There is a flurry of preterist activity online attacking those who think that Revelation was written in about 95 AD. The biggest preterist argument is that it's just incredible that John would not have mentioned the destruction of the Jerusalem temple if Revelation were written 20-25 years after it. Ya-but, preterists, imposters, you are neglecting something: John didn't write Revelation, he dictated it. If you have such an argument, it's with Jesus.

Go ahead, see if you can't think of a reason as to why Jesus doesn't mention the temple's destruction in 95 AD? You can certainly think of one, but, being imposters, not true prophecy experts, and rebels against the words of Jesus, they don't want to come up with a reason. Their only goal as a preterist is to convince the sheep that the anti-Christ was Nero or another emperor, and that there's no need to fear his appearance in the future. Preterists are therefore foolish-virgin material in the sense that they will not prepare to endure the 666 night, and will then need to go out and BUY their storage needs while the 666 is enforced, after the wise virgins refuse to share their stored foods with them.

The preterists will than say that John saw the Jerusalem temple in the Revelation itself, but they never mention that, even if he did see it, it was in a vision, not of the real temple. He was only told to measure the temple's yard, the one said to be given to the anti-Christ for 42 months, and so there alone we see that it's pertaining to the end-time temple grounds yet to our future.

Thus, preterist gumption insisting that John saw the pre-70 temple is self-infliction because preterists ignore, like the ignoramuses that they portray themselves as, the obvious reality. I'm not calling them ignoramuses, but rather they expose and portray themselves as such. Jesus in Matthew 24 speaks to a future trampling of Jerusalem at his Second Coming, but preterists insist that the trampling/desolation He spoke of was in Nero's time, what a bunch of IGNORANT rebels.

They often say that Nero was the anti-Christ, yet Nero did not destroy the temple. Big problem there, imposters. Daniel 9:27 says that the anti-Christ sets up an abomination on the temple grounds. Nero didn't, imposters. You violate prophecy time and time again. Some of them say that Mystery Babylon is Jerusalem, proving that they are not prophecy experts because Revelation 18 portrays her as a city of highly-valued trade on the sea, but Jerusalem is neither.

Besides, these imposters can clearly read (last verse of chapter 17) that Babylon is the ruler of all the kings of the earth, which Jerusalem was not. Still, you will find some imposters telling that Jerusalem sits on the seven hills of Jerusalem in order to argue that Revelation 17 has nothing to do with the seven hills of Rome. The Romans even named their seven hills; they are not an obscure feature of the city.

The Romans were in fact ruling the planet at the time Revelation was written, in accordance with the globalist prophecy of Daniel 7, which sees Rome burned with fire at the very end of this history, same as what Revelation 17 has. Daniel 7 has ten-minus-three Roman emperors, and Revelation 17 has seven Roman emperors. There has got to be a reason that God tells of three, knock-off emperors, and I've found the reason, thanks to Will Durant. It's a key clue for finding which emperors they were.

There are prophecy "experts" (e.g. pre-tribulationists) who say that the "kings" in Revelation 17 are kingdoms, not individual kings. Ya-but, but my position is better, because I see them as kings. Plus, Revelation 17 gives an obvious clue as to what kinds of kings they were, for they are depicted by seven heads on a beast, yet the same seven heads are said to be seven hills. It makes it glaringly obvious, to less than prophecy experts, that the seven heads depict seven Roman emperors.

Therefore, at least some preterists, if not most, claim that the seven heads begin with Julius Caesar as the first, and Nero as the sixth, for the emperor who came after Nero ruled only some months (a short time) before he was knocked off by Otho. Revelation 17 gives another clue, that the seventh must rule only a short time. Thus, Nero is a pretty good fulfillment for fitting that latter clue, but there are other clues that cancel that possibility beside the fact that he didn't step foot in the Jerusalem temple.

Plus, Revelation 17 gives us an additional clue telling that the 6th king was ruling during the writing of Revelation. It's this clue that the imposters all violate who know that Galba was knocked off, six months into his rule, by Otho, while Otho was knocked off three months into his rule by Vitellius, and the latter was knocked off eight months later of Vespasian. Thus, three emperors in a row were knocked off such that any prophecy expert can't help but realize that these are the three uproots kings of Daniel 7.

But how many prophecy experts even mention these three, short-ruling kings as a possible fulfillment of Daniel, if only to offer rebuttal against it? Almost none. It's as though they dare not mention it, as though they hope you will never hear of it just because it's a compelling clue that makes Domitian, the son of Vespasian, look like the 6th king of Revelation 17. It undercuts the absolute need of preterists to make Nero look like he's the 6th king.

Plus, the three uprooted emperors were consecutive, making it more compelling (as fulfilled prophecy) than if otherwise. Plus, the three uprooted ones were followed immediately by the one under whose rule the Jerusalem temple was destroyed. Plus, the three uprooted ones follow AFTER Nero, and Nero never stepped foot into the temple grounds while the eighth king of Revelation 17 will. The 11th king of Daniel 7 will likewise because he is the 7th king of Revelation 17. Why don't preterists argue in this way in order not to deceive those who are not keen on prophecy? Because, they are imposter "experts" whose greatest sport is to tear down the futurist view of the anti-Christ. They love doing it, and they talk like they have the upper road due to the mention of a temple in Revelation.

What good is it for Daniel to mention three uprooted kings in conjunction with the 11th, if the king who comes before the three uprooted ones doesn't even enter the temple? Big problem there, imposters. How can Nero fulfill the 11th king of Daniel? He can't, and preterists know it, yet they deny you that clue. If they argue that Nero was the 6th of Revelation 17, they then can't square that with the 11th of Daniel. If he's the 11th of Daniel, preterists are required to find the three uprooted ones prior to the reign of Nero, but nobody I've read has ever tried to nail them down from that perspective. Daniel 7 speaks to the 11th coming AFTER the ten, but preterists have not named the ten so far as I've heard from them, and, for certain, three knocked-off kings are not known during the time that goes back ten kings from Nero, or preterists would have mentioned them as a priority.

Revelation 17 places a gap of unknown time between the 7th and 8th king, but preterists do now acknowledge this gap. It clearly says, in Revelation 17, that the power of satan is active during the writing of Revelation, then will not be active for an unspecified time, then will activate again with the 8th king. What don't preterists understand about this? They don't understand what they are unwilling to understand, because they are rebellious imposters to deny you all of the clues. They cite only the clues that can somehow argue in their favor, that's their wicked game. And it is wicked in the sight of God, because it doesn't alert end-timers to the need of fending off the plots of the anti-Christ.

When one regards ALL of the prophetic clues in Revelation 17 and Daniel 7, and when one rightly ignores the common distortion that the seven kings are seven kingdoms, the key for identifying the seven emperors by name is to find the short rule of the 7th. Aside from the three uprooted emperors, there were only two emperors who ruled a short time, Titus for 27 months starting in 79, and Nerva for 16 months starting in 96. If Nerva is the 7th, timing the Revelation at 90-95 AD works perfectly, for if the 7th began his rule in 96, the 6th emperor was clearly Domitian (started rule in 81 AD).

If we entertain Titus as the 7th, it makes sense where he was the one who destroyed the Jerusalem temple at the orders of his father (Vespasian). It also makes sense because the first of the ten-minus-three then becomes Augustus, the one regarded by historians as the first, official Roman emperor. It also makes sense where the 8th, said to belong to the seven, likewise attacks the temple site so that we can clearly see why God would connect him to the seven, i.e. they both conduct a destruction of Jerusalem.

However, Nerva fits the 7th better than Titus because Augustus and his successor, Tiberius (ended in 37), were not evil as were those who started from Little Boots in 37 AD. Little Boots is routinely described as the most wicked emperor of the first century. When he's the 1st of the seven, Nerva becomes the 7th.

And so I'll now tell of a day, back in about 1980, when reading a book that told of a claim by Will Durant, an atheist historian. He said that the emperors, beginning with Little Boots, were the 10 most wicked kings of Roman history. Some historians might disagree, but that statement stuck out at me because I was delving into prophecy at that time, and was well acquainted with Daniel's 10 emperors. I thus discovered, thanks the Durant's claim, that the three uprooted emperors were Galba, Otho, and Vitellius, and that Nerva is the 7th.

I see it as unexpected for God to assign seven heads to the anti-Christ beast if the first two were not anti-Israeli emperors, or in some way like-minded with the final anti-Christ. It's a super argument, is it not? Of course it is, for the seven heads are on an anti-Christ beast. We need only to find why the 1st of the seven was "Caligula = Little Boots" (official name, "Gaius").

Augustus ruled before he knew who Jesus was, and there is no evidence that either he nor Tiberius were persecuting Jews or plotting the ruin of Israel, though some anti-Jewish sentiments were arising during Tiberius: "The Roman Empire was generally tolerant of other religions at the time [of Tiberius], and the stability of the empire under Tiberius helped the early Christians spread their message. Hostility toward Jews: Tiberius was known to be hostile to Jews, expelling many from Rome in (19) AD, but this is separate from any organized persecution of Christians." (google AI).

Then, Little Boots wanted to place statues of himself in the Jerusalem temple. See that? He's got anti-Christ markings. "Although Augustus and Tiberius had been 'divinized,' or declared to be Gods after their deaths by the Roman Senate, Caligula was the first emperor to demand this worshipful status during his lifetime" (jamestabor.com).

This imperial godhood hearkens back to the anti-Christ of Daniel 11:36 onward, where one clearly sees a futurist interpretation of prophecy, where the First Resurrection occurs within the demise of an end-time anti-Christ. But preterists are calculatively ignorant of this view, because they are wicked imposters bent on rebelling against the Word. They are having so much fun these days with the Internet at their disposal. They think they can win the battle against a futurist anti-Christ.

Granted, Augustus followed on the heels, and with the program, of Julius Caesar, and the latter is the one who conquered all of Israel. But Julius supported, and even allied, with Jewish fighters. Hatred toward Israel starts with Little Boots. His successor, Claudius, claimed to be a god. See that? God apparently wanted to point out that the seven heads were vying, as will the 8th, to be ruler of His universe.

I'm reading that Nero, who followed Claudius, did not claim to be a god, yet some preterists insist that he fulfilled the Biblical anti-Christ, the man. A Nero who did not enter the temple grounds is so problematic that some preterists have opted for Titus as the anti-Christ instead, yet he followed Vespasian's 10-year reign, i.e. which cannot be said to be a short one, as needed where the 8th king of Revelation 17 follows one having a short reign. Preterists are dogged on all sides with a lashing given to them by God Himself through prophetic clues. Prophecy itself haunts preterists and reveals them to be foolish enemies of prophecy. God knows their motives.

Unfortunately, Daniel 7 does NOT tell that the 11th king is a Roman. It's alluded to because he follows the 10-minus-three, but as there is a large gap of time between he and they, it leaves a question as to how he applies to the Roman empire. It seems to be a must for our connecting him to Rome in some way, or God would not have portrayed him as belonging to the ten emperors. Yet, Daniel 7 says that he will be "different" from the ten. As God did not specify what is to be different about him, He either wants it to remain a mystery until his appearance, or He's goading us to seek the reason in other prophecies concerning him.

Yet, Revelation 17 has him paired with Mystery Babylon, and we can assume that God wants her to be a mystery to some degree for obvious reason. Yet, He reveals that she sits on the seven hills of Rome, and that she holds the seven emperors, therefore. We can only grapple with any possible linkage of Rome to ancient Babylon, for this is what God is saying.

Isaiah makes the anti-Christ the "king of Babylon," and an "Assyrian," and Daniel 11 plays perfectly into that picture where it identifies the anti-Christ as an extension of the Seleucid empire that itself ruled Babylon, and later in Syria. In being an "Assyrian," it fits with his being "different." Today, anyway, we don't view the stretch from Syria to Iraq as a Roman entity. But Revelation 17 is key here by showing the anti-Christ as merely a partner of Rome, not necessarily a Roman ruler itself.

One assumes that somebody in the Assyrian domain will invade Israel with Muslims, yet that seems to counter his ability to be a partner with the EU. Yet, in the recent past, and even as we speak, many Western groups have arisen opposing Israel probably because they despise Christians too. No one will dispute today that there is a vast atheist / anti-Christian bloc in the leftist West.

The Christian, Irenaeus (born 130 AD), claimed to know Polycarp (born 69), a disciple of the apostle John (very old man in 90). Irenaeus said that John wrote Revelation in the latter years of emperor Domitian; hence, the traditional claim that it was 90-95 AD. This is why preterist desperadoes try to murder Irenaeus' claim. Polycarp would definitely have known when John was on Patmos, and nobody who doesn't have a preterist axe to grind thinks that Irenaeus is lying about Polycarp's claim. Thy will even argue that Domitian was not persecuting the churches. Someone writes:

It is fascinating to think that during Emperor Domitian’s persecution of Christians, in particular during the Apostle John’s exile on the island of Patmos in the mid-90s, when he wrote the Book of Revelation, Polycarp was a member of the Church of Smyrna. Think about that -- when John addressed the Church in Smyrna in Revelation 2:8-11, Polycarp would have probably been there. He had lived through and endured the same persecution that John endured at that time.

https://www.joeledmundanderson.com/the-early-church-fathers-series-polycarp-of-smyrna-part-3

Preterists might try to argue that's it's a loooong way from John to Irenaeus, that the latter got third-hand information (i.e. possibly distorted), but on a scale of 2,000 years, that's almost as close as one can get. Plus, when an early Christian claimed that the Apostolic works that became the New Testament were all finished before 70 AD, that doesn't necessarily include the Revelation because the New Testament was not compiled in book form yet. I can't recall who it was in or about 200 AD that made that claim, but he could have been referring only to certain epistles and gospels that the churches generally recognized, or knew of, to that time. He wasn't necessarily including Revelation in his statement because it's altogether a different sort of work, not about the affairs of Jesus and the establishment of His churches. I'm reading elsewhere that Polycarp acknowledged 15 NT (out of 27 total) works (books) by 108, but, decades later, Irenaeus claimed only seven.

We then have the nasty Jews who despise Jesus, claiming that the Gospels were written after 70 AD. A main reason for this claim, if not the only reason, is that Jesus predicted the over-turning of the temple stones within one generation of roughly 30 AD. Thus, the nasty Jews and other imposters would like for you to believe that someone put that prophecy into Jesus' mouth after 70 AD, and framed it to be a true prophecy when in fact it was only a trick. Jesus proclaimed a great tribulation on these nasty personalities exactly where he predicted the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. The nasty preterists deny this great tribulation of Israel to our future.

I resent it when google AI presents itself in my Bible-topic searches without being asked to. This is the atheistic world of educational control freaks trying to control Bible knowledge too. Can google program its AI to just lay off of Bible-topic searches until asked for it? Yes, but google instead chooses to foist itself into our faces as though it were a first-class educator on Bible topics. Expect google to front liberal theology too, and, once it sinks its teeth in, after gaining the confidence of searchers, expect it to advance heresies like upon a slippery slope. You can tell who the rude snakes are when they use "C.E." and "BCE". google's AI is a monster that feeds off of Wikipedia, you've been warned.

How many of you think that google AI and Wikipedia are apt to favoring preterism so as to make us think that there's nothing of prophecy to fear to our future? Give it a few years, and many young Christians will state for facts whatever these globalist imposters teach them...which is the obvious goal, we reckon, to feed false knowledge sprinkled amongst truth.

The existence of a wide persecution at the behest of Domitian, or anyone else, is not necessary for sending John to Patmos for exile. We can assume that this exile was due to his evangelistic successes or inroads into western Anatolia, but, even if for some other reason, it's possible that while Domitian didn't care to persecute Christians, some ruler in Anatolia complained to Rome falsely about John such that Domitian punished him merely with exile though the instigator wanted death.

A google offering I did not ask for gives both a question and an answer: "How did the apostle John end up on Patmos? The Roman authorities exiled John to Patmos due to his testimony of Jesus Christ and his active preaching of the Christian faith. During Emperor Domitian's reign (81–96 AD), Christians faced persecution for refusing to worship the emperor as a deity." We are not likely to get confirmation of that picture from a preterist or other type of imposter with a personal bias to push what's not in the Bible.

? The problem is, google is a pathetic search engine for doing refined research. It gives you its own too-short answer to questions, but brings up almost nothing else of much value. It's now poised to become as stingy as young people who text one sentence at a time to each other because they are unwilling to muster, or read, whole paragraphs. Good luck parsing vatican tradition from reality when it comes to google steering you in the truthful direction on matters of church history. Like an idiot, google AI says that mythical Aeneas was the first king of Rome. We are at the mercy of idiot boxes, robbing us from what is otherwise a great educational tool. google is under a compulsion not to be a great educator, deliberately. google is a mechanical "personification" of a demon.

I am not an expert in church history. I don't know the validity of the following quote, whether it's from vatican legend or real history:

Roman historians such as Pliny described Domitian as a violent madman who persecuted Christians. Domitian was also a believer in prophetic omens, and he was one of the few emperors who insisted on calling himself a god during his reign. In about 86 AD, a temple to Domitian was built in Ephesus. At the same time, the people of Ephesus were forced to worship and make sacrifices to Domitian, practices that would have certainly been denounced by John.

https://drivethruhistory.com/john-exiled-to-patmos/?srsltid=AfmBOorcIx9nOsQLa19rYEr00o6irhMJaBt3BTYDDj9yBEl4Fp2DZOFA

You are not going to get such a report from modern preterists. They will say that Domitian was not a persecutor because they want Nero to be the 6th head of the Revelation beast. Someone else writes: "In addition, Flavius Clemens, consul in 95, and his wife, Flavia Domitilla, were executed and exiled, respectively, by Domitian's orders; many historians suspect this was because they were Christians."

The following from Sherwood Oaks Christian Church, which doesn't sound catholic: "During his rule, [Domitian] imposed harsh taxes and blamed every misfortune on the Christian community, igniting a wave of persecution. Historical accounts by prominent figures like Dio Cassius, Suetonius, and Tacitus portray Domitian as vain and tyrannical, drawing parallels between his cruelty and that of Nero."

Vaticanites were prone to mixing Christ with paganism, and so they built the monastery of Saint John, in Patmos, upon the ruins of the temple to Artemis. Way to go, demonic freaks. This low-population island also had a temple to her brother, Apollo, and the latter is even in Revelation as a destroyer from the abyss. I see the Patmos city of Chora portrayed by mythical Coronis the crow, Apollo's mate. The Patmos city of Skala looks like it helped to name ASCLepius, Coronis' son. He's a modification of mythical "ASCALAphus." I see the latter also as "AscaLAPHUS" because it seems part-code for Lapiths, for Coronis was a Lapith by ethnicity.

I see mythical Orion as an alternative word for Uranus, for both gods had a urine symbol. Uranus was father to Coronis-like Cronus. The Orion/Iron surname (Norfolk with Benjamins) can take us to Orems/Orrins who in turn share the vaired Shield of Skala-like Scayle's (Yorkshire with Crone's), yet the latter are also Schole's while Abraham lived at least near the Eschol valley of Hebron. Scayle's/Schole's share the annulet of Benjamins (Norfolk with Palmers/Parmers). The Scayle/Schole Shield is almost the one of Scottish Crone's while English Crone's (Yorkshire with Palms/Parms) share the fleur-de-lys of Palms/Parms and Kimmers/Kammers. I'll show below how Parms look like an Abram branch.

Kammer-like Cambers are listed with Gomer-like Comers while Gomerians are thought to have furnished the Kimmer-like Cimmerians. Cimmerians lived in Wales, where Tail-branch Tillers are first known, and Chora-like Corks/Core's use the lion tails of the Tail/Tailer and Tiller lion. Corks/Core's are first known in CORNwall, named by a Cornovii peoples that I trace to Crone elements from the Ceraunii Illyrians, beside the Maezaei Illyrians. Cornovii were also in Cheshire, where Masseys/Maceys are first known who share the Palm/Parm and Crone fleur-de-lys. "Coronis" was code for the Ceraunii mountains beside Apollonia.

Crone's are also Crooms, in the colors and format of Croms. The latter's QUATRafoils are, I think, code for Quadratus Bassus, the line to Julia MAESA Bassianus, sister of empress Domna Bassianus whose first name could have been in honor of Domitian. Domna-like Domino's are first known in Piedmont with Massey-branch Masci's. Quadratus was born about/exactly in 70 AD.

Cotters use "evetts," and Evetts could have been from Julius Avitus, husband of Julia Maesa above. Evetts share a green dragon with Lewis, first known in the same place as Tillers. Quadratus' daughter was queen QuadraTILLa. Tile's/Tilleys (Dorset with Cottar-like Cutters) use the dragon too. Evetts have a large patee cross, and Patti happens to be a location at the Scylla part of Sicily, in Messina province. The Messina surname uses patee crosses, and can be gleaned as a Masci branch. Evetts are in the colors and format of the Dume's/Dome's while Domna (disgusting Roman empress) was the sister of Julia Maesa. Pattys are first known in Worcestershire with a Croome location.

Dume's/Dome's were related to Horns/ORNE's while Ferte-Mace of the Masseys is in Orne province off the Orne river. Domino-like Domine's/DUNHAMs, which named Dunham Masci in Cheshire, look applicable, and they are first known in Norfolk with Orions/Irons. Bassianus-like Base's/Bassens show only hunting horns. The Orne river flows into the Bessin. Bessins are first known in Cheshire. German Bessens are first known in Austria with Base's/Bassens, and English Bessens share the Massey QUADRants. QUADRAtus Bassus. Mackays share the QUADE/Wade Coat, and Wade's/Waids share the Masci fleur-de-lys. Might proto-Maezaei have named PatMOS? Apollo was leader or symbol of the Muse's, and Moss'/Mose's (QUADRants) use the patee cross while Moses' are first known in Shropshire with Meschins (from the Bessin). English Base's (Lincolnshire with le-Meschin's wife) share the BRUNswick Coat while English Bruns are first known in Middlesex with Horns/Orne's.

The two Base surnames together look related to Jewish Levi's, and then Lupus LAEVillus married Quadratilla Bassus. Le Meschin descended from the sister of Hugh LUPUS. Moss/Mose's love the Billets (Devon with Saffers and Walerans), a branch of Bellows who share "Vita" with Saffers. Billets and Bellows are in the colors and format of Percivals (Somerset with Leavells) while Waleran de Perceval was a direct Leavell ancestor. Huckabee's use Asclepius rods while Rods are first known in Devon with them, and with Hooks. Hucks use owls while Ascalaphus was a mythical owl. The Kos owl god of Edom can make sense here, and EDOMites from Herods might have named DOMna Bassianus, for her father (high priest of El-Gabal) was the nephew of Julius Agrippa.

I trace the Levite blood in the Sadducees, who had a Herod-related house of BOETHus, to mythical Orion's father at BOEOTia's Tanagra, the line to Tankerville's sharing the Billet / Bellow cinquefoils. The Biblical and Kenite-connectable Shechemites were, in my claims, at SCHIMatari of Tanagra, and Shechemites trace to Shake's, and to the "shakeFORK" of Cunninghams (Ayrshire with Kennedys). El-GABAL can trace to Gable's, for they use a pitchFORK while "fork" is a Cunningham motto term. It just so happens that English Gable's share the Shake chevron, and the Shake molehills are good for taking us to Mole's, first known in Roxburghshire with Scottish Leavells, and sharing the SCHIM boar.

Asclepius had a following in Sicily, founded by the Skala-like Sicels. It suggests Patmos elements on the east side of Sicily. Mythical Scylla, on Sicily, was depicted as a monstrous wolf, symbol also of Apollo and Artemis. Sicily also had the Sicani, and Sicyon is about 10 miles only from Coronis-like Corinth. Just follow/track myth codes to real places. Note that mythical SISYphus was king of Corinth, suggesting that a family from SICYon came to rule Corinth. Note the ending on SisyPHUS, like the ending on AscalaPHUS. It tends to notify me that Corinthians or proto-Corinthians were at Chora of Patmos. Gore's/Core's are first known in Kent with Trips using a "scaling ladder," and Scalia's use a ladder too. Scalia's show a Sicily-like Scicli variation.

When a trained pre-tribulationist reads from Paul that the Church is not given to God's wrath, he sees that bittie as the pre-trib rapture? Why? Because his training is the brainwashing of a dope who allows it. Nobody who reads that from Paul, who hasn't been coached by a pre-trib fool, thinks that Paul is referring to the pulling out of the Church from the world and into the sky. Instead, a first-time reader thinks that Paul is talking about the final Wrath that shuts sinners from the Kingdom of God.

And when Revelation 3:10 says that people of this world will be brought through an "an hour of TRIAL," it's referring to the ultimate DIFFICULTY, a horror, AFTER the great tribulation of Israel, for we read later, in Revelation 18, of "one hour" pertaining to the destruction of Mystery Babylon. Revelation 17 makes it clear that Babylon's destruction comes at the hand of the anti-Christ i.e. not at a pre-tribulation time.

The seven churches of Revelation are absolutely not national Israel, and so when Jesus tells those churches that they can escape the hour of trial, it's is absolutely not the "great tribulation," for that phrase is in Matthew 25 pertaining to the anti-Christ's assault on Israel, which is indeed God's wrath on Israel. Nobody in their right mind should confuse the great tribulation of Israel with the troubles that Christians in general, the gentile Christians, face from the anti-Christ, but this is exactly the confusion that pre-tribulationists create when they re-interpret the "great tribulation" as the plight of the Church.

Charlie Kirk Still a Mystery

Even Baron Coleman thinks Paramount Tactical could be part of the false-flag insiders (see 42nd minute for that part of the story). This video has compelling evidence that the insider players at the Charlie-Kirk event were under Israelite overwatch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkojTmo46vA

A viewer comment for the video above: "Paramount tactical won't entertain any theory other than the government narrative. He also deletes any comments that question him or his credibility. All of his reporting, interviews, and evidence proves only the official narrative and he never questions or pushes back on anything or anyone..." Paramount isn't the only one. Thank you for revealing how fake you are, Paramount, you've made it so easy to see who you really are. Same goes for Gray Hughes Investigates.

Pity those who say that they don't take to either opposing theories in Kirk conspiracy theories, as if to say that normal people are somewhere in the middle. Ya-but, taking the middle ground means you're half right, half wrong, what's to be proud of?

After four weeks of some podcasters making light of no blood at the crime scene, Paramount comes out with never-before seen pictures where various people had small blood smears on their skin. To me, that looks like doctored images introduced to the public by a fellow insider.

No blood on the hands of three or four men who tended to Charlie where he fell means either that Charlie faked his own death, or that the team conspired to kill him, and that they didn't tend to him in order to let him bleed out and die. The latter is, by far, harder to believe because it requires the consent of several team members to a crime carrying great punishment, and any one of them could later snitch on the others. But, if they all knew it was a faked murder, it explains all the oddities perfectly, and getting caught might result only in disgrace. Turning Point is already disgraced, but because it's suspect in a murder. It serves the team right to be disgraced in this way.

Nobody knows where Charlie's grave is, not because his wife wants to protect it from leftists, but because he's not buried. I'm convinced.

One of the men tending to him was the palm-gun man, now thought to be an Israeli operator, who many think shot him with a small palm gun. It certainly looks like he shot Charlie, but, if so, he would need to be a super-expert in palm-gun accuracy. It may make more sense that he was faking a palm-gun shot, for video even spots the bullet i.e. it was doctored into the scene because the plan is to make everyone believe that Charlie was killed in one way or another. Start this video at 2 minutes to see palm-gun man:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NMiASrStgME

Here's follow-up to or up-ramping of Baron Coleman's work:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1EvaMdUUpGY

Although the general public cannot find the computers that did the searches prior to the Kirk event, John Ratcliffe at the CIA can easily find which people owned the computers that did the searches from Israel. Ya-but, does Ratcliffe have the gumption to do such investigation in light of Kash Patel and Pam Bondi advancing the false-flag narrative? If Ratcliffe does nothing to expose Patel and Bondi, then he supports their crimes. It'll become his legacy.

Candace Owen's problem is that I've never heard her yet talk about no blood stains on the men tending to Charlie. The men were not frantic enough, and they weren't even talking to each other. Nobody pulled off a piece of clothing to stop the bleeding. The theory that Charlie's heart stopped immediately in order to explain the bloodless ground is contradicted by the doctor who said that his heart was yet beating at the hospital. The false claim that the neck expanded to twice its diameter (the video was doctored to produce that look), due to bullet force trapped within the neck, needs to be accompanied by a massive blood burst out the bullet hole that should have sprayed the audience. The blood we did see is typical of much milder heart-pump pressure. However, I'm now considering that the blood issue we see is fake, one of two possible methods.

The most compelling fact everyone agrees with, who's not an insider, is that the FBI is staging this event's aftermath, in which case we are lame on one leg if we refuse to entertain tampered, made-for-TV videos controlled by the government. How do we explain that, of the many cameras in the audience, we have seen only about a dozen versions of the stage scene? How does the government control such a thing?

I suggest that 30 minutes only of the video below, by touch-his-face Baron Coleman, is good enough. Early, it shows Turning Point's staff manager, Mikey McCoy, knowing that Charlie Kirk was not shot. I'm able to make that claim now. Mikey makes me more sure. I suggest that young Mikey was his father's spy on the goings-on at Turning Point. Someone at another video says: "Mikey McCoy’s brother is the chief financial officer of TPUSA,...":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIAi_hBOn1g

At about 3:00 in the video below, there's good proof that Mikey was calling Erika while walking away from the "crime scene." It was a crime scene, indeed, but I now think it was not a murder. Faking your death on this level has got to be a crime in multiple ways. I say that Erika had demanded from Mikey to be called if the staging of the murder got the green light. There was always the chance that it would be called off if some major problem arose. The reason Mikey is calm when walking away is that he knew Charlie to be fine and dandy. Erika may have breathed a sigh of relief to know that Charlie would now be out of her life. That's a possibility. She may have demanded or partially facilitated the "divorce" in the first place. The team may have paid Charlie handsomely to go find another life, with perhaps some future royalties from Turning Point.

I think it was Baron Coleman who claimed that Rob McCoy claimed that Mikey had blood on his skin/clothes, but we now know it to be false. While Josh HAMMER is a former Turning Point member close to Charlie, Mikeys/Mickeys share the "salmon" of Hams, and the latter, first known in Sussex with Hammers, are in Hammer colors. Mikeys/Mickeys share the dagger with McCoys/Mackeys, and Salmons are first known in Cumberland with Hammer-beloved Dolphins and Salmons.

You can click Mikeys now, which loads them on another tab in order to load other surnames, to better follow the heraldic links. Mikeys/Mickeys share the giant, double-headed eagle of Joyce's/Joice's, who have: "The surname Joyce is derived from the personal names Josse or Goce." Josh's are listed with Josse's! Joyce's are first known in Glamorganshire with Tylers/Tillers.

Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, think of it, are knowingly contributing to a faked murder. LOSERS. BACK-STABBERS. HYPOCRITES. DEEP-STATE SUCKS (i.e. FBI newbies who suck on the deep state).

In the last two weeks of last month, and every month of October to date, I've talked about a crow that pointed to Turning Points and Charlie Kirk. It was the first crow I've heard this year. Then, on Sunday of this week, I heard a crow above me for the second time. I was under some trees in the rear yard pulling/uprooting small pine trees (fire hazard). When I got to the edge of the trees, I saw the crow CIRCLING. At times it did only semi-circles such as to form a S-shape, but nonetheless it was making perfect circles. It just so happens that Circle's are listed with KIRKners. Therefore, we might take this crow as yet another pointer of God to the Kirk saga. The first crow was suspect in pointing to Candace Owens, and she, after a two-week break, is coming back tomorrow, as I write here on Sunday, with some heavy-duty revelations / accusations.

The first crow also pointed to the McCoys, Rob the co-founder of Turning Point, and Mikey, a 23-year old chief of staff for Turning Point (he probably gets orders / advice from Rob, his father). The McCoys were pointed to because the crow first CAWed directly above my head only some 40 feet high. Caws are listed with McCoys. Mikey is the biggest topic, by far, at the end of this week, on the Kirk saga.

Below is the video of BARON COLEMAM, superstar google-clue finder. He treats more newly-released faked evidence, by the plotters, against Tyler Robinson. Note that Irish Barons share the same, five annulets of Candle's/Cantwells, first known in Suffolk with Candys. Candace Owens is sometimes, "Candy," and the first crow that I think points to her (crow-colored skin) first cawed when flying over my CANTaLOUPE plants while Loupe's share the German Kirk tower.

Then, compare Irish Barons to CAWs/Adams!!! It now suggests that the crow can also point to Baron Coleman the BIG SNITCH.

OH WOW. Colemans are first known in Sligo with Keons/OWENs who share the Owen lion!!! Here's why I looked up Keons, first because they are kin of Irish Neils who in turn share the estoile of COLchesters. Neils came to mind because Colemans almost have the Coat of Tailards, the latter first known in Huntingdonshire, near Colchester. The Arms of Colchester has nails in its cross, and German Neils are also Nails. That's why I looked up Keons, though I had forgotten at first that they are also Owens!!! I happily shocked.

Colemans and Tailards use the same patonce cross while Patents/Pattens are first known in Essex with Colchester, and with Chase-branch Chance's, and with Vere's who share the blue boar in Crest with Irish Barons! The patonce is also with Chase's (and Chance's), first known in Hampshire with Honey-branch Hone's (beside Carys) who just came up as Owen-like "Howen." Owens are first known in Montgomeryshire with Kerrys, and the latter share bees and a hive with Honeys! It proves that Honeys and Howens/Hone's were an Owen branch. The flag of Utah has a beehive. For centuries, Vere's ruled Oxfordshire, where Bee's and Crow-branch Crawls/Crowells are first known.

More. The Cantels can be in the CANTALoupe, and the Cantel Crest shares a black tower in Crest with the Higgins/Hickens, first known in Sligo with Colemans and Keons/Owens! The Pasco's in the Cantel motto share the giant Owen lion! Pasco's are first known in Cornwall with COLE's! Pascals are first known in Essex with Colchester! My cantaloupes speak!

Cantels share a "vos" motto term with Walerans (share black bull with Cole's) who are in turn from Waleran de Leavell of Castle CARY, a location in Somerset with Sticks. A Kyle Society webpage claimed that Kyle's, using CANDLEsticks, were a Cole branch, and Baron Coleman took us to Candle's/Cantwells because they share the Baron annulets. Vos' are first known in Pomerania with German Cants in turn in the colors and format of Irish Carys/Keerys. It recalls the Kerry beehive.

Ahh, Dutch Vos' almost have the Coat of Italian Barons! Cantels love the Vos'. My cantaloupes are pointing to Baron Coleman.

The only thing missing is the Crows, yet they use a camel while Camels (Waleran colors and format), first known in Somerset with Castle Cary and Waleran-beloved Bulls, can take us to Camulodunum, the previous name of Colchester.

Here's Baron's Sunday-night video; he makes the mistake of thinking that Charlie was shot, and he also fails to realize that the flying necklace was doctored into a video in an effort of the plotters to combat the shot-from-the-rear theory that cropped up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oKFkKdRCRSc

Baron shows tan-shirt camera thief, as well as Dan the security guy, speaking in Charlie's ear minutes before the shot rang out, and so Baron thinks that this nearing Charlie's head makes both men innocent of the murder plot. Achem, Baron is yet relatively new to all the clues, and he works days for a living. I've covered this story full-time every day since the shooting, and while I thought, for four weeks, that Charlie was shot, I now KNOW that both the tan-shirt camera thief and Dan the security man knew this was going to be a faked shooting, and they even act like it, especially the tan-shirt guy, but also Mikey McCoy, who both went away, after the shot, to do unexpected things in the case of a real shooting, but expected of a faked shooting.

My position is that the plotters assured that only their own cameras were at key locations so that they could modify videos before public dissemination. My position is that the only way to make Charlie appear shot, so well, is to doctor the video before public dissemination. In reality, I doubt that his body moved with perfect timing, and so realistically, as it did in the videos we saw. There's no valid explanation for the chain fling, or the rising shirt, or the near doubling of his neck's circumference without tearing the skin. Those things are best explained as faked imagery for the purpose of supporting the Robinson narrative.

At first, I thought the plotters raised the shirt to block from our sight the bullet exiting the neck, but then an alternative theory crept out wherein the plotters wanted us to believe in the "capitation" event i.e. needs a powerful bullet such as from Robinson's gun. There is a third theory now, that the shirt collar was raised to hide something that went not well with the Hollywood item that spurted a gush of fake blood. In Charlie's case, such an item would need to be behind fake skin. google AI:

A fake skin squib is a special effects device used to simulate a bullet impact on an actor's clothing or skin, involving a small explosive charge (the "squib") concealed under a protective shield. It is often combined with a fake blood pack that is ruptured by the force of the squib, and the entire apparatus is triggered remotely by a crew member or the actor.

Ashkenazi Hebrews, or Gomerians?

It wouldn't be surprising if the discovery were made that several national shadow governments were run by Rothschild-reporting "Jews." The video below betrays the viewer by not mentioning the Khazars when talking about a fake-ized national Israel. It is thought that Rothschilds had been from Khazar "Jews," but after time, such an accusation is turned into a conspiracy theory so that many educators are afraid to mention it. This video shows a concerted plot over many decades to Jew-ize Israel from what were likely Khazar-descending men otherwise known as "Ashkenazi Jews":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_SHC30pfLZk

The trick of the long-standing plot was to give Rothschild Zionism the look of re-establishing the Abrahamic covenant in order to foster support for Zionism from around the world. Pre-tribulationists were a fundamental part of this effort, as were JW's and Mormons, who still are. The founding of Mormonism (1830) can be connected to the Catholic Apostolic Church (founded 1830), under Henry Drummond, London banker), which assigned 12 Europe-wide apostles, fakes. The cult was renamed to, New Apostolic Church. Rothschilds were already ruling Britain in 1830, and were gearing up their Zionism. One would be a fool not to realize that Rothschild worms included infiltration into leadership positions of whole denominations.

Israel is, by design, non-religious in the majority. This is the same secularism seen in the West, responsible for liberalizing and corrupting society with covetousness = greed and other flagrant sins. You can see in the news daily how big corporations are unashamed when, but proud of, gobbling up more money this year than the previous. Every time a corporation banks money, it's not finding it's way into the bank accounts of workers. The more they bank each time they bank, the less goes to the workers. Their globalist aim is to make workers more their hopeless slaves tomorrow than they are today. On whose side do you think Trump is on?

One can expect that Ashkenazi created surnames after that term, and so it's interesting that Askens/Heskins and Haskens look related to the Gates Coat. I can trace Gates' to an Agatha of Podebrady, suspect by me lonely as the mother of Scottish queen, Margaret, who was in exile amongst the Varangian Rus with prince Andrew of Hungary, the future king Andrew I. The latter gave birth to George, whom is thought to have married a women in Podebrady, but I may be alone in discovering her to be the Agatha above. This George birthed the Scottish Drummonds, and Trump can be traced well to Drummonds, especially if true what they say, that his ancestry is in a Mr. Drumpf.

It's known that Khazar Jews, when conquered by Varangian Rus, moved largely to Germany and Hungary. The latter was founded, they say, by seven Magyar tribes and three Khazar tribes. Hungarian lore traces Hungarian ancestry to a stag, the Trump symbol, and stag-using Staggs/Stage's are first known in Devon with Gates', and with the Spice's/Spicers suspect in the Hasken motto. Donald Trump's first press secretary was Mr. Spicer.

While Spicers are first known in Devon with a Brampton Speke location of Spike's/Speke's and Speccots, the latter are in the colors and format of Lorraine's who in turn descend from princess Maria of Kiev, a daughter of a Varangian king who became a Polish queen when marrying Casimir, explaining why the Casimir ANTLER (Veringer-of-Baden symbol) is in the colors of the Lorraine bend, which is the Arms of Baden. Staggs/Stage's have a cross between ANTLERs. The Casimir antler is in the colors of Scottish Drummonds.

Spike's/Speke's are first known in Lancashire with the Bottle-loving Charlie's/CHORleys, Such's, and with the GORsuch's sharing the Lorraine bend-with-eagles, which is the eagle of the Polish Piasts (see it at google). Gore's/Core's are first known in Kent with English Trips, while German Trips are first known in Hamburg with Trump-colored German Drummonds.

The Arms of Podebrady has a "gold GATE," and above the gate are TRIPle fesses, the Drummond symbol too, though the ones in the Podebrady Arms are black on white, the colors of the TRIPLE fesses of Feins/Fins and Finchems suspect in the "Finem" motto term of Ashkenazi-like Haskens. Those triple fesses are almost the double chevrons of Ash's/ASCHs, first known in Devon with Gates', with Trypillia-like Treble's, and with Trebys/TREEbys too while Trip-beloved Shoe's have a "tree". See that? I read that TRYPILLia (of ancient Trypillians) was south of Kiev, where the Budini and Roxolani (Rus-Alans) lived, and that area was ruled by Varangian Rus. The latter apparently got their Rus name from Roxolani, and Roxburghs have a horse head in Trump colors while horse-head Horse's are first known Northumberland with Lorraine's.

The triple fesses above are colors reversed from the same of Khazar-like Cassers. English Case's were kin of the Hungarian Leslie's, proto-Rothschilds. Chase's are first known in Hampshire with Budini-like Buttons/Budins. Cassers are in Gator/Cather/Catter colors, and the latter are in the colors and format of Butt-beloved Fish (Lincolnshire with Askens/Heskens) and Vaughns (Shropshire with Alan-connectable Boyds). Khazars lived beside, or amongst, the Budini.

Vaughn-like Fiens/Vans/Veynes' are first known in Monmouthshire with Haskels/Askels. The latter love Vairs while Feins/Fins are first known in Burgundy with French Vairs/Fers' while English Vairs/Vere's are first known in Essex with Fien-connectable Waynes' (share Fien gauntlets), Esters, and Chichs/Chicks/CHOCKs (share Asken/Hesken and Hasken lions). Vairs/Fers' share the Coat of Ukrainian Babys/BabCHIKs and CHICHesters (Devon with Gates'/GATTs). Khazars were in Ukraine. Fiens/Finis' are first known in Kent with CHOKE-branch Chaucers and Chalks. Choke's (version of Drummond Coat) are first known in Berkshire with GATTors/Cathars/Catters.

Fiens/Finis' share the Gates lion, and the Askens/Heskens share a brown Crest with Fiens/Finis'. The latter's motto probably has the English Forts, in turn in Gates / Asken/Hesken / Hasken colors, and first known in Lancashire with Haskens ("FINem reSPICE" motto). The Res' possibly in the latter's motto share the Bauer Chief, and the latter share wings (different colors) with the Hasken Crest. Wings/Winks, which I can trace to VINKovci over by Hungary, are first known in Worcestershire with Babchik-like Babcocks. I'll show below how Wings/Winks can link to Fein/Fin elements.

The Trip shoes are in the colors of the boots that the same Trips once showed, and Charlie-beloved Bottle's/Bootels of LIVERpool come up as Buddle's too, possibly from the Budini, for Boyds are first known in Shropshire with Rus-Alan-connectable Alans and Tyne's/BOTville's.

The Charley branch of Charlie's/Chorleys has: "The surname Charley was first found in Leicestershire at Charley or Chorley,...". Charlie's/Chorleys were from a Chorley location in Lancashire, where LIVERs/Levers are first known who share a gold rooster in Crest with Haskens, yet the Livers/Levers add a TRUMPet to their rooster. The Askens/Heskens are said to have named the "township of Heskin, which is in the parish of ECCLESton, near Chorley in Lancashire."

Charleys share the lion of Czech Hungars, and Podebrady is in Czechoslovakia along with Moravia. While "Moravia" was the alternative name of Moray, the latter is where Bellys are first known, suspect from king Bela, brother of Andrew I of Hungary. Czech Hungars have a "flag" while Flags share the Casser scallops. Thus, Czech Hungars can have the Asken/Hesken lion, for Ashkenazi "Jews" were heavily in Hungary. Flags share the scallops of Meschins who are in turn in Askey/Asker colors and format.

EccleSTONE's could have derived in an Eccles-Stone marriage because Stone's look related to Gates'. Stone's share the cinquefoil of the Gangs in turn in the Drummond motto. The Stane's in the Stone write-up are listed with Stands/Stains, with almost the triple fesses in the Arms of Podebrady, and the Liver/Lever rooster is said to be "STANDing on a rooster." Ecclestone's are said to have been first in Chorley, beside Liverpool, making Eccles liners look as Ashkenazi as Askens and Haskens. Stone's are first known in Cornwall with the Bude's in turn sharing the bow with Bauer-branch Bowers, and the first Rothschild banker was a Bauer by birth.

Haskens probably love the Browns/Bruns, the latter first known in Cumberland with the Dacres' kin of Haskens shown in the Hasken write-up. Dacres'/Daggers were a branch of Acre's who in turn look related to the Coat of Aggs, and then Acre-like Agers, sharing the Gates lion, probably have the Speccots in their motto because Gates' are first known in Devon with Speccots. Eggs are first known in Worcestershire with the Dagger-connectable Squirrels/Square's.

Here's the triple bars of the Podebrady family that come with WINGs too. Bauers share the Chief of French Alans for a trace to Roxolani, and the Wings/Winks (same place as Child-connectable Eggs) in the Bauer Coat are linkable to Vince's/Finch's, and thus to Finchems and Feins/Fins suspect in the Hasken motto. Finchems and Feins/Fins both share the triple Podebrady BARs, and Bar-le-Duc is in Lorraine, named after Barrs of BRUNswick, and Drummonds share a brown Crest with Askens/Heskens while the latter use a brown lion, the color of the Brown/Brun-Crest lion. English Bruns are first known in Middlesex with Stands/Stains.

Vince's/Finch's are first known in Hertfordshire with the Childs sharing the Lorraine and Egg eagle, and with the Cass- and Trip-connectable Scale's (English Trips have the "scaling ladder). Haskels look related to the Scayle/School Coat. It makes Cass' look like a Khazar line, especially as Cass-branch Custs are first known in Lincolnshire with Askens/Heskens.

I can now take this to Lorraine's grass stain that I've mentioned a million times, for Haskens and Askens/Heskens share the lion of English Grasse's, first known in Lincolnshire with Askens/Heskens. The latter share the vertically-split Shield colors of Stone's and Gates'.

Lorraine had gotten a babe symbol, and then Babwells, once said to be first known in Middlesex with Stands/Stains, use a "gold gate" in Crest, the Arms-of-PodeBRADY symbol. Babe's share a hand pointing with Bradys, and Bradds/Breads share the Grasse lion too, though in Trump colors and format. Bradys are first known in Galway with Lynch's while Lyngs are first known in Suffolk with Babe's (almost have the Podebrady bars above the gold gate of Podebrady). Lyngs even look related to the Asken/Hesken Coat, especially as Lyngs have fish heads while Fish's are first known in Lincolnshire with Askens/Heskens. Butts/Bute's/Boets use a "fish," and Lorraine's grass stain was on her butt and ASS. Ash's are also Aschs (Devon, beside Bude). The Arms of Podebrady shares the Botter/Bodin eagle.

Botters/Bodins have their eagle on a "perch" while Perche's share the double chevrons of Scottish Olivers, the latter first known in Roxburghshire, named from the Roxolani that lived south of Kiev with Budini. Buttons/Budins share the Butt/Bute/Boet fesse, and probably the Boyd and Alan fesse too. The Button/Budin "horns" can take us to Orions/Irons (Norfolk with early Alans of Mileham), and then to Iron = Alania (Caucasia).

Lyngs/Lings are first known in Suffolk with Buckle's and StarLINGs; the latter have a square-buckle version of the Coat of Hungarian Leslie's. ROSlins (Lincolnshire) once showed square buckles.

Stands/Stains married YARborough's, from YARoslav, brother of Maria of Kiev, the line to Lorraine's because Maria's mother-in-law was from Richeza of Lorraine. Rich's/Richess', who named a location in Lorraine, are first known in Hampshire with their Button/BUDIN and Botter/Bodin kin. The latter look related to the Casimir Coat. Maria married Casimir of Poland.

The Eccles (Lancashire with Eccleston), with an Askel-like Accles variation, share the Asch-like axe of Badens/Battins, and Ash's/Aschs are first known in Devon with a Axe river. The neighboring Badens/Battins are first known in Somerset with another Axe river, with Bodins/Boydens, and with the Baths who share the Charley lion. Charleys are first known in Leicestershire with Scottish CHAMPagne's who in turn share the vaired Shield of Haskels/Askels. The latter have an "apple tree" while Tree's (Wiltshire, beside the Somerset Axe) were once said to be first known in Warwickshire with Camps/CHAMPs.

Probably, roughly nobody but the descendants of the "Jewish" Khazars knows whether they were true Jews, Israelites, or non-Israelite Hebrews. I don't buy the claim of Joseph, the Khazar king, that his ancestry was in Togarmites who merely converted to Judaism on a whim. He was hiding his Hebrew ancestry when the Sephardic "Jews" of Spain inquired of him. I trace the latter to Joktanite Hebrews said in Genesis to have lived at Sephar. English Saffers (Devon) use vair fur, and French Vairs/Fers' are first known in Burgundy with French Saffers and Save's. English Saffers (branch of Savers/Severs) are first known in Devon with Togarmah-like Tokers/Tuckers who in turn look linkable to German Drummonds.

Tokers/Tuckers can be linked to Drummond-connectable Sea's, and the latter are first known in Kent, where Ticks/Tucks were once said to be first known along with JOKtanite-possible Joke's. The latter's Jack branch is first known in Yorkshire with Ticks/Tucks and Tickhills, and Tick-branch Teague's/Teegers are first known in Galway with Bradys.

Tickhills look like kin of Hastings (Kent with early Ticks/Tucks), and German Grams share (in colors reversed) the vertically-split Shield of VARANgian-line Yarborough's who in turn have a Crest like the Graham/Gram and VARN Crests. Grahams/Grams and Varns share the Joke scallops, and then Scottish Jacks are first known in Renfrewshire with proto-Rothschild Pollocks while Peleg was Joktan's brother. It begs whether tribes from Peleg eventually named Poland, especially as Nahor-suspect Neuri were on the Bug river between Poland and Kiev.

Yarborough's (share falcon with French Saffers) love the Sine's/Sions (Lanarkshire with Caseys) who share the swan with Hochs (Switzerland with Sion) who in turn share a Yoke variation with Joke's. Mythical Ajax was the god of Kennati priests of Cetis (Cilicia), not far from Sephar, and Joke-connectable Varns are first known in Ayrshire with Kennedys. Joke's are first known in Kennedy-like Kent. Condys/Conadys (beside Cone-branch Conte's) are first known in Yorkshire with Ajax-like Jacks (almost have the Joke Coat). Dovers (Kent with Cone's) have the Jackson cinquefoil in colors reversed.

Quadratilla Bassus was a queen of Cetis. As her line is suspect by me in marriage to Julius Avitus, note the "Avise" motto term of Kennedys (share the Arms of Carrick), the latter first known in Ayrshire with Caracalla-like Carricks. Caracalla was the brother-in-law of Avitus' wife, and "Charax" (Proculus) was the name of one of Quadratilla's sons with Lupus LAEVILLus, and Leavells are first known in Somerset with Severs. I suggest that the original Templars / Freemasons were heavily from her line, even to the royal Bruce's (suspect from Abrussi) married by Carricks. I can trace Avis'/Avisons to Avezzano, a location in Abruzzo. Avis'/Avisons share the Comine/Comyn Coat, and Miss Comyn was mother to Adam Kilconquhar, first husband of Marjory Carrick, before she married Bruce's.

Kennedys share symbols with Scottish Cassels while the first Rothschild is thought to have seized the fortune of a prince of Hesse-Cassel. Hesse's share the Abram/Abraham Coat, just a giant sun shared with Nathan-suspect Needle's/Nadlers (Shropshire with early English Rothes'). The English Pettys, suspect from Peter Pollock, builder of the castle at Rothes, sharing the quadrants in the Arms of Rothschild, have an Irish branch using a "needle." It's showing as a compass needle, and although the word "compass" is not in the description at Hall of Names, Nathans/Nations use COMPasses. It just so happens that Camps/COMPs are first known in Warwickshire with Pettys. Plus, Compo's/Campeau's share the engrailed SUN/Sinclair cross! The Casey eagle head is in colors reversed with Dutch Camps.

Scottish Cassels share the chevron of Irish Caseys, potential Khazars, and of Irish Neme's/Name's. The latter place an eagle head, symbol of Irish Caseys, on their chevron. Sinclairs lived at Roslin while Roslins are first known in Lincolnshire with Scottish Cassels, English Neme's/Neems/Name's, and Askens/Heskens. While Cassels use a "fin" motto term, Haskens use "FiNEM," suspect with Neme's/Neems, perfect because the latter share the Petty quadrants! FIENS/Finis' (Kent with Rothes') share a Neme/Name lion, and the two colors of the Neme/Name lion heads are in the Crest of English Peters.

Sinclairs had been of the Clare's, and the latter's English branch can be gleaned in the Coat of German Cassels. The latter share a white castle with Spanish Casa's/Casillo's (Aragon, the Ebro-river theater). Claren-related Feeters nearly have the Clare Coat while Fetters (Bavaria with Bauers and Rothes'/Rothchilds) and Abrams/Abrahams of BalFETH share the Hesse Coat. BRAMtons share the Coat of Sempers/St. PIERRE's while Pierre's are first known in Languedoc with Font de Ville's. The latter have a purple flag while Flags and Purple's are first known in Norfolk with Fonts/Fountains. Spanish Fonts are first known in Castile while Cass'/CASTs have fountains.

The Cassel castle is shared with McLeods/LUTTs, a branch of Lutts/Lute's who in turn essentially share the Coat of English Neme's/Name's, both sharing the quadrants of Fasts in the McLeod/Lutt motto.

As the Avis' sharing the Comine Coat are in the Kennedy and Cassel motto, the black Cassel key must be the one in the Arms of Comines, a location in Artois. The Artois/Ardon surname shares a red eagle head with Caseys. Comine's can take us to the Coms/Goms/Gumms, and thus to Gumms/GOMERs (same place as Cass'/Cash's) and Comers. The Biblical Ashkenaz was a son of Gomer. Thus, we could expect Gomer's descendants amongst Khazars. Comers are first known in Lincolnshire with Neme's/Name's while Enanys/Nernys share the Comb/Cumm Coat (share KIMMER lion). Nannys (Wales with Gomer-suspect CIMMERians) share the lion of Masons who in turn share the Enany/Nerny mermaid.

Comine's are first known in Norfolk with Finchems and Cass-beloved Fonts/Fountains, and the Lafins (Tipperary with Irish Kennedys) expected in the Kennedy / Cassel motto, "Avise LA FIN," are also La Fonts. The Vince's suspect in the LaFIN motto phrase, "Vincit OMNia," are also Finch's (Hertfordshire with Cass-beloved Scale's), and they have one of the triple Finchem / Fein/FIN fesses. Vince's/Finch's are in the colors and format of OMANs (Suffolk with Artois'/Ardons). Hertfordshire is also where Horns/Orne's are first known in the hunting horn of Gumms/Gomers. Hunt-like Hundts are also Huns.

Lafins/La Fonts have the giant lion of Brams/Brems in colors reversed, and the Fetters sharing the Abram/Abraham and Hesse Coat are first known in Bavaria with Brams/Brems, Gumms/Gomers, and Cimmerian-like Kimmers/Kammers. Chine-branch Kemmis' list Camois'. Bramtons (similar to the Comb/Cume Coat) are first known in Norfolk with Fonts/Fountains. Bramton Speke (Devon with Combs/Cume's, Tokers/Tuckers and Pine's) is of the Speke's (porcuPINE) with a giant eagle in the colors of the Casey eagle. The eight Speke bars are those of Tokers/TUCKERs (beside English Ducks), and almost those of German Ducks/DUCKERs while Duce's share the Bramton Coat. English Duckers/Dockers (same place as Jack-connectable Dackers and Acre's) love the Semper variation of St. Pierre's. Decks/Daggers almost have the Coat of Kimmers/Kammers. The ten bars of Ducks/Duckers (same place as Velins and Velens and Aiken-like Achens/Ache's) are in colors reversed with English Valence's/Valens' (Kent with Joke's) who are in turn in the motto of Fetter-like Feathers.

Speke's share the double-headed eagle of Joyce's who in turn share an "aut" and "vita" motto term with English Saffers. The Speke porcupine can be for Porcia's sharing the black boar with Ebers. The latter, in Abreu/Abruzzo format, are first known in Umbria (beside Abruzzo) with Ottone's/Otto's while the "aut" term can be for the Auto variation of Otto's. That works, especially as Vita's (Saver/Sever kin) are in the colors and format of the giant Speke and Joyce eagle. Saffers are first known in Devon with Speccots. The Speke bars can be related to th four of English Crispins because French Crispins share the pomegranate with Grazi's, first known in Perusia with Ottone's/Otto's.

The Vita's can be traced to Julius Avitus, husband of Julia Maesa Bassianus, sister of empress Domna Bassianus, wife in turn of emperor SEVERus. Julia MAESA appears named after the Maezaei because her father was stationed by emperor Caracalla (Domna's son) in Dalmatia, at least near the Maezaei.

Apollonia was obviously personified as Apollo when he was mate of Coronis because Apollonia is beside the CERAUNii mountains of Epirus. The Molossians of Epirus can be traced to Molise, a province beside Abruzzo, and while the people of Epirus were Epirotes, Aprutium was the earlier Abruzzo capital. As Perusia is also "Perugia," it looks tracable to Perga because there was a temple to Artemis there, twin sister of Apollo. The Herod, Plancia Magna, and her mother, were the high priestesses of that Perga temple.

The Pugh's look like a corruption from "Perga" because they share the Perkin Coat. Pugh's share the motto of Fiscs, the latter first known in Norfolk with Orions/Irons and Holly's. The latter look related to the Plunkett Coat, suggesting a surname from "Plancius," the father of Plancia MAGNa. Irish Maghans, sharing a "sic" motto term with Pugh's, share the Comb/Cume Coat, and Pugh's are first known in MontGOMERyshire. See that? It's in Wales, and Wales is thought to be founded by Cimmerians. Welsh Hugh's (share Welsh Owen Coat) have a Kimmer-like "Kymmer" motto term. Kimmers/Kammers share the Comb/Cume lion. Plancia's Galatian ancestry birthed Quadratilla Bassus.

I trace Bramton elements (Norfolk with Risons and Rise's) to KOTOR, beside Rhizon, and therefore to Abraham's second wife, Keturah. KODRum is on the Apsus river, up from Antipatria, on this map, and the DEXARoi were at Antipatria while Decks/Daggers share the Palm/PARM fleur-de-lys. Then, Abrams/Abrahams come up as "EPARMs." Palmers/Parmers (Norfolk with Bramtons, Case's and Flags) almost have the Coat of Casser-connectable Flags, making Abraham elements appear the same as Palms/Parms (Yorkshire with Jacks sharing the Dagger/Dacker scallops). German Palmers are first known in Bavaria with Kimmers (share Bramton lion, likely).

The Apsus river of the Dexaroi flows into Fier county, explaining while the Apps'/Abbs were once said to be first known in Middlesex with Fiers/Fears, and where Stands/Stains are still said to be first known who share the double Palmer/Parmer fesses. Apps'/Abbs are now said to be first known in Huntingdonshire with Balfour-beloved Otters/Others, and with Kemmis' (in case they were of Cimmerians). Balfours are first known beside the Abrams/Abrahams of Balfeth, and the latter is in Angus with Apps-branch Abbys. Huntingdonshire is near the first-known CRAILs/Crabs while Bridge's have crabs while Scottish Bride's (Angus) look related to the Abby Crest. Balfours are first known in Fife with the Crail location of BalCOMBs/BalCOME's. Palm/Parms are first known in Yorkshire with the Feets suspect at BalFETH.

French Bride's are first known in savor with the FORE's/Forez's while BalFOURs have a motto, "FORward." As per "ForWARD," English Wards have a "Comme" motto term, and share the checkered Shield of Enany-like Nene's/Nane's. Enanys share the Combs/Cumm Coat. Irish Name's/Neme's are also Nanamys. Scottish Neans/Nons/NEVins have a "speranDUM" motto term while Horns/Orne's, with a "deSPERANDUM" motto term, share the heron with DUME's. Neve's and Navys are first known in Angus with Abrahams.

"Forward" is a motto term of Side- and Suty-branch Seatons, and Scythian-like Scythes' are listed with Side's (Fife with Balfours, and Angus with Abrams/Abrahams). Scythe's are listed with Skate's, first known in Norfolk with Bramtons.

English Saffers share the heron with Horns/Orne's, and the latter are first known in Middlesex with Fiers/Fears while Fire's/Furs/FIRs, in the Saffer vair fur, have the Saffer unicorn in half its colors. A "fir" tree is with Alis', a branch of Allisons, and the latter are first known in Lanarkshire with Scottish Caseys and Aikens. "Alis" is a motto term of Cassane's (Hampshire with Chase's). Scottish Caseys can be suspect from Khazars as per Allison Bauer, who was in my last update (of last week). Bauer-branch Bowers are first known beside Lanarkshire. The first Rothschild was Mayer Bauer. Aikens, in Cassel colors and format, share black roosters with Gumms/Gomers.

Pollocks of Rothes married Leslie's who in turn became earls of Rothes so as to carry the Rothes surname, which can explain why Leslie's are in the format of English Rothes' (Kent with Joke's). Repeat from above: "The triple fesses above [of Fins] are colors reversed from the same of Khazar-like Cassers. English Case's were kin of the Hungarian Leslie's, proto-Rothschilds." English Case's are first known in Norfolk with the Finchems having the said triple fesses/bars. Casers/Casa's have triple fesses. Leslie's love the Buckle's, first known in Suffolk with the Sea-branch Seamans who in turn share the seahorse (different color) with Tokers/Tuckers.

Togarmah-like Tokers/Tuckers love the Drops, first known in Norfolk with the Fonts/Fountains in the "fountains" of Cass'/Cash's. These fountains have wavy, blue-white bars, as do Tokers/Tuckers, Sea's, Seamans, and German Drummonds. Cassane's and Chase's are first known in Hampshire with the Sturs sharing the triple fesses of Scottish Drummonds (named Drymen in STIRling).

Case's (Norfolk with Cousins) are in Gosser/Kossen colors and format, and the latter are first known in Hesse with Sephar-like Shaffers (Goose/Googe colors). Casers/Casa's/Casabona's share the fesse of Casano's while Cassane's and Chase's are first known in the same place as Caser-connectable Change's. Casers/Casa's/CasaBONA's are first known in Milan with Bono's in turn sharing the Asken/Hesken and Hasken lion, and in fact Bono's essentially have the Hasken Coat, and nearly the one of German Cassers/Gassers/Kassers (Bavaria with Goz's/Gos'). The same lion is with English Grasse's while Grazi's are first known in Perusia with Ottone's/Otto's. Milan was home to Ottone Visconti, and while Ottone's share an Otto variation with Auto's, "aut" is twice in the motto of English Saffers. This heraldic set can make Sephardic Jews, and Joktanites, suspect from the Hebrew rulers of Khazars.

Grazi's share the "pomegranate" with French Crispins, first known in Lorraine, which affirms that God set up my date, Lorraine, with a grass stain on her butt. Crispins are first known in Parez while Grazi's in PERUSia, and then Parez's/Paris' (Lorraine with Perins) have an apple to go with the apple tree of Haskels. Tree's have a knight "BRANDishing" a sword, and Brands/BRANTs are in the colors and format of French Landrys (Lorraine) while a giant tree is with Laundrys (Lincolnshire with Brands and Askens/Heskens). Brantons are listed with Abram-like Bramtons, and Abrams share the Hesse Coat.

To show how rude and deliberately useless google has become, Abrams are said to be first known in Balfeth, but when I search "Balfeth" at google, it not only brings up Belfast, but refuses to bring up anything with "Balfeth" even though it's online with houseofnames and WikiTree. It's also at another website revealing it's situation in Angus. The google computer can instantly and easily find all websites having "Balfeth," but it refused to bring them up. Multiply this ignorant attitude by millions of times to see how google is a globalist, anti-educational frustration in your face.

When searching "Balfeth Scotland -Belfast", it then brought up Balfour. google STINKS. The world needs a new search engine. Have no pity on google when the alternative arrives that's not controlled by the same people. Pay google back what it deserves.

While Needle-loving Pettys are first known in the same place as English Camps/Comps, German Camps are first known in Westphalia with German Ducks while English Ducks were a branch of Duce's who in turn share the Coat of Abram-like Bramtons. Abrams share the Needle Coat.

English Saffers put an "olive branch" in the Bec-like beak of their heron. Beaks (Babe kin) share the triple fesses in the Arms of Podebrady, only the ones of Beaks (Dorset with George's) are wavy, same as the triple fesses of both Drummond surnames (descended from George of Hungary). Beaks and Babe's share the leopard faces of Huriens/Urine's while Hurons/Herons (same place as Lorraine's) share the Horn/Orne Coat.

As we are probably dealing with Spanish Sephardics when on Saffers, we can take the Spanish Olive's (Ebro-river theater) to task because they have a giant, brown owl while Owls'/Howls can take us to Howells (Monmouthshire with Haskels/Askels) who in turn share the tower of Peleg-like Pellicans. Genesis doesn't tell with Peleg's descendants lived at Sephar, but it's possible.

Crispins of Bec were Clare's directly while English Clare's are first known in Suffolk with English Carlsons and Charles' (share Lorraine eagle) while Carls (ABERDEENshire with Leslie's) have another pomegranate. Suffolk is also where Owls/Howls and Crauns/Crane's are first known while a giant "crane" is with Caspian-like Caspers, looked up because Khazars lived on the Caspian sea.

The Augets/Auge's in the motto of English Charles' have the Parez/Paris Coat, almost. English Paris'/Pares' (Lincolnshire with Askens/Heskins and Ermine's) share the Saffer unicorn heads, and Parrs are first known in Lancashire with Askens/Heskins of Charley- / Charlie-related Chorley, and with the first-known English Carltons. Spanish Paris' love th Ermine's and share the Asken/Hesken lion. Pierro's/Pero's of Pavia trace to the Feets who in turn share the martlets of French Charles'.

"Aberdeen" looks like "Kabardino," home of the Khazar-branch KABARs who made up three of the ten Hungarian tribes. Hebrews of Babylon and Akkadia lived on the KHABUR/Habur tributary of the Euphrates, which river I think was personified as, Aphrodite, alternatively, KYPRis, the line to Aprutium, the Abruzzo capital.

Buckle-loving Leslie's of Rothes, from the Hungarians, are first known in Aberdeenshire with Buchans who in turn have the Rothes lion heads in colors reversed. Lesks are first known in Berkshire with Cathers/Catters. Buckie is a location down the river from Rothes. Khazars lived on the Caspian sea, and Caspers have "two horns" for linkage to the Orems/Orrins of Aberdeenshire.

Polish Caspers share the lion of Hebrew-line Abreu's/Abruzzo's. The latter were related to both Brave/Bravo surnames, and "Brave" is a motto term in the English-version motto of TROTTers. The Latin version has "feROX," suggesting the Roxolani of Ukraine that were also between the Ialomita and Siret rivers, and the latter has a TROTus tributary, in Romania, beside Ukraine on the Polish side.

As the Abruzzo capital uses a black eagle, the black eagle legs of Brays suggests that Brave's were a Bray branch. The MowBRAYs, have the giant Brave and Abreu/Abruzzo lion in half its colors, and the MOWbray lion is the giant one of Montforts while Monforte is a location beside Bra of Piedmont. Mows are listed with Mole's, first known in ROXburghshire, a location of the Roxolani, with their Googe kin. Gog is in Ezekiel 38 along with Gomer and Togarmah.

Mowbrays curiously come up as "Mummy" while English Kirks have two "mum" terms buried in their motto. Spanish Brave's share the tower of German Kirks. Brays are first known in Northamptonshire with Kirkfields/Chirchfields who in turn almost have the Bramton Coat. English Cassels are in the colors and format of Kirktons/Kirtmans (same place as Cassels). The latter named KIRKETon while Crickets are first known in Warwickshire with CURTis', tending to explain the KIRTman variation of Kirktons.

The "salmon HAURIENT" of Gators/Cathars/Catters can be for an Orrin branch. Salome Boethus was a Herod-line Hebrew of 1st-century Israel.

The first Rothschild banker named his first son, Nathan, and Nathans/Nations share the "comPASS" with Polish Caspers who in turn share the lion of Askens/Heskens, though many surnames share this lion. Pass'/Pascals (Essex with Chichs/CHOCKs) share the lamb with Lamberts, suspect from Mieszko Lambert of Poland. Mieszko was a Piast, and the Piast eagle is colors reversed from the Pass/Pascal eagle, suggesting that Piasts were Pasi / Paisley liners. Paisley-branch Packs are first known in Sussex with the Diane's/Deans in turn sharing the giant Polish Casper lion. English Pasleys (CHOKE kin), with almost the Casser Coat, are first known in Berkshire with Cathers/Catters and Choke's. Pasi's/Pascels were kin of Spears/SPEYers while Rothes and Buckie are on the Spey river (of Moray). Rothschilds/Roddensteins are first known in Speyer.

"Spera" is an Askey/Asker motto term, and the whole motto is shared with Scottish Mathie's (HEBRides with Askey-beloved Donkeys) while English Mathie's/Matthews share the Coat of Bleds while Bled is beside Lesce, where I trace Leslie's. Bled and Lesce are on the upper Sava that later flows into Hungarian zones. Lesks are first known in the same place as Pasleys while Paisleys/Pasleys are first known in Renfrewshire with Spears/Speyers and Pollocks of Rothes. Mathie's/Matthews share blue wings with Bauers. Mattis' are first known in Hebrew-line Abruzzo.

Packs and Paisleys share the MontGOMERy anchor, and both Ashkenaz and Togarmah were sons of the Biblical Gomer. Montgomerys look like kin of Leicesters while Charleys, sharing the Asken/Hesken lion, are first known in Leicestershire. Montgomerys share the fleur-de-lys of Pane's/Panico's, first known in Bologna with Pasi's/Pascels. "Passe" is a motto term of Roet-related Rollo's while Pane-branch Payens (Dauphine with French Lamberts) have "spur ROWELLs." Passe's/Pascals share the lamb with English Lamberts who are in turn in the colors and format of Childs who in turn have the eagles of Pass'/Pascals (Essex with Broke's) and Courcys in colors reversed. The latter are first known in Somerset with Roet-related Payne's (BROKEn spear) and Rothes-branch Roets (share Spear/Speyer boar heads).

German Gumms/GOMERs (hunting horn) share the black rooster with Aikens, the latter first known in Lanarkshire with Caseys, and beside the Montgomerys (same place as Paisleys). Irish Caseys share the Pass/Pascel eagle such that the Casper COMpass can be part-code for the Com variation of English Gumms (Cambridgeshire, beside Pass'/Pascals). Comers can have the Asters in their motto, first known in Essex with Pass'/Pascals.

BLEDa was the brother of Atilla while Khazars lived at the Atil river. There is a way online to trace Atilla elements to the Terek river of Alania (Caucasia), where proto-Khazars are thought to have been. Atilla ruled at proto-BUDApest, now the HUNgarian capital. Boyds are first known in Shropshire with Tyne's/BOTville's, Hope's, and HOPkin-beloved Pistols/PESTers (stag heads, symbol of Hungarian roots). BudaPEST was named partially after the city of Pest. This makes Boyds look Hungarian.

Alania was also called, Iron, and Irons are listed with Orrin-like Orions. The latter's KENiron variation could explain why Kens are first known in Devon with the Alan-line English Stewarts.

Welsh Matthews (near Bluds) are first known in Glamorganshire, where the Arms share the Coat of English Clare's, itself colors reversed from the Bled / Mathie/Matthew Coat. Welsh Matthews have a "fyn" motto term for linkage to Podebrady.

Carltons (Dent and Rothes colors and format) share the lozenges of Hungary-connectable Hounds. See Huns/HunGATE's (Yorkshire with Dents) and Huns/Hundts as compared to Hungars. Carltons almost have the Coat of Dents who in turn share two motto terms in this Arms of Rothschild. The five arrows in the Rothschild Arms, shared by Barksdale's (Lancashire with Haskens), can be construed as ten tribes.

Barksdale's (look related to Asken/Heskins) are said to have named Birkdale in ORMSkirk, and Orems/Orrins are first known in Aberdeenshire with Buckle-loving Leslie's of Rothes while Bucks (Norfolk with Barks and Denet-branch Donuts/Danets) share the Barksdale motto, which shares "Fide" with Barkers who in turn share the Asken/Hesken, Hasken, and Bono lion. Barkers share the green griffin head in Crest with Leslie's and Fenns/Venns (Devon with Saffers). Bucks have antlers in the colors and format of the Yates gates.

Danet-branch Denets have a "proviDENTiam" motto term, and are first known in Sussex with Dans, Dan's, Diane's/Deans, and Bono-like Bone's. Bono's look very related to Gates', and the latter share the Bone and Bunn lion.

King Joseph of the Khazars was writing to Hasdai ibn SHAPRut, a Spanish rabbi of the Sephardics of Spain. His surname looks related to Sephar-like Shapers/Shapiro's who share three feathers in Crest akin to the three in the Arms of Rothschilds. Shapers/Shapiro's look a little related to the Casser Coat. Shapers/Shapiro's share the lamb with Saffer-like Sheaffers/Shafers and English Lamberts, and I can trace the latter to Mieszko II Lambert, husband of Richeza of Lorraine, and father of Casimir of Poland. English Sheaves'/Shaws are first known in Berkshire with Cathers/Catters, and French Saffers can be linked to Italian Sheaves'/Chiava's, first known in Hebrew-line Abruzzo.

Sheaffers/Shafers (Hesse with German Silvers) are in the colors and format of German Silvers while English Silvers almost have the Coat of English Saffers. The latter's Saver/Sever branch share the annulet of Chevers, and with the Vita's in the Saffer and Bello motto. Vita's are first known in Tarvisium while Chiava-like Chives'/Shewas' are first known in Aberdeenshire's Tarves. Bello's, possibly from Hungarian king Bela, share the Coat of English Billets (Devon with Saffers and Chevers) while French Billets/Billiards, a branch of Billiards/Hillards (Surrey with English Lamberts) almost have the Coat of French Lamberts. Billets/Billiards are first known in Maine with Peleg-like Pellicans.

Khazars lived north of the Iberi Caucasians, land of Scythian tribes, and Sephardic Jews live in Iberia = Spain. Ashkenazi are usually said to have been scythians of some sort. It can explain why Sephardic Jews should send the Khazar king(s) a letter(s) inquiring of their Jewish nature. I absolutely do not agree with the simpleton claim that the Biblical Togarmites named the Turks, even though Khazars are thought to have been of the Kok-Turks. I see "Togarmah" in the Tocharians that spread across southern Russia east of the Khazars.

I claim that Mystery Babylon, in the end-times, will be the EU under Rothschild rule. It befits a Khazar link to end-time Israel, for the latter nation is known to be founded by British Rothschilds (could have been working with Rothschilds in other nations). Babwells are also Babels, by the way. Babylon was home to the earliest Hebrews, named after Eber, father of Joktan and Peleg. Perhaps God used "Babylon" the whore as an alternative name for ancient Rome because it extends to the Hebrew rulership of end-time Rome, but how does one then explain a Rothschild partnership with the destroyer of future Israel?

NEWS

Kushner has a $oft $pot for Qatar, and doesn't like Israel hamming things up in the Gaza "peace deal":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8fAR6GTI60

Kushner is flying into Netanyahu's face because he wants globalists to create a Palestinian state. In the meantime, a red-faced Trumpeace in trouble:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NVrU61xm3U

Trump doesn't want Israel to break the peace deal, but Trump wants Israel to break the peace deal to disarm Hamas, in order that his family and friends can bag the Ga$a re-building program sooner rather than later. In the meantime, Jesus has his own plans for the region. The rebuilding program can't go ahead with an armed Hamas.

I once thought that satan would hold the hottest place in Hell, but, turns out, it's reserved for Benny Hinn:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khtQSCScLr4

Larry Ellison is apparently working with the billionaire "12 tribes of Israel":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt67zaOVWtg

In the last update, I claimed that an old friend, Larry Kepke, pointed with Allison Bauer, to Larry Ellison. In the video above, you can hear of "Bari Weiss," who was recently purchased by Ellison's CBS. It just so happens that Weiss' almost have the Kepke Coat, and both surnames are first known in Saxony. The Weiss Coat is almost the Weishaupt Coat, and Adam Weishaupt was founder of the Bavarian Illuminati. The Weishaupt, Weiss and Kepke goat is suspect as the symbol behind Baphomet, because it's a Templar-Zionist god while the first Templars were under the supervision of the great-grandson of Gothelo, the line to goat-like Goths/Gothels, in Kepke colors and format.

Goats/Gothams are first known in Nottinghamshire with the Bix's/Bigsbys while the "ibex" of Weishaupts can be code for English Becks, first known in Berkshire with Biks/Bickers. Biggs are first known in Essex with the Asters suspect in the Bix/Bigsby motto.

It's completely sickening that Jarred Kushner appears with American diplomats when they do Israeli news shows for the world to see and hear. When the American vice-president was in Israel this week to tame Israel, he actually said, "Jarred is the investor here...". That's a slur. That's exactly correct, but it's a slur. Kushner wants to pose as a peacemaker, but he and Trump are in it for the Ga$a dollars. Vance likely wants to run for the White House in three years, but Kushner might like to as well, and Vance may know it. Hence, the slur. If it's not a slur, then Vance is trying to legitimize the investors who are rubbing their hands in anticipation of disarming Hamas. Perhaps Trump wants to normalize the true motive of destroying Gaza. I can see Trump agreeing with Netanyahu to, "turn it all into rubble." It creates the "angelic" excuse to go in a rebuild it, as if they are the builders, but not also the destroyers. SICKENING.

Trump's "democracy" includes the endorsements / payments of money to politicians to unseat people, i.e. Thomas Massie, if they don't vote for Trump's programs. Senators are not allowed to vote their conscience, or their political positions, without threat of losing their senate seats. That's called a bully, or a dictator wannabe.

The Knesset just barely passed a 25-24 vote to make Israel the boss in the West Bank. On the same day, Trump was furious when he heard the news. He told Israel through a press conference that it will not get the West Bank. Vance repeated it on the same day. Trump spoke this as though he's the Israeli leader. Netanyahu tried to play down that vote, perhaps feigning opposition in order to keep Trump happy for an interim. The Israeli finance minister then came out to tell a news outlet (i.e. to tell Trump too) that Israel will go ahead with West-Bank annexation whether the United States supports of not.

Trump is giving his party a bad name, without qualms, after starting off at least feigning that he's committed to fulfilling his promises. Democrat news feels juiced up at this time, like an awakening corpse; it still stinks, but it's starting to move a little excitedly, as it does always when Trump seems to be in political trouble. Trump could have told the Israeli's, go ahead and annex, just don't make me look like I'm in favor.

Kash Patel publicizes only what favors him; he's now publicizing that some gamblers have been arrested. Ya-but, big deal. What about those who jailed, and tried to jail for years, perfectly-innocent pro-Trumpers??? Trump has said nothing at all about his doubts that Tyler Robinson is the shooter, which is woeful to his voter base. My sentiments: what kind of a piece of trash is Trump? He's been briefed by the FBI many times on the Kirk prosecution, and yet Trump has said NOTHING about it to his voter base. He's apparently given the green light against Robinson. When Patel called others "anarchists" this week, for doubting the Robinson prosecution, I'm wondering whether Trump put that word into his mouth. I just think that Patel would not use that harsh language unless given confidence to do so by Trump.

I think Trump would like to betray his base sooner rather than later, but, the question is, what would that betrayal look like, passive or persecutionary?

Redacted thinks Trump wants South American oil as per his war there. China wants the same oil, but needs the Panama canal to get it cheaper, which can explain why Trump sought to frustrate China's hold on that canal not long ago:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqiLkbu9wwI

Here's Kushner the nobody, for he has no political position in the Trump administration, yet he's front-and-center in Gaza rebuilding. You can smell a Western gangster rat here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HJ7KcQVh_x4

If Netanyahu frustrates the Kushner re-building program, will Trump go to war with Israel to save it if Israel's military takes a stand in Gaza to take charge? It's being called the "Master Plan," a phrase that I can see in honor of Trump with Ego on his Face. The $50B price tag that Witkoff claimed has got to be two or three times smaller than the reality that they already know i.e. they are hiding the true allotment and the anticipated plans. They want hotels and hookers to draw in the Egyptians and Israelis alike, not what Jesus wants for Israel.

The video below can explain why some textual problems exist in out modern Bibles, where ancient Jews altered the Old Testament where it affirms Jesus (so that it doesn't affirm Him so much):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dhTX1hG2_B0

---

NEXT UPDATE Next Monday

Here's all four Gospels wrapped into one story.

For Some Prophetic Proof for Jesus as the Predicted Son of God.
Also, you might like this related video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W3EjmxJYHvM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efl7EpwmYUs

Pre-Tribulation Preparation for a Post-Tribulation Rapture

---