phillips. Here's from my last update: "After we all had moved out [Chris, Louise and I], I bumped into Louise once only, and asking what she was doing, she said she was in stage productions. What are the chances? The sleeping bag dream [with stages] was decades later." The new point now is the "LOYaulte" motto term of Aude-connectable Pollets/Pauletts, for French Loys are listed with LOUIS'! That's amazing, because Aude's came off of "AudACTER."
Plus, Pollets/Pauletts are first known in Somerset with English Paulins/Pallins (and Pile's) while the neighboring Palins/Pauleys, sharing the giant PHILLips and Pile lion, are first known in Dorset with Pollet-loving Pole's/Pools. Louise PHILLIPs. The triple Pollet and Aude swords go to a point in the way many piles do, for example the triple piles of Orrs. The Points use "piles."
French Paulins share the rooster of French Galli's whom I link to the rooster of French Gays, the latter first known in Savoy with same-colored Aude's. Italian Galli's (rooster) are first known in Rome with Pool-connectable Rita's. The latter are from Vespasia Polla of Rieti, mother of three heads of the Revelation-17 dragon, including Domitian, the 6th head who was ruling Rome when Revelation was written. French Gays are in the colors and format of Rita's, and while the latter use "pieces of wood", Bags are first known in GayWOOD. Plus, Woods were related to the Roots (Kent with Phillips and Dragons) almost having the Loy/Louis Coat, and having the Bagley Coat. Welsh Lewis' (same place as Welsh Louis' and Tylers) have a dragon head.
In the two videos above, ADAM, a cameraman at the Kirk event, is a topic. At the 48th minute of the second video, Adam's footage is under review. English Adams list Caws, probably because they share the Sutherland stars while Caws/McCoys are first known in Sutherland.
I've never seen the gunshot theory shown at 1hr15min of the same video above. At about 1hr25min, the video owner (Baron Coleman) claims that there's a rifle flash in the tree branches corresponding to a man-on-roof behind the tree, but I do not see this flash. Perhaps youtube has removed it, a good theory proving that youtube regularly removes (or alters?) things from videos without permissions.
The problem with Baron's take is: if Adam was a scout to show the killers the rooftops scenery live, in the final minutes, why would the killers put his videos online for public consumption, especially if the rifle flash can be seen through the tree? Makes no sense, unless Charlie was not killed while the plotter's only want people to think so. In that theory, even Baron could be an insider, where he's feigning a duke-out with Adam, a fellow plotter, to make us believe that a rifle to Charlie's front fulfills the killing. However, Baron's not making money on this videos, and that's unique / special.
Near the end of the video, Baron speaks of a black cameraman who supposedly sees something in the tunnel behind Charlie, then supposedly signals to someone by turning his white identification card around so that the black side of the card now shows, as if to signal to a fellow plotter that the weapon has arrived under the tunnel. I say: so long as the public believes that Charlie was killed, the plot has been successful. There are too many guns with too many bullets in this story, all the better to make everyone think that Charlie was killed with one gun or another.
You've probably heard of Phil Lyman in the Kirk story:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfCUIQ2H7LYMy bet is that the video below has three pre-tribulationist speakers crying the blues about "replacement theology," but mainly attacking Doug Wilson's "reconstructionism," another way to describe Kingdom Now. There's quite a few things that upsets me about this show, but before going on, I want to say that I don't know much about Doug Wilson, and that I just want to speak against the position of this video's trio against a theocracy, because they prefer the American, Constitutional democracy over a theocracy as if the latter is somehow dangerous for evangelism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKo74rVE3kQBut first, I resent it when Brannon Howse paints "replacement" adherents wrongly as those who say that God has no program for modern Israel. That's a broad-brush tarnishing of people like myself who teach that the true Israel is the Church of Jesus, which concept Howse rejects probably in favor of the pre-trib poison pill. He's talking like a pre-tribber, anyway, for they are generally the ones who use "replacement theology" as part of their poison pills.
The obvious and Biblical truth is that the gentile Christians were grafted into the tree of Israel such that all of Christianity is the true Israel, but Howse does not mention this Pauline reality because pre-tribulationism gets a black eye if it tries to. Then, people like myself, which he wrongly places puts into a "replacement" camp when in no way do I say the Church replaced Israel, teach the God has a plan for modern Israel that includes, but is not limited to, grafting some bloodline Israelis into the same tree of Israel into which gentile Christians have been grafted. This view is unassailable, and Howse is REQUIRED by God to mention it whenever he attacks replacement theology. If he doesn't mention it, he's trying to give the false impression that we believe in something else, something drastically unBiblical, and for this Howse is guilty of attacking God's people sinfully.
There may be some who wrongly teach that the Church "replaced" Israel, but they may be guilty only of using wrong language. If what they mean is that national Israel is NOT the true Israel of God, they are correct, but if they go as far as saying that God is forever done with national Israel, I say that's wrong. In that case, Howse needs only to point out that error, and correct it by saying that SOME, not all, national Israelis, and some, not all, global-wide Jews, will be brought into the Church at the second coming of Jesus. But he won't even do that because he sees no Church on earth when Jesus returns. He's a rebel who senselessly violates the words of Jesus and Paul.
His attack on the rest of the Pauline doctrine above (i.e. leaves grafted into a tree), in an attempt to protect his pre-trib poison, is a trap laid out for common pre-tribulationists who listen only to pre-trib teachers who do all in their power to act the act of "expert" scholarship in order to foist the poison down their throats.
I would rather live under a "theocracy" than under the American Constitution. I would like to see adultery made illegal. I would like to see harsh punishment for abominable pornographers and prostitutes. I would love to see abortionist doctors in jail. And this will be the Future Government. But for Howse and his guests to say that such a government is wrong because it makes non-Christian citizens angry at Christianity is a swipe to the face of the Future Government. These non-Christians who swipe the face of Jesus daily are going to hate Christians whether or not we lead the national government. It's going to go much better for us if we control the police and legal systems, the schools and other government institutions, than if our enemies control it.
I agree that God will not permit a full-blown or global theocracy because that glory belongs only to Jesus. I agree that Kingdom Now, the attempt of Christians to set up the Future Government of Jesus before His return, is futile and misguided. In no way do I oppose Christians lending their voices to political battles when making national policies. I want to see that more. I want all pastors to move all Christians to voicing God's concerns for nations and local societies. That's being done to some degrees in all nations, and our "democratic" enemies hate us for it already, no need to worry about them hating us if per chance a quasi-theocracy could ever succeed by the democratic process.
Here's Doug Wilson's in his own words, but as presented and steered by a leftist media so as to make him appear like a horror story to leftists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zlz_0kwno0cI'm not opposed to Christian nationalism if it's defined as Christians partaking in national dialogue, and if it includes, as a priority, a bitter, verbal fight against the amoralism of our spiritual enemies that translates into political power over them. But if Christian nationalists partner with pro-Trump sewer mouths and fornicators not grounded in Jesus, or with Mormons, vaticanites and other heretical groups, then, no-brainer, I oppose it. These other groups can add their voices to the political battles, but we should not sit at the same table with them. That's akin to Freemasonry, and where Freemasonry partners with the many, Freemasonry wants to be in charge.
I don't like Christians schmoozing with Trump. If he decides to do anything that favors and promotes God's ways, or weakens our atheist enemies, we can take it happily, but we cannot become stained by Trump's clothes, so to speak, so long as he resists bending the knee to Jesus. In that case, he's a walking corpse that can do NOTHING good. Everything a carnal man does, if he sets out to do something good, becomes betrayed by the trash man operating in his own heart. Jesus is the only one who can do good because he has no trash man in his heart.
At the 22nd minute of the Howse video, the confident "expert" belittles people who think that salvation is by both faith and obedience. He portrays as ridiculous those who think that salvation goes to those whose good works out-weigh the bad. I wouldn't phrase it that way, but this expert needs to consider Jesus when saying: "For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom of heaven." Faith-only proponents need to grapple with that, and they do, but they twist it in order that faith-only remains the winner.
I don't have a position on the plight of Gaza at this time, as per how God feels about it. I do favor Israel over violent Palestinians. But I lean on the idea that Netanyahu and Trump together are acting carnally on behalf of their selfish ambitions but in the name of a "good" thing, "peace."
NEWS
No sooner did "An Inconvenient Study" get released that Trump announced he took a COVID booster shot, revealing that Trump is a murderous snake, deceiver, a delinquent fool who wields the military as his true wife. Beware, because it could signal that he's planning another pandemic:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51GbrQKwurcI'm not offering the video above for it's treatment on Charlie Kirk.
In the video below, you can't respect Tucker Carlson, because he, for years, denied an inside job for 9-11, just to keep his job at Fox. But, now free to do as he pleases, he's making a documentary. He doesn't say anything that others have already said. Note how Trump once again proves to be an enemy of the people when he knows, from the beginning, that planes didn't take the towers down, yet did nothing to investigate the massive crime. In other words, he covered for the ones who conducted that massive crime and cover-up, just like he's covering for other world-class crime rings even now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-UHpHezjdkAt 16 minutes, Tucker tells that the American government refused to reveal a person/company that probably had foreknowledge of the 9-11 crime. The point is, Trump's Kash Patel could reveal the person, but don't hold your breath, for Tucker aims to blame Israel for 9-11, and Trump right now is celebrating a convenient alliance with Netanyahu.
Tucker doesn't have enough money yet, though he was making several million dollars annually on Fox alone. he still wants to make money on his videos, or he's not going to do them. But, he pretends to care for the people by doing them, because that pretension is needed to keep video customers. Recently, he said that Arabs attacked the towers with planes, and even in the video above, he expends time on the nonsense that planes with Arab pilots took the two towers down. Carlson cannot be fully trusted to present the truths.
Unless this guy below is with China for doing disinformation, he's got some hefty evidence that Tyler Robinson was a crisis actor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZX1mn3ijgOcHollywood has all sorts of ways to fake gunshot wounds, including blood spatters. Possibly, the method that was faked on the ground was not as drastic as what we see in videos, because any video can be modified before release to the public.
The day after Trump signed the Israel-Hamas peace treaty, without Hamas being present, and with Hamas threatening that it won't disarm, Trump said he's prepared to bomb the living daylights out of Hamas unless it disarms, because Hamas is threatening to spoil the treaty that has him radiating in glory. We can forgive Trump, because his pride blinds him, making him unable to realize when he's an embarrassment. But what's the excuse of all the podcasters who celebrated him as a great man of peace? Pity the Christian podcasters who were treating him as a God-send. Trump the piece man, who wants a piece of Gaza.
Look at his corruption, using the White House and the military to secure fortunes in Gaza for his family members. Biden is blushing. What a contemptible snake, Trump is. It was never a peace agreement. Hamas got back 2,000 potential fighters out of this deal. It's an embarrassment. But Trump do doubt raised himself in pride for getting the 20 hostages home, meaning that Netanyahu is now begging Hamas to abduct a few dozen more hostages to keep the war on.
The guy below suggests that you not use Windows 11 because it's a Microsoft spy, and because Microsoft can sell you information to national spy systems:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C44iCr6czAoWe can imagine that the fiendish Jews are always bucking to get the biggest companies, like Microsoft, to bend to their demands. I'm not saying that Microsoft did not spy on us with Windows 10. The spying is only becoming more sophisticated and compulsory as the new generation gets brainwashed to accepting spying as normalcy. AI Companion is a spy system, not your pal, but young people don't care as they have so much fun. Microsoft is a worm.
The video below talks sense concerning the killing of Hezbollah officers via their phones exploding on them. Israel sold them the phones, then programmed them remotely to all go off as bombs. This can be done against Christians too, especially those who don't subscribe to a dispensational view of Israel. I'm saying this because Israel was caught recording the phones of thousands of Christians at and around the Kirk-shooting event. How else can phones be used to kill people remotely, aside from explosive bombs?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c97MvdI3enUThe video above talks about prepping for old people. He is bang-on when saying that old people need to keep moving. Pulling weeds is an excellent way to keep moving. Touching the grass with bare hands while "walking" along on knee pads is very nice exercise with a nice feel, until the back demands that I get up and stand straight for a minute. I then go back to it for a few more minutes.
The video above says that older people need to keep healthy in order to grow foods if the tribulation arrives. But I can tell you one better. As old age will make it hard to even cook foods, dry them before getting too old, you'll have plenty of time in retirement years. Jar those dried meats, fruits and vegetables. They won't go bad. I'm still eating dried ground beef and chicken from 2021; it doesn't taste any different than when I jarred it. I'm now going to dry another big batch of beef, probably this winter when all I have is time and more time. Computer work alone, all day and evening, will kill us fast. Keep moving between computer sessions.
I curse weeding only in July and August, when it's too hot, and when they haven't gotten better than the year before in certain spots. But weeding in the summer evening is very nice aside from the gnats. When it's all over, in late September, and then after some wood splitting (with the axe) in October, I feel good all over again, ready to shrivel up one more winter into a weakling. That's how my life has gone here on a 2-acre responsibility. It gives me a "job." I've got to do it whether I like it or not, because I can't stand the thought of weeds everywhere on this patch. I don't do it because I need to see weed-free grass, but because I would feel sick repeatedly to see an infestation of 25 different kinds of weeds as my lawn. When I mow the lawn, I only spread seeds around unless I first yank off the flower tops. It's kept me healthier to fight this fight.
Try it on your place if you have nothing else to do; don't just sit on a lawn chair for hours looking at the weeds grow. It'll make me feel better to know that there's someone else in the world suffering this same thing "in vain." Yes, the weeds will all return when I'm gone, but it's not in vain because it keeps the body parts moving without applying too much stress on them.
By the way, in the north where I'm at, in central Ontario, I figured that one cannot grow cantaloupes. But earlier this year, I dumped some cantaloupe scraps on a weed pile that was half turned to soil, and, a few months after the seeds sprouted, I learned that cantaloupes as small as three inches in diameter can be eaten. They taste great! None of the cantaloupes got store-quality ripe, but some made it to five inches round, "hard," but still sweet and soft. Even the three-inch ones were sweet and non-crunchy. Just keep that in mind in northern regions. Orange fruit is probably good for us.
And because they are not ripe, the cantaloupes have lasted four weeks and counting at the basement floor. I've just brought up five more of them, and only one is rotted out. The one with rot only starting is being eaten as I write, juicy and delicious after the rot has been cut out. The seeds are small and edible.
Here's more evidence that Trump is protecting the pedophile witch, and perhaps trying to set her free. Pro-Trumpers are apt not to report on this story, shame on them:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2PuFMblQZsBelow is on Pam Bondi's Epstein cover-up as per her performance in the congress last week. It appears that Trump weaponized the DoJ against the Trump base after the Democrats did the same under Biden, yet Trump has done it twice over two terms. Trump's DoJ doesn't go after Trump's base, but leaves it like a goat herd in the open fields for the Democrat wolves to come swallow just as soon as they get the White House back. Trump is a fake shepherd for his goats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRVdHH_VhakThe crow flew over me when it flew over my cantaLOUPE plants. Loupe is a location in the write-up of Scottish Allisons, first known in Lanarkshire with crow-using Caseys. I now have a reason to point to Larry Ellison, who is a part of the Trump-Netanyahu Gaza heist. To show how LARRY Ellison applies, I'll repeat here from the 3rd update of last month, where Weddings, first known in Yorkshire with Keppochs, and in Keppock colors and format. The Kepke fellow below is Lawrence by first name, short-form, "Larry," and Larrys/Laurie's happen to share the motto and brown stump of Lauders who in turn share the Ellison griffin:
Weddings list Waddletons while Waddle's share a "Truth" motto term of Scottish Allisons!!! The latter, first known in Lanarkshire with Crow-loving Kash's, came to topic because Kepke and I, months before meeting Miss Peare, were sitting on my Mustang's hood watching ALLISON BAUER leave me for another fellow worker at KNOB Hill Farms grocers. She had been my JEWISH girlfriend for some two months previous. Knobs/KNOBELmanns (Bavaria with Roths'/Rothchilds and Bauers) probably have the Rothes'/Rothchild arrow in saltire form.Allison Bauer was a Khazar-like cashier, and Cassers'/Casse's look like Casino / Change / Cassane / Chase / Chance kin. Caseys love the Crows while Crows are first known in Norfolk with Case's. Rothschilds are thought to be from Khazar "Jews." The first Rothschild banker was Mayer Bauer.
The Rothschild/RODDENstein arrow is the bend of Roddens who in turn share a brown tree STUMP (see Stumps below) with Lauders and Larrys, and with Letters who in turn share the goose with Gaza-like German Gas' who in turn have a giant goose in the colors and format of the giant griffin of Lauders and Letters. I can now see that the Knob Hill Farms event above (Kepke and I were 17/18 years old) pointing to Larry Ellison.
A few weeks ago, we read: "On Thursday, US president Donald Trump signed an executive order to transfer ownership of TikTok's US operation to a group of American investors, including Oracle cofounder Larry Ellison." Trump is a back-stabbing snake who has helped to push Gazans out of their homes in order to produce a trillion-dollar piece of ground partially for his own family. It appears that God arranged the heraldry to point to Larry Ellison of TIKTOK because the Coat of Ticks/Tocks (Yorkshire with Tickhills and Ellis') is a different colors version of the Ellison and STUMP Coats.
Tickhills are in Gas and Letter / Lauder colors and format. The German Gas' under discussion are first known near the first-known Trumps who in turn have the stag head of Hanna's in colors reversed, and then Anne's/Hanne's are first known in Tickhill.
In the same update as has the quote above, it was added: "Kepke spotted Allison getting into the car of our fellow stockboy, Mike Denardo. I've told this story a million times, but can now add that Denardo's/Nordi's share the lone tower of German Kirks." Again, Loupe's, found in the Allison motto, share the same tower, as do Junks while Jungs have a full-stag version of the Trump Coat.
If correct that God chose to point to modern events through ancient heraldry, and having me report those pointers, it can make sense as God using heraldry, created largely in Templarism, against the end-times "Templars," the Rothschild Zionists. However, I don't focus only on heraldic pointers, but also on tribulation preparation, and proper doctrine for preparing your soul for what's to come. And, of course, I'm waiting to identify the anti-Christ. The idea is to snag his identity years before his 666, to give us more time to prepare.
Why does Jared Kushner own 666 Fifth Street in New York? What does it mean that he now has priority in Gaza's re-building, where Jesus in no way wants that rebuilding project for His own Israeli kingdom? We can see a clash here. It spurs me to watching Jared's moves closely. I expect Trump to betray his Christian base, which he has started to do, and will do more as per pro-Trump Christians turning against him due to his seizure of Gaza. Trump seems capable of attacking even the Israel army if Netanyahu gets in the way of his Gaza dreams. What sort of war could that escalate to?
I've been wondering whether we should buy silver for tribulation endurance. I'm not yet decided upon it, but use of silver is better for small-scale purchases, than gold, such as a month's groceries. Plus, if silver and gold cave by design of those who resent our tribulation endurance in wilderness areas, there will probably be less loss with the silver, or no loss at all. It's a good bet that silver will be worth more in five years than it's worth now. There's plenty of news on silver now, some suggesting that now is the time to buy, others warning of a crash. Buying at the crash seems like a good idea.
Here's the twisted, preterist prophetic outlook of Frank Turek, the man standing near Charlie Kirk at his staged event. In short, Frank doesn't expect the Return of Jesus to our future, which plays well to Kingdom Now heresy, which fosters over-action of Christians in politics, seeking a global theocracy. The big takeaway is that Turek's Zionism ignores the coming anti-Christ and Israel's dreadful fall to him, and as such, Turek is willing to view Netanyahu as a God-send, and Trump too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uhpn_ILGRX8If you attack preterism as a heresy, the preterist will come back and call you arrogant. If you tell a leftist that Sodomites are disgusting, they will accuse you of not being loving as well as applying self-righteous arrogance. Disagreements have different priorities at the root. A leftist generally opposes the Bible and therefore prioritizes countering the Bible, and a preterist has animosity toward future fulfillment of prophecy; you'll need to drill down into his brain to discover the reason, but one possibility is that he/she desires a brighter future than the one I, as a post-tribulationist, envision. The preterist is going forward as though no danger exists. I hope to prepare for nearly the worst without letting it spoil my days now. A preterist spoils my day similar to a jester dancing wretched naked.
Below is the kind of "Christian" that Charlie Kirk was making when he embraced active faggots. Some of these "Christians" are expected enter churches to do damage before they decide to leave due to being unable to convert the regulars into pro-queers or pro-feminists. "Faggot" is not harsh enough of a description for an active Sodomite. A proto-maggot of hell would be closer to the truth:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PVfFBFIvJAIf a Sodomite wants to hate me for using such terms, he's not ready for Grace. Be ashamed, worm, the first step to finding Grace. And appreciate me for my harsh words against you, because leftists who embrace you, who stoke your undeserved pride, are allowing you to become a maggot of hell without concern whatsoever. You are in grave danger, but they will not tell you. For you, the only word that matters is, STOP IT. Go clean. Don't even dream of being with another man. It's hideous in the sight of God, and He's much bigger than me, much more tolerant therefore. Your fight, or your surrender, is with Him.
Here's a great journalist who treats trash like trash so that it knows its trash:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvOPgUAmIwwHere's a good video for all Christians:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lbihF_QVl_wI've just learned this week that "prophecy after the fact" is, in Latin, "vaticinium ex eventu," which for the first time in my life gives clue that "vatican" means "prophecy." Perhaps the Roman popes named the Vatican after prophecy as if to claim it as the prophetic New Jerusalem. It makes total sense because the popes were thieves of God's Kingdom, and God wannabes. In other words, Big Fools.
NEXT UPDATE Next MondayHere's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.
For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs